View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#1551
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Wow, did he say a helmet will prevent everything? Maybe, just maybe if you put a little "more" prevention in to not having a crash you would not need the "protection" of a helmet?? I stand by my claim a helmet will not prevent anything. Period. And I have yet to see ANY helmet manufacturer make any kind of statement that their helmet provides any type of prevention. That's because it does not.
#1552
Senior Member
helmets
I'd like to give my opinion on wearing helmets. I believe each individual adult should have the right to choose what safety precautions they take when it comes to cycling...I wouldn't argue making wearing helmets for children compulsory because I think children are more prone to falling off bikes. For me personally..it's makes absolutley no sense to wear a helmet..the statistics prove this....I am 57 years old and have never had a serious crash and i have ridden commuter and city bikes all my life...I would be a complete hypocrite to wear a helmet to cycle when the risk of head injury is 2 or 3 times more when I drive my car...in fact head injuries caused by cycling are only slightly higher than people just walking around on the street...most of these people wearing helmets only do it because some politician on TV that has probably never ridden a bicycle tells them to...these people conform to anything someone in a position of authority tells them to regardless if it makes any sense at all....what really grinds my gears are some of these spandex warriors who shake their head at me as they go by and won't even say hello....then they load their bikes onto the back of their vehicles ..take their helmets off...get into their car and drive off!
#1553
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Jersey near PHL
Posts: 593
Bikes: Frequently
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 158 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
131 Posts
Seeing as I think it is worthwhile to try to protect my brain from injury, I try to imagine what my skull would look like after hitting the pavement, a tree, utility pole, rock etc at 12-30 mph, after being launched off my bike for whatever reason.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
I like my chances better with a helmet, but of course that is anecdotal, just based on imagination.
Also, I recently upgraded to a MIPS helmet for additional concussion protection, because I heard concussions are bad for the brain.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
I like my chances better with a helmet, but of course that is anecdotal, just based on imagination.
Also, I recently upgraded to a MIPS helmet for additional concussion protection, because I heard concussions are bad for the brain.
#1554
Senior Member
Seeing as I think it is worthwhile to try to protect my brain from injury, I try to imagine what my skull would look like after hitting the pavement, a tree, utility pole, rock etc at 12-30 mph, after being launched off my bike for whatever reason.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
#1555
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Seeing as I think it is worthwhile to try to protect my brain from injury, I try to imagine what my skull would look like after hitting the pavement, a tree, utility pole, rock etc at 12-30 mph, after being launched off my bike for whatever reason.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
I like my chances better with a helmet, but of course that is anecdotal, just based on imagination.
First I imagine it without a helmet, then I imagine it with a helmet.
I like my chances better with a helmet, but of course that is anecdotal, just based on imagination.
A bicycle helmet would be immediately overwhelmed by a 30 mph impact.
Wear a helmet by all means. If you fall off at lowish speeds and bang your head it may save you some pain and superficial injury. But it is most unlikely to save your life or your faculties, it simply isn't designed to do so. Too light, too friable.
#1556
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Since I've seen the discredited 85% protection claim crop up again, and it's still posted on the Bicycle Safety Institute pages, let's reiterate:
"The federal government is withdrawing its long-standing claim that bicycle helmets prevent 85% of head injuries, in response to a petition filed by WABA under the federal Data Quality Act."
Also of interest from that article,
"In 2001, a review of all published studies found that helmets reduce the risk of head injuries by 45–71%, and increase the risk of neck injuries by 0–86%. That “meta-analysis” was updated in 2011: Helmets reduce head injuries by 25–55%, but because of the increased risk in neck injuries, the combined reduction in head and neck injuries is only 2–26%."
The majority of injuries reduced or prevented are, as chasm54 mentions, the superficial cuts and contusions.
"The federal government is withdrawing its long-standing claim that bicycle helmets prevent 85% of head injuries, in response to a petition filed by WABA under the federal Data Quality Act."
Also of interest from that article,
"In 2001, a review of all published studies found that helmets reduce the risk of head injuries by 45–71%, and increase the risk of neck injuries by 0–86%. That “meta-analysis” was updated in 2011: Helmets reduce head injuries by 25–55%, but because of the increased risk in neck injuries, the combined reduction in head and neck injuries is only 2–26%."
The majority of injuries reduced or prevented are, as chasm54 mentions, the superficial cuts and contusions.
#1557
Senior Member
That said, if all a helmet helps with is superficial cuts, contusions, and abrasion injury, in the very rare instance of a crash with helmet contact, that's reason enough for me to wear one...
#1558
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Someone posted an updated study a while back, with figures indicating that the less serious an injury is, the better helmets do with protection. While that might be stating the obvious, the numbers were interesting, and the study came to the conclusion that helmets helped mitigate injury even in half of serious injuries, a majority of moderate injuries, and most light injuries.
Me too usually, but honestly that's more of a matter of habit. It's only in the rain or other inclement conditions, or if I'm off the pavement, or on a crowded MUP that I'll wear one for safety reasons. For me, it would be more logical to wear shoulder pads since I have been injured in that region and a head injury is unlikely for me. But I don't because the odds are so low.
#1559
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
I did that 3-4 foot fall at 35 mph a few decades ago. Cost me head trauma, a 5 day coma, 4 months before all the wiring was back and 7 years before I could really say it was past. I was wearing the original Bell Biker.
Suppose my injuries would have been just 25% worse had I done that head first spill without a helmet. In other words, that I suffered 80% of the damage I would have received wearing nothing. At the cost I had to live through? Seeing 25% more? No thanks! Life after was hard. Harder than most of you can imagine. Sanity was an ongoing challenge. But I came through with my life intact, most of my abilities and most of my memories. That 25% worse would probably been more memories lost, a bigger setback to my career and some more life skills and abilities lost. That alone makes a helmet look like cheap and wearing it easy.
One of my first memories after that crash was of wandering into the rooms of other brain injury patients still out and wired up and thinking I would never want to be like that. That was the recovery ward, not IC. That 5 days in a room with nothing but a bed and a wall of electronics was plenty enough for me. And the only reason I know what that room (IC) looked like is that I could walk into the IC under my own power when I went back for an evaluation with my neurosurgeon.
Ben
Suppose my injuries would have been just 25% worse had I done that head first spill without a helmet. In other words, that I suffered 80% of the damage I would have received wearing nothing. At the cost I had to live through? Seeing 25% more? No thanks! Life after was hard. Harder than most of you can imagine. Sanity was an ongoing challenge. But I came through with my life intact, most of my abilities and most of my memories. That 25% worse would probably been more memories lost, a bigger setback to my career and some more life skills and abilities lost. That alone makes a helmet look like cheap and wearing it easy.
One of my first memories after that crash was of wandering into the rooms of other brain injury patients still out and wired up and thinking I would never want to be like that. That was the recovery ward, not IC. That 5 days in a room with nothing but a bed and a wall of electronics was plenty enough for me. And the only reason I know what that room (IC) looked like is that I could walk into the IC under my own power when I went back for an evaluation with my neurosurgeon.
Ben
#1560
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I did that 3-4 foot fall at 35 mph a few decades ago. Cost me head trauma, a 5 day coma, 4 months before all the wiring was back and 7 years before I could really say it was past. I was wearing the original Bell Biker.
Suppose my injuries would have been just 25% worse had I done that head first spill without a helmet....
Suppose my injuries would have been just 25% worse had I done that head first spill without a helmet....
#1562
Senior Member
#1563
Senior Member
I just saw a documentary about numbers on Netflix "The CODE"... Part of it was about the "wisdom of the crowd" So I am now wondering what this recent poll and the other helmet poll is actually saying about helmet wearing? It basically said individual opinions sucked, but collective opinion usually is pretty accurate...
Last edited by 350htrr; 09-09-15 at 11:01 AM. Reason: add more info
#1564
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
I don't really see what's wrong with what chasm54 wrote. And apparently you don't see it either since you can't or won't elaborate and opt for vague insinuations instead.
#1565
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
I just saw a documentary about numbers on Netflix "The CODE"... Part of it was about the "wisdom of the crowd" So I am now wondering what this recent poll and the other helmet poll is actually saying about helmet wearing? It basically said individual opinions sucked, but collective opinion usually is pretty accurate...
#1567
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It never occurred to me to wear a bicycle helmet when I was a kid.
It was taught to me to wear one on a motorcycle.
Low sided at 40 mph on a motorcycle. Helmet looked like it was attacked by a right angle grinder. I got up and rode away. Not far, as the bike was in bad shape, but my head was fine.
Now I wear a bicycle helmet, too.
It was taught to me to wear one on a motorcycle.
Low sided at 40 mph on a motorcycle. Helmet looked like it was attacked by a right angle grinder. I got up and rode away. Not far, as the bike was in bad shape, but my head was fine.
Now I wear a bicycle helmet, too.
#1568
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Since I've seen the discredited 85% protection claim crop up again, and it's still posted on the Bicycle Safety Institute pages, let's reiterate:
"The federal government is withdrawing its long-standing claim that bicycle helmets prevent 85% of head injuries, in response to a petition filed by WABA under the federal Data Quality Act."
Also of interest from that article,
"In 2001, a review of all published studies found that helmets reduce the risk of head injuries by 45–71%, and increase the risk of neck injuries by 0–86%. That “meta-analysis” was updated in 2011: Helmets reduce head injuries by 25–55%, but because of the increased risk in neck injuries, the combined reduction in head and neck injuries is only 2–26%."
The majority of injuries reduced or prevented are, as chasm54 mentions, the superficial cuts and contusions.
"The federal government is withdrawing its long-standing claim that bicycle helmets prevent 85% of head injuries, in response to a petition filed by WABA under the federal Data Quality Act."
Also of interest from that article,
"In 2001, a review of all published studies found that helmets reduce the risk of head injuries by 45–71%, and increase the risk of neck injuries by 0–86%. That “meta-analysis” was updated in 2011: Helmets reduce head injuries by 25–55%, but because of the increased risk in neck injuries, the combined reduction in head and neck injuries is only 2–26%."
The majority of injuries reduced or prevented are, as chasm54 mentions, the superficial cuts and contusions.
#1569
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't want to talk any adult out of wearing a helmet, nor insist that they should wear one. I do want them to have the information necessary to evaluate their risk, to make their own decisions. Too often the risk is overstated, and the effectiveness of helmets exaggerated. It's often stated that helmets reduce head injury by 85%, and that claim has been conclusively refuted and retracted.
#1570
Senior Member
#1571
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,663
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1612 Post(s)
Liked 2,594 Times
in
1,225 Posts
If you want to consult the wisdom of the crowd, you should at least try to go for a random sample, and not for a highly specific group of people like "People who like polls about bicycle helmets on a forum specialized in cycling". Furthermore is you look at the big picture, it's obvious that the great majority of cyclists ride without helmets. Even in Muhrica, one of the bastions of helmeteering only a large minority is into foam hats IIRC.
#1572
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,663
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1612 Post(s)
Liked 2,594 Times
in
1,225 Posts
I was just looking at that link and saw a local city to me had a mandatory all age law {rescinded in 1998**. How the heck would you enforce that when the surrounding cities didn't follow suit and you were part of a major bikeway?
#1573
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,856
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12782 Post(s)
Liked 7,696 Times
in
4,085 Posts
They just do. I think I live in the most ridiculous state. WA is riddled with city and county all-ages MHLs.
#1574
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
When I was picking up a bicycle at the (free!) Bikeshare at Timbuk2 in Seattle, they tried to give me a bag, a lock and a helmet.
Told them I didn't need the helmet.
They told me it was the law.
Told them I don't care, keep the helmet.
Rode off happy.
I did not die.
-mr. bill
Told them I didn't need the helmet.
They told me it was the law.
Told them I don't care, keep the helmet.
Rode off happy.
I did not die.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 09-14-15 at 01:17 PM.
#1575
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,856
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12782 Post(s)
Liked 7,696 Times
in
4,085 Posts
When I was picking up a bicycle at the (free!) Bikeshare at Timbuk2 in Seattle, they tried to give me a bag, a lock and a helmet.
Told them I didn't need the helmet.
They told me it was the law.
Told them I don't care, keep the helmet.
Road off happy.
I did not die.
-mr. bill
Told them I didn't need the helmet.
They told me it was the law.
Told them I don't care, keep the helmet.
Road off happy.
I did not die.
-mr. bill