Should I change this chainring?
#3
Worn spots on the sides of the teeth aren't a problem. The only critical wear is on the drive side of the tooth, where the chain rollers push against the tooth. For chainrings, that allows the chain to ride up toward the tip of the tooth, and to accelerate the chain wear.
Actually, your chainring looks fairly new, with minimal wear. How many miles on it?
(The tips of the teeth have a notched look to them, which appears to be part of the chainring design, machined in when it was made.)
In another chainring wear thread, I posted this photo of my chainrings after 5000 miles, with very minimal wear, other than the black anodizing on the sides of the teeth. Yours look much less used than these.
Minimal wear. Most modern chainrings have repeated sections of differently shaped teeth, to aid in shifting, usually just on the big ring. This shows the interior side, so the pedaling rotation is counter-clockwise, and the chain engages on the left/bottom side of the teeth. The opposite sides are sloped more to help with shifting.
Actually, your chainring looks fairly new, with minimal wear. How many miles on it?
(The tips of the teeth have a notched look to them, which appears to be part of the chainring design, machined in when it was made.)
In another chainring wear thread, I posted this photo of my chainrings after 5000 miles, with very minimal wear, other than the black anodizing on the sides of the teeth. Yours look much less used than these.
Minimal wear. Most modern chainrings have repeated sections of differently shaped teeth, to aid in shifting, usually just on the big ring. This shows the interior side, so the pedaling rotation is counter-clockwise, and the chain engages on the left/bottom side of the teeth. The opposite sides are sloped more to help with shifting.
Last edited by rm -rf; 08-28-17 at 09:47 AM.
#4
Thread Starter
Commuting Fool

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 274
Likes: 74
From: USA
Bikes: 1994 Norco Monterey
It is for a triple crankset. The notches are actually damage done to the chainring, I'm guessing from poor shifting habits or a chain getting jammed at one point or another. I have no idea how many miles this ring has, removed from crank dating around 1989. The other two chainrings look good however, and I'd like to keep this vintage stuff together if possible.
#6
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
It is for a triple crankset. The notches are actually damage done to the chainring, I'm guessing from poor shifting habits or a chain getting jammed at one point or another. I have no idea how many miles this ring has, removed from crank dating around 1989. The other two chainrings look good however, and I'd like to keep this vintage stuff together if possible.
#7
Thread Starter
Commuting Fool

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 274
Likes: 74
From: USA
Bikes: 1994 Norco Monterey
If you look closely at the second picture you can see the notches on the teeth. Looks like the chain took chunks of metal out of the tips of the teeth. I'm getting the feeling this isn't all that important and I'm going to use them anyway.
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
I can't see how the chain could cut such sharp notches into every tooth like that, from poor shifting or wear. You sure they weren't always like that?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doctor Morbius
Bicycle Mechanics
19
10-08-17 08:50 PM







