Spoke tension?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Spoke tension?
I have purchased spoke tension meter, i set tension and tool shows around "25" i have 2.0mm straight gauge spokes, so its about 49 KGF according to chart?
Is acceptable tension range for 2.0mm spoke 49-160 KGF, whats the recommended KGF tension for single walled 700c rim and single walled 24" rim?

Is acceptable tension range for 2.0mm spoke 49-160 KGF, whats the recommended KGF tension for single walled 700c rim and single walled 24" rim?


Last edited by PimpMan; 05-11-21 at 02:03 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Depends on the rim but I'd want to see 80-100 kgf.
Likes For cxwrench:
#3
Senior Member
There's no way there's published specs on a cheap single wall rim like that, but I'd probably bring it up to about 80-90KGF ideally. Quality rims to whatever the rated max is, if unknown usually I do about 120kgf.
#4
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 26,948
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5934 Post(s)
Liked 3,759 Times
in
2,163 Posts
I have never found any “published specs” for any rim. Ranges, yes. Actual values, no. And those ranges tend to be a single number for all of the rims that the manufacturer makes. Velocity, for example, gives a single range for their 15 different models of rims even though the rims have a wide variety of profiles and widths. They have more information on the width of tire for each rim than they do for spoke tension.
110 to 120 kgf is probably a good guess but it is only a guess.
__________________
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Last edited by cyccommute; 05-11-21 at 06:19 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,597
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1005 Post(s)
Liked 899 Times
in
648 Posts
I would agree with those who say 80-100 for a singlewall rim, which would suggest your spoke tension is too low. However, you may want to verify that the tensiometer is actually correct, having a known good wheel with proper tension will tell you if it is in the ballpark though unless you know what its actually at won't give you precise accuracy. Even Parktool meters have been known to be inaccurate from the factory since they just spec a spring and make the charts based on the expected results from that spring type, springs of course vary. This is why Wheelsmith meters the chart was based of the tool's actual reading of a tensioned spoke with a known reading. Its also why the wheelsmiths were expected to be sent in every few years depending on number of wheels built and have a new chart made to reflect the actual results of the tool. Test the tool before presuming the wheel is that far off. Also, the big advantage of the tool isn't its perfect accuracy to spoke tension but its ability to tell you how accurate the spokes are in relation to each other, having a wheel with tension that isn't perfect but all the same is still a better build then spokes with wildly varied tensions.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I should have mentioned i don't want super tense spokes (e.g. like mountain bicycle with active suspension), i use single wall rims intentionally because they flex better to make ride softer. Coming from that what tension is minimal, provided i adjust it often so its not a problem to make adjustment once a month or so.
Picture is from the internet i antique single walled aluminum rims.
#7
Full Member
if you want a softer ride let some air out of your tyres or run a wider tyre, single/double wall rims with loose or tight spokes will make little to no difference to perceivable ride quality.
Likes For headasunder:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,683
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2031 Post(s)
Liked 2,347 Times
in
1,336 Posts
Wider tires can increase shock absorption; using single-wall or double-wall rims makes no difference to rider comfort..
Last edited by Trakhak; 05-12-21 at 02:42 AM.
Likes For Trakhak:
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Bigger tires with lower pressure is option, but it affects speed too much IMO.
When i press down single walled rim down with my body weight it actually flex somewhat, double walled rim does not, somehow i believe this flexing can absorb some or the small road vibrations.
If we are talking about cruising / city bicycle i want to give it a try.
If we are talking about cruising / city bicycle i want to give it a try.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Fact it being single wall rim dont make it worse its just different design.
I should have mentioned i don't want super tense spokes (e.g. like mountain bicycle with active suspension), i use single wall rims intentionally because they flex better to make ride softer. Coming from that what tension is minimal, provided i adjust it often so its not a problem to make adjustment once a month or so.
Picture is from the internet i antique single walled aluminum rims.
I should have mentioned i don't want super tense spokes (e.g. like mountain bicycle with active suspension), i use single wall rims intentionally because they flex better to make ride softer. Coming from that what tension is minimal, provided i adjust it often so its not a problem to make adjustment once a month or so.
Picture is from the internet i antique single walled aluminum rims.
Likes For cxwrench:
#11
Senior Member
With too low spoke tension you will feel the wheel wobble under load. Go for 100kG tension and lower the tire pressure. I am guessing with the tires shown you could go a 30PSI depending on the vehicle weight. There are sites that help with tire pressure on the web.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,683
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2031 Post(s)
Liked 2,347 Times
in
1,336 Posts
Bigger tires with lower pressure is option, but it affects speed too much IMO.
When i press down single walled rim down with my body weight it actually flex somewhat, double walled rim does not, somehow i believe this flexing can absorb some or the small road vibrations.
If we are talking about cruising / city bicycle i want to give it a try.
When i press down single walled rim down with my body weight it actually flex somewhat, double walled rim does not, somehow i believe this flexing can absorb some or the small road vibrations.
If we are talking about cruising / city bicycle i want to give it a try.
Quote from this page:
"If the wheel is strong enough for its intended use then its stiffness is more than adequate.
Since the stiffness of the frame, pedal-cranks and especially the tires is much lower than the wheel stiffness, the rider cannot possibly feel the minute differences in stiffness among different wheels. The "liveliness" attributed to "stiff" wheels is an acoustic phenomenon that results largely from light tires with high pressure and to a lesser degree on tight spokes. This mechanical resonance can be heard, and possibly felt, in the handlebars and is not related to wheel stiffness. Liveliness may have some merit but it does not result from certain spoke patterns and has nothing to do with wheel stiffness.
In summary, stiffness is generally not an issue to consider. A wheel that is strong enough to withstand the loads of its intended use, with a reasonable margin of safety, is stiff enough."
Last edited by Trakhak; 05-12-21 at 03:06 PM.
Likes For Trakhak:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 731
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
127 Posts
You're obviously talking about pressing down on a free-standing rim that hasn't been built into a tensioned wheel. Try that again with a fully tensioned built wheel. The spoke tension prevents any flexing of the rim, regardless of whether it's double-walled or single-walled. The late Jobst Brandt, a former Porsche engineer who wrote "The Bicycle Wheel," the first, definitive work on the forces at work in the structure of a bike wheel, determined that bike wheels will dent before they flex to any significant degree.
Quote from this page:
"If the wheel is strong enough for its intended use then its stiffness is more than adequate.
Since the stiffness of the frame, pedal-cranks and especially the tires is much lower than the wheel stiffness, the rider cannot possibly feel the minute differences in stiffness among different wheels. The "liveliness" attributed to "stiff" wheels is an acoustic phenomenon that results largely from light tires with high pressure and to a lesser degree on tight spokes. This mechanical resonance can be heard, and possibly felt, in the handlebars and is not related to wheel stiffness. Liveliness may have some merit but it does not result from certain spoke patterns and has nothing to do with wheel stiffness.
In summary, stiffness is generally not an issue to consider. A wheel that is strong enough to withstand the loads of its intended use, with a reasonable margin of safety, is stiff enough."
Quote from this page:
"If the wheel is strong enough for its intended use then its stiffness is more than adequate.
Since the stiffness of the frame, pedal-cranks and especially the tires is much lower than the wheel stiffness, the rider cannot possibly feel the minute differences in stiffness among different wheels. The "liveliness" attributed to "stiff" wheels is an acoustic phenomenon that results largely from light tires with high pressure and to a lesser degree on tight spokes. This mechanical resonance can be heard, and possibly felt, in the handlebars and is not related to wheel stiffness. Liveliness may have some merit but it does not result from certain spoke patterns and has nothing to do with wheel stiffness.
In summary, stiffness is generally not an issue to consider. A wheel that is strong enough to withstand the loads of its intended use, with a reasonable margin of safety, is stiff enough."
Likes For LV2TNDM:
#14
Full Member
i tighten the derailleur side spokes til the wrench almost starts to round off the nipples.
don't blame me, that's what ken spears told us to do in the wheel building class at Bicycle Outfitter in Los Altos.
don't blame me, that's what ken spears told us to do in the wheel building class at Bicycle Outfitter in Los Altos.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,683
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2031 Post(s)
Liked 2,347 Times
in
1,336 Posts
Yes. My pet peeve: the dimensions of spoke nipples for bicycles were established many decades ago, long before high-strength stainless steel spokes became ubiquitous on the market. Rounding off of spoke nipples, a.k.a. the old mechanic's joking universal instruction to "tighten the bolt until it breaks and then back off a quarter-turn," would become a thing of the past if the width of spoke nipple faces were increased just a few thousandths of an inch.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 731
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
127 Posts
Oh, and isn't it nice that this method is no longer necessary, tongue in cheek or not? A proper spoke wrench, brass nipples and proper lubrication will ensure 120kgf is reached without a rounded nipple to be found! Heck, even alloy nipples as well. I've been perfectly happy with them living and riding in the Bay Area. No issues yet, except the once-a-decade rock impact that pops one.
#17
Senior Member
https://cdn.bike24.net/i/mb/0b/b9/4b...00-d-15231.jpg
what most folks neglect (wilful ignorance) is to get the proper lube for the job at the eyelets-nipples contacts and also in the spoke threads.
https://www.klueber.com/my/en/produc...icating-waxes/
Lubricating waxes are not solid lubricants in the proper sense. They form a dry-to-the-touch layer on the surface of the prepared part to ensure reliable lubrication while reducing boundary and mixed lubrication friction. They consist of high-molecular synthetic hydrocarbons, additives and oil (mineral oil, synthetic hydrocarbon).
first of all... if you don't prevent metal to metal contact then microcracks will develop and then stress corrosion will be more of a problem.
and then... if you ever use spokes that are thin they'll be more vulnerable to torsion if proper lube is not present. more friction - more torque on the spoke, more torsional stress and strain on the spoke.
Last edited by adipe; 05-21-21 at 01:17 AM.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
https://www.klueber.com/my/en/produc...icating-waxes/
Lubricating waxes are not solid lubricants in the proper sense. They form a dry-to-the-touch layer on the surface of the prepared part to ensure reliable lubrication while reducing boundary and mixed lubrication friction. They consist of high-molecular synthetic hydrocarbons, additives and oil (mineral oil, synthetic hydrocarbon).
Lubricating waxes are not solid lubricants in the proper sense. They form a dry-to-the-touch layer on the surface of the prepared part to ensure reliable lubrication while reducing boundary and mixed lubrication friction. They consist of high-molecular synthetic hydrocarbons, additives and oil (mineral oil, synthetic hydrocarbon).
#19
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,034
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
327 Posts
If that is a front wheel in the photo above, you are taking the tension reading on the non disc, or low tension side. if this is correct, 100 KGF is likely way too high.
Take your tension readings on the high tension side, drive side rear, disc side front. Centre the rim and the low tension side will be what it is.
Take your tension readings on the high tension side, drive side rear, disc side front. Centre the rim and the low tension side will be what it is.
Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 05-27-22 at 10:50 AM.
Likes For Dan Burkhart:
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Forget to ask where i supposed to check the tension closer to the rim as on the photo in the first post (random picture from internet) or closer tot he axle?
I don't have disks regular linear pull brakes on mine.
Front wheel i have equal tension both sides around 100kgf
What do you mean?
Rear wheel i currently set 120kgf freewheel side and 70kgf other side.
Front wheel i have equal tension both sides around 100kgf
What do you mean?
Rear wheel i currently set 120kgf freewheel side and 70kgf other side.
#23
Really Old Senior Member
Because it is what it is when the DS is 120kgf.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I measure with tension meter each sides multiple times all around while i true the wheel until i get equal reading for every spoke on each side took like 3 hours...
#25
Really Old Senior Member
It's a ratio between Center To Flange dimensions.
Center (rim) to Right Flange/Center to Left Flange. (hub flanges)
Download Spocalc.
It shows what % of DS/NDS is.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/spocalc.htm
Likes For Bill Kapaun: