Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Front Fork Offset difference 44 vs 51, is that too big a difference

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Front Fork Offset difference 44 vs 51, is that too big a difference

Old 12-11-09 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
Daspydyr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 69
From: Vegas Valley, NV

Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20

Front Fork Offset difference 44 vs 51, is that too big a difference

I am looking to build up a 29HT this winter. The frame I am looking at has a Fox F80 with a 51 degree offset. I would like to put a Marzochi Fork with a 44 degree offset. Is this too big a difference for the frame geometry? (Gary Fisher Paragon, G2 geometry )
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
Daspydyr is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-09 | 01:36 PM
  #2  
Guest
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 6
From: Grid Reference, SK

Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.

Originally Posted by Daspydyr
I am looking to build up a 29HT this winter. The frame I am looking at has a Fox F80 with a 51 degree offset. I would like to put a Marzochi Fork with a 44 degree offset. Is this too big a difference for the frame geometry? (Gary Fisher Paragon, G2 geometry )
Firstly, forks do not affect the angle of the steering - the offset is generally given in millimeters (mm) and is the distance ahead of the steering axis the fork puts the wheel - it is usually called 'rake.' Rake affects the "trail" of a bike, which is the derived measurement that determines a bike's tendancy to want to keep going straight.

Secondly, the G2 geometry is designed specifically around the 44mm rake forks, IIRC. The forks were designed specifically for the G2 geometry which has a more slack head tube angle than most bikes, as more rake tends to make a bike have quicker or tighter turning.

Using a fork with less rake will make the bike more stable and it will turn less tightly or quickly. I suspect going from 51 to 44 mm will make the bike a little sluggish, but certainly still ok to ride.

Also beware that the fork with less rake might give you problems with toe-overlap with the front wheel, and that can be a problem... If it is a very small frame this is more likely than if it is a big frame.

Someone with more experience with the G2 bike might have a more definitive answer.
LarDasse74 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-09 | 01:51 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Don't forget the fork length. I know little about suspension forks, but the same priciples apply. If the fork is longer or shorter, it will alter the head tube angle and further change the trail.

Apparently it's common for a 29er to have a lot of trail compared to a road bike. Those trail numbers are really large compared to values in the 54-68mm range found on road bikes.

https://www.fisherbikes.com/bike/model/paragon

Last edited by DaveSSS; 12-11-09 at 05:53 PM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-09 | 05:37 PM
  #4  
Daspydyr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 69
From: Vegas Valley, NV

Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20

Thanks for the info. The frame I am considering is an XL 21" so hopefully toe overlap won't be an issue. I will check the specs on the overall fork length. The fork I want to install has 100mm of travel, the Fox only has 80.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
Daspydyr is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-09 | 06:09 PM
  #5  
Mr IGH's Avatar
afraid of whales
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 6
From: Front Range, CO
Originally Posted by Daspydyr
...Is this too big a difference for the frame geometry? (Gary Fisher Paragon, G2 geometry )
If I understand the G2, it's designed to take advantage of the newer offset forks, it's part of the secret sauce. Might make sense to have this thread moved the the Mountain Bike Forum, someone there will know.
Mr IGH is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-09 | 06:57 PM
  #6  
well biked's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 227
Originally Posted by Mr IGH
If I understand the G2, it's designed to take advantage of the newer offset forks......
I think the forks specced on Genesis2 bikes are made specifically for G2 geometry, i.e. Gary Fisher G2 bikes.
well biked is online now  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Camilo
Framebuilders
13
06-23-19 11:28 AM
chaser97
Road Cycling
2
01-28-14 08:47 AM
xenologer
Bicycle Mechanics
2
12-09-13 01:49 PM
cazzooo
Bicycle Mechanics
48
12-08-09 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.