Crank Gearing Question
#1
Crank Gearing Question
Hey guys I have a question on switching gears on my crank. This spring I built up a 2004 Trek 520 frameset. I knew that I would not be doing any touring until summer of 2010 so I used some parts I already had to get it on the road. My set up is an Ultegra triple 6503 crank and BB, XT FD-M771, Ultegra RD 6600GS, Ultegra 12-25 casette, DA 9 speed chain, and a set of DA Bar End shifters. I have already purchased a XT RD-M771SGS, XT 11-34 cassette, and was about to purchase a XT Crank when I saw that there are some crank gears available from Salsa that I could put on. The gears are 48/38/24. These are not quite the same as the XT's 44/32/22, but close enough for me and much cheaper. Will these gears from Salsa work or, as the noob I am, is there something not right here?
#2
with the 48/38/24 crankset and a cassette with 11-34t you should have low enough gearing to do anything you want. That 24 X 34t is a really low gear...probably only used on incredibly steep hills with gear.
You should be fine. For unloaded riding you'll probably spend most of your time on the 38 chainring and the middle of your cassette....at least I do anyway.
You should be fine. For unloaded riding you'll probably spend most of your time on the 38 chainring and the middle of your cassette....at least I do anyway.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Your Ultegra crank has 130/74 mm bolt circle diameters so be sure the Salsa chainrings match them.
#5
Elitist Troglodyte
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
The ring spacing might not be perfect since ring thickness varies all over the place, but it should be good enough. The only way to tell for sure is try it.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#6
Part-time epistemologist
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer
Hey guys I have a question on switching gears on my crank. This spring I built up a 2004 Trek 520 frameset. I knew that I would not be doing any touring until summer of 2010 so I used some parts I already had to get it on the road. My set up is an Ultegra triple 6503 crank and BB, XT FD-M771, Ultegra RD 6600GS, Ultegra 12-25 casette, DA 9 speed chain, and a set of DA Bar End shifters. I have already purchased a XT RD-M771SGS, XT 11-34 cassette, and was about to purchase a XT Crank when I saw that there are some crank gears available from Salsa that I could put on. The gears are 48/38/24. These are not quite the same as the XT's 44/32/22, but close enough for me and much cheaper. Will these gears from Salsa work or, as the noob I am, is there something not right here?
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#7
Likes to Ride Far

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 15
From: Switzerland
Bikes: road+, gravel, commuter/tourer, tandem, e-cargo, folder
I would go with the 26 tooth inner ring if I was you - it will make front shifting a little smoother and reduce the chance of dropping the chain (although still use a chain retention device like Third Eye or N-Gear), and your lowest gear will be plenty low enough. Are you aware of how widely-spaced the gears are on the 11-34 cassette? I would want something with tighter spacing for road riding. Even 11-32 is a bit better.
My Trek 520 now has 26-42 chainrings up front and a BBB 12-28 10-speed cassette out back, which I find to be ideal for touring - lots of closely-spaced gears, a good range for touring, and minimal shifting with the front derailleur.
My Trek 520 now has 26-42 chainrings up front and a BBB 12-28 10-speed cassette out back, which I find to be ideal for touring - lots of closely-spaced gears, a good range for touring, and minimal shifting with the front derailleur.
#9
Likes to Ride Far

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 15
From: Switzerland
Bikes: road+, gravel, commuter/tourer, tandem, e-cargo, folder
Correction: You want as low a gear as you're likely to need (which is probably not the same as the lowest you can get). Unless you're hitting extended sections of >20% gradients (which I seriously doubt), then I cannot see the point of having a 24-34 gear, even on a touring bike.
#10
Galveston County Texas
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,286
From: In The Wind
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Correction: You want as low a gear as you're likely to need (which is probably not the same as the lowest you can get). Unless you're hitting extended sections of >20% gradients (which I seriously doubt), then I cannot see the point of having a 24-34 gear, even on a touring bike.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#11
Elitist Troglodyte
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Which in no way contradicts what Chris_W said, so no correction needed.
You're projecting again.
You're projecting again.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers






