Torque Spec for Octalink Crank
#1
Bike Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,591
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
Torque Spec for Octalink Crank
I'm mounting a Hollowtech crank on a late model Hard Rock. It hit me last night that I don't know the torque spec. for mounting the cranks to the BB. Does anyone know the spec? It's an older Octalink with inboard bearings. Thanks
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times
in
568 Posts
The recommended bottom bracket cup torque is 50-70 Nm (435-608 inch-pounds)
The recommended crank fastening bolt torque is 35-50 Nm (305-435 in-pounds)
The recommended crank fastening bolt torque is 35-50 Nm (305-435 in-pounds)
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 143
Bikes: Soma Stanyan, Giant Roam, Pace 500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the crankset is brand new and has not been mounted before there will be a full turn or more of the bolt where it is feeling quite tight but has not yet met the torque spec and is forming the aluminum crank to the axle. It is very important to keep tightening to the specified torque. IMO most of the failures that gave this system a bad rep are due to installers not using a torque wrench and stopping with the bolts felt tight.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times
in
568 Posts
#5
Bike Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,591
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
Thanks, I've got the correct torque wrench and will make sure it is at least the min. spec. Thanks Again.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#6
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,924
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Also be sure the splines are fully engaged before torquing. Search for a couple of informative threads on techniques for installing Octalink BBs. (Unless like me you find them dead simple.)
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times
in
568 Posts
If you are installing an Ultegra or Dura Ace crank with the autoextractor feature, unthread and remove the outer ring before installing the crank. That lets you see inside and assure the splines are engaged properly before you install and tighten the crank bolt. A 105 crank does not have the autoextractor collar so you can see whats going on without removing anything else.
#8
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
+1. It is possible to install the crank with it's splines opposing the bb splines instead of interlaced with them and that will ruin the interface as soon as the bike is ridden.
If you are installing an Ultegra or Dura Ace crank with the autoextractor feature, unthread and remove the outer ring before installing the crank. That lets you see inside and assure the splines are engaged properly before you install and tighten the crank bolt. A 105 crank does not have the autoextractor collar so you can see whats going on without removing anything else.
If you are installing an Ultegra or Dura Ace crank with the autoextractor feature, unthread and remove the outer ring before installing the crank. That lets you see inside and assure the splines are engaged properly before you install and tighten the crank bolt. A 105 crank does not have the autoextractor collar so you can see whats going on without removing anything else.
#10
biked well
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,401
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Liked 87 Times
in
53 Posts
Since this is a mountain bike, is the bottom bracket/crank v2 octalink? With these,the splines are deeper than on Octalink v1, and you can align the splines and then push them manually together a bit to make sure the crankarm is going onto the spindle properly before you use the bolt to tighten things up. In other words, you can engage the splined interface simply by pushing, by hand, the crankarm onto the spindle with Octalink v2. V2 covers all the Octalink mtb cranksets except XTR I believe.
Last edited by well biked; 01-01-10 at 04:20 PM.
#11
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,924
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Re Sheldon:
* The original "V1" type for:
o XTR (BB-M952 9-speed) 112.5 & 116 mm lengths
o Dura-Ace (BB-7700 9speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
o Ultegra (BB-6500 9-speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
o 105 (BB-5500 9-speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
* The later "V2" type for:
o Deore XT (ES70/71)
o Deore LX (ES70/71)
o Deore (ES50/51)
The V2 BBs work with FC M752, FC M751, FC M572, FC M571, FC M510-8 and FC M440-8 cranks.
o Tiagra 2005 (4401,4404)
o Sora 2005 (3301,3304)
* The original "V1" type for:
o XTR (BB-M952 9-speed) 112.5 & 116 mm lengths
o Dura-Ace (BB-7700 9speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
o Ultegra (BB-6500 9-speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
o 105 (BB-5500 9-speed) 109.5 mm (double) & 118.5 mm (triple) lengths
* The later "V2" type for:
o Deore XT (ES70/71)
o Deore LX (ES70/71)
o Deore (ES50/51)
The V2 BBs work with FC M752, FC M751, FC M572, FC M571, FC M510-8 and FC M440-8 cranks.
o Tiagra 2005 (4401,4404)
o Sora 2005 (3301,3304)
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
In the bigger picture, Octalink is one of the easier things to get right without a torque wrench, because the Octalink crank is intended to bottom out onto the inboard end of the spindle's splined section, and when it does, the resistance ramps up so abruptly it's blindingly obvious (famous last words
). So if anything, roccobike, aim for the high end of the torque range just to be sure the crank's fully seated.
Like operator said, grease or anti-sieze the interface. If your cranks don't have auto-extractors, then when you're extracting the arms with a conventional puller, do make sure to remove the washer from under the head of the bolt before you insert the extractor. They're very slim washers so they're easy to overlook.

Like operator said, grease or anti-sieze the interface. If your cranks don't have auto-extractors, then when you're extracting the arms with a conventional puller, do make sure to remove the washer from under the head of the bolt before you insert the extractor. They're very slim washers so they're easy to overlook.
Last edited by mechBgon; 01-01-10 at 05:15 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 143
Bikes: Soma Stanyan, Giant Roam, Pace 500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the bigger picture, Octalink is one of the easier things to get right without a torque wrench, because the Octalink crank is intended to bottom out onto the inboard end of the spindle's splined section, and when it does, the resistance ramps up so abruptly it's blindingly obvious (famous last words
). So if anything, roccobike, aim for the high end of the torque range just to be sure the crank's fully seated.
Like operator said, grease or anti-sieze the interface. If your cranks don't have auto-extractors, then when you're extracting the arms with a conventional puller, do make sure to remove the washer from under the head of the bolt before you insert the extractor. They're very slim washers so they're easy to overlook.

Like operator said, grease or anti-sieze the interface. If your cranks don't have auto-extractors, then when you're extracting the arms with a conventional puller, do make sure to remove the washer from under the head of the bolt before you insert the extractor. They're very slim washers so they're easy to overlook.
#15
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,924
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My experience is that there is a small hump (maybe what you're calling "ramp up abruptly to pretty tight") in torque as you mesh the splines (and I always mesh them by feel, but others may be more visually oriented). Then several turns before the splines bottom, then a fast ramp - maybe 1/4 turn? I see no reason to aim for the high end of the spec; the hump isn't anywhere near the spec ... unless you haven't meshed them correctly. But that should be obvious.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#16
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Me experience is that when new they do not ramp up abruptly to the proper torque. They ramp up abruptly to pretty tight and then they need to be turned quite a bit more before they reach proper installation depth and proper torque spec. I agree with aiming for the high end of the spec. Tightening them until the torque ramps up and then a smidge more by "feel" will likely result in a loosened and ruined crank.
Either visually inspect the splines to check for engagement or if you have enough experience to know, how much the crank SHOULD slide onto the spindle that also helps. After doing a couple cranks, you should have enough experience to tell right away, even without being able to see it whether or not the splines are properly engaged by how far the crank slides on and how it behaves when you are tightening the bolt.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Tightening them until the torque ramps up and then a smidge more by "feel" will likely result in a loosened and ruined crank.
Overall, I liked my Octalink cranks pretty well. I remember sticking Ultegra 6500's on my old Cannondale full-tourer in place of my venerable-but-cracking XT M730s, and noticing an improvement in stiffness just launching from a stoplight. It wasn't a bad system really, other than the finicky roller-bearing XTR and Dura-Ace variants

#18
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Finicky or not, the roller bearing variants of the octalink bb's are superior - if you are prepared to do more maintenance over the non roller version. It's stiffer, lighter and can be made to have a much lower drag by removing seals. I will be replacing my dura ace 7710 with the higher maintenance version for my good weather only bike when it wears out (probably in a really ****ing long time)
It's basically a cup/cone octalink bb, where every part can be replaced/overhauled as needed, for those that want that anyways.
It's basically a cup/cone octalink bb, where every part can be replaced/overhauled as needed, for those that want that anyways.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 143
Bikes: Soma Stanyan, Giant Roam, Pace 500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What I'm referring to by "ramp up abruptly" is the point at which the bolt no longer wants to turn because the crank is fully seated at the far end of the splines, and there's nowhere further to push the crank to. Not the initial soft swedging where the crank is obviously (to us, anyway) being pressed further and further onto the splines. Shimano also has made certain square-taper cranksets that were designed to bottom the crank arm onto a collar on the spindle, and it's the same story: tighten until full seating occurs, then stop.
#20
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,924
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When I say, "by feel" I mean getting the splines to mesh. I always use a torque wrench to set final tightness, though I suspect Octalink is less vulnerable to under-torquing than square taper.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers