Nexus 7 on vertical dropout Help!
#26
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not the antirotation was the problem. I has arrived at the same conclusion.. filing 2mm will be enough without many headaches.
#27
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for the clue, but I prefer filing a bit to solve the problem. Anyway, with the hub rotated 90 degree, is just perfect. Perhaps the IGH shaft is not straight.
#31
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
right now the chain is almost new, and maximum tensioned possible... when will become used it will just relax a bit and then i'll ghange it. I do not force my bike, i use it more for city and short roads and trips. I don't agree the darailleur ideea instead gear hub (gear box), the same I don't agree chain idea instead shaft drive and also I don't agree non 4WD cars. Think about having derailleur and chain to your car.... not so great. For me, derailleurs and chains on bikes, have the same place with wooden wheels on old carts. I don't like non reliable (life time) objects.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
if you are so serious about internal gear hubs, and long term reliability ; why not choose a bike frame designed to work with them instead of all the unreliable kludges/ shoehorning?
#35
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
some things cannot be changed at all, I'm so serious about what I said. I don,t need a bike to work with, but also I don't like to have a bike with primitive speed changer derailleur IMO.It is not an offense, just my real opinion... perhaps I can be wrong, but this is what i believe.
Last edited by waingroo; 12-02-13 at 05:31 AM.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Maybe you should ask for some pointers on how to be tactful. You seem to need it even more than you need mechanical assistance.
Being "honest" is not an excuse for rudeness.
If you prefer IGHs, fine, that's your call. But there's no need to talk down on others preferences because of that.
#37
Banned
Some bike frame rear dropout designs work well with a single speed /IGH conversion
Vertical dropouts are not one of them , start over , now that you know you want an IGH Drivetrain .
get something else , all the suggestions have been made , It's the Shopping season ,
In December, the Baby Jesus wants you to spend Money
Vertical dropouts are not one of them , start over , now that you know you want an IGH Drivetrain .
get something else , all the suggestions have been made , It's the Shopping season ,
In December, the Baby Jesus wants you to spend Money
#38
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
And you don't think it's offensive to say that other people's preferences are primitive?
Maybe you should ask for some pointers on how to be tactful. You seem to need it even more than you need mechanical assistance.
Being "honest" is not an excuse for rudeness.
If you prefer IGHs, fine, that's your call. But there's no need to talk down on others preferences because of that.
Maybe you should ask for some pointers on how to be tactful. You seem to need it even more than you need mechanical assistance.
Being "honest" is not an excuse for rudeness.
If you prefer IGHs, fine, that's your call. But there's no need to talk down on others preferences because of that.
But, first of all, the word primitive doesn't mean an offence like for example "ugly". There are expensive old primitive cars that i love them. The word primitive, IMO is something like is out of fashion, or not performig... in not a case ugly. My bike is so primitive without a drive shaft and with a chain instead... not difference between my bike and the world war two ones. But you Dabac, have just make a personal attack (offence).
Dabac, in this phrase: IMO, manual gear box is more primitive than A/T and normal disks clutch AT is more primitive than DSG AT** you find an offence? considering that my car have a normal gear box and also considering (IMO) wich mean that it can or can't be wrong?
Last edited by waingroo; 12-02-13 at 12:54 PM.
#39
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some bike frame rear dropout designs work well with a single speed /IGH conversion
Vertical dropouts are not one of them , start over , now that you know you want an IGH Drivetrain .
get something else , all the suggestions have been made , It's the Shopping season ,
In December, the Baby Jesus wants you to spend Money
Vertical dropouts are not one of them , start over , now that you know you want an IGH Drivetrain .
get something else , all the suggestions have been made , It's the Shopping season ,
In December, the Baby Jesus wants you to spend Money
#40
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
i cant imagine how you have so much emotional investment
in derailleurs
that you consider a criticism of them
a personal attack
ironically
i believe planetary hub gear transmissions
predate derailleurs
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
You're reading way too much into this.
Try this thought out:
- if you were to ask 100 people whether they associated "primitive" with something good or desirable, or something bad or undesirable, how do you think the vote would fall?
So, sure, maybe you can find a place where "primitive" is a neutral classification. But in general usage and general population, it's not.
I don't see upkeep of external gears as a problem, and I don't see the (possible) drivetrain losses or the weight penalty of an IGH as a problem either.
Only things keeping me from IGHs are range/ratios and cost. And possibly the current lack of a suitable frame to stick one in.
Besides, I find it hard see how "primitive" would fit as a description either way.
Maybe back in the early days where the whole wheel was scooted back & forth to allow enough slack to move the chain from one sprocket to another. Or the not-so-parallel linkages in early generation rear derailers.
But today? "Excessively complicated" would be more apt for the escapement mechanisms in the shifters and all the itty-bitty machining on parallelograms and cages.
"Ridiculously exposed" - I'd buy that too. But "primitive"?
#43
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're reading way too much into this.
Try this thought out:
- if you were to ask 100 people whether they associated "primitive" with something good or desirable, or something bad or undesirable, how do you think the vote would fall?
So, sure, maybe you can find a place where "primitive" is a neutral classification. But in general usage and general population, it's not.
I don't see upkeep of external gears as a problem, and I don't see the (possible) drivetrain losses or the weight penalty of an IGH as a problem either.
Only things keeping me from IGHs are range/ratios and cost. And possibly the current lack of a suitable frame to stick one in.
Besides, I find it hard see how "primitive" would fit as a description either way.
Maybe back in the early days where the whole wheel was scooted back & forth to allow enough slack to move the chain from one sprocket to another. Or the not-so-parallel linkages in early generation rear derailers.
But today? "Excessively complicated" would be more apt for the escapement mechanisms in the shifters and all the itty-bitty machining on parallelograms and cages.
"Ridiculously exposed" - I'd buy that too. But "primitive"?
Try this thought out:
- if you were to ask 100 people whether they associated "primitive" with something good or desirable, or something bad or undesirable, how do you think the vote would fall?
So, sure, maybe you can find a place where "primitive" is a neutral classification. But in general usage and general population, it's not.
I don't see upkeep of external gears as a problem, and I don't see the (possible) drivetrain losses or the weight penalty of an IGH as a problem either.
Only things keeping me from IGHs are range/ratios and cost. And possibly the current lack of a suitable frame to stick one in.
Besides, I find it hard see how "primitive" would fit as a description either way.
Maybe back in the early days where the whole wheel was scooted back & forth to allow enough slack to move the chain from one sprocket to another. Or the not-so-parallel linkages in early generation rear derailers.
But today? "Excessively complicated" would be more apt for the escapement mechanisms in the shifters and all the itty-bitty machining on parallelograms and cages.
"Ridiculously exposed" - I'd buy that too. But "primitive"?
#44
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
You're reading way too much into this.
Try this thought out:
- if you were to ask 100 people whether they associated "primitive" with something good or desirable, or something bad or undesirable, how do you think the vote would fall?
So, sure, maybe you can find a place where "primitive" is a neutral classification. But in general usage and general population, it's not.
I don't see upkeep of external gears as a problem, and I don't see the (possible) drivetrain losses or the weight penalty of an IGH as a problem either.
Only things keeping me from IGHs are range/ratios and cost. And possibly the current lack of a suitable frame to stick one in.
Besides, I find it hard see how "primitive" would fit as a description either way.
Maybe back in the early days where the whole wheel was scooted back & forth to allow enough slack to move the chain from one sprocket to another. Or the not-so-parallel linkages in early generation rear derailers.
But today? "Excessively complicated" would be more apt for the escapement mechanisms in the shifters and all the itty-bitty machining on parallelograms and cages.
"Ridiculously exposed" - I'd buy that too. But "primitive"?
Try this thought out:
- if you were to ask 100 people whether they associated "primitive" with something good or desirable, or something bad or undesirable, how do you think the vote would fall?
So, sure, maybe you can find a place where "primitive" is a neutral classification. But in general usage and general population, it's not.
I don't see upkeep of external gears as a problem, and I don't see the (possible) drivetrain losses or the weight penalty of an IGH as a problem either.
Only things keeping me from IGHs are range/ratios and cost. And possibly the current lack of a suitable frame to stick one in.
Besides, I find it hard see how "primitive" would fit as a description either way.
Maybe back in the early days where the whole wheel was scooted back & forth to allow enough slack to move the chain from one sprocket to another. Or the not-so-parallel linkages in early generation rear derailers.
But today? "Excessively complicated" would be more apt for the escapement mechanisms in the shifters and all the itty-bitty machining on parallelograms and cages.
"Ridiculously exposed" - I'd buy that too. But "primitive"?
both have strengths and weaknesses
nor am i arguing that calling derailleurs primitive
is positive or negative
or anything inbetween
my comment was that you
for some reason
take criticism of derailleurs as a personal attack
what if i were to say
steel frame bikes are too heavy and give a crappy ride
this is a negative opinion
which many people will disagree with
but it is not a personal attack
on anyone
no matter how many peugeots or serottas or surlys they own
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyHighest
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
4
10-28-12 08:00 PM