Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

700c fork on a 650c frame?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

700c fork on a 650c frame?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-14 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
700c fork on a 650c frame?

So recently I picked up a Velovie Vitesse 500 for very cheap. the thing is its a factory defect, so only a 650c can fit on the rear. Its a 51cm but fits more closer to a 55cm.

I'm curious if I can put a 700c fork on the front, and still use a 650c wheelset just fine?

Am I going to have horrible toe overlap? what other complications am I getting myself into?...
OrbeaSorbet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-14 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by OrbeaSorbet
So recently I picked up a Velovie Vitesse 500 for very cheap. the thing is its a factory defect, so only a 650c can fit on the rear. Its a 51cm but fits more closer to a 55cm.

I'm curious if I can put a 700c fork on the front, and still use a 650c wheelset just fine?

Am I going to have horrible toe overlap? what other complications am I getting myself into?...
Odds are you can get away with the 700s fork. Handling will be different, but it's impossible to predict if it's be different enough to be a problem.

However, the biggest issue will be brake reach if you use 650 wheel in a 700c fork.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-14 | 09:43 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

it would help to know the nature of the defect. for instance, was the frame made for 700c wheels and the rear triangle is designed for 650c? or was it designed for 650c wheels and the fork is wrong?

or maybe you don't know? and can't find out?

is there a fork on the frame now? if so, what size?

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 12-06-14 at 09:47 PM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-14 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by hueyhoolihan
it would help to know the nature of the defect. for instance, was the frame made for 700c wheels and the rear triangle is designed for 650c? or was it designed for 650c wheels and the fork is wrong?

or maybe you don't know? and can't find out?

is there a fork on the frame now? if so, what size?
Pics would be interesting....
achoo is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-14 | 10:40 PM
  #5  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,349
Likes: 5,466
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Most jerry rigged bikes, to the degree that the OP suggests, don't tend to work well enough to stay on the road for the test of time. Unless the OP is of a body fit that is on the edges of the bell curve it's hard for me to believe that a weird bike will fit and ride well. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-14 | 10:56 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

as an experiment, i once put MTB wheels (only 12 millimeters in diameter less than a 650c rim) on a bke make for 27" wheels. it rode noticeablly closer to the ground, but that was just a minor inconvenience compared to the severe "death wobble" steering effect at any speed above 10MPH. unbelieveably bad.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 02:55 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hueyhoolihan
it would help to know the nature of the defect. for instance, was the frame made for 700c wheels and the rear triangle is designed for 650c? or was it designed for 650c wheels and the fork is wrong?

or maybe you don't know? and can't find out?

is there a fork on the frame now? if so, what size?
its a 700c frame, but as you stated the rear triangle had a defect of being to short so only allows 650c. I currently dont have a fork with the frame.
OrbeaSorbet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 09:23 AM
  #8  
alcjphil's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 2,253
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by OrbeaSorbet
its a 700c frame, but as you stated the rear triangle had a defect of being to short so only allows 650c. I currently dont have a fork with the frame.
What sort of defect would prevent a 700c wheel from fitting a frame that is designed for that size wheel? What part of the rear triangle is too short?

Last edited by alcjphil; 12-07-14 at 09:57 AM.
alcjphil is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 09:31 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

well... hmmm, that's a problem. i suspect, and as mentioned, there's no way to tell for sure without what may turn out to be a failed and possibly expensive experiment, whether or not a 700c fork and a 650c rear wheel, or a 650c fork and two 650c wheels, is the better option.

if i had to guess i'd say matching 650c wheels. after all, the frame may be designed for 650c, seeing as how the rear triangle is obviously a 650c rear triangle. but it's just a guess. i hope the frame was really, really cheap.

to facilitate a 650c/650c test, i might look into borrowing set of old mtb wheels. they are readily available, can be cheap, tires can be had down to about 25mms, and a 650c fork will usually accommodate them. you may need a long reach caliper brake. i ran my 650c road bike for years on a nice set of mtb wheels. good luck to you.

i googled that frame and it looks like a nice one, it would be sad if it turned out to be unusable.

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 12-07-14 at 09:41 AM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 10:26 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by alcjphil
What sort of defect would prevent a 700c wheel from fitting a frame that is designed for that size wheel? What part of the rear triangle is too short?
Most likely defect is the wrong word here. These are build as super tight frames for 700c wheels, and odds are that the issue isn't that 700c wheels won't fit, but that they'll fit only with tires smaller than 25mm (or less).

If you search for a photo of the frame or bike, you'll see the near zero clearance behind the seat tube, which is cut away to follw the curve of the wheel, with no room to spare.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 11:10 AM
  #11  
alcjphil's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 2,253
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Most likely defect is the wrong word here. These are build as super tight frames for 700c wheels, and odds are that the issue isn't that 700c wheels won't fit, but that they'll fit only with tires smaller than 25mm (or less).

If you search for a photo of the frame or bike, you'll see the near zero clearance behind the seat tube, which is cut away to follw the curve of the wheel, with no room to spare.
The difference in diameter between a 650c wheel and a 700 c wheel is 51mm, which would drop the bottom bracket by about 1" and also increase brake reach by the same amount
alcjphil is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 11:31 AM
  #12  
Jiggle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 6
From: Somewhere in TX

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Put a 700c fork and wheel on the front like it was designed. Then modify the rear to take 700c. There are tons of cheap 1 1/8 carbon forks on ebay you can strip and paint.
Jiggle is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 12:27 PM
  #13  
SquidPuppet's Avatar
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 41
From: Coeur d' Alene

Bikes: 3 Chinese Gas Pipe Nerdcycles and 2 Chicago Electroforged Boat Anchors

Originally Posted by hueyhoolihan
as an experiment, i once put MTB wheels (only 12 millimeters in diameter less than a 650c rim) on a bke make for 27" wheels. it rode noticeablly closer to the ground, but that was just a minor inconvenience compared to the severe "death wobble" steering effect at any speed above 10MPH. unbelieveably bad.
Interesting. Especially since the wheel base didn't change. I am currently in the middle of a build using a mid 70s Schwinn frame and fork. It's designed for a rim/tire combo that measures 26.65 inch diameter. I'll be using 700c rim/tire combo that'll measure 28.14 inches in diameter. I wonder what surprises are in store for me.
SquidPuppet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 04:29 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

I once bought a bike for my son that had a rear triangle so tight that you had to deflate the rear 700 x 23c tire in order to get it past the chainstays. If you have access to the bike see if you can mount a 700 wheel and tire by deflating the tire and tube.
Al1943 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 04:39 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Al1943
I once bought a bike for my son that had a rear triangle so tight that you had to deflate the rear 700 x 23c tire in order to get it past the chainstays......
I suspect that was on a bike with horizontal dropouts, and it was a fairly common on super tight bikes BITD. I credit this issue with contributing to the current dominance of verticals which usually have the slot aligned (very slightly back pointing) to solve that problem.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-14 | 08:09 PM
  #16  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,349
Likes: 5,466
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
Interesting. Especially since the wheel base didn't change. I am currently in the middle of a build using a mid 70s Schwinn frame and fork. It's designed for a rim/tire combo that measures 26.65 inch diameter. I'll be using 700c rim/tire combo that'll measure 28.14 inches in diameter. I wonder what surprises are in store for me.
I suspect that old Schwinn was made around the 597ISO rim diameter. A pair of narrow 700c wheels and tires won't be too much larger in diameter and the fore/aft balance will remain the same. Although the rotating masses will be far different. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-14 | 10:08 AM
  #17  
SquidPuppet's Avatar
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 41
From: Coeur d' Alene

Bikes: 3 Chinese Gas Pipe Nerdcycles and 2 Chicago Electroforged Boat Anchors

Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
I suspect that old Schwinn was made around the 597ISO rim diameter. A pair of narrow 700c wheels and tires won't be too much larger in diameter and the fore/aft balance will remain the same. Although the rotating masses will be far different. Andy.
Yes, 597, but the 700c replacements will not be narrow. Total diameter increase will be 38mm. I'll be forced to partially deflate the rear tire for removal and installation.
SquidPuppet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-14 | 05:47 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Originally Posted by FBinNY
I suspect that was on a bike with horizontal dropouts, and it was a fairly common on super tight bikes BITD. I credit this issue with contributing to the current dominance of verticals which usually have the slot aligned (very slightly back pointing) to solve that problem.
No, vertical dropouts, Specialized Allez 9-speed, about 10 years ago.
Al1943 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
qko
Classic & Vintage
3
12-30-17 11:04 PM
qko
Bicycle Mechanics
1
12-29-17 05:50 PM
Paintking
Bicycle Mechanics
4
12-08-11 02:42 PM
Artful Dodger
Classic & Vintage
3
01-31-11 11:33 PM
schpetra
Bicycle Mechanics
10
08-03-10 03:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.