Why C&V bikes are better than carbon fiber
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
#27
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,617
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10970 Post(s)
Liked 7,496 Times
in
4,192 Posts
You may thing that, but I think you think there are too many serious group riders around here.
I would imagine everyone would have to be part of a lot of pace lines for everyone to have been involved in a takedown like you describe.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,543 Posts
Grant Petersen does not like carbon
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#33
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
I think that "Numb Willies" would be a good name for a rock band.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I like bicycles. I like lightweight racing bicycles. They will always be fragile. No matter what they are made of. They are made to go fast. Not for jousting.
#35
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times
in
2,286 Posts
Man, that's really grabbing the chain and yanking hard...
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
Yup, felt moved impulsively. First time. Results of several observations and encouraged by previous posts.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
went for the branch trimmer pole with the saw at the end. He did acknowledge that.
#38
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times
in
642 Posts
The new future will be nano-engineering. Everything from bicycles to cars to houses to highway bridges. Carbon fiber will just be a footnote in history.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#39
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
There have in fact been a few steel airplanes; the MiG-25 is the most notable, probably. I'm pretty certain the designers in the design bureau didn't go around dissing aluminum's fatigue limit
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18381 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Apparently MTBs with CF frames and CF wheels are much more resilient than road bikes with CF Frames and CF wheels, and most of the MTBs can take quite a beating. So the problem isn't as much the carbon fiber, as the ultralight construction.
It would be easy enough to implement a 1 frame & 2 wheels rule in which a rider would have to finish the race on a single frame & set of wheels. Forcing tire changes rather than wheel changes would also tend to encourage using more resilient tires and cleaning the course before the race. It may, in fact, increase rider safety not due to fewer broken bikes, but fewer support vehicles buzzing around the riders.
As far as accidents getting worse over time, there seems to be a slow creeping up in speeds. For example, the average TDF speed during the early 20th century was about 25 kph (15 mph). In the 70's and 80's, it was about 35 kph, and now about 40 kph (25 mph).
Pushing the envelope from bikes to fitness to drafting to fast hill descents, and it isn't surprising that accidents are getting worse.
Since this is the C&V Forum, why not just require all TDF bikes to be single speed flip-flop bikes with toeclips?
#41
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
For me, steel works just fine. Ti is a little nicer. I now have two ti bikes because I can.
And to get on topic - the one issue not addressed by the OP (and a little harder to get circumstantial evidence on) is the element of energy absorption in a crash. Metal bikes bend, absorbing real amounts of energy which perhaps the rider does not have to absorb. Carbon fiber bikes, while very strong, absorb little energy before they break. (Energy absorbed = force applied X distance the force is applied for. Say we bend a metal tube 6 " but a CF tube breaks after bending 1/2". That CF tube would have to be 6 divided by 1/2 = 12 times as stiff to absorb the same energy. Bent fork after a crash? If you are the rider, that's a good thing. The work to straighten that fork is work/energy your body didn't have to absorb.
Ben
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Personally I try not to crash my bike.
Apparently MTBs with CF frames and CF wheels are much more resilient than road bikes with CF Frames and CF wheels, and most of the MTBs can take quite a beating. So the problem isn't as much the carbon fiber, as the ultralight construction.
It would be easy enough to implement a 1 frame & 2 wheels rule in which a rider would have to finish the race on a single frame & set of wheels. Forcing tire changes rather than wheel changes would also tend to encourage using more resilient tires and cleaning the course before the race. It may, in fact, increase rider safety not due to fewer broken bikes, but fewer support vehicles buzzing around the riders.
As far as accidents getting worse over time, there seems to be a slow creeping up in speeds. For example, the average TDF speed during the early 20th century was about 25 kph (15 mph). In the 70's and 80's, it was about 35 kph, and now about 40 kph (25 mph).
Pushing the envelope from bikes to fitness to drafting to fast hill descents, and it isn't surprising that accidents are getting worse.
Since this is the C&V Forum, why not just require all TDF bikes to be single speed flip-flop bikes with toeclips?
Apparently MTBs with CF frames and CF wheels are much more resilient than road bikes with CF Frames and CF wheels, and most of the MTBs can take quite a beating. So the problem isn't as much the carbon fiber, as the ultralight construction.
It would be easy enough to implement a 1 frame & 2 wheels rule in which a rider would have to finish the race on a single frame & set of wheels. Forcing tire changes rather than wheel changes would also tend to encourage using more resilient tires and cleaning the course before the race. It may, in fact, increase rider safety not due to fewer broken bikes, but fewer support vehicles buzzing around the riders.
As far as accidents getting worse over time, there seems to be a slow creeping up in speeds. For example, the average TDF speed during the early 20th century was about 25 kph (15 mph). In the 70's and 80's, it was about 35 kph, and now about 40 kph (25 mph).
Pushing the envelope from bikes to fitness to drafting to fast hill descents, and it isn't surprising that accidents are getting worse.
Since this is the C&V Forum, why not just require all TDF bikes to be single speed flip-flop bikes with toeclips?
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 08-19-15 at 11:12 AM.
#45
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times
in
2,286 Posts
Yup, felt moved impulsively. First time. Results of several observations and encouraged by previous posts.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
I'm not sure how this forum is moderated, I'm sure there are things that will get you immediately censored. Is there anything we can do for those that don't cross that line, but push against it? In the case of one poster, I PM'ed my reply, as the tone and direction was detracting from the thread. It was a "let's take this outside" reply. I received multiple, lengthy PM's that were variations on "mine is bigger than yours" arguements. At least no one else had to deal with it.
*perusing a dictionary in my youth, I found these two archaic words, and try to use them together whenever possible.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 811
Bikes: You mean this week?
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
20 Posts
Yup, felt moved impulsively. First time. Results of several observations and encouraged by previous posts.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
When I joined back in 2008, this forum was full of very friendly, courteous, accepting, and tolerant individuals that NEVER, made obnoxious statements or outlandish ones in a forceful manner. I believe many had the approach that this was a place to learn and test our understanding and opinions against others experiences and knowledge. Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void.
In the last few months the deterioration of the tone of communications has been very disappointing. Some significant, knowledgeable people have disengaged as a result, to the loss of the value of this forum. Assumptions are made, or implied, in statements without validation. Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
I don't' expect everyone to be knowledgeable about everything, I certainly am not! I have learned a great deal in the very short time on this forum from some very knowledgeable, experienced people that I have grown to respect as a result of their contributions, attitude and historical knowledge. It's benefited me and those I have shared the new found understanding.
I keep meeting folks who are so much smarter than me, it's almost humiliating. But I've learned that I can be the student, and pass the knowledge at the proper time.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18381 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Oh it gets worse Exclusive Carbon Fibre Running Bikes by MORES-DESIGN
Tot bikes don't have to be made heavier than their parent's full-sized bikes
#48
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times
in
2,286 Posts
As far as accidents getting worse over time, there seems to be a slow creeping up in speeds. For example, the average TDF speed during the early 20th century was about 25 kph (15 mph). In the 70's and 80's, it was about 35 kph, and now about 40 kph (25 mph).
Since this is the C&V Forum, why not just require all TDF bikes to be single speed flip-flop bikes with toeclips?
I'd just go back to the "you gotta fix your own bike" rule.
Or an alternative stage race?...
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#49
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times
in
2,286 Posts
Oh it gets worse Exclusive Carbon Fibre Running Bikes by MORES-DESIGN
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#50
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times
in
910 Posts
I'm holding out for the carrot fiber bikes we were promised back in '07