Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Why C&V bikes are better than carbon fiber

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Why C&V bikes are better than carbon fiber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-15, 12:43 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139

Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ex Pres
I'm holding out for the carrot fiber bikes we were promised back in '07
It might make better sense to use a more inert base for the fiber. Currently wood fiber is used to make the Rayon fibers woven into cloth and then charred (carbonized). The process uses vast amounts of pure water. I don't think there are any American sources anymore.

Originally Posted by repechage
In my neighborhood the raccoons just tear your shingle roofs apart. Tenacious.
I am glad they got the pic BEFORE the raccoon started eating!
Dave Cutter is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 12:48 PM
  #52  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times in 910 Posts
No wrecks made worse by carbon here, if you don't count the fact that the moronic TT-tuck wrecks have all been on carbon bikes....I think that's just part of their package.

My worst wreck was on a Technium, but the bonds did not fail. The frame bent, the fork bent, and the spokes broke when the front wheel taco'd. 1 spoke went through and through my R calf. 1 spoke went in and hung there. You'd be amazed at how fast your mind can work out the angles to reverse the direction of said spokes while removing them. Self-preservation created intuitive geometric thought.

There is no doubt in my mind that accident would have been just as brutal on almost any bike other than perhaps a mountain bike. I was racing one dog and hit another, broadside. The funny thing; I was cycling to get over a running injury.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 01:44 PM
  #53  
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,970

Bikes: See sig

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by thinktubes
Why asplode is better than assplode - discuss.

because Strongbad:

__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 01:49 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 162 Posts
Steal bikes fail also. I the 1980's periodically we would see a frame crack or split from fatigue.
It was probably a manufacturing defect that would come to light over time.
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 01:54 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by RobbieTunes
No wrecks made worse by carbon here, if you don't count the fact that the moronic TT-tuck wrecks have all been on carbon bikes....I think that's just part of their package.

My worst wreck was on a Technium, but the bonds did not fail. The frame bent, the fork bent, and the spokes broke when the front wheel taco'd. 1 spoke went through and through my R calf. 1 spoke went in and hung there. You'd be amazed at how fast your mind can work out the angles to reverse the direction of said spokes while removing them. Self-preservation created intuitive geometric thought.

There is no doubt in my mind that accident would have been just as brutal on almost any bike other than perhaps a mountain bike. I was racing one dog and hit another, broadside. The funny thing; I was cycling to get over a running injury.
Man, that is gruesome.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 02:04 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
inkandsilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 781
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Damn, I clicked. Then nearly threw up.
1500 euros ! ! !
inkandsilver is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 02:25 PM
  #57  
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,652

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3093 Post(s)
Liked 6,608 Times in 3,787 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
I'm not sure how this forum is moderated, I'm sure there are things that will get you immediately censored. Is there anything we can do for those that don't cross that line, but push against it?
For the longest time, this forum was mostly self moderated. Something over the line might get posted, and someone would chime in with a "That's now how we behave in here." type of response. Apologies would be issued, the poster would edit their post, and life in here moved on. Of course, we had the occasional dust up, too. When that happened, the post would get reported and the mod staff would have to look into it.

Lately I have seen more and more snarky comments and more staff moderation needed. I've seen many long time members move on. Maybe their interest in bikes moved on to other things. Maybe they didn't like the tone of the forum as much, and didn't feel as welcome. Likely, a combination of both.

If you see something posted in here that you think needs to be addressed, report it by clicking the little triangle in the lower left corner of the post in question. I mainly hang out here in C&V but don't have the time to read every thread. I like to ride bikes more than I do like to read and write about them.

Thank you.
cb400bill is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 02:52 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,752 Times in 939 Posts
Is it fibre or fiber?
In Canada, it is fibre.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 02:56 PM
  #59  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,792

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3591 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times in 1,935 Posts
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
There have in fact been a few steel airplanes; the MiG-25 is the most notable, probably.
FWIW, both Reynolds 531 and Columbus SL/SP tubes were initially developed for use in airframes. But since unlike bicycles, aircraft have mandatory routine airframe inspections, extrapolating from experience in aircraft to bicycles is like apples and oranges. And then there's the issue of counterfeit carbon fiber frames and components of unknown quality in the marketplace.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 03:03 PM
  #60  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,792

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3591 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times in 1,935 Posts
Originally Posted by embankmentlb
Steal bikes fail also.
Yes, they do. But steel tends to fail gradually, giving the perceptive rider an indication that something is wrong before completely failing. When carbon fiber fails, it tends to fail completely and immediately.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 03:09 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 162 Posts
i think that is true but there are instances of bikes failing suddenly without worning in the tdf. I have never seen one fail suddenly first hand of any material.
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Yes, they do. But steel tends to fail gradually, giving the perceptive rider an indication that something is wrong before completely failing. When carbon fiber fails, it tends to fail completely and immediately.
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 03:24 PM
  #62  
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,286 Posts
Originally Posted by cb400bill
For the longest time, this forum was mostly self moderated. Something over the line might get posted, and someone would chime in with a "That's now how we behave in here." type of response. Apologies would be issued, the poster would edit their post, and life in here moved on. Of course, we had the occasional dust up, too. When that happened, the post would get reported and the mod staff would have to look into it.

Lately I have seen more and more snarky comments and more staff moderation needed. I've seen many long time members move on. Maybe their interest in bikes moved on to other things. Maybe they didn't like the tone of the forum as much, and didn't feel as welcome. Likely, a combination of both.

If you see something posted in here that you think needs to be addressed, report it by clicking the little triangle in the lower left corner of the post in question. I mainly hang out here in C&V but don't have the time to read every thread. I like to ride bikes more than I do like to read and write about them.

Thank you.
Thank you!
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:23 PM
  #63  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times in 910 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK


Pushing the envelope from bikes to fitness to drafting to fast hill descents, and it isn't surprising that accidents are getting worse.

Since this is the C&V Forum, why not just require all TDF bikes to be single speed flip-flop bikes with toeclips?
Neat stuff. Merckx once suggested everyone ride the same bike, and then see who showed up for Stage 2.

Last edited by RobbieTunes; 08-19-15 at 06:47 PM.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:32 PM
  #64  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times in 910 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
And then there's the issue of counterfeit carbon fiber frames and components of unknown quality in the marketplace.
This is what scares me. I know a rider who bought a "Dogma," for $600. Yep, one of those. In fact, a reputable bike shop that did not sell Pinarello told him "it just went out the back door, same maker." Head tube broke in half on a climb. Only carbon failure like that I've ever seen.

I did buy an FSA Plasma bar/stem that gave me pause after I saw pictures posted about the counterfeit failures.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:42 PM
  #65  
Duo
Banned.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509

Bikes: The Good Book of bicycling

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by embankmentlb
Steal bikes fail also. I the 1980's periodically we would see a frame crack or split from fatigue.
It was probably a manufacturing defect that would come to light over time.
My bike is a steel touring bike, built not for speed but durability. Just wondering, would the average recreational rider be better off with a good sturdy steel touring bike over aluminum/carbon racing bikes? I tried demoing some of the higher end stuff, but it didn't do much for me as racing is not in my blood.
Duo is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:42 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by SJX426
Many spoke, rightly so, with authority based on experience, education and knowledge and common sense. Often they, in turn, admitted lack of understanding or knowledge seeking to fill the void...Then a whole argument is presented based on an unfounded assumption. You know about "assume." Instead of fact based arguments, it is about "feelings" and unsubstantiated comments/perspectives without room for reasonable corrective information.
Exactly. The whole "steel is real" cult mentality and all the kool-aid drinking is almost always based on a lack of experience with titanium, aluminum, carbon fiber and really is just perpetuated by people who ride steel, have only ridden steel, and want to validate their feelings about the steel bikes they have.

I couldn't' agree with you more.
mtnbke is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:48 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Duo
My bike is a steel touring bike, built not for speed but durability. Just wondering, would the average recreational rider be better off with a good sturdy steel touring bike over aluminum/carbon racing bikes? I tried demoing some of the higher end stuff, but it didn't do much for me as racing is not in my blood.
For me the carbon fiber thing makes no sense. I want my bikes to last a lifetime. I don't want a favorite bike to rust out being exposed to moisture and rain, or salt on the roads when touring. I don't want a bike to fail because its fragile like with carbon fiber. For me aluminum is a great choice.

Search for threads on C&V Cannondale ST touring bikes. Relaxed geometry, will embarrass any steel "racing" bike in a climb all other things being equal (rider, wheel set, components), they are literal "rocket bikes" in terms of acceleration and when sprinting. You pedal and you GO. The relaxed geometry and fitment of wide tires and fenders, and touring gearing makes these a favorite of many C&V people here. The fact that these touring bikes can be raced in a pinch and they will more than hold their own with vintage steel, just makes them even more cool. Plus they are incredibly strong and stiff, and very lightweight, for a touring bike and can carry much heavier loads than steel touring bikes. They aren't as beautiful as a lugged steel bike though with lug lining, a chromed fork and seat stays, and nice paint. Just monochromatic.
mtnbke is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:51 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RobbieTunes
Need stuff. Merckx once suggested everyone ride the same bike, and then see who showed up for Stage 2.
That's a really good point. You can visually see the increase in average speed when the paradigm changed to aluminum and then carbon fiber OR you can look at that graph and see the paradigm change from doping. Or both.

I see the gaps for WWI and WWII but what is going on in the '20s? Why are average speeds so much lower? Where on that graph do we actually see multi-speed derailleurs com into play? Would that be 1930 and that steep climb? What explains the DROP of average speeds essentially since Lance was done?
mtnbke is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:52 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Blue Belly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200

Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnbke
Exactly. The whole "steel is real" cult mentality and all the kool-aid drinking is almost always based on a lack of experience with titanium, aluminum, carbon fiber and really is just perpetuated by people who ride steel, have only ridden steel, and want to validate their feelings about the steel bikes they have.

I couldn't' agree with you more.
I speak for myself but, I couldn't disagree more. Ive owned top of the line modern race bikes. Aluminum, too. I'll give a nod to modern shifting & pedals, for racing. New carbon wheel technology is superb. Add that to a properly built steel bike & I'd be happy to race against anyone, all things equal. & Ive dropped may a good rider on my inferior shifting, old tech steel bikes, as well. The rider plays a much larger role, in the scheme of things, than most wish to believe.
Blue Belly is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:53 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Ayers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 137

Bikes: Centurion Ironman - Cannondale Six13 - Cannondale CAAD4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I learned early on this board how to utilize the ignore feature for the more abrasive members. No sense in not enjoying this fantastic forum just because a few that I don't care for.

And, bonus obligatory picture of my wife's pet raccoon.

Ayers is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:56 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
I'd have bought those if I'd knew about them. Everyone talked about the Strider but it was just cheap chinese crap with plastic tires. We tried a Kettler but it was heavy and I wasn't impressed. We bought a Specialized Hotwalk and it was very heavy and seemed very cheaply made.
mtnbke is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 05:58 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Blue Belly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200

Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Duo
My bike is a steel touring bike, built not for speed but durability. Just wondering, would the average recreational rider be better off with a good sturdy steel touring bike over aluminum/carbon racing bikes? I tried demoing some of the higher end stuff, but it didn't do much for me as racing is not in my blood.
Yes & No. Touring geometry can be a great thing for long rides. But swift handling usually isn't something that comes along with that. Touring bikes do often give a comfortable ride which allows for less fatigue over a long ride. There are many racing bikes that try to combine both characteristics, however.
Blue Belly is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 06:02 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 679

Bikes: 2023 Canyon Endurace 7 CF Di2, 1982 Trek 957 (retro), 80s Trek 710 (retro), 1995 Trek 930 MTB (singlespeed), Surly LHT

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnbke
Carbon-fibre bicycles in the frame for rising number of injuries

When was the last time someone broke a vintage aluminum Klein, Cannondale or a Steel Cinelli, Olmo, Pinarello, Merckx, Masi, etc. in a crash that contributed to an INCREASE the injuries sustained.

Curious who amongst our C&Vers have suffered injuries in a group ride pile-up due to someone else's carbon bike shattering or breaking. Do share. I think we've all been a part of some doofus bringing down a pace line because they tried to ride on TT extensions, that doesn't count. I'm talking just regular crashes where someone on carbon rims or a carbon frame broke their bike and that contributed to others being taken out or where someone sustained injuries because of the broken carbon? A carbon frame fragment through the arm or something.
I prefer Earth's "carbon"-based fiber:

Renovo Hardwood Bicycles. Handcrafted in Portland, OR
ppg677 is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 06:02 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
I think this is an instance of The Tragedy of the Commons. This is a free resource, at some point a pother of grobians* erupts.

I'm not sure how this forum is moderated, I'm sure there are things that will get you immediately censored. Is there anything we can do for those that don't cross that line, but push against it? In the case of one poster, I PM'ed my reply, as the tone and direction was detracting from the thread. It was a "let's take this outside" reply. I received multiple, lengthy PM's that were variations on "mine is bigger than yours" arguements. At least no one else had to deal with it.

*perusing a dictionary in my youth, I found these two archaic words, and try to use them together whenever possible.
Since you are mudslinging, I'll bring something more accurate to the conversation. Actually I found my replies to be reasonable and conciliatory, and I was trying to explain to you where your indictments and preconceived notions were coming up short. Your replies were insulting and abusive, you actually didn't read anything that was sent to you as was clear from your replies which were disconnected from any reasonable attempt to establish a dialog. I answered your questions repeatedly and you seemingly didn't care to acknowledge that. I took the whole thing as just an attempt to bait on your part. At which point you PMd me in a tantrum and said you were done with the communication.

For the record.
mtnbke is offline  
Old 08-19-15, 06:10 PM
  #75  
All Campy All The Time
 
CroMo Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 1,417

Bikes: Listed in my signature.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Ayers
I learned early on this board how to utilize the ignore feature for the more abrasive members. No sense in not enjoying this fantastic forum just because a few that I don't care for.

And, bonus obligatory picture of my wife's pet raccoon.

Really cool raccoon. We once hand-raised a pair of baby possums that my wife picked up on the side of the road after their mom was killed by a car. They grew to be as big as tomcats and very tame and friendly.
__________________
My C&V Bikes:
1972 Bottecchia Professional, 1972 Legnano Olympiade Record,
1982 Colnago Super, 1987 Bottecchia Team C-Record,
1988 Pinarello Montello, 1990 Masi Nuova Strada Super Record,
1995 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, 1995 DeBernardi Thron









CroMo Mike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.