|
Originally Posted by crank_addict
(Post 20715430)
The early days..
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...766e7e8e96.jpg |
Originally Posted by fleslider
(Post 20724038)
Is there a larger size image of this?
|
Originally Posted by fleslider
(Post 20724038)
Is there a larger size image of this?
Old magazines are often worth it just for the adverts and history. Found another advertisement and learned how Mercedes first established US distribution using Studebaker dealers. |
Here's a link to a somewhat larger version. It's fairly clean for a jpg. It could be cleaned up with a one-click tool to remove jpg artifacts, adjusted and sharpened carefully, then resized to produce a poster sized version.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...6bdf57779c.jpg |
Thanks |
Breaking news, just in:
Red/white 60cm 88 IM Expert was being disassembled earlier this afternoon. Disassembler noticed strange markings on BB cups and spindle. Upon closer inspection this was discovered. BB cups are Kajita brand. Spindle is SCM brand. Repeat, Kakita and SCM brand. Loose ball cup/cone with no bearing cages. Appears to be original. Be on the lookout, there could be others out there. Other related news: The bare frame/fork/headset combo weighed 6.90 lbs on a cheap Dr. Meter hanging scale. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8a7dd6c36f.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...77b518eab7.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by seypat
(Post 20726104)
Breaking news, just in:
Red/white 60cm 88 IM Expert was being disassembled earlier this afternoon. Disassembler noticed strange markings on BB cups and spindle. Upon closer inspection this was discovered. BB cups are Kajita brand. Spindle is SCM brand. Repeat, Kakita and SCM brand. Loose ball cup/cone with no bearing cages. Appears to be original. Be on the lookout, there could be others out there. Other related news: The bare frame/fork/headset combo weighed 6.90 lbs on a cheap Dr. Meter hanging scale. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8a7dd6c36f.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...77b518eab7.jpg |
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 20726568)
Could you provide me with the specs on that spindle? See if I have one to match. Thanks loads.
|
Originally Posted by seypat
(Post 20726604)
The spindle length is 113mm. According to Sheldon's chart,(linked above by markwesti) the universal marking size is 3H. If you have a 3H in da casa, you are good to go.
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bbe2aaf7d1.jpg From 89 Expert 52cm That looks the same as my granddaughters. Had GPX groupset |
I guess those 2 became suppliers in 1988. I have to admit, I can't put a spindle in without a plastic sleeve. If I don't have one, I make one from a disposable water bottle.
Patrick |
Question for you experts. If everything on these bikes was metric and Japan was on the metric system why are the balls 1/4"? Surely if Japan could make everything else they could make bearings or is the worldwide standard for bearings in Imperial sizes?
|
Originally Posted by seypat
(Post 20726104)
Breaking news, just in:
Red/white 60cm 88 IM Expert was being disassembled earlier this afternoon. Disassembler noticed strange markings on BB cups and spindle. Upon closer inspection this was discovered. BB cups are Kajita brand. Spindle is SCM brand. Repeat, Kakita and SCM brand. Loose ball cup/cone with no bearing cages. Appears to be original. Be on the lookout, there could be others out there. Other related news: The bare frame/fork/headset combo weighed 6.90 lbs on a cheap Dr. Meter hanging scale. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8a7dd6c36f.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...77b518eab7.jpg
Originally Posted by TXsailor
(Post 20726638)
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bbe2aaf7d1.jpg
From 89 Expert 52cm That looks the same as my granddaughters. Had GPX groupset The only thing I did differently was to eliminate as much slack as possible from the bearing cones without any grinding sensation. The original BB felt like the cones were snugged up about half a turn tighter than necessary. But, heck, it had lasted almost 30 years without pitting the races or deforming the ball bearings. |
Originally Posted by canklecat
(Post 20727059)
Identical to my '89 Ironman's Suntour GPX group bottom bracket. I expected to see caged bearings like my Univega's BB and headset but found loose bearings. No problem. I replaced 'em last week just for giggles, along with using Phil's grease. The BB didn't even need any servicing, the original grease and everything was still good, no indications of infiltration from water or debris. The rubber seals were still good and doing their job.
The only thing I did differently was to eliminate as much slack as possible from the bearing cones without any grinding sensation. The original BB felt like the cones were snugged up about half a turn tighter than necessary. But, heck, it had lasted almost 30 years without pitting the races or deforming the ball bearings. |
Originally Posted by TXsailor
(Post 20727098)
The first time I rode my '89 the bottom bracket had a pretty loud clunk and I am hard of hearing. I figured the bearings were shot so I tore it down to see what I needed. The adjustable cup lock ring was good and tight but the fixed cup was loose. I repacked it & adjusted it right and it hasn't made a sound since. I'll bet it clunked since it was new 30 years ago.
It would also drop the chain every time I went to little ring if the rear was in any of the three lowest gears. I adjusted the limit screw and its never done it again. From the wear on the chain rings its a very low mileage bike. I wonder if it was poor dealer prep? When I got my Ironman the front derailleur shifted perfectly. No chain drops. Then I noticed the FD was slightly askew. I "fixed" it. Big mistake. For months afterward I had to shift very carefully or risk chain drops. Recently when I had most of the bike disassembled I studied that GPX front derailleur carefully, comparing it with the three Shimano FDs on my other bikes. I realized why Suntour designed the GPX FD that way. I nudged the front derailleur nose-inward slightly, counter-clockwise, so it was slightly but visibly askew if you eyeball the outer plate of the FD against the big chainring. After that I only needed to tweak the low limit screw slightly. Now it shifts perfectly. But it looks wonky. Just like when I first got the bike. Before I "fixed" it. BTW, another bit of the GPX system that seems to be picky -- that long horizontal adjustable dropout. On my bike it really affects not only rear shifting but drivetrain tension and whether I can use the two smallest cogs while in the small chainring. A couple of weeks ago I completely removed the adjustable set screws from the dropouts because one screw was bent. I probably did that clumsily moving the Ironman on and off the Cycleops trainer. While the set screws were off the bike I decided to try the bike without those screws for awhile. Without the screws the rear wheel can be set fully back into the dropout. This helps clear the chain from the jockey wheels so there's no clatter in the smaller cogs while in the smallest chainring. It also reduced the chain sag -- I had left the chain a couple of links longer than usual just as an experiment to see how it affected drivetrain tension. The B-screw adjustment alone wasn't doing the trick. I'll try the bike a few times this week, but I suspect the sweet spot will be slightly forward of fully back in the dropout -- this will still be farther back than I could set the wheel if the set screws were installed. So I may need to either modify the screws by filing down the heads, or just leave them out and align the rear wheel by eye. So far the wheel hasn't slipped while riding, even when I stand to stomp the pedals for sprints and climbs. So those set screws in the dropouts may not be absolutely necessary. |
Originally Posted by canklecat
(Post 20727116)
Yeah, I finally had to buy a Hozan forged lock ring wrench to properly secure that bugger. My cheap stamped wrench wouldn't grip tightly enough. The Hozan has sharp, squared edges to securely grip the lock ring to tighten it snugly. (Funny side note, it's marked "Rock Ring Wrench" due to a literal transliteration from a Japanese accented person speaking English. Later Hozan corrected it to "Lock Ring Wrench". I wish this were a joke but it's true.)
Check the front derailleur. Most tutorials for aligning the front derailleur recommend aligning the front plate of the FD cage with the big chainring where it's parallel. But this doesn't work with the GPX front derailleur. Suntour added a clever little bump, hump or knuckle to the inside of the inner plate on the FD. This helps nudge the chain onto the big ring without dropping, and helps keep the chain from dropping on downshifts to the little ring. Problem is, techs have to ignore the old advice for visually aligning the front derailleur. When I got my Ironman the front derailleur shifted perfectly. No chain drops. Then I noticed the FD was slightly askew. I "fixed" it. Big mistake. For months afterward I had to shift very carefully or risk chain drops. Recently when I had most of the bike disassembled I studied that GPX front derailleur carefully, comparing it with the three Shimano FDs on my other bikes. I realized why Suntour designed the GPX FD that way. I nudged the front derailleur nose-inward slightly, counter-clockwise, so it was slightly but visibly askew if you eyeball the outer plate of the FD against the big chainring. After that I only needed to tweak the low limit screw slightly. Now it shifts perfectly. But it looks wonky. Just like when I first got the bike. Before I "fixed" it. BTW, another bit of the GPX system that seems to be picky -- that long horizontal adjustable dropout. On my bike it really affects not only rear shifting but drivetrain tension and whether I can use the two smallest cogs while in the small chainring. A couple of weeks ago I completely removed the adjustable set screws from the dropouts because one screw was bent. I probably did that clumsily moving the Ironman on and off the Cycleops trainer. While the set screws were off the bike I decided to try the bike without those screws for awhile. Without the screws the rear wheel can be set fully back into the dropout. This helps clear the chain from the jockey wheels so there's no clatter in the smaller cogs while in the smallest chainring. It also reduced the chain sag -- I had left the chain a couple of links longer than usual just as an experiment to see how it affected drivetrain tension. The B-screw adjustment alone wasn't doing the trick. I'll try the bike a few times this week, but I suspect the sweet spot will be slightly forward of fully back in the dropout -- this will still be farther back than I could set the wheel if the set screws were installed. So I may need to either modify the screws by filing down the heads, or just leave them out and align the rear wheel by eye. So far the wheel hasn't slipped while riding, even when I stand to stomp the pedals for sprints and climbs. So those set screws in the dropouts may not be absolutely necessary. |
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 20727228)
My ARX fd has that bump, and sure enough it doesn't work well with the cage parralel to the chain.
|
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 20727228)
My ARX fd has that bump, and sure enough it doesn't work well with the cage parralel to the chain.
Trying to reproduce the problem, it appears my chain is just a little too long, maybe one link. So when the rear derailleur snaps back to take up the slack there's some bounce before it settles down. If it becomes a problem during actual road rides I'll remove a link.
Originally Posted by TXsailor
(Post 20727567)
My ARX and GPX are both shifting good now. Yes they are slightly askew but not enough to notice without really looking close. The lock ring wasn't the problem on my bottom bracket it was the drive side fixed cup. It wasn't even finger tight. My lock ring tool is a Park but its pretty new and still has sharp corners. If it gets so that it slips I'll get a Hozan.
|
Originally Posted by seypat
(Post 20726604)
The spindle length is 113mm. According to Sheldon's chart,(linked above by markwesti) the universal marking size is 3H. If you have a 3H in da casa, you are good to go.
|
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 20728353)
The three I have are in the 120+ range. Could you save that bb for me please? That was the one outstanding question from the very beginning.
|
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 20728354)
I know this seems extra long for bb spindles(to me anyway), but that's how they measure.
|
|
WoW! [MENTION=365143]fleslider[/MENTION]
|
Ohh nice score [MENTION=350383]crank_addict[/MENTION]. where did you find that?
|
Whoa! I need to go to yard sales in the Asian market!
Originally Posted by crank_addict
(Post 20742901)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.