Raleigh bottom bracket problem?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Raleigh bottom bracket problem?
Hi,
Pretty new to working on bikes altogether, but I recently picked up a Raleigh super course (anniversary badges so I believe. It's a '69). I took it down to the frame, and ordered news bearings for the bottom bracket. I put a fair amount of grease on them and reinstalled the spindle and bracket caps and when I turn the spindle it feels a little 'grabby'. The best way I could describe it would be as if the bearings had SLIGHTLY flattened sides. Not anything crazy, but it definitely doesn't spin silky smooth. When I put the cranks on and spin it from the pedals, it's much less noticeable. Being that I don't know what is normal, I'm trying to get an idea if this is right or not? Thanks a lot for any guidance here!
Pretty new to working on bikes altogether, but I recently picked up a Raleigh super course (anniversary badges so I believe. It's a '69). I took it down to the frame, and ordered news bearings for the bottom bracket. I put a fair amount of grease on them and reinstalled the spindle and bracket caps and when I turn the spindle it feels a little 'grabby'. The best way I could describe it would be as if the bearings had SLIGHTLY flattened sides. Not anything crazy, but it definitely doesn't spin silky smooth. When I put the cranks on and spin it from the pedals, it's much less noticeable. Being that I don't know what is normal, I'm trying to get an idea if this is right or not? Thanks a lot for any guidance here!
#2
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,347
Likes: 5,253
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
I assume you checked for damage on the spindle and cups before re-assembling?
If all the parts are in reasonable condition, it could be that the BB shell needs facing to ensure that the faces are parallel. If they're slightly off, a "tight spot" is created.
If all the parts are in reasonable condition, it could be that the BB shell needs facing to ensure that the faces are parallel. If they're slightly off, a "tight spot" is created.
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Thanks for the reply. I checked the races and they looked smooth to the touch. I'm wondering if I'm doing something stupid here, as the headset seems to be exhibiting the same type of issue when I move the fork left and right. These (bottom bracket caps and headset nuts) should be snugged down pretty tight, correct?
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,122
Setting a traditonal ball and cup bottom bracket is a matter of feel. Basically, you want just enough preload of the bearings so that there is no detectable play when you try to move the arms laterally. Most mechanics will adjust using 1/8 turn increments. If there's no play, back off progressively by 1/8 turn until there is play , then tighten 1/8 turn. If there is play, tighten in 1/8 turn increments, until there is no play. Once you get to this point, you may want to fine tune by doing smaller increments of turn. Make sure when you so this, that you tighten the locknut, as will reduce the preload.
One way to test whether the shell is properly faced, is to check the lateral play at different crank orientations. For instance, if the shell is not faced properly, you may get play with the crankarm at 3 o'clock but none at 6 o'clock.
One way to test whether the shell is properly faced, is to check the lateral play at different crank orientations. For instance, if the shell is not faced properly, you may get play with the crankarm at 3 o'clock but none at 6 o'clock.
#7
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Setting a traditonal ball and cup bottom bracket is a matter of feel. Basically, you want just enough preload of the bearings so that there is no detectable play when you try to move the arms laterally. Most mechanics will adjust using 1/8 turn increments. If there's no play, back off progressively by 1/8 turn until there is play , then tighten 1/8 turn. If there is play, tighten in 1/8 turn increments, until there is no play. Once you get to this point, you may want to fine tune by doing smaller increments of turn. Make sure when you so this, that you tighten the locknut, as will reduce the preload.
One way to test whether the shell is properly faced, is to check the lateral play at different crank orientations. For instance, if the shell is not faced properly, you may get play with the crankarm at 3 o'clock but none at 6 o'clock.
One way to test whether the shell is properly faced, is to check the lateral play at different crank orientations. For instance, if the shell is not faced properly, you may get play with the crankarm at 3 o'clock but none at 6 o'clock.
#8
Señor Member



Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 1,558
From: Hardy, VA
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Sounds like it. Back the adjustable cup off about 1/8 of a turn and see how it spins. Repeat this until it spins freely. If there's no play at that point, you're golden.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#9
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,347
Likes: 5,253
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
#10
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
#11
aka Tom Reingold




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,171
Likes: 6,390
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
You want the cups to be as loose as possible while still not allowing any side-to-side play. Tighten just enough to eliminate that play. Any tighter will give you rough movement, and you'll wear everything out prematurely. The fact that you don't notice the roughness at the pedals just means you have more leverage which merely shields you from the bad news.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#13
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Yeah, I believe I understand. Basically, I don't want the bearings to be pinched between the cups and the race on the shaft. In order to achieve the correct tension, I just back the cups in to the shaft right up to the point at which there's no lateral play. The outside notched ring nut keeps the cup from backing out. I do wonder why there's not a nut on both cups though?
#14
Yeah, I believe I understand. Basically, I don't want the bearings to be pinched between the cups and the race on the shaft. In order to achieve the correct tension, I just back the cups in to the shaft right up to the point at which there's no lateral play. The outside notched ring nut keeps the cup from backing out. I do wonder why there's not a nut on both cups though?
#15
Mr. Anachronism


Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 293
From: Somewhere west of Tobie's
Bikes: fillet-brazed Chicago Schwinns, and some other stuff
One side is the adjustable cup, and the other is designed to be non-adjustable. If they were both adjustable you could end up with the spindle center line off-center. That would throw off your chain line.
Edit: What he said.
Edit: What he said.
__________________
"My only true wisdom is in knowing I have none" -Socrates
"My only true wisdom is in knowing I have none" -Socrates





