Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Terrible shift pattern

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Terrible shift pattern

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-10 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Terrible shift pattern

I would appreciate it if the board could double-check my shift pattern for me. I am just now figuring out that not all chain ring/cluster combo's shift sequentially, so please bear with me.

My old Fuji "10 speed" has a 52-42 x 14-28 on it with 27" wheels, which would give the following in gear inches:


(14 16 19 24 28)
52: 100.6 88.01 74.12 58.68 50.29
42: 81.24 71.09 59.86 47.39 40.62

Which would give a shift pattern of : (L=52, S=42, etc.)

L14, L16, S14, L19, S16, S19, L24, L28, S24, S28

That seem impossibly complicated. I am missing something here or should I just memorize that pattern? Are any of those gear combinations that I should avoid? I haven't noticed any cross-chaining on this bike.

Thanks
ibarbuckle is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 06:14 PM
  #2  
illwafer's Avatar
)) <> ((
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
you're thinking about it way too much. imo, you should just try to minimize cross-chaining.
illwafer is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,397
Likes: 1,864
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Replace the 42 with a 40, for a perfect 1.5-step pattern: 52-40/14-17-20-24-28. I use a slightly tighter version of the same concept: 50-42 / 14-16-18-20-23-26. Normally, one shifts by one rear cog at a time, which skips over one ratio, e.g. 4th gear to 6th. (Pattern is 1,2,4,6,8,10; 3,5,7,9,11,12.) To fine-tune upward by one ratio, you have to remember that the front shift covers three ratios at a time, whereas each step in back covers two. To shift up one gear, you either have to add 4 and subtract 3 (if coming from the large chainring) or subtract 2 and add 3 (if coming from the small chainring). Trust me -- these shifts become second nature after awhile.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 07:27 PM
  #4  
jonwvara's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 923
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record

Right, don't overthink it. If a "ten speed" gives you six or seven usable speeds, you're doing okay. When you're on the big ring, use the three smallest cogs in back to get 100.6, 88.1, and 74.1. Then drop to the small chainring and stay on the middle cog in back. Now you've got 59.9 (I'm rounding off), 47.4, and 40.6. That's six evenly spaced and easy-to-find speeds. That's all you need. Don't obsess about it.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 07:29 PM
  #5  
mickey85's Avatar
perpetually frazzled
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 9
From: Linton, IN

Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer

For me on a double, the big ring is for cruising and light hills. I feel no compunction about cross chaining it up to 2nd gear (or down to 5th on a 6 gear cluster while in the little) when in the big ring. When I hit a hill (or am going slow enough), I'll put it in the little ring, go through all but the last gear, then upshift to the big one again once I get underway on the other side.

It's not like a car, and doesn't have to be all that linear - remember, the chainrings are the main changes - the freewheel/cassette is for tailoring it exactly.

In fact, on one of my bikes, I can't remember the last time I used anything BUT the big ring...but that one is a 48X38X26 triple. with 175mm cranks...and I'm a masher.
mickey85 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
iab's Avatar
iab
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,854
Likes: 5,376
From: NW Burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by jonwvara
Right, don't overthink it. If a "ten speed" gives you six or seven usable speeds, you're doing okay. When you're on the big ring, use the three smallest cogs in back to get 100.6, 88.1, and 74.1. Then drop to the small chainring and stay on the middle cog in back. Now you've got 59.9 (I'm rounding off), 47.4, and 40.6. That's six evenly spaced and easy-to-find speeds. That's all you need. Don't obsess about it.
+1

Exactly correct.
iab is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 08:00 PM
  #7  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,397
Likes: 1,864
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

When I am accelerating through the gears, I default to simple "crossover" shifting, e.g.:
42/20 to 42/18 to 50/18 to 50/16
The double-shift fine-tuning comes in at cruising speed, when I want something between, say, 42/18 and 50/18, where I have the choice of 50/20 or 42/16.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
sykerocker's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 257
From: Ashland, VA

Bikes: The keepers: 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Twenty, 3 - 1986 Rossins.

Don't even worry about all those numeric figures, just ride the bike. You'll find, after a few weeks, that certain gear combinations work best in certain situations, so you end up using them. Other combinations provide no advantage, so you ignore them. Period.

The closest I've ever bothered to worry about gear combinations and ratios is finding a comfortable combination for large chainring/middle freewheel cog while keeping my normal cadence on a flat road (leaving me a couple of cogs for fast downhill pedaling). Which gives me a speed of about 16mph in a normal, relaxed riding mode. Which keeps me happy. This got me to change all my large chainrings to 48t or 49t (depending on availability) from the original 52t. Other than that, I could care less. I'm too busy riding.
__________________
Syke

“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

H.L. Mencken, (1926)

sykerocker is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 08:04 AM
  #9  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Yeah, don't look down, and don't think about it too much. If your feet are going around too fast, try a higher gear. Otherwise, try a lower gear. When in doubt, try a lower gear.
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 11:33 AM
  #10  
liquefied's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco

Bikes: 1989 Team Miyata, 1989 Miyata 1400, 1989 Miyata 1400, 1986 Miyata 610, 2007 Specialized Stumpjumper Hardtail

I didn't know people obsessed over gear ratios like this. I just pick the gear that gives me proper RPMs. It's not difficult.
liquefied is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 11:41 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
That was super informative. So my best bet without changing my hardware will be to cross-shift on the middle cog, and occasionally use the two other ratios if I can't double-shift right away?


And John E., I would like to switch to half-step eventually, I'm just not sure that my shifting is up to it yet. Seems like a waste to use only 60% of my available ratios...

Thanks.
ibarbuckle is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
Homebrew01's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,979
Likes: 1,154
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Think of the big chainring as a "high range" for tailwinds and downhill, and the small ring for climbing and normal cruising, with a bit of overlap.
Exceptions: I stay in the small ring if it looks like I won't be going fast for long, and stay in the big ring if it look like the upcoming hil is short & shallow.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 12:13 PM
  #13  
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,531
Likes: 9
From: Smugglers Notch, Vermont

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Originally Posted by ibarbuckle
I haven't noticed any cross-chaining on this bike.
Just as a point of clarification there are always at least 2 cross chained combos when you've got more than 1 chainring and a rear cassette.

Big Chainring/Big Rear Cog & Small Chainring/Small Rear Cog are crosschained combinations. Although depending on the chainline of your cranks (&derailleur capacity&chain length&other stuff) those combos can be used with varying levels of success.

Case in point I've got a TA crankset set up as a wide double 50/28. On the big ring there is enough chain and the chainline is close in enough to allow me to use all 5 cogs effectively. The Big/Big combo is still technically cross-chained but its useable.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 12:23 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,944
Likes: 853
From: Wilmette, IL
Do you need the low gears for where you ride? In the flatlands where I ride I have a 42-52 and a 14-21 ultra six speed freewheel. Makes for closer stepped gearing.
big chainring is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hatsuwr
Bicycle Mechanics
22
12-30-18 03:27 PM
rsterman
Classic & Vintage
20
02-28-16 05:23 PM
jyl
Classic & Vintage
81
11-19-15 09:42 PM
Boppsie
General Cycling Discussion
15
06-13-14 07:10 PM
snarkypup
Classic & Vintage
38
10-28-10 10:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.