need help
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
need help
I am 66" tall... What is that in feet? i thought i was 5 foot 7 or 8.. I have a 31" inseam
so what size road bike would i ride then? I have been going by the 5 foot 7 height? would a 54CM frame be too big for me then
or 65"
I was going to spend a bit money on a bike today... just double checking.... this chart says 54cm. https://bicycling.about.com/od/howtor...ike_sizing.htm
so what size road bike would i ride then? I have been going by the 5 foot 7 height? would a 54CM frame be too big for me then
or 65"
I was going to spend a bit money on a bike today... just double checking.... this chart says 54cm. https://bicycling.about.com/od/howtor...ike_sizing.htm
Last edited by lowlux; 10-23-10 at 09:34 PM.
#2
Thrifty Bill

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,639
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
66 = 5-6. 54 might work. You need to test ride it some.
This is the chart I usually use, AS A STARTING point.
This is the chart I usually use, AS A STARTING point.
#5
My inseam is 30" and my bikes range from 53 cm to 56 cm. The 54 cm seem like the best fit. But, as others have said, ride it first and see how it feels.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1991 GT Karakoram, 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, 1989 Spectrum Titanium,
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1991 GT Karakoram, 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, 1989 Spectrum Titanium,
#6
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,397
Likes: 1,864
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
I stand 68" = 5'8", with a 30" inseam, and the chart says 54-56cm. My Bianchi and both Capos are 55cm C-T, which I consider my ideal size. Having said that, I also note that top tube length and BB height are major factors, as well.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#7
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,804
Likes: 3,705
I think top tube length can make the real difference. The original poster did not indicate what kkind of riding and what he feels comfortable on now. If he wants the Rivendell bars at the seat height fit, then that will lead to a larger bike than a classic CONI book racing position. While this is posted in the C&V forum, I just have this feeling it in regard to a modern bike, which can make it more challenging as there are fewer sizes now often.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lemonlime
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
5
05-28-16 10:05 PM







