Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Brooks flyer not so springy?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Brooks flyer not so springy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-11 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 111
Brooks flyer not so springy?

Just finished building a lugged Trek 930 as a townie/wet weather bike and bought a brand new Brooks flyer saddle.

I have no experience with Brooks or other leather saddles. I was under the impression this thing was going to be nice and springy. It's just horrendously uncomfortable though, and not springy at all.

I understand these things need to break in but it's so horrible that it's pretty unlikely I'm going to sit on it long enough to do so.

So...if there is a question in here somehwere...What saddle am I looking for?

I want something wide-ish and springy. Do I need to go full silly wide like a Brooks B67 or whatever the big one is? Do I need the new un dyed comes out of the box soft one?

It also occurs to me that putting a leather saddle on a wet weather bike is stupid, but I can't seem to find a wide saddle that isn't a huge gel thing.

Any help much appreciated.
wesmamyke is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins CO

Bikes: Too many to count alway changing

I'm an authorize brooks dealer... in my opinion the spring do not add comfort to the saddle but comfort to the ride... absorbing the bumps in the road as you ride.

Brooks saddle take time and effort to break in... get some proof hide and work it into the saddle ever day for a month or so and ride as much as possible.

The saddle needs to be broken in... also make sure you have the saddle adjusted correctly... try different angles and rail positions till you find one that is tolerable enough to ride. Give the brooks saddle a chance...

If you want to stick with brooks you could try the aged flyer or aged b67... the aged saddle break in little quicker. You may also want to look at the b17 imperial which has a cutout to relieve renal pressure... also breaks in a bit quicker.

Other wise... just get a cheap mountain bike saddle
septacycles is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
canopus's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 174
From: Kingwood, TX

Bikes: Road, Touring, BMX, Cruisers...

The Brooks flyers are not springy but they do take the harsh jolts out of sudden impacts as they were designed. What is uncomfortable about it though? What is your position on the bike? Back straight up (wider, b67ish saddle), bent over at a 45 deg angle or so (flyer is good) or bent further over (racer saddle)? Depending on your position you might need a wider saddle or you might try to change the angle of the flyer. They work fine in wet weather but do need to be protected from the wet with a cover. Don't ride them wet. If you can't or don't want to watch your saddle that much then you should get a different one.

Wide and springy isn't all that comfortable either. They important thing with any saddle is that you are riding on your sit bones and not on your soft tissue.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:14 PM
  #4  
Road-Geek
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Bangor, ME
Give your Brooks time. There is nothing like the comfort of the Brooks B 17 I have on my commuter bike. Make sure that you keep the leather happy with Proofide, especially the underside which takes the brunt of sloppy weather riding.
tenzing211 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:30 PM
  #5  
Velognome's Avatar
Get off my lawn!
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,035
Likes: 119
From: The Garden State

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Post a photo of your build. If your sitting bolt upright a Flyer might not be the best choice, something wider might be more in order.
Velognome is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:36 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 111
As far as position on the bike it's pretty upright but not straight backed. Bars pretty much exactly level with the saddle.

Right now it feels like if I actually slide back on it so it supports my sit bones they rest right on the metal frame. That's what it feels like anyway, could the unbroken in leather really feel that harsh if I'm not putting my weight on the frame?

I'm starting to think I have really wide sit bones...

As far as the springs go they don't seem to be worth the weight penalty. I can see them helping if you totally clip a huge pothole or something. Normal riding around they don't seem to move at all.

Thanks for the help so far. Just bummed at the moment because I pretty much have to sell this saddle to afford another one if it doesn't work out.
wesmamyke is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

It is true that leather saddles start out really hard and soften up with use and the application of moisture (i.e. Proofide). People often say this makes them more comfortable, but not everyone shares that opinion. I don't. I prefer them before they soften up.

Whether you will like a Flyer, or any leather saddle, will depend on a lot of factors specific to the rider, mainly how you ride. What I like about a leather saddle is that it breathes; it wicks moisture away, so you don't get all sweaty. Also, the lack of padding is much better for circulation. Padding cuts off circulation, and on long rides this gets to be a real pain in the saddle.

I had a Flyer for a while; didn't like it, traded it to another forum member, and he didn't like it either. I usually see bumps coming, and lift myself off the saddle as necessary. That's what knees are for.
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
mkeller234's Avatar
Rustbelt Rider
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 390
From: Canton, OH

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Originally Posted by rhm
That's what knees are for.
That..... and I suppose to bend your leg. I do agree with you though, I stand up a little bit if I see some nasty pavement ahead.

OP, if you decide that saddle is not what you want you should attempt a trade in the trade thread. I've seen people swap Brooks saddles before, even just for a different color.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 05:05 PM
  #9  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Originally Posted by mkeller234
That..... and I suppose to bend your leg.
Really???

Woah, check that out! I can't believe I never tried that before! Thanks, man!
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 05:41 PM
  #10  
Velognome's Avatar
Get off my lawn!
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,035
Likes: 119
From: The Garden State

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Originally Posted by mkeller234
That..... and I suppose to bend your leg.
Really???

Woah, check that out! I can't believe I never tried that before! Thanks, man!
Which way should I bend it or bend them? Got any photo's of this technique?
Velognome is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 05:48 PM
  #11  
canopus's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 174
From: Kingwood, TX

Bikes: Road, Touring, BMX, Cruisers...

Originally Posted by wesmamyke
As far as position on the bike it's pretty upright but not straight backed. Bars pretty much exactly level with the saddle.

Right now it feels like if I actually slide back on it so it supports my sit bones they rest right on the metal frame. That's what it feels like anyway, could the unbroken in leather really feel that harsh if I'm not putting my weight on the frame?

I'm starting to think I have really wide sit bones...

As far as the springs go they don't seem to be worth the weight penalty. I can see them helping if you totally clip a huge pothole or something. Normal riding around they don't seem to move at all.

Thanks for the help so far. Just bummed at the moment because I pretty much have to sell this saddle to afford another one if it doesn't work out.
I don't find sit bone width all that important. How much do you weigh? If you think your riding on the metal frame then chances are good your sit bones are fairly normal and not all that wide.

My bars are level with the saddle and I usually ride on the hoods so... If your even a little bent over a B67 probably won't be that comfortable for you. Think English three speed or Schwinn cruiser and they are heaven, otherwise not so much in my opinion. I wouldn't worry about the weight of the flyer or any saddle for that matter, especially on a Trek 930, that's a non-starter IMO.

New leather is nice, firm and slick, i personally like that in a saddle but the slickness wears off after a coupe of hundred miles and the leather will eventually form to your bones. Are you riding with cycling shorts or are you just using regular walking shorts? Breaking in a brooks sans cycling shorts should only be left to those that are young and crazy.

What position is your saddle in? Level? nose up? nose down? I find I need most all of my saddles to be nose up, with the sit bones usually riding about 1/4 to 1/2 inch ahead of the rear frame. If your nose down your probably constantly pushing back (because your sliding forward) with your arms causing you to go further back in the saddle than you normally would. Or maybe your tilted to far back and you are like you say, sliding back. Hard to tell without more input from you. Have you tried positioning the saddle any?
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 06:32 PM
  #12  
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,531
Likes: 9
From: Smugglers Notch, Vermont

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Originally Posted by rhm
Really???

Woah, check that out! I can't believe I never tried that before! Thanks, man!
I think you broke my sarcasm meter.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 06:39 PM
  #13  
illwafer's Avatar
)) <> ((
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by canopus
I don't find sit bone width all that important.
worst advice ever.

if you are sitting on the frame, your sitbones are too wide for the saddle. flyer is not very wide. a b67 or a VO model 8 is what you want.

i tried my share of saddles before finally coming to the conclusion i have really wide sitbones. im 6'4" and 175lbs.

edit: or a b68 which is a springless b67.
illwafer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-11 | 10:31 PM
  #14  
mkeller234's Avatar
Rustbelt Rider
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 390
From: Canton, OH

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
I think you broke my sarcasm meter.
Haha! I noticed the needle was stuck in mine too, that had a large blast radius.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-11 | 12:49 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by wesmamyke
As far as position on the bike it's pretty upright but not straight backed. Bars pretty much exactly level with the saddle.

Right now it feels like if I actually slide back on it so it supports my sit bones they rest right on the metal frame. That's what it feels like anyway, could the unbroken in leather really feel that harsh if I'm not putting my weight on the frame?

I'm starting to think I have really wide sit bones...
As far as the springs go they don't seem to be worth the weight penalty. I can see them helping if you totally clip a huge pothole or something. Normal riding around they don't seem to move at all.

Thanks for the help so far. Just bummed at the moment because I pretty much have to sell this saddle to afford another one if it doesn't work out.
The bike shop near me has this really simple, clever in-store gadget used to essentially make an imprint of your sit bones, which you can then measure to match to a saddle with the same dimensions. Maybe you already know this. The gadget is just a plastic envelope that looks to be filled with something kind of like the stuff in a lava lamp. Seems to be accurate and works well.
wsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-11 | 12:58 AM
  #16  
mkeller234's Avatar
Rustbelt Rider
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 390
From: Canton, OH

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Originally Posted by wsbob
The bike shop near me has this really simple, clever in-store gadget used to essentially make an imprint of your sit bones, which you can then measure to match to a saddle with the same dimensions. Maybe you already know this. The gadget is just a plastic envelope that looks to be filled with something kind of like the stuff in a lava lamp. Seems to be accurate and works well.
Something about that seems a little embarrassing. I can see it now... "Hey guys.... do you have that tool that accurately measures my butt?"

illwafer: The good news is that if anyone ever calls you a fat a** you can claim that you are in fact just big boned. Although I doubt anyone is saying that at 6'4 and 175 lbs.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-11 | 07:34 AM
  #17  
BigPolishJimmy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 2
From: Southwest Michigan

Bikes: Fuji Monterey, Schwinn Traveler, Fuji Special Road Racer, Gitane Interclub, Sun EZ-1, Schwinn Frontier, Puch Cavalier, Vista Cavalier, Armstrong, Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Stingray

Originally Posted by mkeller234
Something about that seems a little embarrassing. I can see it now... "Hey guys.... do you have that tool that accurately measures my butt?"

illwafer: The good news is that if anyone ever calls you a fat a** you can claim that you are in fact just big boned. Although I doubt anyone is saying that at 6'4 and 175 lbs.
You have to ask for the "A$$-o-meter" ...almost rhymes with thermometer.

I'm 6'4" and 275 and I wasn't sure about that brooks when I first got it. With the new bars I installed on my bike, it is in a very upright position and the brooks flyer is awesome. It took some work to get it dialed in, just tilted a little nose up, and had to raise the saddle height so I was sitting in the right spot and not back on the saddle frame. It now feels like riding in a hammock.
BigPolishJimmy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-11 | 09:50 AM
  #18  
formicaman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Brooks saddles are hard as a rock until you break them in, then there is nothing better. As far as the springs go, I was surprised myself when I got my B67 yesterday that the springs were very stiff. I had been riding a mattress saddle that bounced around and bottomed out on big bumps (of course I'm 6'1" 230 lbs on a 40 lbs bike) and the Brooks springs, at least new, barely bounce at all. However, yesterday I rode on cobblestones with my unsprung B17 and there was some pain involved. Today I rode the same stretch on the same bike with my B66 and it was a lot better.
formicaman is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spectastic
Touring
27
10-02-16 01:20 PM
Amazonia
General Cycling Discussion
0
06-24-16 04:06 PM
LDB
Classic & Vintage
82
03-29-13 01:05 PM
CBuff
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
26
01-30-12 04:09 AM
FrenchFit
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
7
05-25-10 10:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.