Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Tommaso time trial. Columbus CROMOR.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Tommaso time trial. Columbus CROMOR.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-11 | 08:34 AM
  #1  
4funbikes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 309
Likes: 39
From: Southeastern,VA
Tommaso time trial. Columbus CROMOR.

This falls enough into C&V right?

Ok, as stated in the COD section, I've had a lead on this bike for some time now, and finally the fellow decided to sell it.
These will be the ''before'' pictures. Hopefully have some other projects out of the way soon so I can focus on this one.
Just a little dirty now, and could use new cables. Other than that it is a great piece.





Any ideas on the front hub? Phil possibly?
4funbikes is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 09:42 AM
  #2  
Alan Edwards's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster,CA the desert north of Los Angeles

Bikes: 84' Ciocc, 79' Shogun 1000, 76' KHS Gran Sport, 96' Schwinn Super Sport,

That is so coool, I love Funny bikes. Total speed machine. 700 and 650 wheels ??
Alan Edwards is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 10:42 AM
  #3  
thook's Avatar
(rhymes with spook)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 749
From: Winslow, AR

Bikes: '83 univega gran turismo x2, '85 schwinn super le tour,'89 miyata triple cross, '91 GT tequesta, '90 yokota grizzly peak, '94 GT backwoods, '95'ish scott tampico, '98 bonty privateer, '93 mongoose crossway 625, '98 parkpre ariel, 2k'ish giant fcr3

Mmmmmm.........pretty, pretty, pretty! Nice acquisition!!
thook is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
Gary Fountain's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 305
From: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

Great buy. A real time machine.
Gary Fountain is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
Chombi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 39

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

I'm surprised again to see yet another TT frame built with heavier tubing (Cromor). You would think that they would use at least Colombus SL for these bikes, but there must be a concious design decision to use the heavier tubing to meet the particular needs in time trials?? Are they looking at these bikes more like track bikes where frame stiffness is a big goal?

Chombi
Chombi is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
kpug505's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Puyallup Washington

Bikes: Motobecane Mirage fixed gear, Nashbar Alpha Road 5000, Bianchi Grizzly, Coppi Fiorelli, , Schwinn Trike, , GT All Terra, Old Peugeot, Nishiki 3 speed, Bugatti, Cannondale Black Lightning, Dura All, Bianchi Touring, Bridgestone T700 & more

Front hub is an American Classic. Cool bike!
__________________
Originally Posted by CardiacKid
We don't cotton to people who cut things off their bikes in these here parts.

Check out my bike blog!
kpug505 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 01:27 PM
  #7  
wallymann's Avatar
Junior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Chombi
I'm surprised again to see yet another TT frame built with heavier tubing (Cromor). You would think that they would use at least Colombus SL for these bikes, but there must be a concious design decision to use the heavier tubing to meet the particular needs in time trials?? Are they looking at these bikes more like track bikes where frame stiffness is a big goal?

Chombi
CROMOR and SL use the same cyclex steel alloy, i.e., the tubesets weigh the same for the same physical spec. if you find a CROMOR tubeset to be heavier, then the tubeset is thicker gauge and/or larger diameter. in general, CROMOR had a heavier down-tube than SL tubesets, otherwise the tubeset specs were identical.

the difference is in production: SL is drawn over a mandel to create a seamless tubing, whereas CROMOR is rolled into tubes from sheet and then seam-welded into tubes. iirc...back in the day True Temper made *all* of their tubesets, even their best, via the latter seam-welding process.
wallymann is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 01:55 PM
  #8  
scozim's Avatar
Ellensburg, WA
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 706
From: Lewiston, ID

Bikes: See my signature

Great looking bike - I also love the funny bikes for some weird reason.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1991 GT Karakoram, 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, 1989 Spectrum Titanium,






scozim is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-11 | 02:34 PM
  #9  
GrayJay's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 119
From: EagleRiver AK
Originally Posted by Chombi
I'm surprised again to see yet another TT frame built with heavier tubing (Cromor). You would think that they would use at least Colombus SL for these bikes, but there must be a concious design decision to use the heavier tubing to meet the particular needs in time trials?? Are they looking at these bikes more like track bikes where frame stiffness is a big goal?

Chombi
Cromor tubeset is approx 1/2 lbd heavier than SL. The frame stiffness requirements for a largely constant and relativley low torque effort of time trial are less than for a typical road bike. Note that in the old Columbus catalog, they list that thier lightest KL road tubing (.7/.5mm) as suitable for time trials. https://os2.dhs.org/~john/catalogs/Columbus-tubes.pdf
The road bike needs to be able to sprint and climb well, so needs to be stiffer to withstand the higher peak torque. About the only time a TT bike sees much torque is at the start and turnout, and even those are gradual accelerations in comparison to a finishing sprint. A lighter (limper) frame on a TT bike wouldnt be much of a problem in terms of stiffness but the lighter weight also wouldnt really be any faster on a flat course. If there are uphills involved, a TT position bike is the wrong bike for the job anyway!
I would think that the selection of cromor was probably largely just an economic pricepoint decision, particularly since the performance of a TT bike would not be effected much by either a lighter frame or a stiffer frame. Spend the $$ on some aero wheels if you want to go fast.

+1 for American Classic hub ID.
GrayJay is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maki.dm
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
1
02-05-15 02:19 AM
gregaz
Classic & Vintage
6
01-25-14 06:06 PM
that_guy_zach
Classic & Vintage
6
02-20-12 09:48 PM
Gotti
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
16
07-13-11 12:39 AM
sjpitts
Classic & Vintage
81
11-10-10 05:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.