Gear Ratio Question
#2
Just do the math - 46/18 = 2.55, 44/16 = 2.75. For gear inches multiply by ~27" 1st = ~69", 2nd = ~74".
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
I didnt know how to compute the figures. So the 44/16 is the higher ratio correct??
What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed
Is it worth the trouble to change sprockets seeing as how the figures are quite close?
What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed
Is it worth the trouble to change sprockets seeing as how the figures are quite close?
#5
no I think he wants a smaller cog.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#6
Banned
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 6
#9
20" wheels?
or frame size?
or frame size?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#10
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed
bigger chain ring turning your [probably a Fixie] smaller cog more often ..
people who race on a velodrome, bring a box full of chainrings and cogs
to the track, because, to them, it does matter ..
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-14-12 at 11:39 AM.
#12
Super Moderator

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,985
Likes: 1,159
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Divide the front chainring by the rear cog. Bigger result = bigger gear.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#13
What??? Only 2 wheels?


Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,501
Likes: 995
From: Boston-ish, MA
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Bigger charinring = smaller cog (rear) = go more distance per pedal revolution = go faster = more force on the pedals.
Smaller chainring = bigger cog (rear) = go less distance per pedal revolution = go slower = less force on the pedals.
But that's not all you asked. Is that difference significant? Not really. Those ratios are comparable to about 51 and 55 gear-inches on a bike with the more common 700c wheels. That difference is about "one click's worth" on a modern zillion-speed indexed system. You can feel the difference if you are trying to maintain an optimum cadence riding for speed, but otherwise it won't matter one bit. If you are changing your gearing because you are changing your riding style, then you need to reconsider.
Smaller chainring = bigger cog (rear) = go less distance per pedal revolution = go slower = less force on the pedals.
But that's not all you asked. Is that difference significant? Not really. Those ratios are comparable to about 51 and 55 gear-inches on a bike with the more common 700c wheels. That difference is about "one click's worth" on a modern zillion-speed indexed system. You can feel the difference if you are trying to maintain an optimum cadence riding for speed, but otherwise it won't matter one bit. If you are changing your gearing because you are changing your riding style, then you need to reconsider.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller







