Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Unknown frame identification

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Unknown frame identification

Old 10-16-12 | 10:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Unknown frame identification

So about a year back I bought a frame off of craigslist. I didn’t realize what I had because the frame has been completely stripped and repainted. There is not even a head badge. I went home for the weekend and was inspecting the bike and realized there are campagnolo rear dropouts. So I decided to bring the frame up to college with me to build it up, but I would like to identify the frame. A guy at the bike shop said the frame may be a late 70’s, early 80’s touring frame. I was unable to find much online regarding the serial number. Any help identifying the year, and/or make of the frame would be much appreciated! Things to note: the rear dropout spacing is 126mm (I don’t have a ruler around but I put my 130mm wheel in and I had to span the dropouts for it to fit which led me to believe 126), there are also cable stops where the shifters braze on’s would normally be mounted, there is only one bottle rack mount which is located on the down tube, and the cable guides run above the bottom bracket instead of underneath the bottom bracket.
The serial number is 0949
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0018.jpg (45.9 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_2019.jpg (60.1 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_3760.jpg (68.5 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_7842.jpg (68.9 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_8780.jpg (55.2 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_1752.jpg (61.3 KB, 71 views)
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-12 | 10:29 PM
  #2  
Gary Fountain's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 302
From: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

I don't know much about touring frames but I can see where the bikeshop owner would think it's a touring frame. I think it may be an early to mid 70's frame and I think it may have been set up for bar-end shifters. I wonder what the centre to centre distance is for the dropouts/axles if the rear wheel was in the centre of the rear dropout? What i'm getting at is, does the frame have a long, touring wheelbase? It looks a little short to me - I think it may be around 1020mm. I am thinking that it might have been a racing cyclocross frame.
Gary Fountain is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-12 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
unworthy1's Avatar
Stop reading my posts!
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,992
Likes: 2,184
at a glance I agree that it doesn't strike me as particularly "tourist" but more like a vintage "sport" frame that kept the eyelets in place so it could easily take fenders.
How about a shot of the rear seat cluster? And a better view of the headlugs?
What size seatpost?
My quick guess is that it's British, and that the barrel cable guides on the DT may have been added later.
unworthy1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-12 | 03:14 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

the seatpost is 26.8mm. I don't know very much about road frames but there is a shimano BB if that tells you anything also. so I believe that would mean it's english threaded?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_2223.jpg (60.2 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_5376.jpg (51.8 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_7962.jpg (62.1 KB, 22 views)
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-12 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
lostarchitect's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,970
Likes: 59
From: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: See sig

I'm thinking early 70's or maybe even late 60's based on the long drops and over the BB cable braze ons. Then again the fork crown looks later. Are the fork ends also Campagnolo? Those look like Prugnat lugs to me.
lostarchitect is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-12 | 09:31 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by lostarchitect
I'm thinking early 70's or maybe even late 60's based on the long drops and over the BB cable braze ons. Then again the fork crown looks later. Are the fork ends also Campagnolo? Those look like Prugnat lugs to me.
I don't know what the fork ends are, they don't say anything.
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-12 | 10:32 PM
  #7  
unworthy1's Avatar
Stop reading my posts!
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,992
Likes: 2,184
Originally Posted by ldorchester12
the seatpost is 26.8mm. I don't know very much about road frames but there is a shimano BB if that tells you anything also. so I believe that would mean it's english threaded?
Not necessarily since Shimano made sealed BBs in both BSC and Ital, but you could probably both measure the width of the shell (68mm or 70mm?) and/or find the notation on the BB unit that tells you (may require removal for that).
I can't tell what brand those lugs are, but the seat stays are single-taper and a 26.8 could be a plain-gauge 531 seat tube,OR Aelle tubing, OR a Japanese tube like Tange or Ishiwata. I still think the other details (tho there aren't many) point to a Brit frame so if that seat post is correct size, I'd lean toward the plain-gauge 531.
Still just guessing.
unworthy1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-12 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
lostarchitect's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,970
Likes: 59
From: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: See sig

Originally Posted by ldorchester12
I don't know what the fork ends are, they don't say anything.

So the fork might not be original if the drops don't match. My vote is for late 60's English. Hard to say any more than that.
lostarchitect is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-12 | 02:32 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by lostarchitect
So the fork might not be original if the drops don't match. My vote is for late 60's English. Hard to say any more than that.
Yeah I've been looking around and can't really find anything with a similar fork. I doubt it is original. thanks for you input
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-12 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
unworthy1's Avatar
Stop reading my posts!
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,992
Likes: 2,184
full-sloping crown is not that unusual, can't tell if that one is a Haden (I think so) or a Cinelli, but since I'm still in the "Brit" camp on this I'd say Haden. Found on lots of Holdsworths and a few Raleighs among many brands. Yours looks like it is drilled for nutted brakes...if you measure the outer dimensions of the forkblades where they meet the crown (long and short axis) we can probably determine if the blades are Reynolds Imperial (my vote) style or Columbus (Continental) dimensions.
unworthy1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-12 | 04:11 PM
  #11  
realestvin7's Avatar
Large Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Did you figure out the bottom bracket shell width or threading?
realestvin7 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 03:57 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by Gary Fountain
I don't know much about touring frames but I can see where the bikeshop owner would think it's a touring frame. I think it may be an early to mid 70's frame and I think it may have been set up for bar-end shifters. I wonder what the centre to centre distance is for the dropouts/axles if the rear wheel was in the centre of the rear dropout? What i'm getting at is, does the frame have a long, touring wheelbase? It looks a little short to me - I think it may be around 1020mm. I am thinking that it might have been a racing cyclocross frame.
Hey sorry it took so long to respond. I had to get my hands on a tape measure. but the wheelbase looks to be about 1047mm.
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 04:06 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by realestvin7
Did you figure out the bottom bracket shell width or threading?
So the shell width looks to be 70mm and english threading
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 04:17 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by unworthy1
if you measure the outer dimensions of the forkblades where they meet the crown (long and short axis)
sorry but how would I measure for the short and long axis?
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 05:42 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 10

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

The braze on cable guides say mid 70s to me. Could be English, but so far photos not good enough to tell much.
dbakl is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 05:57 PM
  #16  
ftwelder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 10
From: vermont

Bikes: Many

It is slack with not much drop, I am thinking c 1970 audax or cross bike also. It's interesting the only one side of the BB lug was cut but it has a really low serial number. Odd mix of stuff.
ftwelder is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 07:39 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Is it possible that the serial number is actually O949 and not 0949? the "clubrider" owned by Roy Clark towards the end of the page uses one letter and 3 numbers for a serial number https://www.classicrendezvous.com/Bri...n_registry.htm
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 07:47 PM
  #18  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,318
Likes: 5,231
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by lostarchitect
I'm thinking early 70's or maybe even late 60's based on the long drops and over the BB cable braze ons. Then again the fork crown looks later. Are the fork ends also Campagnolo? Those look like Prugnat lugs to me.
Those BB cable guide braze-ons were common up until the early 1980s at least. Fork crown looks like the Davis crown used on the Raleigh "Professional" model. Are there eyelets on the fork ends as well? If not, it's possible the fork might not be original to the frame.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 10-22-12 | 07:54 PM
  #19  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,318
Likes: 5,231
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by unworthy1
if you measure the outer dimensions of the forkblades where they meet the crown (long and short axis) we can probably determine if the blades are Reynolds Imperial (my vote) style or Columbus (Continental) dimensions.
Originally Posted by ldorchester12
sorry but how would I measure for the short and long axis?
Calipers work well for this. "Imperial" oval blades measure 29mm x 16mm at the crown, while "Continental" oval blades measure 28mm x 20mm at the crown.



Imperial oval blades were most often found on British bikes and may help narrow down the origin of your frame. N.B. Reynolds supplied blades in either profile, but most other tubing manufacturers only supplied "Continental" profile.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 10:09 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Calipers work well for this. "Imperial" oval blades measure 29mm x 16mm at the crown, while "Continental" oval blades measure 28mm x 20mm at the crown.



Imperial oval blades were most often found on British bikes and may help narrow down the origin of your frame. N.B. Reynolds supplied blades in either profile, but most other tubing manufacturers only supplied "Continental" profile.
so I dont have a caliper but using a vice grip i'm measuring the long axis at about 28.575mm and the short axis at 9.525mm
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 10:37 AM
  #21  
Gary Fountain's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 302
From: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

Originally Posted by ftwelder
It is slack with not much drop, I am thinking c 1970 audax or cross bike also. It's interesting the only one side of the BB lug was cut but it has a really low serial number. Odd mix of stuff.
I think "Audax" is a big possibility. I'm going off the idea that it was a cyclocross bike mainly due to the brake mountings. The wheelbase is quite long - longer than it appears to be.
Gary Fountain is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 11:25 AM
  #22  
Andycapp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 443
Likes: 3
From: Puyallup, WA

Bikes: Tommasini Super Prestige, Kamra Triathlee, Nishiki Tri-A equipe', Sakai 2000

Originally Posted by ldorchester12
so I dont have a caliper but using a vice grip i'm measuring the long axis at about 28.575mm and the short axis at 9.525mm
I got to get me of some these vice-grips!
Andycapp is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 03:25 PM
  #23  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,318
Likes: 5,231
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by ldorchester12
so I dont have a caliper but using a vice grip i'm measuring the long axis at about 28.575mm and the short axis at 9.525mm
Wow! Vise-grips with accuracy to four significant figures! Short axis of ~10mm is very narrow.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 02:02 AM
  #24  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA

Bikes: 2005 kona stinky garbanzo, rocky mountain element, surly steamroller, unidentified vintage steel frame

haha I guess they might be called c-clamps also... not sure. but I just used a tape measure after I found the axis distances then converted it.. definitely not the exact numbers I posted.
ldorchester12 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
primitiverancid
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
13
08-13-19 08:30 AM
rch427
Classic & Vintage
14
11-03-15 05:03 PM
HenryT
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
1
09-12-14 09:19 AM
Rossco76
Classic & Vintage
6
08-20-12 08:45 PM
polobreaka
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
8
10-08-10 09:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.