View Poll Results: Columbus KL?
Yes



5
71.43%
No



2
28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll
Columbus KL yes or no?
#1
Columbus KL yes or no?
54cm frame w/ a flat fork crown. Spiral helix in the fork steerer.
Frame 1749g
Fork 722g
Based on that information alone, do you think its Columbus KL tubing?
Frame 1749g
Fork 722g
Based on that information alone, do you think its Columbus KL tubing?
Last edited by miamijim; 04-24-13 at 06:25 PM.
#2
Bianchi Goddess



Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 28,962
Likes: 4,230
From: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
I am going to vote yes but only if your a lightweight and your not going to make this an everyday rider. Any pics of the frame?
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#5
#6
Senior Member


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 248
From: Southern Maryland
Bikes: A few
Some time ago I did a comparison on weights of a couple bikes I have.
The first is a 58cm Colnago Mexico I believe it's a '78 or '79. I believe this frame is KL tubing. The second is a mid-80's Raleigh Team USA 753 Ilkeston built frame. Edit: The Raleigh frame is 60cm.
The Colnago frame when measured still had the cups in the head tube, and the bearing race on the fork. So you would have to subtract for that. And also for the size difference between a 54 and 58cm frame.
Weights came out as follows:
Mexico Frame: 1874 g
Mexico Fork: 726 g
753 Frame: 1866 g
753 Fork: 694 g
I don't know if this helps but it's at least another data point.
The first is a 58cm Colnago Mexico I believe it's a '78 or '79. I believe this frame is KL tubing. The second is a mid-80's Raleigh Team USA 753 Ilkeston built frame. Edit: The Raleigh frame is 60cm.
The Colnago frame when measured still had the cups in the head tube, and the bearing race on the fork. So you would have to subtract for that. And also for the size difference between a 54 and 58cm frame.
Weights came out as follows:
Mexico Frame: 1874 g
Mexico Fork: 726 g
753 Frame: 1866 g
753 Fork: 694 g
I don't know if this helps but it's at least another data point.
Last edited by satbuilder; 04-24-13 at 08:15 AM. Reason: size
#7
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,123
Personally, I never use weight in an attempt to determine tubesets. There's such a variation in the weights of lugs, BB shells and other fittings, especially when you consider how much some manufacturers pare them.
Having said that, it is a very light frame. To the best of my knowledge, KL did use the patented steerer with helical reinforcements. KL used a traditional single butted seat tube but with a 0.1mm thinner wall than SL, so you nay be able to discern the difference via seat post diameters. Are you sure it's Columbus?
Having said that, it is a very light frame. To the best of my knowledge, KL did use the patented steerer with helical reinforcements. KL used a traditional single butted seat tube but with a 0.1mm thinner wall than SL, so you nay be able to discern the difference via seat post diameters. Are you sure it's Columbus?
#8
Personally, I never use weight in an attempt to determine tubesets. There's such a variation in the weights of lugs, BB shells and other fittings, especially when you consider how much some manufacturers pare them.
Having said that, it is a very light frame. To the best of my knowledge, KL did use the patented steerer with helical reinforcements. KL used a traditional single butted seat tube but with a 0.1mm thinner wall than SL, so you nay be able to discern the difference via seat post diameters. Are you sure it's Columbus?
Having said that, it is a very light frame. To the best of my knowledge, KL did use the patented steerer with helical reinforcements. KL used a traditional single butted seat tube but with a 0.1mm thinner wall than SL, so you nay be able to discern the difference via seat post diameters. Are you sure it's Columbus?
#10
#12
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,861
Likes: 3,748
My view:
The frame could well be a mix, the fork to me is pretty close to my 55 CTT Super's fork, so it might be SL.
Remember guys, forks got built, sent out for chrome and paint... and they had little or no identification.
The frame is lighter than my 55 CTT Super, but not by a large amount. MY best guess is some is KL and some is SL, like the seat tube, and who knows what else.
The frame could well be a mix, the fork to me is pretty close to my 55 CTT Super's fork, so it might be SL.
Remember guys, forks got built, sent out for chrome and paint... and they had little or no identification.
The frame is lighter than my 55 CTT Super, but not by a large amount. MY best guess is some is KL and some is SL, like the seat tube, and who knows what else.
#13
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,402
Likes: 5,333
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
#14
Hogosha Sekai

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 26
From: STS
Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition
#16
aka Tom Reingold




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,299
Likes: 6,556
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Folks, the question is in the post, not the title of the thread. Please read.
Also, you can subscribe to a thread without posting to it. Drop down the Thread Tools menu near the top.
Also, you can subscribe to a thread without posting to it. Drop down the Thread Tools menu near the top.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#17
Senior Member


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 248
From: Southern Maryland
Bikes: A few
Here's a thread on another site about a Colnago Mexico. Photo in the last response shows a frame weight of 1737g for a 53cm frame.
Another data point.
https://forums.roadbikereview.com/ret...st4338189.html
Another data point.
https://forums.roadbikereview.com/ret...st4338189.html
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 17
I have a 61 cm. 1980s KL TT frameset. Right around 2400 grams, bare frame + fork. (Just weighed it, with headset and both brake calipers attached, at 2800).
Your frameset is most likely SL, I would say. Could be a mix of SL and KL, though, perhaps? Does it have a legit KL tubing decal?
The published weight difference between a KL tubeset and an SL one was about 250 grams. (1675 vs. 1925, probably a 'small' set?).
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: san leandro
Bikes: enough bikes to qualify for Hoarders......
For reference my Nuevo Mexico is purportedly partially KL, at least the top and down tubes and weighs near exactly 5lbs for the frame and fork size 56x55 ctc. My SL Somec also a 55cm also weighed 5lbs, but had thinner more worked lugs and an internal crown fork.
#20
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,402
Likes: 5,333
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
For many years, Columbus decals did not designate the specific tubing type; only that it was "tubi rinforzati garanatiti, acciaio speciale" (guaranteed butted tubes, special steel).
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 17
My KL frame clearly & proudly sports a KL decal. Weight of this Colnago says it's not KL. Seatpost size says it's not KL. I also have a KL tubeset, which came with a KL decal. This is the dark-blue Colnago, right? That has (what is left of) an SL decal, not a KL decal, as far as I can see.
Last edited by 753proguy; 04-30-13 at 08:34 PM. Reason: added 'of this Colnago'
#22
My KL frame clearly & proudly sports a KL decal. Weight of this Colnago says it's not KL. Seatpost size says it's not KL. I also have a KL tubeset, which came with a KL decal. This is the dark-blue Colnago, right? That has (what is left of) an SL decal, not a KL decal, as far as I can see.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 17
Definitely not!
Jim, your 54 cm (alledgedly KL) frameset weighs more than my 61 cm (definitely KL) frameset, ergo, it's not KL. Simple math. Your frameset was made with SL. Small possibility that it has one or more KL tubes, but frankly, I doubt it....
Jim, your 54 cm (alledgedly KL) frameset weighs more than my 61 cm (definitely KL) frameset, ergo, it's not KL. Simple math. Your frameset was made with SL. Small possibility that it has one or more KL tubes, but frankly, I doubt it....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
7/8timing
Classic & Vintage
1
09-05-13 07:20 PM






