Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Steel or carbon? Rivendell philosophy or??

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Steel or carbon? Rivendell philosophy or??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-16, 09:14 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Albany GA
Posts: 193

Bikes: 1983 Trek 400, 2015 Cannondale Synapse, Soma Double Cross, 2021 Salsa Warbird 600

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 19 Posts
Steel or carbon? Rivendell philosophy or??

Looking for some helpful guidance and tips... here's my situation...

A) I'm 56, 6'-2" and 255, in pretty good shape w/no limitations physically.

B) I've been riding a '83 Trek 400 for the past few years. I ride alone generally, once or twice a week as far as 35 miles. I want a bike that's lighter and has better, more modern components.

C) I've read and like a lot of the Rivendell philosophy, yet my 12 year younger brother rides a Felt carbon bike in group settings and LOVES it, so I'm torn... I've ruled an aluminum bike out. I'm gonna either get a carbon or a steel frame bike.

The Rivendell Roadeo weighs around 20 lbs. I don't wanna pay $3,700 for one, though!

Are there any other "light" steel bike alternatives that are less money?

Or should I say the heck with steel and go for a carbon instead? I'm okay with spending $1,200 for the right bike... maybe $1,500 or $2,000 if I was really impressed.

Oh, here's the last part... I live in Albany, GA, not exactly a hotbed of bike activity. We have 2 shops here, both very small... one is a Fuji dealer, the other is a Specialized dealer.

A lot of the bikes I'm looking at are on Craigslist and are anywhere from 90 miles to 200 miles away.

Thanks for your tips and thoughts,

Gary
BrazAd is online now  
Old 05-23-16, 09:37 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Northwestrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 2,470

Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, Dahon Mu P 24 , Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Rodriguez Tandem, Wheeler MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you go used, you may be able to find a carbon bike in your price range . I ride alone usually as do you, so I have no need to keep up with others. I'm happy with my steel Surly , but it's not light . Yes there are light steel bikes , but again, they are not inexpensive .
Northwestrider is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 10:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
If you want something substantially lighter than your 400 I'd opt for a used carbon bike in good condition. Steel bikes that are that light tend to be more expensive (and my experience with steel durability hasn't been very good).
prathmann is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 10:44 PM
  #4  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazAd
Thanks for your tips and thoughts,

Gary
I was given a beautiful +3500 carbon bike, never really liked it much. Getting rid of it next month, though it is a fine bike for someone.

Love riding my C&V cr-mo bikes.

So, it's a matter of taste..do you really know what you want?

I'd love to have a Rodeo in the stable, but like you I'm not clear on why I need to drop $3700 on it. Especially when you can get a killer C&V bike for under $1500.

Take your time, buy right.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 05-23-16, 11:10 PM
  #5  
Spandex free since 1963!
 
HauntedMyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 400

Bikes: Cannondale Road Warrior 900, Surly Big Dummy, Electra Townie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I haven't ridden a carbon bike but my two steel bikes are more comfortable than the aluminum bikes I have.
HauntedMyst is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 12:02 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
DMC707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times in 746 Posts
I rode a 17 lb carbon Cannondale Synapse for 3 years, then upped my game to a Pinarello Opera steel bike with carbon seatstays at 18.5 lbs

not going back to a carbon bike again . The Opera has what i would consider a training wheelset (Mavic Cosmos) yet still rides livelier than the Synapse-- great bike. Also built a nice DeBernardi with Columbus steel tubing and a triple chainset that is more fun to ride than the modern 'Dale.

maybe if i stepped up to a 12k S Works, Colnago C60 or Cipollini i would see what all the carbon fuss is about, --- But when it comes to the "run of the mill" 3-5000$ machines, I'll take steel

heck, in your price range i have seen nice titanium Serottas on ebay and the like
DMC707 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 03:01 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Willbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Very N and Very W Ohio Williams Co.
Posts: 2,458

Bikes: 2001 Trek Multitrack 7200, 2104 Fuji Sportif 1.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I shopped all kinds of bikes, had a few hard rules. And broke both of them when I bought my 105 super six EVO. The downside is 25c tires max, I also never wanted a mostly white bike but who can explain what will "click". It is also a mid compact crank which was a challenge starting out this year :-).
Willbird is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 03:45 AM
  #8  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130

Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times in 220 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazAd
Looking for some helpful guidance and tips... here's my situation...

A) I'm 56, 6'-2" and 255, in pretty good shape w/no limitations physically.

B) I've been riding a '83 Trek 400 for the past few years. I ride alone generally, once or twice a week as far as 35 miles. I want a bike that's lighter and has better, more modern components.

C) I've read and like a lot of the Rivendell philosophy, yet my 12 year younger brother rides a Felt carbon bike in group settings and LOVES it, so I'm torn... I've ruled an aluminum bike out. I'm gonna either get a carbon or a steel frame bike.

The Rivendell Roadeo weighs around 20 lbs. I don't wanna pay $3,700 for one, though!

Are there any other "light" steel bike alternatives that are less money?

Or should I say the heck with steel and go for a carbon instead? I'm okay with spending $1,200 for the right bike... maybe $1,500 or $2,000 if I was really impressed.

Oh, here's the last part... I live in Albany, GA, not exactly a hotbed of bike activity. We have 2 shops here, both very small... one is a Fuji dealer, the other is a Specialized dealer.

A lot of the bikes I'm looking at are on Craigslist and are anywhere from 90 miles to 200 miles away.

Thanks for your tips and thoughts,

Gary
Something like the Jamis Renegade Explat might be the go for you.
ColonelSanders is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 05:28 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
If you're after steel bikes, you're not going to have much luck at Fuji or Specialized dealers. I guess Specialized have the AWOL, but it's heavy and really for touring and gravel grinding. If you're after a light road bike it's not the bike you want.

I'm a guy who likes steel bikes but it comes at a cost, that cost is not always price, but scarcity. From that point of view, it's likely easier for you to find a carbon bike that you like, because you have local places that sell them.

If you really want to try Steel, your best bet is try to find a Jamis dealer (they have a range of steel road and gravel bikes) or bike shop that deals in QBP brand bikes like Surly and All-City. Looks like you're talking about a trip of >50 miles for either of those though.

Your other option is to buy online, but there you always have the issue that you don't really know if you like the bike until you get it, and if you don't like it, I you'll have to get it packaged back up to return it, likely at cost to you.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 06:23 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazAd
Looking for some helpful guidance and tips... here's my situation...

A) I'm 56, 6'-2" and 255, in pretty good shape w/no limitations physically.

B) I've been riding a '83 Trek 400 for the past few years. I ride alone generally, once or twice a week as far as 35 miles. I want a bike that's lighter and has better, more modern components.

C) I've read and like a lot of the Rivendell philosophy, yet my 12 year younger brother rides a Felt carbon bike in group settings and LOVES it, so I'm torn... I've ruled an aluminum bike out. I'm gonna either get a carbon or a steel frame bike.

The Rivendell Roadeo weighs around 20 lbs. I don't wanna pay $3,700 for one, though!

Are there any other "light" steel bike alternatives that are less money?

Or should I say the heck with steel and go for a carbon instead? I'm okay with spending $1,200 for the right bike... maybe $1,500 or $2,000 if I was really impressed.

Oh, here's the last part... I live in Albany, GA, not exactly a hotbed of bike activity. We have 2 shops here, both very small... one is a Fuji dealer, the other is a Specialized dealer.

A lot of the bikes I'm looking at are on Craigslist and are anywhere from 90 miles to 200 miles away.

Thanks for your tips and thoughts,

Gary
You need to decide if you buy into the Rivendell philosophy, or not. I read Peterson's book a few years back and like some of it, find some of it (particularly his anti bike kit stance) iconoclastic.

My takeaway from Peterson/Rivendell is, unless you are competing in a race, why worry about shaving off the very last gram off the weight of your bike? Pay for quality, whether or not it is super lightweight. A bicycle can and should be a machine to transport a 250 lb man and whatever gear/groceries/whatever he wants to take with him. And get wheels tires that will hold up to years of riding over a variety of surfaces, since unlike the pros in European stage races, you don't have a mechanic in a team car ready to jump out and change a wheel, or tire for you. Or fix your bike should you run into a mechanical in the middle of a tour.

If you are worried about getting a bike that is lighter than 20 lbs, then go carbon fiber. As for myself, I pretty much buy into some of Peterson's philosophy. Because I weigh over 250 lbs, I am not worried about shaving every last gm off the weight of my bike. It is much cheaper for me to shave 10 or 20 lbs off my body than to worry about a lb or two of bike weight. My back wheel is a touring model with 36 spokes, and I ride on tires that are more robust than they are aero or super lightweight. Why? Because at the speeds I ride, there isn't much aero advantage anyway, and because I would prefer to keep riding than to constantly change flats, or dealing with broken spokes. And while I like technological change, I won't be changing bikes just to have the latest and greatest electronic shifting 11 speed drivetrain. And barring a catasrophe, I fully expect that while I will be changing wheels, tires, brake pads, and drivetrain components eventually, that I will still be riding my current bike 10 or 15 years from now.

Last edited by MRT2; 05-24-16 at 06:35 AM.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 06:58 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MRT2
If you are worried about getting a bike that is lighter than 20 lbs, then go carbon fiber.
I'm riding an 18lb steel road bike, and that's with a 36h Clydesdale wheelset, so you don't need to go CF to be under 20lbs.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 07:52 AM
  #12  
Abuse Magnet
 
arex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870

Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 89 Posts
Personally, I'm a fan of steel.

If you do buy a used CF bike, be sure and inspect it carefully for ANY frame damage...you don't want to pay for someone else's problem.
arex is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 08:01 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I don't know what the Rivendell philosophy is. I can share my experience though. The short story is:

Anyone over 250 lbs that wants to ride on the road and do long miles, but not race, needs to ride a steel bike.

The long story is I've owned carbon, aluminum, steel and titanium bikes and steel is where it is at, imo. What the dealer won't tell you is most of Specialized carbon bikes (if not all) have a weight limit of 240 lbs. Granted, they will support more than that, but the manufacturer says don't ride them if you are over that.

As for where to get reasonably priced, but good steel bikes:

Black Mountain Cycles - Call Mike have him build you one to your specs

Adrenaline Bikes - Call them and tell them your budget and they will put you on a good steel bike (Soma, Ritchey, Gunnar, etc.)

Excel Sports - Online Bicycle Retailer - Call them and ask for pricing on a Ritchey Road Logic build

Bicycle Doctor USA Home - Call them and ask for pricing on a Ritchey Road Logic build

All of these places, you can tell them about you, your type of riding, they will get measurements and build a bike for you at a reasonable price.

On the flip side if you want to buy used, start combing Craigslist for Soma, Ritchey, All-City, Kona, Jamis, Gunnar steel bikes. Post them here and we can help you pick one out.

Welcome and good hunting
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 08:25 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Fuji carbon bikes seem to be a bit more lenient on weight limits. For their "catagory 1 road bikes" they list 275lbs and for everything else they list 300lbs as the limit.

https://www.fujibikes.com/docs/FUJI+OWNERS+MANUAL.pdf

I agree with everything that @Jarrett2 says above, obviously as I own both a Ritchey Road Logic and a Black Mountain Cycles bike, but I'm also a pragmatist.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:15 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by dr_lha
I'm riding an 18lb steel road bike, and that's with a 36h Clydesdale wheelset, so you don't need to go CF to be under 20lbs.
True, but the Rivendell philosophy seems to take weight out of the equation, past a certain threshold.you can easily spend $4,000 for a Rivendell bike weighing closer to 30 lbs then 20 lbs.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:23 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MRT2
True, but the Rivendell philosophy seems to take weight out of the equation, past a certain threshold.you can easily spend $4,000 for a Rivendell bike weighing closer to 30 lbs then 20 lbs.
OK, but I don't buy into the "Rivendell philosophy" which just seems like retro-grouchery to me. For that reason I don't think the choice is between CF and heavy steel.

I like to ride fast on a road bike and I never carry groceries on it. I like the feel of a light bike. I'm OK with my tires lasting only a season. I enjoy running the latest drivetrains and tech, I don't think riding a steel bike means that you're old fashioned. If I had the money I'd be all over installing SRAM Etap on my Road Logic for example. I don't expect to be riding my current bike 10-15 years from now, but that's more likely because I succumb to the N+1 bug than a failure of said bike. The "speeds I ride at" is as fast as possible.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:24 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
andr0id's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MRT2
True, but the Rivendell philosophy seems to take weight out of the equation, past a certain threshold.you can easily spend $4,000 for a Rivendell bike weighing closer to 30 lbs then 20 lbs.
If you're talking with racks and fenders, that's within reason. But a steel frame and fork with modern multi-speed setup shouldn't be over 25 lbs. My all steel Gunnar is about 20 lbs and it's fixed with brakes. So add a couple of lbs for gears and shifters.

My Waterford with Dura Ace is 19 lbs, but that's an all carbon fork.

Those are 59cm, so we're talking larger size bikes here.
andr0id is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:37 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139

Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
I recently looked at the Cannondale 10. An awesome bike... but at my age the geometry was just way too aggressive (I am older).

Your '83 Trek 400.... has an old less aggression geometry... as does the Rivendell Rodeo.

Just based on your age, and the geometry of what you're used to.... if your looking at CF I'd test ride the Fuji Gran Fondo. At least it should be serviceable at your local Fuji bike shop.

Other than that.... and even stay close to the budget you mentioned. Look at a good used steel bike. Maybe even a higher-end old Trek. Take it down to bare metal and build it up light.

Last edited by Dave Cutter; 05-24-16 at 09:41 AM.
Dave Cutter is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:38 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazAd
C) I've read and like a lot of the Rivendell philosophy, yet my 12 year younger brother rides a Felt carbon bike in group settings and LOVES it, so I'm torn... I've ruled an aluminum bike out. I'm gonna either get a carbon or a steel frame bike.
Personally, I ride carbon and aluminum frames and love them. I'm not a fan of steel; too heavy and too flexible in my experience. Aluminum frames work well with carbon fiber forks and slightly wider tires. My aluminum touring bike wears 700x32 tires and rides like a dream! Since it sounds like you don't have a whole lot of experience with bikes, I'd encourage you to ride a number of different models including those with different components and frame materials. I always tell my friends that they should ride at least one bike that's way out of their price range. You'll get a feel for what more expensive components and exotic frame materials are like and whether spending more money would provide any benefits you can discern. Since your budget sounds like it's $1200-1500 see if you can get a ride on a $2500-3000 bike. If you can't feel a difference, don't spend the money!

FYI, when you go shopping tell the salesman that you're interested in an "endurance geometry" bike (as opposed to a "race geometry" bike). That will likely make a lot more difference to your comfort than which frame material you choose. In the Specialized line-up, the Roubaix is their endurance geometry carbon fiber bike. The Secteur used to be the aluminum equivalent of the Roubaix, but it looks like it's been dropped. The Diverge is an aluminum frame that accepts wide tires, but the geometry looks a bit racey to me. For Fuji, you want the Gran Fondo (carbon) or Sportif (aluminum).
sstorkel is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:45 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139

Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by sstorkel
........ For Fuji, you want the Gran Fondo (carbon) or Sportif (aluminum).
I am also a fan of the alum frames with carbon forks. And I like the Sportif too.
Dave Cutter is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:51 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by dr_lha
OK, but I don't buy into the "Rivendell philosophy" which just seems like retro-grouchery to me. For that reason I don't think the choice is between CF and heavy steel.

I like to ride fast on a road bike and I never carry groceries on it. I like the feel of a light bike. I'm OK with my tires lasting only a season. I enjoy running the latest drivetrains and tech, I don't think riding a steel bike means that you're old fashioned. If I had the money I'd be all over installing SRAM Etap on my Road Logic for example. I don't expect to be riding my current bike 10-15 years from now, but that's more likely because I succumb to the N+1 bug than a failure of said bike. The "speeds I ride at" is as fast as possible.
that is fine. As I said, I agree with some aspects, find others to be retro grouch era, like the aversion to kit. It was OP who brought up Rivendell. I am just wondering if OP really is concerned with weight if he really buys into Peterson's philosophy.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:52 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Albany GA
Posts: 193

Bikes: 1983 Trek 400, 2015 Cannondale Synapse, Soma Double Cross, 2021 Salsa Warbird 600

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by dr_lha
I'm riding an 18lb steel road bike, and that's with a 36h Clydesdale wheelset, so you don't need to go CF to be under 20lbs.
What kind of bike?

Gary
BrazAd is online now  
Old 05-24-16, 09:54 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by andr0id
If you're talking with racks and fenders, that's within reason. But a steel frame and fork with modern multi-speed setup shouldn't be over 25 lbs. My all steel Gunnar is about 20 lbs and it's fixed with brakes. So add a couple of lbs for gears and shifters.

My Waterford with Dura Ace is 19 lbs, but that's an all carbon fork.

Those are 59cm, so we're talking larger size bikes here.
Racks, fenders, bags. Brakes with enough clearance to accommodate 35 mm tires or wider. That is how many, if not most Rivendells are set up. You can, of course build it up any way you want.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 09:56 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazAd
What kind of bike?

Gary
Ritchey Road Logic frameset that I built up myself.

I built it with a full 6800 Ultegra groupset, Ritchey WCS Alloy stem/handlebars + Thomson Elite seatpost. Wheelset is 36h Velocity Deep-V with Ultegra 6800 hubs. I could save another pound easily by replacing the wheelset with something light.

Cost to me was ~ $2300, but this was sourcing all the parts as cheaply as I could and doing the full build myself.

EDIT: He's a recent photo of said bike:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_3099.jpg (102.4 KB, 293 views)

Last edited by dr_lha; 05-24-16 at 10:11 AM.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-24-16, 10:00 AM
  #25  
Just Plain Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,026

Bikes: Lynskey R230

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I'm only throwing this in there because you mentioned 20 lbs. My Lynskey titanium bike weighed in at 20 lbs, with mid-level components and cheap wheels. They can be had for under 2K used.

Wrong size for you, but for reference:
Lynskey R230 Medium | eBay

Mine:

PhotoJoe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.