Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Does my "ultimate commuter" exist?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Does my "ultimate commuter" exist?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-15 | 05:11 AM
  #26  
bmthom.gis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 5
From: Columbia, SC

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 Rival; 2014 Cannondale Trail 7 29; 1972 Schwinn Suburban, 1996 Proflex 756, 1987(?) Peugeot, Dahon Speed P8; 1979 Raleigh Competition GS; 1995 Stumpjumper M2 FS, 1978 Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Prologue

[MENTION=365305]kickstart[/MENTION] That bike is a thing of beauty! Thanks for sharing

Last edited by bmthom.gis; 07-07-15 at 08:13 AM.
bmthom.gis is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 07:53 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire, UK

Bikes: Genesis Equlibrium, Salsa Vaya, Claud Butler Urban 100

This is the closest I've seen, but not widely available in the US unfortunately:
Day One Alfine 8 | Genesis Bikes

I think you may be forced to do your own build to get what you want, starting with an appropriate frameset.
mhifoe is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:20 AM
  #28  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Isn't wanting an IGH and a "ride fast" commuter a bit of a contradiction. I could see a 2-3 speed hub being a "ride fast" commuter but IGHs have significant efficiency and weight penalties and are not designed for mashing.
Those "significant penalties" aren't very apparent in the real world, and the ability to select any gear at will at any time more than compensates for it. Unless one is planning on using the same bike for fast club rides too, its not really an issue unless one wants it to be.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:23 AM
  #29  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 2
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Isn't wanting an IGH and a "ride fast" commuter a bit of a contradiction. I could see a 2-3 speed hub being a "ride fast" commuter but IGHs have significant efficiency and weight penalties and are not designed for mashing.
According to wikipedia (which references Bicycle Science), IGHs are only a few % to 10% less efficient than a derailleur depending on the condition of the components of derailleur system, what cog you're using, and whether or not you're cross chaining. I think that's acceptable considering the reliability and convenience of the IGH. Besides, my commuting bike rarely takes rides over 8 miles.

When I say "go fast" I don't mean I'm racing to work, I just don't want to be stuck on a bike meant to go ~10 mph when I want to go around 15-20 mph depending on terrain and wind.
corrado33 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:24 AM
  #30  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by bmthom.gis
@kickstart That bike is a thing of beauty! Thanks for sharing
It was a $75 craigslist find.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:25 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 2
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by kickstart
It was a $75 craigslist find.
Gah. I hate living in an area where all bikes are overpriced, even the $100 wal-mart bikes sell for much more than they're worth.
corrado33 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:28 AM
  #32  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,160
Likes: 6,382
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by corrado33
When I say "go fast" I don't mean I'm racing to work, I just don't want to be stuck on a bike meant to go ~10 mph when I want to go around 15-20 mph depending on terrain and wind.
My feeling is impossible to quantify precisely, but if you are a 15+ mph rider, you're conceiving a bike that's too heavy. My cruising speed is slower than yours, around 14 mph, and I don't want drum brakes or IGH's because of the weight penalty. But I would not worry about internal friction. I doubt it makes much difference. I use a dynamo front hub on two of my bikes, and I can't discern the drag they create.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:29 AM
  #33  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by corrado33
When I say "go fast" I don't mean I'm racing to work, I just don't want to be stuck on a bike meant to go ~10 mph when I want to go around 15-20 mph depending on terrain and wind.
That describes most bikes other than cruisers, or BMX bikes........depending on the engine of course.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:30 AM
  #34  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
The best use for an IGH is on bike with a dog and a wide chushy "seat."

alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:40 AM
  #35  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 2
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by noglider
My feeling is impossible to quantify precisely, but if you are a 15+ mph rider, you're conceiving a bike that's too heavy. My cruising speed is slower than yours, around 14 mph, and I don't want drum brakes or IGH's because of the weight penalty. But I would not worry about internal friction. I doubt it makes much difference. I use a dynamo front hub on two of my bikes, and I can't discern the drag they create.
Originally Posted by kickstart
That describes most bikes other than cruisers, or BMX bikes........depending on the engine of course.
Thanks to both of you for your honest opinions. I think I really just have to find an IGH bike and take it for a serious ride, instead of just around the parking lot. Maybe I'll just try to put an IGH on one of my bikes first, to see if I'll notice the difference. Then, if I like it, build a bike up around it.
corrado33 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:43 AM
  #36  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,160
Likes: 6,382
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by corrado33
Thanks to both of you for your honest opinions. I think I really just have to find an IGH bike and take it for a serious ride, instead of just around the parking lot. Maybe I'll just try to put an IGH on one of my bikes first, to see if I'll notice the difference. Then, if I like it, build a bike up around it.
That's a good plan.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 08:56 AM
  #37  
GovernorSilver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area

Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert

I highly recommend you test ride a bike with a Shimano Nexus hub before you buy. My Breezer Uptown 8 has one.

Read Sheldon Brown's article - it's true there is a "clunk" when you shift sometimes - I notice it most after shifting into 6th gear: Shimano Nexus and Alfine Eight Speed Internal-Gear Hubs

You can do 20 mph or more on the 8th gear on flats, at least on this Breezer, according to Cyclometer GPS - MapMyRide says I've never done faster than 18 mph, but it also stopped reporting elevation too so who knows how messed up that app is now. Because of my current level of strength/conditioning, it takes me a while to get up there - maybe you can accelerate faster. I'm not sure though you will like the performance as much as you might with a Shimano 105 set or something.
GovernorSilver is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 09:44 AM
  #38  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 2
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by GovernorSilver
Read Sheldon Brown's article - it's true there is a "clunk" when you shift sometimes - I notice it most after shifting into 6th gear: Shimano Nexus and Alfine Eight Speed Internal-Gear Hubs
I'm not sure though you will like the performance as much as you might with a Shimano 105 set or something.
Thank you. There's no way I'd put 105s on a commuting bike though. Maybe that though will change one day when I have more money to spend, but for now I feel like 105s are too nice to be used on a commuting bike. My current commuter has Soras, so almost anything will be an upgrade. I'm not saying they don't shift well (they do), but I can definitely tell the difference between them and my 105 bike. (It could also be that the 105 bike has very many fewer miles than the commuter bike, who knows.)
corrado33 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 09:52 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

Perfect as you wish, out of the box, maybe Not, But, you can always change component parts.
just needs Money added.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 10:13 AM
  #40  
GovernorSilver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area

Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert

Originally Posted by corrado33
Thank you. There's no way I'd put 105s on a commuting bike though. Maybe that though will change one day when I have more money to spend, but for now I feel like 105s are too nice to be used on a commuting bike. My current commuter has Soras, so almost anything will be an upgrade. I'm not saying they don't shift well (they do), but I can definitely tell the difference between them and my 105 bike. (It could also be that the 105 bike has very many fewer miles than the commuter bike, who knows.)
The point is not that you should get a 105 set but that you may or may not get the performance out of the Nexus 8 that you might be used to seeing, in comparison to non-IGH, geared bikes like the 105 or the Claris or the whatever.
GovernorSilver is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 10:49 AM
  #41  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by GovernorSilver
The point is not that you should get a 105 set but that you may or may not get the performance out of the Nexus 8 that you might be used to seeing, in comparison to non-IGH, geared bikes like the 105 or the Claris or the whatever.
I converted a derailleur MTB to a 7 speed Shimano IGH, and I couldn't tell any difference in weight, or efficiency within comparable gear ranges.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 10:58 AM
  #42  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by kickstart
I couldn't tell any difference in efficiency within comparable gear ranges.
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 10:59 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA

Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Isn't wanting an IGH and a "ride fast" commuter a bit of a contradiction. I could see a 2-3 speed hub being a "ride fast" commuter but IGHs have significant efficiency and weight penalties and are not designed for mashing.
Well we are limited by the OP's $1000 price point.

My Rohloff bikes easily cruise at 15-18 on the flats but the hub alone is well over $1000.

The BMC Alpenchallenge and the Spot Brand bikes with Alfine hubs will all likely outperform any sub-$1000 IGH bike given the same or comparable rider.
ShortLegCyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:16 AM
  #44  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

[MENTION=345109]corrado33[/MENTION], what you want is a decent steel road bike frame from the early 70's, which you build up to your specifications.

I suggest you forget about hub brakes. Rim brakes are just so much easier to deal with.

Look at the IGH shifter options; comparatively few fit on a 23.8 mm bar (which is standard for drop bars). Sturmey Archer makes a good 5 speed hub that comes with a bar end shifter; and there are aftermarket options for some others. But most IGH shifters fit on a 22.2 mm bar, which is standard for "upright" style bars but also some older steel drop bars. Soma makes a "Lauterwasser" shape bar that's 22.2 mm and works well with IGH shifters. That's what I have on my commuter.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:32 AM
  #45  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by alan s
And who exactly would expect 7 speed road gearing to be fully comparable to MTB gearing.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:38 AM
  #46  
GovernorSilver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area

Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert

Originally Posted by ShortLegCyclist
My Rohloff bikes easily cruise at 15-18 on the flats but the hub alone is well over $1000.
Sounds nice to me. My cruising speed on flats with my Shimano Nexus 8 is more like 10 mph. I only get into the 20s when I have momentum from a descent, or traffic conditions (when sharing roads with cars) forces me to pedal harder/faster.

That said, I'm more of a "take responsibility for the bike's engine (me)" than a "blame the tools" kind of person.
GovernorSilver is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:40 AM
  #47  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,160
Likes: 6,382
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by rhm
@corrado33, what you want is a decent steel road bike frame from the early 70's, which you build up to your specifications.

I suggest you forget about hub brakes. Rim brakes are just so much easier to deal with.

Look at the IGH shifter options; comparatively few fit on a 23.8 mm bar (which is standard for drop bars). Sturmey Archer makes a good 5 speed hub that comes with a bar end shifter; and there are aftermarket options for some others. But most IGH shifters fit on a 22.2 mm bar, which is standard for "upright" style bars but also some older steel drop bars. Soma makes a "Lauterwasser" shape bar that's 22.2 mm and works well with IGH shifters. That's what I have on my commuter.
Good suggestions.

You might be happy with mounting the shifter on an accessory mount. The mount clamps to the handlebar, next to the stem. Here is one with a bike computer attached to it.

__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:42 AM
  #48  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by kickstart
And who exactly would expect 7 speed road gearing to be fully comparable to MTB gearing.
typical MTB (24/32/44 12/34) 519%
Rohloff 526%
Nexus 7 245%

not exactly comparable gear ranges
https://www.rohloff.de/en/technology/...ge_comparison/
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:44 AM
  #49  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by rhm
[MENTION=345109]corrado33[/MENTION]

I suggest you forget about hub brakes. Rim brakes are just so much easier to deal with.
That depends a lot on ones environment, hub brakes have real advantages in most conditions other than clean and dry.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-15 | 11:48 AM
  #50  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by alan s
typical MTB (24/32/44 12/34) 519%
Rohloff 526%
Nexus 7 245%

not exactly comparable gear ranges
Yes, thank you, my point is that within that 245% range the difference in efficiency is hardly perceptible. If the gear range is inadequate for ones needs, the type isn't going to make a difference.
kickstart is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.