Drinking and Riding?
#26
Dazed and confused
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 319
Bikes: Trek 1000, Kona Caldera, Raleigh Record ("Rusty"), Tiger Foldaway ("Cub")
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh dear. I'm such a bad person.
In my younger days (probably not entirely legal yet, actually), I've cycled home when I've been too drunk to walk. It feels like flying! It was only a couple of miles.
In my more recent uni days, everywhere was close enough to walk to on a night out. Of course, I have cycled next morning whilst still drunk. And only fallen off once.
These days I generally only have a couple of pints anyway. I feel too bad next day to really enjoy any more (and I'm a skinny runt, so it goes straight to my head). And yes, I will still cycle to the pub, and cycle back again too. Walking takes too long.
Actually, you can get a criminal record for being drunk in charge of a bike. But around here they generally only look for that if you're cycling in one of the villages around midnight, because it's pretty blatant that you've only cycled because you wanted to drink.
Ellie
In my younger days (probably not entirely legal yet, actually), I've cycled home when I've been too drunk to walk. It feels like flying! It was only a couple of miles.
In my more recent uni days, everywhere was close enough to walk to on a night out. Of course, I have cycled next morning whilst still drunk. And only fallen off once.
These days I generally only have a couple of pints anyway. I feel too bad next day to really enjoy any more (and I'm a skinny runt, so it goes straight to my head). And yes, I will still cycle to the pub, and cycle back again too. Walking takes too long.
Actually, you can get a criminal record for being drunk in charge of a bike. But around here they generally only look for that if you're cycling in one of the villages around midnight, because it's pretty blatant that you've only cycled because you wanted to drink.
Ellie
#27
Just ride.
Originally posted by Harry
a stop by the chipper for a smoked cod and a single
a stop by the chipper for a smoked cod and a single
So, what's a chipper? Is smoked cod fast food in Ireland?
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My neighbor had a Christmas party with his fellow wine shop employees. They sampled some of the product and had a wonderful time. As he was biking home in an enlightened state, he fell off the bike. So at 2AM his flatmate came banging on my window because she couldn't talk him into going to the hospital for the gaping wound on his head. I think the looks of horror in my girlfriend and my eyes convinced him that he needed to go. The point is that sometimes other people do have to put up with the consequences of your decision to ride drunk.
Then again, I guess it is kind of a funny story. You win some, you lose some.
andy
Then again, I guess it is kind of a funny story. You win some, you lose some.
andy
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Ive ridden in a car with a driver who was falling-over drunk. It was 3:00 am on a deserted road on the Olympic peninsular, Washington, after a climbing trip. We needed to get to a campsite a few miles away, but were sensible enough to know we were drunk, so drove at 5mph in a pretty good straight line.
We got to the campsite without incident, but were too drunk to assemble the tent.
I know its not big, and its not clever, but I think I have done more dangerous and scary things than that.
We got to the campsite without incident, but were too drunk to assemble the tent.
I know its not big, and its not clever, but I think I have done more dangerous and scary things than that.
#31
Carfree since '82. Grrr!
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Out walking today, I saw a guy riding a department-store bike down the street while drinking out of a paper sack.
I didn't get a chance to ask him to respond to this poll, however.
I didn't get a chance to ask him to respond to this poll, however.
#32
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Watch out with CUI. In some states it's the same crime as driving a motor vehicle while under the influence.
In my draconian state, for example, the law prohibits operating a "vehicle", as opposed to a "motor vehicle", while under the influence, _or_ with alcohol to blood/breath/urine ratios above a certain amount. (These are two different offenses. Get caught drinking while operating a vehicle and you'll be charged with two crimes. A lot of other states are like this, too.) Here, bikes aren't vehicles, but riders have all of the "rights and responsibilities" of operators of vehicles. The courts have settled the specific issue of CUI, too-- mounted cyclists are criminally liable just as motor vehicle drivers are for operating under the influence. I know for sure cyclists here have been convicted under the DUI statute.
I strongly suspect that cyclists can proudly count themselves on a par with drivers of vehicles in another important respect, too: our driver's licenses are contingent on our "consent" to our choice of blood/urine/breath tests should the constabulary decide we seem intoxicated. In other words, refuse to take these tests, even on a _bicycle_, and your driver's license could be forfeit for a year. (This, of course, is independent of whatever penalties you might suffer should you end up being convicted of DUI anyway.) I don't know of case in which a cyclist lost his license for refusing these requested tests, but from the precendents in other CUI cases that's what I think would happen.
Of course, losing a license is not quite the same punishment for a cyclist as for a motorist. Interestingly, even the sentencing schedule for DUI calls only for longer and longer license suspensions, as opposed to prohibitions on vehicle operation on public roads. So, at least in principle, even multiple convictions for CUI wouldn't affect your ability to cycle on public roads. Convictions would, though, land you in the joint as well as costing you an arm and a leg. And a judge might order you to stop riding anyway.
If you really want to get drunk, what you ought to do in my state is ride a horse, or a horse-drawn carriage. You can be passed out drunk on these conveyances and there is no per se crime. Yes, you could be charged with being drunk in public, or various traffic offenses, but these are a much smaller deal than driving drunk.
But, anyway, my guess is that you enjoy one practical advantage cycling drunk instead of driving. Cops are less likely to arrest you. You've probably got a decent chance of just receiving an order to walk home. This, too, is just a guess, and in my own case just a theoretical concern anyway, but there it is.
The last state I lived in also didn't distinguish between cyclists and motorists with respect to DUI. Yet, I was never asked to stop at the DUI checkpoints I would sometimes encounter. The cops just ignored me. I don't think the troopers even knew it was a crime to cycle while drunk. (Of course, if I _had_ been stopped, I would just have turned around the next time I saw a roadblock and taken another route home, or just walked off of the street for a ways and then remounted. Another advantage of cycling as opposed to driving...) I would have pretty ticked off if they did stop me, but what could I have done but comply?
Which makes me curious: anyone here been _stopped_ at a DUI checkpoint on your rig?
Also, while I'm on the subject, I do know of a case a few years ago in Washington State in which a cyclist appealed a CUI conviction all the way the State Supreme Court. He won. In Washington, the relevant statutes contain "motor vehicle" at crucial points, though they just refer to "vehicles" at other points. The S.C. ruled, correctly, that this ambiguity in the law had to be resolved in the way favorable to the defendant. So, as far as I know, it's not a crime to cycle while drunk in Washington. At least, that's how it was a few years ago. Perhaps the legislature acted quickly to close this "loophole" after the case was resolved.
In my draconian state, for example, the law prohibits operating a "vehicle", as opposed to a "motor vehicle", while under the influence, _or_ with alcohol to blood/breath/urine ratios above a certain amount. (These are two different offenses. Get caught drinking while operating a vehicle and you'll be charged with two crimes. A lot of other states are like this, too.) Here, bikes aren't vehicles, but riders have all of the "rights and responsibilities" of operators of vehicles. The courts have settled the specific issue of CUI, too-- mounted cyclists are criminally liable just as motor vehicle drivers are for operating under the influence. I know for sure cyclists here have been convicted under the DUI statute.
I strongly suspect that cyclists can proudly count themselves on a par with drivers of vehicles in another important respect, too: our driver's licenses are contingent on our "consent" to our choice of blood/urine/breath tests should the constabulary decide we seem intoxicated. In other words, refuse to take these tests, even on a _bicycle_, and your driver's license could be forfeit for a year. (This, of course, is independent of whatever penalties you might suffer should you end up being convicted of DUI anyway.) I don't know of case in which a cyclist lost his license for refusing these requested tests, but from the precendents in other CUI cases that's what I think would happen.
Of course, losing a license is not quite the same punishment for a cyclist as for a motorist. Interestingly, even the sentencing schedule for DUI calls only for longer and longer license suspensions, as opposed to prohibitions on vehicle operation on public roads. So, at least in principle, even multiple convictions for CUI wouldn't affect your ability to cycle on public roads. Convictions would, though, land you in the joint as well as costing you an arm and a leg. And a judge might order you to stop riding anyway.
If you really want to get drunk, what you ought to do in my state is ride a horse, or a horse-drawn carriage. You can be passed out drunk on these conveyances and there is no per se crime. Yes, you could be charged with being drunk in public, or various traffic offenses, but these are a much smaller deal than driving drunk.
But, anyway, my guess is that you enjoy one practical advantage cycling drunk instead of driving. Cops are less likely to arrest you. You've probably got a decent chance of just receiving an order to walk home. This, too, is just a guess, and in my own case just a theoretical concern anyway, but there it is.
The last state I lived in also didn't distinguish between cyclists and motorists with respect to DUI. Yet, I was never asked to stop at the DUI checkpoints I would sometimes encounter. The cops just ignored me. I don't think the troopers even knew it was a crime to cycle while drunk. (Of course, if I _had_ been stopped, I would just have turned around the next time I saw a roadblock and taken another route home, or just walked off of the street for a ways and then remounted. Another advantage of cycling as opposed to driving...) I would have pretty ticked off if they did stop me, but what could I have done but comply?
Which makes me curious: anyone here been _stopped_ at a DUI checkpoint on your rig?
Also, while I'm on the subject, I do know of a case a few years ago in Washington State in which a cyclist appealed a CUI conviction all the way the State Supreme Court. He won. In Washington, the relevant statutes contain "motor vehicle" at crucial points, though they just refer to "vehicles" at other points. The S.C. ruled, correctly, that this ambiguity in the law had to be resolved in the way favorable to the defendant. So, as far as I know, it's not a crime to cycle while drunk in Washington. At least, that's how it was a few years ago. Perhaps the legislature acted quickly to close this "loophole" after the case was resolved.
#33
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my state (New York), horse-drawn carriages are included in the DWI statute, as well as bikes. Glad thing, too, since occasionally even the local Amish over-indulge and then hit the road. If a carriage driver is either drunk or unconcious, the horse will head home, but won't stop at intersections.
I guess what disturbs me most about your post is the way you seem to feel that it's acceptable to be operating anything when you are intoxicated. This is totally unacceptable, juvenile behaviour. If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
Yesterday, I happened to observe an intoxicated man on a bike, using the local multi-use path. It was bad enough that he was drunk, and that he was riding one-handed, with a beer can in the other hand, but he nearly ran over a small child while weaving his way through people. Eventually, he did a face-plant in the grass along the road, and I gladly joined in the laughter at his misfortune.
I guess what disturbs me most about your post is the way you seem to feel that it's acceptable to be operating anything when you are intoxicated. This is totally unacceptable, juvenile behaviour. If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
Yesterday, I happened to observe an intoxicated man on a bike, using the local multi-use path. It was bad enough that he was drunk, and that he was riding one-handed, with a beer can in the other hand, but he nearly ran over a small child while weaving his way through people. Eventually, he did a face-plant in the grass along the road, and I gladly joined in the laughter at his misfortune.
__________________
Je vais à vélo, donc je suis!
Je vais à vélo, donc je suis!
#34
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by D*Alex
I guess what disturbs me most about your post is the way you seem to feel that it's acceptable to be operating anything when you are intoxicated. This is totally unacceptable, juvenile behaviour. If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
I guess what disturbs me most about your post is the way you seem to feel that it's acceptable to be operating anything when you are intoxicated. This is totally unacceptable, juvenile behaviour. If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. I share your attitude about riding while drunk, no question about it.
I was just making some points about what the law says.
I should add that I think it unduly harsh for cycling while drunk to be punished as severely as DUI, but it isn't the greatest injustice i can think of. And I don't like the fact that you'd lose your license for refusing to consent to blood/urine/breath tests on a vehicle for which licensing is not required. Why not make it a condition of the "driving privilege" that you'll submit to searches of your house, etc.? But nonetheless, given that the cost of avoiding these problems is simply avoiding riding while drunk I don't think this is any big deal.
Cheers,
Last edited by Merriwether; 04-01-02 at 09:29 AM.
#35
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If a person is so irresponsible to operate any vehicle-tricycles included-while drunk, he shouldn't be allowed to operate a car. Give an alcoholic just one reason why he shouldn't be riding the bike, and sure as $h!t, he'll drive. Operating a vehicle while intoxicated shows poor judgement, regardless of the vehicle being operated. I actually think that people who are publically itoxicated should also have their driving privleges revoked. Furthermore, "conditional licenses" should never be given to anybody who has a DWI.
__________________
Je vais à vélo, donc je suis!
Je vais à vélo, donc je suis!
#36
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by D*Alex
If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
If you are too d@mn drunk to walk, then sleep it off!
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Greenwich, UK
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pissed on a bike or pissed in a car.
In a car you are a danger to everyone, on a bike you are only a danger to yourself.
Hence whilst the police may take a very dim view of driving a bike whilst being incapable of standing up, I don't think it is technically illegal in this country
In a car you are a danger to everyone, on a bike you are only a danger to yourself.
Hence whilst the police may take a very dim view of driving a bike whilst being incapable of standing up, I don't think it is technically illegal in this country
#38
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by Brains
Pissed on a bike or pissed in a car.
In a car you are a danger to everyone, on a bike you are only a danger to yourself.
Pissed on a bike or pissed in a car.
In a car you are a danger to everyone, on a bike you are only a danger to yourself.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
#39
Poky
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pocahontas, Iowa
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1999/2000 Rans Rocket - red, of course, and a forest green 2001 Specialized Expedition w/ 2" slicks, fenders and Jaand baskets
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was reminded of a certain fellow I know who likes to imbibe large amounts of alcohol and because he drove his car into a house and lost his license now only bikes. Of course he bikes home totally sloshed--but only when he can't scam a ride.
One night he rode his bike at a high rate of speed into the back of a parked conversion van that he couldn't see because of oncoming headlights. Naturally it was probably hard for him to figure out which image to steer around. His head went through the back window and the glass slit his throat. The oncoming driver stopped and administered first aid and a cop got there quickly. Fortunately they were able to control the blood loss and he lived. The cop said if he hadn't been so drunk he would have bled to death--the alcohol somehow slowed his blood flow or his heart rate or something. Now he has a nice scar across his throat which he is proud of.
Another time he says he drunk drove his bicycle at about 30 mph down a long hill. Unfortunately he forgot the road "T"ed at the bottom. So instead of making a 90 degree turn left or right, he slammed into the curb straight on. I think he just landed in the mud.
The bad news is he just got his drivers license back.
There was also a guy here who drunk drove his bike into a tree and died of head injuries. I guess he hit the curb and fell into the tree. Heck, some people should wear helmets when they WALK!
One night he rode his bike at a high rate of speed into the back of a parked conversion van that he couldn't see because of oncoming headlights. Naturally it was probably hard for him to figure out which image to steer around. His head went through the back window and the glass slit his throat. The oncoming driver stopped and administered first aid and a cop got there quickly. Fortunately they were able to control the blood loss and he lived. The cop said if he hadn't been so drunk he would have bled to death--the alcohol somehow slowed his blood flow or his heart rate or something. Now he has a nice scar across his throat which he is proud of.
Another time he says he drunk drove his bicycle at about 30 mph down a long hill. Unfortunately he forgot the road "T"ed at the bottom. So instead of making a 90 degree turn left or right, he slammed into the curb straight on. I think he just landed in the mud.
The bad news is he just got his drivers license back.
There was also a guy here who drunk drove his bike into a tree and died of head injuries. I guess he hit the curb and fell into the tree. Heck, some people should wear helmets when they WALK!
#40
Life's Too Short
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I guess the advantage to riding and drinking is not as many people are in serious danger. A bike won't do any damage copared to a car.
#41
Velolutionary
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Iowa City area
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally posted by Oxymoron
Fortunately they were able to control the blood loss and he lived. The cop said if he hadn't been so drunk he would have bled to death--the alcohol somehow slowed his blood flow or his heart rate or something.
Fortunately they were able to control the blood loss and he lived. The cop said if he hadn't been so drunk he would have bled to death--the alcohol somehow slowed his blood flow or his heart rate or something.
Emergency Rule #1: All bleeding eventually stops.
#42
Mister Slick
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 373
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by manderax
Not more than $250.00? No jail time? A mere slap-on-the-wrist when compared to driving. Heck, they are practically endorsing it as an alternative.
Not more than $250.00? No jail time? A mere slap-on-the-wrist when compared to driving. Heck, they are practically endorsing it as an alternative.
#43
It's only a hill.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Berlin
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Whilst stationed here in Germany, I got called to an RTA (Road Traffic Accident) just outside of the camp. It involved two cyclists. It was dark, both had no lights and both were travelling on the cycle path alongside a dark stretch of road running through a forest. Unfortunately, one was travelling the wrong way up the cycle path and because no lights were used, they both collided head-first into each other. One survived with heavy facial injuries, the other died a few hours later in hospital.
I kept thinking at the time, how could anyone die in that sort of accident? But it happens people. Oh by the way, both were sober.
I kept thinking at the time, how could anyone die in that sort of accident? But it happens people. Oh by the way, both were sober.
#44
cycle-powered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ok, while i agree that cycling while intoxicated is not the smartest thing to do and it is possible that you could injure someone else, for the most part you are only endangering yourself...
thus, there is absolutely no comparison between driving a car while drunk (which is a horribly bad unsafe act and socially wrong) and cycling while drunk (which is basically kind of dumb)
back in college i rode my bike while over the legally drunk level but still pretty in control maybe 10 times...
once i was so drunk i could hardly walk and cycling was like flying... it was late at night (maybe 3am) so the streets were deserted and i would be riding along and then notice "hm, my legs won't move" and then realize it was because i was lying on the ground... and then my eyes would focus and i could see i was lying face first on the pavement... i think i fell maybe 10 times in about 1 mile home and ruined my jeans and skinned my hands a little. i rode slowly and sure, i could have hurt myself worse, but compared to my many drunk buds who were piloting huge steel cages around and endangering other people (or riding with such people), i consider what i did comparatively safe... (as far as endangering yourself, people frequently injure themselves quite severly walking drunk and tripping or whatever --- it's the getting sloshed that really creates most of the danger --- but then driving a car extends the danger to other people) -- i think my biggest real danger as a drunk cyclist was danger from the drunk auto drivers... (and yes, if sober i could better avoid those guys too)
not seeing a stop sign or a curve on a bike is dangerous to the cyclist, but not seeing a stop sign or a curve in a car often results in a car in a living room or a few people being run over...
drunk auto drivers kill hundreds of people per year... how many people are killed by drunk cyclists? it's just simply not in the same league of danger or 'social wrong'
in my teen crazy years i only drove a car once while kind-of drunk (2am in the country but it was stupid anyway) and maybe twice while near the legal level AND i will NEVER drive a car drunk again - but even now if i were not totally sloshed and the distance were short, i would not rule out cycling... (i drink rather infrequently these days and to excess maybe only once a year so it's pretty unlikely)
thus, there is absolutely no comparison between driving a car while drunk (which is a horribly bad unsafe act and socially wrong) and cycling while drunk (which is basically kind of dumb)
back in college i rode my bike while over the legally drunk level but still pretty in control maybe 10 times...
once i was so drunk i could hardly walk and cycling was like flying... it was late at night (maybe 3am) so the streets were deserted and i would be riding along and then notice "hm, my legs won't move" and then realize it was because i was lying on the ground... and then my eyes would focus and i could see i was lying face first on the pavement... i think i fell maybe 10 times in about 1 mile home and ruined my jeans and skinned my hands a little. i rode slowly and sure, i could have hurt myself worse, but compared to my many drunk buds who were piloting huge steel cages around and endangering other people (or riding with such people), i consider what i did comparatively safe... (as far as endangering yourself, people frequently injure themselves quite severly walking drunk and tripping or whatever --- it's the getting sloshed that really creates most of the danger --- but then driving a car extends the danger to other people) -- i think my biggest real danger as a drunk cyclist was danger from the drunk auto drivers... (and yes, if sober i could better avoid those guys too)
not seeing a stop sign or a curve on a bike is dangerous to the cyclist, but not seeing a stop sign or a curve in a car often results in a car in a living room or a few people being run over...
drunk auto drivers kill hundreds of people per year... how many people are killed by drunk cyclists? it's just simply not in the same league of danger or 'social wrong'
in my teen crazy years i only drove a car once while kind-of drunk (2am in the country but it was stupid anyway) and maybe twice while near the legal level AND i will NEVER drive a car drunk again - but even now if i were not totally sloshed and the distance were short, i would not rule out cycling... (i drink rather infrequently these days and to excess maybe only once a year so it's pretty unlikely)
#45
It tastes like burning!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SOUTH Jersey
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
kinda off-topic, but what the heck...
one day i was driving on the highway in baltimore, and this guy that's stoned is riding in the middle of the highway in the WRONG direction toward my car.... I was far enough away from him to be safe, but that was one of the most bizzarre things I've ever seen LOL
one day i was driving on the highway in baltimore, and this guy that's stoned is riding in the middle of the highway in the WRONG direction toward my car.... I was far enough away from him to be safe, but that was one of the most bizzarre things I've ever seen LOL
#46
Poky
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pocahontas, Iowa
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1999/2000 Rans Rocket - red, of course, and a forest green 2001 Specialized Expedition w/ 2" slicks, fenders and Jaand baskets
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by deliriou5
one day i was driving on the highway in baltimore, and this guy that's stoned is riding in the middle of the highway in the WRONG direction toward my car.... I was far enough away from him to be safe, but that was one of the most bizzarre things I've ever seen LOL
one day i was driving on the highway in baltimore, and this guy that's stoned is riding in the middle of the highway in the WRONG direction toward my car.... I was far enough away from him to be safe, but that was one of the most bizzarre things I've ever seen LOL
Hey! I wasn't stoned! I thought you were a spaceship...
Last edited by Oxymoron; 05-10-02 at 10:00 AM.