Backpack Vs. Pannier??
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Backpack Vs. Pannier??
Hi everyone -- The question about backpacks makes me wonder about a question I'm sure has been rehashed here many times before.
I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)
The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)
The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
For light weights and short distance, a backpack. Longer and/or heavier, a pannier. My backpack range is about 3 miles, then its the pannier.
#3
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
Hi everyone -- The question about backpacks makes me wonder about a question I'm sure has been rehashed here many times before.
I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)
The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)
The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
Stuart Black
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 232
Bikes: A light one, a heavy one, a yellow one and a rusty one.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My back sweats when I look at a backpack. I use a pannier always. I use ortlieb panniers because their mounting system is very secure and they are waterproof. I can put them on my bike in less time than it takes to put a backpack on my back.
Last edited by rainedon; 02-16-05 at 11:06 AM.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
#6
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by rainedon
My back sweats when I look at a backpack. I use a pannier always. I use ortlib panniers because their mounting system is very secure and they are waterproof. I can put them on my bike in less time than it takes to put a backpack on my back.
Stuart Black
#7
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
Stuart Black
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 232
Bikes: A light one, a heavy one, a yellow one and a rusty one.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 1,254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I started out with a pannier and used it happily for several years. But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down. I switched to a backpack and have been using it for about a year with success. I only carry clothes and a book, not too heavy. Check out Vaude, they are awesome.
#10
SoCal Commuter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Agua Dulce, CA
Posts: 592
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck single/9 speed convertible, Novara Buzz beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
Some riders - and you know who you are - go on about how panniers or trunks are dorky, and how you'll only carry so much in your bag. I think it's more about style than substance. But when push comes to shove you need a system that can adapt to a variety of situations - be it a commute or extended day trip. I have both a trunk and a set of panniers. The trunk works great for commuting to work. But just the other day I needed to pack a lunch, extra layer of clothes and a camera (a good size one). That meant double panniers.
If you can't afford both a trunk and panniers get the latter. If your load is light there's no law says you can't mount just one side. If you're bound and determined to try carrying your load on your back (yea, it's kind of cool to just roll up, hop off yer horse and stroll inside without having to fiddle with your geeky bike luggage) try a proper messenger bag. They're not cheap, but they're designed to be a lot more comfortable than a pack. Back packs are only good for sore armpits and sweaty backs.
DanO
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12193 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times
in
1,108 Posts
Hi,
panniers. Can you imagine going on a multiday trip with a backpack? I can't. The backpack thing got old fast. I switched.
If it rains, I have a shell, and a helmet cover. If it gets dark, I got a vest. And a cellphone. And a small, but not crazy small, pump.
panniers. Can you imagine going on a multiday trip with a backpack? I can't. The backpack thing got old fast. I switched.
If it rains, I have a shell, and a helmet cover. If it gets dark, I got a vest. And a cellphone. And a small, but not crazy small, pump.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
>> But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down.
Sounds like you are using an old fashioned mounting system. Modern clip-on systems like Ortleib and Carradice (the Rixen and Kaul Klickfix system) are much quicket to get on and off and cannot be dislodged.
I used to use a hook and elastic and suffered similar problems, but since switching to a modern system I have riddden with bigger loads on bumpier tracks at higher speeds and never have a problem.
Sounds like you are using an old fashioned mounting system. Modern clip-on systems like Ortleib and Carradice (the Rixen and Kaul Klickfix system) are much quicket to get on and off and cannot be dislodged.
I used to use a hook and elastic and suffered similar problems, but since switching to a modern system I have riddden with bigger loads on bumpier tracks at higher speeds and never have a problem.
#13
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by billh
I started out with a pannier and used it happily for several years. But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down. I switched to a backpack and have been using it for about a year with success. I only carry clothes and a book, not too heavy. Check out Vaude, they are awesome.
There's no reason why panniers should ever fall off a rack, a properly designed one that is.
#14
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
My bike actually seems more stable with panniers -> of course it is heaviers.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Out there, on my bike
Posts: 5,421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
panniers are far superior to backpacks. If you are undecided, you could go the Arkel Bug route, but I bet you will find yourself using it as a pannier while on your bike, and a backpack once you get off your bike.
www.arkel-od.com
www.arkel-od.com
#16
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Went from backpack to rack-trunk and now back to backpack. I use the lightest expandable 1lb "day" pack from REI...It carries a 4lb computer some days otherwise, lightweight shirt, pants, grooming and maybe a rain jacket.
#17
No pain, no gain.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California's Gold That's Amazing!
Posts: 513
Bikes: Trek 7100, Windsor Fens
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I haven't looked back since switching to panniers.
Also, pimpage to the Lone Peak brand, their rack lock-on system rules.
Also, pimpage to the Lone Peak brand, their rack lock-on system rules.
#18
OlyCommuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 175
Bikes: Spot Ajax for commuting, Jamis Dakota Sport for dirt.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why I use a backpack:
1) If I stop to do some errands to/from work the backpack is much more convenient to take into a store.
2) Hydration bladder
3) I hike a lot so the backpack does double duty.
4) I treat my commute ride as a workout - I ride as hard as I can. So, I'm sweating anyway.
5) It holds everything I need - clothes (jeans, shirt, underclothes), raingear, emergency tools, lunch.
5) I'm very comfortable with it.
Which backpack for me: REI Alpine day pack (about 2300 cubic inches, I think).
Obviously, you have to make your choice based on your own needs and comfort. You'll get many opinions from folks, many swearing that their system is the best. Which it is - for them. YMMV
1) If I stop to do some errands to/from work the backpack is much more convenient to take into a store.
2) Hydration bladder
3) I hike a lot so the backpack does double duty.
4) I treat my commute ride as a workout - I ride as hard as I can. So, I'm sweating anyway.
5) It holds everything I need - clothes (jeans, shirt, underclothes), raingear, emergency tools, lunch.
5) I'm very comfortable with it.
Which backpack for me: REI Alpine day pack (about 2300 cubic inches, I think).
Obviously, you have to make your choice based on your own needs and comfort. You'll get many opinions from folks, many swearing that their system is the best. Which it is - for them. YMMV
#19
Ice Eater
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 106
Bikes: Specialized Rockhopper (summer), Nakamura Battle Pig (winter)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Over the years I've used both panniers and backpacks. There are a billion variables so it's difficult to say which is best for you. I keep both available and for ME, the equation is:
big gear = panniers
little gear = backpack
I prefer to use just the backpack because it gives me more mobility on some of the rougher parts of the commute - but that may not apply to you. I find it's great for my day-to-day stuff like clothes. For heavier stuff like my laptop I prefer to let the bike frame do the work, so it goes in a pannier if I need to commute with it.
So my recommendation is to get both. You'll be glad you have the flexibility of choosing depending on what you have to carry on a particular day. Whatever you buy, spend the extra $$ if possible and get good quality stuff. Panniers especially will suffer the abuse of the road. And if you get a backpack, get one that is designed for bike commuting.
big gear = panniers
little gear = backpack
I prefer to use just the backpack because it gives me more mobility on some of the rougher parts of the commute - but that may not apply to you. I find it's great for my day-to-day stuff like clothes. For heavier stuff like my laptop I prefer to let the bike frame do the work, so it goes in a pannier if I need to commute with it.
So my recommendation is to get both. You'll be glad you have the flexibility of choosing depending on what you have to carry on a particular day. Whatever you buy, spend the extra $$ if possible and get good quality stuff. Panniers especially will suffer the abuse of the road. And if you get a backpack, get one that is designed for bike commuting.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 91
Bikes: Giant Cypress Sx, Cheap clunker mountain bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use a backpack.
-Running errands I just hop off the bike and take it with me. Easy that way.
-3 Liter hydration bladder that works great for my longer commute on mondays, plus any cruises out in the country side.
-Pretty good wicking system on the pack along with a wicking shirt mean that there is little sweat kept on my back and what is dries quickly when I take off the bag.
-It doubles as a spare backpack for anyone who needs it when going backpacking.
-Holds everything I want- including groceries when needed.
Plus with the compression system on my bag, combined with the suspension system problems such as sore armpits and similar awakard things are not an issue.
-Running errands I just hop off the bike and take it with me. Easy that way.
-3 Liter hydration bladder that works great for my longer commute on mondays, plus any cruises out in the country side.
-Pretty good wicking system on the pack along with a wicking shirt mean that there is little sweat kept on my back and what is dries quickly when I take off the bag.
-It doubles as a spare backpack for anyone who needs it when going backpacking.
-Holds everything I want- including groceries when needed.
Plus with the compression system on my bag, combined with the suspension system problems such as sore armpits and similar awakard things are not an issue.
#21
whatever
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Land of Oversized Mice and Anteaters
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got a Topeak trunk and quick-release rack for commuting ~15-20 miles. I started off with a backpack - a hydration pack at that - when I switched, I was a much happier man.
#23
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The key for a backpack is mostly fit. The straps need to seat over the shoulders and not wander toward the shoulder joint. The better packs have a strap across the chest or hips to prevent that.
Many packs are just too heavy because they have too many compartments. If you get a pack, besure to buy or make a waterproof rain cover. A surprise shower can really soak the contents.
Many packs are just too heavy because they have too many compartments. If you get a pack, besure to buy or make a waterproof rain cover. A surprise shower can really soak the contents.
#24
here
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I started with a Vaude Sienna backpack. It has a clever frame design with a web that holds most of the area away from the riders back...a breathing space that prevents trapping body heat and sweat. It also has waist and sternum straps that keep the pack from shifting no matter how you maneuver.
As good as that was (I think it's the best cycling pack I've seen), I found hauling heavy loads tiring when riding with dropbars (strictly roadie) or I had a hulking pack with just a few items in it.
I went to the Topeak trunk bag with one of their tubular racks that has a Quick Track mount for the bag. You can read about it on their website, but the short version is the bag can be mounted or removed in two seconds and is rock solid on the frame. The bag can normally carry the equivalent of 8 beverage cans, but also has a zippered gusset that nearly doubles the capacity. On my commute I can easily pack food containers for breakfast and lunch, some clothes and other necessities. The zippers are very well made, too, an important point for something that gets heavy use (and frequent overstuffing) for years.
The Sienna still gets used if I have to carry something unusually bulky (a laptop, sports gear). I'll get around to panniers when the price is right (Arkel T-42's), but for now I have a great combination.
As good as that was (I think it's the best cycling pack I've seen), I found hauling heavy loads tiring when riding with dropbars (strictly roadie) or I had a hulking pack with just a few items in it.
I went to the Topeak trunk bag with one of their tubular racks that has a Quick Track mount for the bag. You can read about it on their website, but the short version is the bag can be mounted or removed in two seconds and is rock solid on the frame. The bag can normally carry the equivalent of 8 beverage cans, but also has a zippered gusset that nearly doubles the capacity. On my commute I can easily pack food containers for breakfast and lunch, some clothes and other necessities. The zippers are very well made, too, an important point for something that gets heavy use (and frequent overstuffing) for years.
The Sienna still gets used if I have to carry something unusually bulky (a laptop, sports gear). I'll get around to panniers when the price is right (Arkel T-42's), but for now I have a great combination.
#25
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I use a Specialized Messenger bag. No complaints here I've used it in the summer to boot.