Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Backpack Vs. Pannier??

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Backpack Vs. Pannier??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-05, 10:20 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Backpack Vs. Pannier??

Hi everyone -- The question about backpacks makes me wonder about a question I'm sure has been rehashed here many times before.

I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)

The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
anthonya9999 is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:23 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
For light weights and short distance, a backpack. Longer and/or heavier, a pannier. My backpack range is about 3 miles, then its the pannier.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:24 AM
  #3  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
Hi everyone -- The question about backpacks makes me wonder about a question I'm sure has been rehashed here many times before.

I wanted to ask about which you prefer and why -- a backpack or pannier -- setting everything else equal (distance of commute, weight of cargo, etc)

The second question would be -- which would you use for which kind of commute and which cargo weight?
I use panniers in the winter when I need to carry lots of stuff home (temperature fluctuations can be as much as 50F from morning to night). In the summer, I use a rack bag.

Stuart Black
cyccommute is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:47 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rainedon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 232

Bikes: A light one, a heavy one, a yellow one and a rusty one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My back sweats when I look at a backpack. I use a pannier always. I use ortlieb panniers because their mounting system is very secure and they are waterproof. I can put them on my bike in less time than it takes to put a backpack on my back.

Last edited by rainedon; 02-16-05 at 11:06 AM.
rainedon is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:55 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
anthonya9999 is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:03 AM
  #6  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by rainedon
My back sweats when I look at a backpack. I use a pannier always. I use ortlib panniers because their mounting system is very secure and they are waterproof. I can put them on my bike in less time than it takes to put a backpack on my back.
I have a set of Ortliebs also but I don't like using them for day to day use (expensive and overkill for my area). I just picked up a set of these and I am amazed at how good they are for how little they cost. Their mounting system is almost as good as Ortlieb's. (I did modify the lower mount with an extra Ortlieb QL-1 mount I had.) I particularly like the rubber handles on the bags. Keeps them from hitting against the front wheel on the lowriders.

Stuart Black
cyccommute is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:09 AM
  #7  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
Far less than having the weight high on your back - it's a center of gravity thing. I wouldn't carry more than 5 to 10 pounds of stuff to work anyway.

Stuart Black
cyccommute is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:12 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rainedon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 232

Bikes: A light one, a heavy one, a yellow one and a rusty one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
I use the ortlieb front roller plus, which is smaller than the rear ortlieb. I typically only use one and I put it on the drive side in the rear (I chose drive side only because on the other side, it blocks the view of my mirror). If I have it loaded with heavy items, I can kind of feel it if I'm out of the saddle and rocking the bike, but if I have my butt in the saddle, I can't even tell that it is back there.
rainedon is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:15 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
billh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 1,254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I started out with a pannier and used it happily for several years. But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down. I switched to a backpack and have been using it for about a year with success. I only carry clothes and a book, not too heavy. Check out Vaude, they are awesome.
billh is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:17 AM
  #10  
SoCal Commuter
 
DanO220's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Agua Dulce, CA
Posts: 592

Bikes: Surly Crosscheck single/9 speed convertible, Novara Buzz beater

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
Try an emergency maneuver when your shoulders are restricted 'cause you needed to tighten your straps 'cause you happened to stop by the store and added a little weight to your pack and now it feels like you've got a bowling ball swinging around between your shoulder blades.

Some riders - and you know who you are - go on about how panniers or trunks are dorky, and how you'll only carry so much in your bag. I think it's more about style than substance. But when push comes to shove you need a system that can adapt to a variety of situations - be it a commute or extended day trip. I have both a trunk and a set of panniers. The trunk works great for commuting to work. But just the other day I needed to pack a lunch, extra layer of clothes and a camera (a good size one). That meant double panniers.

If you can't afford both a trunk and panniers get the latter. If your load is light there's no law says you can't mount just one side. If you're bound and determined to try carrying your load on your back (yea, it's kind of cool to just roll up, hop off yer horse and stroll inside without having to fiddle with your geeky bike luggage) try a proper messenger bag. They're not cheap, but they're designed to be a lot more comfortable than a pack. Back packs are only good for sore armpits and sweaty backs.

DanO
DanO220 is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:17 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12193 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times in 1,108 Posts
Hi,
panniers. Can you imagine going on a multiday trip with a backpack? I can't. The backpack thing got old fast. I switched.
If it rains, I have a shell, and a helmet cover. If it gets dark, I got a vest. And a cellphone. And a small, but not crazy small, pump.
late is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:43 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
>> But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down.

Sounds like you are using an old fashioned mounting system. Modern clip-on systems like Ortleib and Carradice (the Rixen and Kaul Klickfix system) are much quicket to get on and off and cannot be dislodged.
I used to use a hook and elastic and suffered similar problems, but since switching to a modern system I have riddden with bigger loads on bumpier tracks at higher speeds and never have a problem.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:43 AM
  #13  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by billh
I started out with a pannier and used it happily for several years. But every once in awhile I would hit a pothole or have to hop a curb and it would fall off. One of those times, the s-hook got caught in my spokes in traffic and I almost went down. I switched to a backpack and have been using it for about a year with success. I only carry clothes and a book, not too heavy. Check out Vaude, they are awesome.
Your panniers sounds like it needed to be retrofitted with the Serratus clip system ($7 for a pair at MEC). There's absolutely NO way those can fall off, easy to remove as well. My original voyager panniers did that as well.

There's no reason why panniers should ever fall off a rack, a properly designed one that is.
operator is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:46 AM
  #14  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
Think about it this way, the weight is on your bike whether it's on your frame or on your back. On your back the center of gravity is even higher and your mobility is decreased. You have to counteract the weight of the bike everytime you shift around or when the stuff in your bag shifts around.

My bike actually seems more stable with panniers -> of course it is heaviers.
operator is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:46 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Out there, on my bike
Posts: 5,421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
panniers are far superior to backpacks. If you are undecided, you could go the Arkel Bug route, but I bet you will find yourself using it as a pannier while on your bike, and a backpack once you get off your bike.

www.arkel-od.com
tulip is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 02:44 PM
  #16  
Enjoy
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Went from backpack to rack-trunk and now back to backpack. I use the lightest expandable 1lb "day" pack from REI...It carries a 4lb computer some days otherwise, lightweight shirt, pants, grooming and maybe a rain jacket.
vrkelley is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 02:48 PM
  #17  
No pain, no gain.
 
PainTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California's Gold That's Amazing!
Posts: 513

Bikes: Trek 7100, Windsor Fens

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I haven't looked back since switching to panniers.

Also, pimpage to the Lone Peak brand, their rack lock-on system rules.
PainTrain is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 03:27 PM
  #18  
OlyCommuter
 
babaluey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 175

Bikes: Spot Ajax for commuting, Jamis Dakota Sport for dirt.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why I use a backpack:
1) If I stop to do some errands to/from work the backpack is much more convenient to take into a store.
2) Hydration bladder
3) I hike a lot so the backpack does double duty.
4) I treat my commute ride as a workout - I ride as hard as I can. So, I'm sweating anyway.
5) It holds everything I need - clothes (jeans, shirt, underclothes), raingear, emergency tools, lunch.
5) I'm very comfortable with it.

Which backpack for me: REI Alpine day pack (about 2300 cubic inches, I think).

Obviously, you have to make your choice based on your own needs and comfort. You'll get many opinions from folks, many swearing that their system is the best. Which it is - for them. YMMV
babaluey is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 05:21 PM
  #19  
Ice Eater
 
gmacrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 106

Bikes: Specialized Rockhopper (summer), Nakamura Battle Pig (winter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Over the years I've used both panniers and backpacks. There are a billion variables so it's difficult to say which is best for you. I keep both available and for ME, the equation is:

big gear = panniers
little gear = backpack

I prefer to use just the backpack because it gives me more mobility on some of the rougher parts of the commute - but that may not apply to you. I find it's great for my day-to-day stuff like clothes. For heavier stuff like my laptop I prefer to let the bike frame do the work, so it goes in a pannier if I need to commute with it.

So my recommendation is to get both. You'll be glad you have the flexibility of choosing depending on what you have to carry on a particular day. Whatever you buy, spend the extra $$ if possible and get good quality stuff. Panniers especially will suffer the abuse of the road. And if you get a backpack, get one that is designed for bike commuting.
gmacrider is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 05:47 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 91

Bikes: Giant Cypress Sx, Cheap clunker mountain bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use a backpack.

-Running errands I just hop off the bike and take it with me. Easy that way.
-3 Liter hydration bladder that works great for my longer commute on mondays, plus any cruises out in the country side.
-Pretty good wicking system on the pack along with a wicking shirt mean that there is little sweat kept on my back and what is dries quickly when I take off the bag.
-It doubles as a spare backpack for anyone who needs it when going backpacking.
-Holds everything I want- including groceries when needed.

Plus with the compression system on my bag, combined with the suspension system problems such as sore armpits and similar awakard things are not an issue.
Frank B is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 05:53 PM
  #21  
whatever
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonya9999
What about control -- doesn't the extra weight on the frame reduce your control of the bike in turns, especially emergency maneuvers?
I can trackstand on both fixed and freewheel bicycles with heavy off-centre panniers. Their effect on balance is minimal.
dasein is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 06:43 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Land of Oversized Mice and Anteaters
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got a Topeak trunk and quick-release rack for commuting ~15-20 miles. I started off with a backpack - a hydration pack at that - when I switched, I was a much happier man.
Hawkear is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 09:08 PM
  #23  
Enjoy
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The key for a backpack is mostly fit. The straps need to seat over the shoulders and not wander toward the shoulder joint. The better packs have a strap across the chest or hips to prevent that.

Many packs are just too heavy because they have too many compartments. If you get a pack, besure to buy or make a waterproof rain cover. A surprise shower can really soak the contents.
vrkelley is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 09:58 PM
  #24  
here
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I started with a Vaude Sienna backpack. It has a clever frame design with a web that holds most of the area away from the riders back...a breathing space that prevents trapping body heat and sweat. It also has waist and sternum straps that keep the pack from shifting no matter how you maneuver.

As good as that was (I think it's the best cycling pack I've seen), I found hauling heavy loads tiring when riding with dropbars (strictly roadie) or I had a hulking pack with just a few items in it.

I went to the Topeak trunk bag with one of their tubular racks that has a Quick Track mount for the bag. You can read about it on their website, but the short version is the bag can be mounted or removed in two seconds and is rock solid on the frame. The bag can normally carry the equivalent of 8 beverage cans, but also has a zippered gusset that nearly doubles the capacity. On my commute I can easily pack food containers for breakfast and lunch, some clothes and other necessities. The zippers are very well made, too, an important point for something that gets heavy use (and frequent overstuffing) for years.

The Sienna still gets used if I have to carry something unusually bulky (a laptop, sports gear). I'll get around to panniers when the price is right (Arkel T-42's), but for now I have a great combination.
solo is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:59 PM
  #25  
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I use a Specialized Messenger bag. No complaints here I've used it in the summer to boot.
__________________
Raiyn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.