Best practices for increasing daylight visibilty
#52
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 424
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: 1983 Peugeot UO14, KHS Green-Heavily modified, 1972 Raleigh Sprite 27" (work in progress)
I'd recommend one of the Amphipod Xinglet jogging cross belts. It's the same kind of reflective harness/belts that police wear for motorcycle/traffic directing duty. Very lightweight, reflectively, hi-viz lime green straps, fits over any clothing, and best of all folding into something as small as a knit cap. I hear the flashing version is quite bright, but that the watch batteries the active flashers use burn out quickly. I personally just use the standard hi-viz reflective one.
If you have a set of fenders you might consider adding a reflective stripe or 12 square inch "cotton tail" as once required by British/Dutch law on bicycles for traffic visibility.
If you have a set of fenders you might consider adding a reflective stripe or 12 square inch "cotton tail" as once required by British/Dutch law on bicycles for traffic visibility.
#53
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 159
From: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton
I run blinking lights night or day.
I also wear plenty of reflective
clothing at night.

NITERIDER by 1nterceptor, on Flickr
I also wear plenty of reflective
clothing at night.

NITERIDER by 1nterceptor, on Flickr
Marc
#55
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: NJ cellphone central
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Even a relatively small front white LED blinky is useful. I can't tell you how many times the rather low output Citibike white blinky lights have caught my eye as I was crossing a bike lane in NYC on foot in the daylight or with a random cyclist blowing through a red light. They catch the eye more than I expected.
#56
?
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 0
Depends how much you're willing to spend, how much runtime you need, and the brightness you want.
I have $30 flashlight setups to $200 dynamo setups. I also have this light coming in the mail soon, it will be very comparable to $200 lights sold by mec.
https://www.fasttech.com/products/160...00-lumen-white
I have $30 flashlight setups to $200 dynamo setups. I also have this light coming in the mail soon, it will be very comparable to $200 lights sold by mec.
https://www.fasttech.com/products/160...00-lumen-white
Last edited by mrbubbles; 09-21-13 at 04:11 PM.
#57
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
I still think Dinotte tail lights are among the best daytime visible tails you can buy. The 300R or 400R are all most people need and the daytime 400R light is among the brightest money can buy (yes I know there are brighter lights out there.) For a front flasher that is daytime visible you probably don't need to spend more than ~$50. The more expensive headlights just allow you to see the road in front of you in the dark.
#58
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 448
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Hmm, we paint school buses, taxis, and heavy construction equipment with (semi) hi-vis yellow/orange, but just imagine a world where ALL motor vehicles, cyclists, runners, and commuting pedestrians were plastered in that color. Accidents would be a thing of the past.
#59
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 7
From: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Lots of cyclists seem to be using faulty logic to assume that hi-viz clothing doesn't help. Just because you got hit by a car wearing hi-viz does not mean that it doesn't work. You could reach plenty of similarly bad conclusions using that logic:
- Helmets don't work because I got hit by a car while riding with a helmet.
- Brakes don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with brakes.
- Lights don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with lights.
- Etc, etc.
Try using some common sense. Hi-viz clothing makes you more visible -- much more visible. That's why highway crews are required to wear hi-viz clothes. Scientific studies have proven that hi-viz yellow-green is the most visible color to most people. Google it if you don't believe me. Making yourself more visible makes it much more likely that drivers will see you, but it doesn't guarantee it. There are no guarantees with any safety measure. If you get hit while wearing hi-viz clothing there could be many explanations. The driver could have been texting, talking on the phone, tuning their radio or any number of actions that took their eyes off the road. The driver could have been distracted, daydreaming or simply a bad driver. The driver could have intentionally hit you or meant to give you a scare. The driver could have been color blind. Likewise, the cyclist could have been at fault. The cyclist could have been weaving or veering to avoid a pothole. The cyclist could have taken too much of the lane. The cyclist could have been riding in the dark with no lights.
You know what I think? A lot of cyclists refuse to wear hi-viz clothes because they think it's ugly or nerdy. I can understand that, but I value personal safety over appearances. Apparently many cyclists feel otherwise judging by the numbers of them I see wearing black, gray or dark clothes while cycling on busy roads.
- Helmets don't work because I got hit by a car while riding with a helmet.
- Brakes don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with brakes.
- Lights don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with lights.
- Etc, etc.
Try using some common sense. Hi-viz clothing makes you more visible -- much more visible. That's why highway crews are required to wear hi-viz clothes. Scientific studies have proven that hi-viz yellow-green is the most visible color to most people. Google it if you don't believe me. Making yourself more visible makes it much more likely that drivers will see you, but it doesn't guarantee it. There are no guarantees with any safety measure. If you get hit while wearing hi-viz clothing there could be many explanations. The driver could have been texting, talking on the phone, tuning their radio or any number of actions that took their eyes off the road. The driver could have been distracted, daydreaming or simply a bad driver. The driver could have intentionally hit you or meant to give you a scare. The driver could have been color blind. Likewise, the cyclist could have been at fault. The cyclist could have been weaving or veering to avoid a pothole. The cyclist could have taken too much of the lane. The cyclist could have been riding in the dark with no lights.
You know what I think? A lot of cyclists refuse to wear hi-viz clothes because they think it's ugly or nerdy. I can understand that, but I value personal safety over appearances. Apparently many cyclists feel otherwise judging by the numbers of them I see wearing black, gray or dark clothes while cycling on busy roads.
#61
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 20
From: Idaho
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Cannondale Topstone 105
Thank you, Leebo. As I was reading through this thread for the first time I was surprised it took 60 posts before someone suggested a mirror as well. I echo other's suggestions re: bright lights (strobe setting) for daytime use. I am also a fan of Dinotte Lighting products. As I upgrade all of my cycle wear I'll be looking for bright colors from here on out. But, back to the mirror, I consider that as crucial an item for cycling safety as the other items discussed.
#62
Let's Ride!

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 42
From: Lexington, VA USA
Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B
Hi-Viz.
Bought it at Aldi for £6.99 along with some UHT milk, a bike repair kit and some pineapples.
Looks like this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Crane-Hi-V...-/261281735968
Bought it at Aldi for £6.99 along with some UHT milk, a bike repair kit and some pineapples.
Looks like this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Crane-Hi-V...-/261281735968
Hi-viz clothing is your friend in daylight. Reflective gear does no good whatsoever unless its dark/dim and drivers have their headlights on (and many do not even when it's nearly dark outside). I have a collection of neon yellow jerseys, jackets and vests that I almost always wear when commuting. I was convinced of their effectiveness when I spotted a jogger 1/2-mile ahead of me during early morning hours. I also run my head and taillights during the day. My taillight is a super bright Dinotte 140 that is powerful enough to be visible in daylight, and my headlight is even brighter. Last but not least, you always need to ride defensively and assume that drivers don't see you, no matter how brightly lit and dressed you are.
I agree I feel naked without my mirror I have found myself looking for my mirror while walking down the street to see behind me.

I am still looking for a high viz jersey and jacket. something like this of they make a waterproof one too.
#63
Banned
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,543
Likes: 41
From: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS
https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...ycle-tool-kit/
#64
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
I'd recommend one of the Amphipod Xinglet jogging cross belts. It's the same kind of reflective harness/belts that police wear for motorcycle/traffic directing duty. Very lightweight, reflectively, hi-viz lime green straps, fits over any clothing, and best of all folding into something as small as a knit cap.
I still think Dinotte tail lights are among the best daytime visible tails you can buy. The 300R or 400R are all most people need and the daytime 400R light is among the brightest money can buy (yes I know there are brighter lights out there.) For a front flasher that is daytime visible you probably don't need to spend more than ~$50. The more expensive headlights just allow you to see the road in front of you in the dark.
Since part of my commute is on unlit surface streets until I get to the unlit MUP, I do want more than a $50 light. In my case I started with a Niterider Lumina 650, then added a Dinotte XML-3 (claimed 1200 lumens) - and I'm thinking of adding a dynamo setup the next time I replace a front wheel. Still trying to figure out which I prefer on the bars and which on the helmet. These run either in continuous or flashing mode, depending on whether it's dark or light outside. Pricey? Maybe, but I think it's money well spent. YMMV
Lots of cyclists seem to be using faulty logic to assume that hi-viz clothing doesn't help. Just because you got hit by a car wearing hi-viz does not mean that it doesn't work. You could reach plenty of similarly bad conclusions using that logic:
- Helmets don't work because I got hit by a car while riding with a helmet.
- Brakes don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with brakes.
- Lights don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with lights.
- Etc, etc.
Try using some common sense. Hi-viz clothing makes you more visible -- much more visible. That's why highway crews are required to wear hi-viz clothes. Scientific studies have proven that hi-viz yellow-green is the most visible color to most people. Google it if you don't believe me. Making yourself more visible makes it much more likely that drivers will see you, but it doesn't guarantee it. There are no guarantees with any safety measure. If you get hit while wearing hi-viz clothing there could be many explanations. The driver could have been texting, talking on the phone, tuning their radio or any number of actions that took their eyes off the road. The driver could have been distracted, daydreaming or simply a bad driver. The driver could have intentionally hit you or meant to give you a scare. The driver could have been color blind. Likewise, the cyclist could have been at fault. The cyclist could have been weaving or veering to avoid a pothole. The cyclist could have taken too much of the lane. The cyclist could have been riding in the dark with no lights.
You know what I think? A lot of cyclists refuse to wear hi-viz clothes because they think it's ugly or nerdy. I can understand that, but I value personal safety over appearances. Apparently many cyclists feel otherwise judging by the numbers of them I see wearing black, gray or dark clothes while cycling on busy roads.
- Helmets don't work because I got hit by a car while riding with a helmet.
- Brakes don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with brakes.
- Lights don't work because I got hit by a car while riding a bike with lights.
- Etc, etc.
Try using some common sense. Hi-viz clothing makes you more visible -- much more visible. That's why highway crews are required to wear hi-viz clothes. Scientific studies have proven that hi-viz yellow-green is the most visible color to most people. Google it if you don't believe me. Making yourself more visible makes it much more likely that drivers will see you, but it doesn't guarantee it. There are no guarantees with any safety measure. If you get hit while wearing hi-viz clothing there could be many explanations. The driver could have been texting, talking on the phone, tuning their radio or any number of actions that took their eyes off the road. The driver could have been distracted, daydreaming or simply a bad driver. The driver could have intentionally hit you or meant to give you a scare. The driver could have been color blind. Likewise, the cyclist could have been at fault. The cyclist could have been weaving or veering to avoid a pothole. The cyclist could have taken too much of the lane. The cyclist could have been riding in the dark with no lights.
You know what I think? A lot of cyclists refuse to wear hi-viz clothes because they think it's ugly or nerdy. I can understand that, but I value personal safety over appearances. Apparently many cyclists feel otherwise judging by the numbers of them I see wearing black, gray or dark clothes while cycling on busy roads.
Hi Viz clothes, multiple lights up front, multiple lights in the rear, bells, horns, defensive lane positioning, situational awareness, etc. These all will decrease the potential for an accident. None will eliminate the possibility of an accident. You can do everything right, and just be unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Of course. I find it much easier to glance in my mirror to see who/what is behind me than to keep turning my head. Plus, at night, a quick glance in my mirror tells me if my Dinotte 300R is positioned correctly ('cuz it "paints" the pavement behind me with red light).
#65
Keepin it Wheel




Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,964
Likes: 5,224
From: San Diego
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
And having a loud horn doesn't hurt either.
#66
This morning I wish I had a loud horn... during my early morning commute a car was approaching from a minor side street looked like he/she wasn't going to stop so I yelled loud enough that he/she jerked to a stop. My command voice isn't what it used to be, the yelling gave me a sore throat.
#67
?
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 0
You know what I think? A lot of cyclists refuse to wear hi-viz clothes because they think it's ugly or nerdy. I can understand that, but I value personal safety over appearances. Apparently many cyclists feel otherwise judging by the numbers of them I see wearing black, gray or dark clothes while cycling on busy roads.

hi-viz vest otoh are not.
#68
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 1,260
This morning I wish I had a loud horn... during my early morning commute a car was approaching from a minor side street looked like he/she wasn't going to stop so I yelled loud enough that he/she jerked to a stop. My command voice isn't what it used to be, the yelling gave me a sore throat.
H
#69
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 1,260
Absolutely agree, however, IMO, your point would have been better illustrated with an actual hi-viz cycling jacket. I have the cycling version of the runners jacket pictured above and, also IMO, it is actually more stylish (and functional) than the runners model you linked. That makes it pretty stylish indeed, since that runners jacket isn't sack-cloth and bunting. FWIW.
H
H
#73
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 1,260
I can't tell anyone what or how to feel, but I can suggest that perhaps they are missing the point: is it better to 'feel' safer or is it better to BE safer? Try reporting for work as a highway flagger without your hi-viz and see where you get. Just because German cyclists don't wear hi-viz... I mean... they don't wear helmets either, for the most part... does that mean that these things are truly not useful, or is it that they are maybe not that useful in GERMANY, where there are stiff penalties for motorists that maul cyclists because "they didn't see them... " In the U.S. and U.K., drivers are held to much less of an account for their actions. Cyclists have fought back against the mounting CARNAGE by doing what they can, to be more visible. Is that such a bad thing? Really? Is it so bad to want to take some steps to tip the odds in your favour (sic) at night. Or even in the daylight. Being contrarian only works when there isn't anyone around as smart or smarter, who can call you on it. It also isn't cool to be contrarian when the issue is a life and death one.
H
#74
Banned
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,543
Likes: 41
From: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS
I can't tell anyone what or how to feel, but I can suggest that perhaps they are missing the point: is it better to 'feel' safer or is it better to BE safer? Try reporting for work as a highway flagger without your hi-viz and see where you get. Just because German cyclists don't wear hi-viz... I mean... they don't wear helmets either, for the most part... does that mean that these things are truly not useful, or is it that they are maybe not that useful in GERMANY, where there are stiff penalties for motorists that maul cyclists because "they didn't see them... " In the U.S. and U.K., drivers are held to much less of an account for their actions. Cyclists have fought back against the mounting CARNAGE by doing what they can, to be more visible. Is that such a bad thing? Really? Is it so bad to want to take some steps to tip the odds in your favour (sic) at night. Or even in the daylight. Being contrarian only works when there isn't anyone around as smart or smarter, who can call you on it. It also isn't cool to be contrarian when the issue is a life and death one.
H
However, FYI, most people make fun of the Germans because they always wear helmets compared to everyone on the rest of the continent, which tend not to wear Hi-Viz nor helmet (Dutch for example).
#75
Let's Ride!

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 42
From: Lexington, VA USA
Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B
I also got this which I think is a steal for £20.
https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...ycle-tool-kit/
https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...ycle-tool-kit/




