Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

How many gear inches are you pushing?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

How many gear inches are you pushing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-14 | 03:28 PM
  #101  
kingston's Avatar
Jedi Master
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL

Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
74" is a big gear. ...
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
... I would go lower (pick up a tooth or two on the cog) and work your way back up as you get used to spinning faster. Even with a lower gear, you'll build strength on the climbs.
Thanks for the advice. I'm going to drop from 44/16 to 44/18 which is 66" on the wabi gearing chart and see how that goes for a week or two. I'll probably have to switch to my winter bike at the end of the month, but it looks like I will need a few more gearing options for the spring to find something that works.
kingston is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 04:23 PM
  #102  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by chas58
Good point. There are a lot of variables to consider.

It takes a lot of practice to get proficient at high cadence. I may be doing 90-100 on a fast road ride, 130-150 on the velodrome, 50-60 riding with my wife, and much lower climbing hills on a tandem or mountain bike. One thing for sure, 90+ rpm works up quite a sweat.

Do what is comfortable for you; just realize if you are pumping hard it may not be efficient. 70-80rpm at a moderate speed is fine for many people
I can't even conceive being able to spin at 130-150 rpm. My Raleigh sports model is 51-69-92 GI, and even on a downhill I spin out at approximately 27 mph which is around 100 rpm. I have been up 30+ mph with that gearing, but I don't feel in control at that cadence.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 05:42 PM
  #103  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,299
Likes: 6,556
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by kickstart
I can't even conceive being able to spin at 130-150 rpm. My Raleigh sports model is 51-69-92 GI, and even on a downhill I spin out at approximately 27 mph which is around 100 rpm. I have been up 30+ mph with that gearing, but I don't feel in control at that cadence.
I've timed myself at 180 rpm. The trick is for your butt not to bounce. You really should teach your legs with a low-geared fixed gear. 'Tis the season.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.

Last edited by noglider; 11-02-14 at 05:50 PM.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 08:11 PM
  #104  
kickstart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Originally Posted by noglider
I've timed myself at 180 rpm. The trick is for your butt not to bounce. You really should teach your legs with a low-geared fixed gear. 'Tis the season.
I tried fixed gear once (other than when I was a kid on my little red tricycle) and absolutely hated it, as in rather not ride than ride one.
Back on topic, my build whether cycling or running has always favored strength over speed, think mule rather than Thoroughbred. I'm not competitive or speed orientated, and where I live strength for hill climbing is far more important than speed.
I don't think I could do 180 rpm on a stationary cycle.




Besides that, I prefer to treat a ride like a gourmet meal than a pie eating contest.
kickstart is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-14 | 06:44 AM
  #105  
kingston's Avatar
Jedi Master
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL

Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

Originally Posted by kingston
...I'm going to drop from 44/16 to 44/18...
I did the same 25 mile loop today with 44/18 gearing as I did yesterday with 44/16 gearing with similar effort in basically the exact same amount of time. I'm not sure what I expected, but I guess I learned that gearing doesn't make you faster.

I also noticed that my top speed was 25.5 mph (downhill) and calculated my cadence at around 130. I'm going to need a lot of practice to get up to 180 because 130 seemed ridiculously fast to me.
kingston is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-14 | 11:52 AM
  #106  
chas58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 415
From: Michigan

Bikes: too many of all kinds

+1

Sounds good. I'm sure you can accelerate and brake faster with the lower gearing too.

Really, 130 is plenty fast. for most people there is no need to spin faster than that (one possible exception - I did 180rpm going down hill once, but I wouldn't recommend that to anyone!)

Originally Posted by kingston
I did the same 25 mile loop today with 44/18 gearing as I did yesterday with 44/16 gearing with similar effort in basically the exact same amount of time. I'm not sure what I expected, but I guess I learned that gearing doesn't make you faster.

I also noticed that my top speed was 25.5 mph (downhill) and calculated my cadence at around 130. I'm going to need a lot of practice to get up to 180 because 130 seemed ridiculously fast to me.
chas58 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-14 | 09:27 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Eastern - Canada - Atl Province

Bikes: DeRosa

Aslong as i could over a 10 miles stretch ...simple i could have push more but was already at high rpm
CastleDerosa is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-14 | 09:35 AM
  #108  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,299
Likes: 6,556
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

You know, I could be way off in saying I went at 180 rpm. Maybe it was a lot less.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-14 | 10:40 AM
  #109  
TransitBiker's Avatar
contiuniously variable
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bikes: 2012 Breezer Uptown Infinity, Fuji Varsity

150 RPM is doable in low gear on a flat (you look silly), or down a steep-assed hill (yer gonna die) from my experience.

The hill in tyler park is a 27% max grade, on my old road bike i went down there at around 45 mph, Speed limit is 25. Took me smoking brakes to stop on the flat at the bottom. If i had crashed, i'd probably not be here right now.

- Andy
TransitBiker is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-14 | 12:17 AM
  #110  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

I was going a little north of 150 RPM when I hit my top speed of 32.4 MPH on the fixed-gear.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-14 | 09:11 AM
  #111  
kingston's Avatar
Jedi Master
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL

Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

I rode 50 miles over the weekend with 44/18 gearing (66"). Finished in just under 3 hours, which is a normal time for me on a geared bike. I calculated average cadence in the high 80's, which means I must have spent a lot of time in the 100's. I don't know for sure, but I think that's a higher average cadence than I would have had on a geared bike. I like the gear everywhere but downhill where I feel out of control when my cadence gets above 120 or so, especially if the decent is bumpy.


I switched to a 44/17 (70") on Monday and did a couple of 25 mile rides this week. I like that gear better for the flat and much better downhill (my 17 tooth is a freewheel), but it's too big of a gear for me riding into a headwind.


I may try a 42/17 (67") or a 45/18 (68") to see how that works. For what it's worth, I think riding fixed is more interesting than SS.
kingston is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-14 | 09:38 AM
  #112  
TransitBiker's Avatar
contiuniously variable
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bikes: 2012 Breezer Uptown Infinity, Fuji Varsity

Funny reading all these posts with teeth counts and whatnot..... with the N360 you never know what exact ratio you're using, but you immediately know if it's the right one.

- Andy
TransitBiker is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-14 | 09:39 AM
  #113  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,299
Likes: 6,556
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by kingston
For what it's worth, I think riding fixed is more interesting than SS.
For sure. For some, fixed is a way of life, almost a religion. Not for me at all, but I like to do it some.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-14 | 01:22 PM
  #114  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

I pulled my Chorus/Centaur mixed group off my old Gazelle to build up a race bike for my son. Just for funzies, I did a quick and dirty FG conversion. 43x15. 75ish gear inches. (Yes, I know 43 is an odd (and unusual) size, but I happened to have a 43t chainring from an ill-fated magic gear experiment.)

Rode it to work this morning. It's a little taller than I would normally go, but not by too much. So far, so good.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AU Tiger
Hybrid Bicycles
13
04-20-19 09:36 AM
Still Pedaling
Folding Bikes
8
08-24-14 05:23 PM
PeregrineA1
Tandem Cycling
12
10-20-13 01:04 PM
bud16415
Touring
78
08-26-11 10:08 AM
J-Jo
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
9
05-03-10 10:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.