PDW Danger Zone tail light?
#27
The Danger Zone wins by default, you know my bad experience with the Radbots I had. The DZ also allows battery changes without tools, has some extra-crazy strobe tricks, and I'm pretty sure it has a longer runtime (although still short).
#28
__________________
Community guidelines
Community guidelines
#29
Yep. Just checked the PDW site- 50 hrs on the DZ and 30 for the Radbot 1000.
__________________
Community guidelines
Community guidelines
#30
I just had another thought on mounting- use a Gino mount. This thingy can be used wherever a M5 bolt can go, so it it could be used at the seat stay or the drop out. But I don't know what size clamps that the PDW and PBSF lights use...
BTW if you're considering the Gino mount, you could just drill a hole in a square piece of scrap metal, bolt that to your eyelet, and bolt the light receptacle straight to it. I know you're not made of money, and those Gino mounts are pricey.
#31
I have a Radbot 1000, and I was disappointed when I did the math -- on steady mode it claims a 15hr runtime, and even using 1200mah primaries, it only puts about 1/5W into a 1W LED.
#32

I have a Radbot 1000, and I was disappointed when I did the math -- on steady mode it claims a 15hr runtime, and even using 1200mah primaries, it only puts about 1/5W into a 1W LED.
So if you run the Radbots in steady-on with NiMH cells, the cells need to be swapped out every 2 hours to stay at or above 75% of max output with NiMH. In flash mode, a 3 hour changeout will stay at or above 80% of maximum.
Another steady-burn monster is the DealExtreme SKU 20333, a flashlight with a red emitter: https://www.dealextreme.com/p/ultrafi...2-cr123a-20333 I have one of these and it's REALLY intense if aimed right
Might be a good "early warning system" for people who ride in dense fog, although flashing would still be better yet.
Last edited by mechBgon; 11-24-11 at 01:12 AM.
#33
Macaws Rock!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
I think the only way a DZ is going to get 50 hours of runtime is if it is running in the OFF mode. I ran mine on a pair of freshly charged 800mAh NiMH cells and it finally shut itself down at about 20 hours. It was pretty feeble during the last 5 hours or so.
__________________
---
San Francisco, California
---
San Francisco, California
#34
Macaws Rock!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
I just had another thought on mounting- use a Gino mount. This thingy can be used wherever a M5 bolt can go, so it it could be used at the seat stay or the drop out. But I don't know what size clamps that the PDW and PBSF lights use...
__________________
---
San Francisco, California
---
San Francisco, California
#35
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Likes: 324
Bikes: 2 many
Thanks----------------------------------------giving............have a happy one.
#36
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 69
From: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
I guess if you want the convenience of using a light with cells integrated in the body then PDW has at least two good tail lights.
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well.
Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four.........
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well.
Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four.........
#37
Macaws Rock!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
__________________
---
San Francisco, California
---
San Francisco, California
#38
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
#39
I guess if you want the convenience of using a light with cells integrated in the body then PDW has at least two good tail lights.
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well.
Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four.........
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well.
Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four.........
#41
On that note, BrianMc did some measurements with the Radbot 1000 and his assessment is found here: https://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/...ar-light/page2
I speculate the 1W blinkies on the market only deliver 1W in flashing mode, if even then. If you want a high-brightness steady-burn light, the Hotshot might be your ticket to ride. I haven't checked burn time in steady mode, but if it's of particular interest I could do a runtime test.
Are there any tests or measurements that compare the visibility of taillights with car tail/brake lights? I don't need crazy -- I've seen bike taillights that were way too bright and I don't want to go there.
#42
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 14
It will not. I think the DZ was meant to be mounted vertically because the button is on the bottom (or top) so no light will be emitted from those areas. Light is, however, emitted from the side of the light when mounted vertically.
#43
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 14
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
DZ will not last more than 12 or 15 hours with any useful amount of output. Not with NiMH at least. Alkalines might be different, but will be more costly in the long run.
#44
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...able-taillight
This light leaves all the cheap lights like Superfalsh/SF Turbo/Danger Zone/Radbot/All Cateyes etc. in the dust. IMHO, there is no compelling reason to buy them at all. I am amazed how a light this small can be so powerful. For the price, one can get two just for the redundancy. Dinotte 300R is 50% brighter but 600% more expensive so there is no reason to buy it either...
This light leaves all the cheap lights like Superfalsh/SF Turbo/Danger Zone/Radbot/All Cateyes etc. in the dust. IMHO, there is no compelling reason to buy them at all. I am amazed how a light this small can be so powerful. For the price, one can get two just for the redundancy. Dinotte 300R is 50% brighter but 600% more expensive so there is no reason to buy it either...
#45
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,239
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area, Calif.
Alkalines vs. good NiMHs will deliver a little higher energy content when used with low-current devices (about 4 W-hr vs. 3 W-hr). But when the alkalines start to go their voltage slowly drops over a long period of time. So the light will stay on for many more hours, but will slowly be getting dimmer and dimmer during that time. With NiMHs, the voltage stays pretty constant until the cells are almost dead and then drops much more rapidly.
#46
Nearly all other taillights are powered by replaceable AAA or AA cells. The Hotshot is powered by a non-user-replaceable Li cell. One has to wonder how long this cell will last, because in a light that sells for $33 shipped, it is likely this is a cheap cell. I have had cheap Li cells last for days or years.
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread.
Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot.
Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot.
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread.
Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot.
Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot.
#47
Nearly all other taillights are powered by replaceable AAA or AA cells. The Hotshot is powered by a non-user-replaceable Li cell. One has to wonder how long this cell will last, because in a light that sells for $33 shipped, it is likely this is a cheap cell. I have had cheap Li cells last for days or years.
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread.
Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot.
Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot.
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread.
Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot.
Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot.
Operating in the rain: you'll find many more links of people complaining of Superflash & the like letting the water in. Come to think about it, they are more likely to do so because of the replaceable batteries so let me disagree with you on this point.
As far as the narrow beam goes, it seems to have a wider one than Superflash & Radbot both of which I also own & use. I mostly use Hotshot for daytime riding when the other cheap lights are just not bright enough & it has performed splendidly.
Last edited by rfomenko; 11-27-11 at 01:12 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Metaluna
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
22
10-22-17 09:26 AM
moleman76
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
10
05-28-13 02:31 AM
Richard Cranium
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
6
08-13-10 08:02 AM






