Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

computer magnet position on spokes

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

computer magnet position on spokes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-11 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
From: Palm Harbor, FL

Bikes: 2018 Specialized Roubaix Sport and Ruby Sport

computer magnet position on spokes

The computers come with setup instructions for a value to use based on tire size. Let's pick the arbitrary 700x23. Based on where you mount the pickup sensor, the magnet could be anywhere along the spoke from outside edge to inside edge. Won't this cause some level of error? When they provide the factors, is it based on the center of the wheel spoke?
rojeho is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-11 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
The space coyote lied.
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 48,723
Likes: 10,982
From: dusk 'til dawn.

Bikes: everywhere

Doesn't matter.
The computer counts how many times the magnet passes the sensor for a given period of time. With this information and the circumference of the wheel it can calculate distance covered, speed and other data.

If you have the magnet REALLY close to the hub, chances of the sensor counting the magnet twice per revolution increases, especially at slow speeds, so don't put it that far down.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-11 | 09:14 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 555
Likes: 11
The magnet and pickup are measuring wheel revolutions. The computer translates revolutions to distance, based on the circumference of the tire size. The error source is that there's quite a bit of variability in circumference with tire pressure for a given tire.
SBinNYC is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-11 | 09:35 PM
  #4  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
Yeah, if you want full accuracy, inflate your tires to your normal riding pressure, then do a measured rollout with the bike loaded (including yourself), and enter the effective tire circumference you get. But the location of the magnet won't matter.
mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-11 | 03:29 AM
  #5  
Juha's Avatar
Formerly Known as Newbie
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 5
From: Helsinki, Finland
There is one thing to consider: distance from the passing magnet to the sensor in the fork blade. Your computer's manual should state this, it's usually a couple of mm. If you place the magnet close to the hub, you will have less distance, even to the point where magnet hits the sensor and/or fork blade. The closer you move it to the rim, the more distance you will have between the two.

As mentioned, as long as the two are correctly positioned in relation to each other, the location itself doesn't matter.

--J
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.

Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?


Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
Juha is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-11 | 05:14 AM
  #6  
akohekohe's Avatar
The Professor
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 899
Likes: 7
From: Center Sandwich, New Hampshire

Bikes: Alex Moulton Double Pylon, Surly Big Dummy, Alex Moulton GT, AZUB TiFly

Originally Posted by mechBgon
Yeah, if you want full accuracy, inflate your tires to your normal riding pressure, then do a measured rollout with the bike loaded (including yourself), and enter the effective tire circumference you get. But the location of the magnet won't matter.
Better yet borrow a Garmin bicycle computer and it will calculate the wheel size based on the wheel revolutions and the distance traveled based on the GPS data.
akohekohe is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-11 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
chasmm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY

Bikes: '85 Rossin Super Record, '88 Specialized Sequoia, '10 Raleigh Cadent FT2, '10 Specialized Roubaix Elite

For one of the more "fun" discussions on BF about this, check out this thread...BF at its best (and worst)

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...he-front-wheel
chasmm is offline  
Reply
Old 01-14-11 | 11:11 PM
  #8  
ItsJustMe's Avatar
Seņior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 10
From: Michigan

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

It should be said that generally it's better to put the sensor closer to the hub. Not because it's going to measure any differently, as has been said, it's just counting how many times the wheel turns, but because if you put the sensor and magnet near the rim, the magnet is going past the sensor very fast, and at higher speeds the sensor may not pick up every revolution, leading to inaccuracy. Near the hub the magnet moves past the sensor quite a bit more slowly and you'll be less likely to have the sensor begin "skipping" counts at high speeds.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dave_mac
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
39
04-19-18 07:45 PM
nihonjin
Bicycle Mechanics
10
02-07-16 03:30 PM
Rdrcr
Bicycle Mechanics
13
02-12-12 08:44 PM
John Phoenix
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
8
10-25-10 02:55 AM
DawgPound
Hybrid Bicycles
6
04-16-10 10:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.