Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Does this frame geometry make sense?

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.
View Poll Results: Does this frame make sense?
Yes, it should be a fun inner-city commuter
6
75.00%
No, you're a moron
2
25.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Does this frame geometry make sense?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-09 | 09:40 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Does this frame geometry make sense?

I played around a little in BikeCAD this afternoon, after getting my frame fitting results back. I'm trying to shoehorn my 6'5", 94cm inseam body around a fast commuter frame to fit 700x38c tires+fenders (and an EBB).

Does this geometry look reasonable? It's 72.5 head angle, 63.5 C-C seat, 63 C-C top. Using a Dimension cross fork (400mm A2C, 45mm rake) the trail ends up being about 62.5mm, the Jones -2.4, and the front projection .067.

This is my first frame design, so I really don't know what I'm doing. Any advice would be welcome!
Attached Images
File Type: png
Side.png (14.9 KB, 160 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt
BikeCAD.txt (3.5 KB, 20 views)
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-09 | 09:19 AM
  #2  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,307
Likes: 5,211
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Looks ok to me!

Braze 'er up and tell us how it rides!
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-09 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
cbchess's Avatar
Map maker
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA

Bikes: Ventana El Ciclon, Walt Works 29er, Specialized Enduro (fixed up for my son).

Front looks to be a bit steep in the head angle and might be on the twitchy side. That is just my personal preference, I like a slacker head angle.
cbchess is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-09 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
Framebuilder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Looks good, should work fine. Although I think you'd be better balanced if the chainstays were a bit longer.
Live Wire is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-09 | 09:36 PM
  #5  
arshak's Avatar
'Cross and Road nut
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: ABQ

Bikes: '85 Atala, 87 De Rosa Track bike, TT Funny bike (24inch front wheel), Ritchey Cross bike, K2 Razorback, Bridgestone, Atherton, Cannondale, Tsunami, Custom Ti Bike,

I would go with 71.5 or 71.7 degree head tube angle as this is going to be a BIG frame and with correspondingly longer chain stays in the back, my 2 cents worth
arshak is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-09 | 01:02 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Thanks all, I appreciate the advice. I'll add 10mm to the chainstays, since I'll be riding it semi-upright most of the time and will probably have lots of weight on my butt.

What I really want to get is the 'carvy' feel in making tight turns in small city streets at 20km/h. Sort of like a criterium, but with less pedaling in the turns. That's why I put in the 72.5 head angle. Fingers crossed!
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-09 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
Framebuilder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by antonyfhilliard
Thanks all, I appreciate the advice. I'll add 10mm to the chainstays, since I'll be riding it semi-upright most of the time and will probably have lots of weight on my butt.

What I really want to get is the 'carvy' feel in making tight turns in small city streets at 20km/h. Sort of like a criterium, but with less pedaling in the turns. That's why I put in the 72.5 head angle. Fingers crossed!
That's what I prefer too- stick w/the steeper HA, you'll be glad you did.
Live Wire is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 05:29 AM
  #8  
Thylacine's Avatar
Industry Maven
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
From: Wherever good bikes are sold

Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.

My Mods in RED

I'm assuming this is a steel frame....


Frame Angles
*Headangle = 72.5∞
*Seatangle = 72.5∞ (71.5 if using a straight post)

Major Lengths
Wheelbase = 1088.5549 mm
*Seat tube length (c-t) = 690.0 mm
Seat tube length (c-c) = 638.6374 mm
Top tube length (effective) = 632.68585 mm (Might be a tad long for a commuter)
Top tube length (c-c) = 630.00476 mm
*Head tube length = 200.0 mm (215)
*Bottom bracket height = 271.5 mm
Bottom bracket drop = 77.5 mm (70)
*Chainstay length = 440.0 mm
*Front Center = 660.0 mm

Fork and Headset Specs
*Fork offset = 45.0 mm (48-50mm would be better with 72/72.5 HTA)
*Fork length = 400.0 mm (might be a tad short)
This is a rigid fork
*Lower stack height = 11.0 mm

Stability Info
Trail = 62.855465 mm
Jones stability criterion = -2.4148805
Relative front projection = 0.06759858

Tube Diameters
*Seat tube diameter = 34.9 mm (31.8)
*Top tube diameter = 31.8 mm
*Head tube diameter = 38.1 mm (36)
*Down tube diameter = 50.8 mm (38.1)

Seatstay Info
*Seatstay diameter = 22.2 mm (16mm if using caliper brakes)
Direct distance from rear axle to center of seatstay at seat tube junction = 566.4608 mm
Sideways angle of seatstay = 6.1623745∞
Seatstays are straight
*Distance from top of seat tube to center of seatstay = 40.0 mm
*Location of center of seatstay at seat tube junction (0∞ = rear of seat tube, 90∞ = side of seat tube) = 45.0

Bottom Bracket Info
*Bottom bracket length = 68.0 mm
*Bottom bracket diameter = 57.2 mm (38.1)
Chainstay angle relative to horizontal = 10.356807
Seatstay angle relative to horizontal = 67.59641

Welding Clearance Info
*Head tube extension above top edge of top tube = 8.0 mm (10mm)
*Head tube extension below bottom edge of down tube = 10.0 mm (15mm)
Gap between bottom of top tube and top of down tube at head tube junction = 90.58825 mm
*Seat tube extension above top edge of top tube = 40.0 mm (20)
Extension of outer face of BB from side edge of chainstay = 3.7928886 mm
Gap between inside edges of chainstays at BB junction = 15.585777 mm


My 2c
Thylacine is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-09 | 08:33 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Thanks Thylacine. I've shortened the seat tube extension above the top tube to 30mm. The 77.5 BB drop and 57mm shell is because I'm using an eccentric - I figure I'll lose about 7-8mm from rotating the eccentric upwards to tighten the chain.

As for more fork rake... well, it's steel, I'll just have to test-ride it and bend it if necessary.
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-09 | 09:36 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Followup: The frame rides great, it's just as carvy as I hoped for. I did get a bit of pedal strike when riding home drunk, and the top tube is definitely 1cm too long, but them's the breaks. Thank you for your advice.
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-09 | 08:57 AM
  #11  
cbchess's Avatar
Map maker
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA

Bikes: Ventana El Ciclon, Walt Works 29er, Specialized Enduro (fixed up for my son).

How about some pictures!?!
cbchess is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 02:27 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
As you wish! (it's a bit ugly, I built it up with cheap used parts from the local bike co-ops)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Image372.jpg (98.5 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg
Image373.jpg (100.9 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg
Image347.jpg (101.3 KB, 64 views)
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-09 | 06:51 AM
  #13  
cbchess's Avatar
Map maker
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA

Bikes: Ventana El Ciclon, Walt Works 29er, Specialized Enduro (fixed up for my son).

nice!
where did you order such a custom frame? how much?
cbchess is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-12 | 02:46 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Three years later on my XACD chinese Ti frame:

* I specced the BB too low, top tube too long (as I mentioned before)
* XACD specced the tire clearance symmetrical on top and sides. This resulted in unneccessarily bent chainstays (didn't need 1cm side clearance)
* Cable guides not ideally placed - rear brake cable guide too close to caliper, Rohloff chainstay guide doesn't secure cable around bends (could be solved be straightening chainstay)
* Top tube too high - straight top tubes are too 1970s. Should have sloped the top tube 10-15 degrees, and gotten a taller seatpost.
* Fork was too short. I replaced it with a 410mm carbon fork which works great.

Other than that, it's been good!
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
e30jean
Bicycle Mechanics
11
06-19-16 09:45 PM
indian101
Framebuilders
11
06-16-15 10:40 PM
adam_mac84
Framebuilders
7
03-28-14 03:18 PM
jemsurvey
Road Cycling
2
01-13-10 05:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.