Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Chrome Moly vs. HiTen fork

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Chrome Moly vs. HiTen fork

Reply

Old 01-09-13, 07:52 AM
  #1  
Myosmith
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Thread Starter
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,845
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Chrome Moly vs. HiTen fork

I wasn't sure where to post this but it seemed to be more of a frame builder question than a mechnic question so I thought I'd try it here first.

I've got a 1990 Trek 700 frameset with the chrome-moly main tubes and the hi-ten fork. The 730 of that year came with a chrome-moly fork. I can get a chrome-moly fork that is a nearly exact replacement for the original but I'm wondering just how much of a difference in weight, comfort and strength it would make to replace the hi-ten with chro-mo. The reason I ask is that the original fork received some cosmetic damage last summer and I'm looking at repainting it (too much damage for a decent touch up, but LBS says fork is structurally fine). I can upgrade to chro-mo for about $60 but I'm wondering if it is worth it.

Thanks
Myosmith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-13, 09:10 AM
  #2  
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Posts: 10,490

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Hi-ten has a lower yield strength than chromoly, so for the hi-ten fork blades to resist permanent bending in a collision for example, the wall thickness for blades of similar outside dimensions would have to be thicker (and therefore heavier) for a hi-ten fork than for a chromoly fork. Also, because the hi-ten blades have thicker walls, the fork won't have the flexibility and resilience of a chromoly fork.

IMHO, for $60 it would be a worthwhile upgrade.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-13, 04:12 PM
  #3  
MassiveD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
The variation in tube thickness tends to be that the tube needs to be twice as thick in order to be the same strength, but that does not mean the whole thing will weigh twice as much, due to the weight of other common components and whether design wise strength is the governing design factor, and depending on how much of the upgrade fork is upgraded to chromo at a lower weight.
MassiveD is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service