Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Conversation at a red light

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Conversation at a red light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-16, 03:54 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
Nice way to treat a woman. A shame the jocks replied to the thread with the same attitude.
You think everybody should agree with her because she's a woman?

And are you calling people "jocks" to be divisive? For shame.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 03:55 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Should have asked him if there were any Pokemon in the intersection.
__________________
Hey guys, lets go play bikes! Strava

SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 03:57 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 149

Bikes: Synapse, Slate

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
My riding buddy tried to tell someone yesterday that they should be wearing a helmet. The excuse was "I wear a helmet on my motorcycle". Told my friend he was just wasting his breath.
faulker479 is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:18 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
You think everybody should agree with her because she's a woman?

And are you calling people "jocks" to be divisive? For shame.
So you think it appropriate for the driver to say "Go F**k yourself"? And for another poster to describe her as a pr**k?

If you want to be included in the jock catergory, go ahead. I didn't think you would want to, but then life turns up all sorts of surprises.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:22 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
And I will go further. There have been posts here where male cyclists have bashed on the sides or roofs of cars after being "offended" by driver behaviour. And the subsequent support has been overwhelming. There also have been lots of threads about cyclists yelling at drivers, giving the single-finger salute and other protest behaviour. All with support.

Yet a woman rider takes a stand, points out to a driver an issue that is recognised as a significant cause of vehicle collisions -- some with cyclists -- and she gets dumped on.

Interesting behaviour.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:24 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
one needs to pick their battles wisely...and choose an appropriate behavior modification tool.

scolding strangers rarely achieves a positive result.

when ******y motorists feel compelled to remind me that I didn't come to a 'full stop' at a sign, I usually inform them that they apparently have me confused with someone who gives a crap what they think.
FullGas is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:25 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,975

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
If it makes you feel better, yesterday I was behind a car at a stop light. The light changed, but the car didn't move. I saw the driver with hands off the wheel looking down. If I were in my car I would give a polite toot of the horn, but I was on my bike and feeling a little adrenaline and such, so I blasted my Airzound airhorn for a moment longer than polite. The car began pulling away and I saw the driver look up and into the rearview mirror where he did a double take.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:37 PM
  #33  
U.I.O.G.D.
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eastern Townships, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 172

Bikes: Bassi Hog's Back gravel/bikepacking, Bombtrack Hook 2 gravel, Marinoni Genius/Campy Record, Marinoni Special EL-OS/Campy Record (retired to permanent indoor trainer), Rocky Mountain hybrid, Rocky Mountain mtb Cervelo R3 Team/Campy Chorus FOR SALE

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
What law was he breaking**********
I don't know about the OP's location but in my jurisdiction (Quebec) it is an infraction to handle a cell phone while in control of a motor vehicle. To do so you are obliged to pull off the road and immobilize your car. And do it quick as we also have a law against idling for more than 3 minutes except when in traffic.
beechnutC23 is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:45 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
drlogik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,772

Bikes: '87-ish Pinarello Montello; '89 Nishiki Ariel; '85 Raleigh Wyoming, '16 Wabi Special, '16 Wabi Classic, '14 Kona Cinder Cone

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 409 Times in 255 Posts
In today's world what you did was a "micro-aggression" and is frowned upon. You see, it is politically incorrect to interrupt a person who is self-absorbed in their electronic media. It's best to let them walk off a cliff by themselves.
drlogik is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:46 PM
  #35  
Just Plain Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,026

Bikes: Lynskey R230

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by smarkinson
I'm not sure of the law in the US but in Australia it is illegal to operate a mobile phone while driving and this includes when the car is stationary ie waiting at lights.

A quick Google and it seems it is the same in California too.
Yes, that's the law. I have a friend who's a cop and assigned to bike patrol. He can ride up the white line at intersections and have his pick of people to cite for being on their phone while driving. He says the looks he gets when he gently taps on the window and asks the driver to pull over is priceless.
PhotoJoe is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:57 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1069 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times in 505 Posts
Originally Posted by NYMXer
The correct answer will vary depending on which state we are talking about. Here in NYS, get caught using any mobile device in a car while operating a motor vehicle on the road and you get a 5 point ticket. Mind you, a normal speeding ticket is 3 points, so the fine is heavy for sure.

More and more states are making this adaptation of their laws but I question if it is for our safety or our money?

As far as the OP goes, it would have been best to say nothing and just focus on your safety at that light.
https://dmv.ny.gov/tickets/cell-phone-use-texting Noticed driving not operating is the word used???

Different guidelines for Commercial drivers. Distracted Driving, Talking & Texting
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 05:01 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Jadesfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,499

Bikes: '88 Bianchi, '94ish Trek

Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1085 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times in 58 Posts
Well, I'm not sure I would have taken the same approach as the OP, I do agree with the sentiment behind it. The state government is trying to pass stricter cell phone laws in Louisiana now, too. While I have no doubt that it is strictly a money-grab, as a driver that has passed people on the Lake Ponchartrain Causeway that are face-timing on their phones going 70mph, I am a big fan of less technology when operating several tons of mechanics. As a cyclist, I just have to ride with as much situational awareness as possible and I am certainly a more defensive rider than I am a driver.
__________________
Originally Posted by LAJ
Everyone thinks they have had a long strange trip, until they look at other folks' journeys. Then they realize everyone has had a long strange trip, just using different modes of transportation.
"The mystery of life isn't a problem to solve, but a reality to experience."
Jadesfire is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 05:19 PM
  #38  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434

Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times in 153 Posts
Thanks for trying Teacherlady, but these selfish jerks really don't care if they hit & kill anyone.
And as you can see from several of the responses herein, many of them are cyclists too.

I drink a toast to Darwin whenever one of these drivers manages to take himself or herself (and their offspring) out of the gene pool without dragging one of us with them.

Seriously, if you text while driving (and that includes while stopped) I hope you are the only one who eventually pays the price for your selfishness and stupidity.
calamarichris is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 05:21 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
I would say that being happy about someone dying is worse than texting while on a stop light, but each to his own.
PepeM is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 05:24 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
Yet a woman rider takes a stand, points out to a driver an issue that is recognised as a significant cause of vehicle collisions -- some with cyclists -- and she gets dumped on.

Interesting behaviour.
No idea the gender of anyone in this story, but knowing it now, it still doesn't change my stance that it is a waste of time and far more likely to result in confrontation than someone admitting they are wrong.

Originally Posted by beechnutC23
I don't know about the OP's location but in my jurisdiction (Quebec) it is an infraction to handle a cell phone while in control of a motor vehicle. To do so you are obliged to pull off the road and immobilize your car. And do it quick as we also have a law against idling for more than 3 minutes except when in traffic.
Originally Posted by PhotoJoe
Yes, that's the law. I have a friend who's a cop and assigned to bike patrol. He can ride up the white line at intersections and have his pick of people to cite for being on their phone while driving. He says the looks he gets when he gently taps on the window and asks the driver to pull over is priceless.
In Michigan, so long as the vehicle is not in motion (and if we really want to nitpick, the offending act is only sending a two way text communication, so facebook is technically legal anytime) it is OK.

Originally Posted by drlogik
In today's world what you did was a "micro-aggression" and is frowned upon. You see, it is politically incorrect to interrupt a person who is self-absorbed in their electronic media. It's best to let them walk off a cliff by themselves.
It is micro-aggression. It is not the OPs job to enforce traffic regulation (AFAIK). It would be like me walking up to a job site and pointing out OSHA violations: even if I am right, I have no authority nor powers of enforcement, and the result is likely to be a big FU from anyone there. If it was that big of a deal, she should have pulled out her phone and called the police with the plate number.

Originally Posted by BobbyG
The car began pulling away and I saw the driver look up and into the rearview mirror where he did a double take.


My horn is most often used on those who are oblivious to green lights too, but that is just downright funny!
jefnvk is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 05:48 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
NYMXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Middletown NY
Posts: 1,493

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix EVO w Hi-Mod frame, Raleigh Tamland 1 and Giant Anthem X

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
https://dmv.ny.gov/tickets/cell-phone-use-texting Noticed driving not operating is the word used???

Different guidelines for Commercial drivers. Distracted Driving, Talking & Texting
That's interesting as I know many who were ticketed for texting a stop light, or talking on the phone. I noticed a lot of old dates and wonder if it is possible that the info is out of date? I also wonder if DMV and the law books the police use differ because I did not see things like "sections" of the law on the DMV link. That makes me thing the language might be different and misleading. I really can't explain what I don't know, I was never cited for this offense. NYS uses weird language and in something like a drunk sleeping in his car in a parking lot, if he is in possession of the keys, he is deemed "in control of his vehicle" and can be charged.

Some people just pull over along a major highway and take their calls. I believe that if the car is running, it's illegal but I am not sure. What I do know if driving along a highway and trying to merge at speed is probably more dangerous than talking while driving. Texting is more dangerous that talking, but now many phones have talk to type features.

Either way, I don't do it, the calls can wait and texting is not something I do often

Last edited by NYMXer; 07-13-16 at 05:53 PM.
NYMXer is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 06:00 PM
  #42  
 
Hardrock23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NoVA - DC Metro
Posts: 1,037

Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Prelude

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 296 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
I wouldnt of said anything myself. If you had said that to me though, I wouldve put my phone down a bit embarrassed actually because i do think its wrong (imo) and dont much like seeing others on theirs either. Even though legally I can talk on the phone while driving, i usually pull over when im alone or put it on speaker and set it down if im on the hwy (i hate pulling off the hwy...so many get hit being parked on the side). If my son is with me, he will take over phone duties...hes 4 lol

This is the law in my state on cell phones, below. Cops will still pull you over for seeing it in your hand even while stopped though. But at the same time they themselves are constantly on their phones too. Not to mention my father was t-boned by an on duty cop a couple years ago in his driver side door...the cop was on his personal phone talking to his girlfriend.

Anyone under 18 years old is banned from using cell phones or any other personal communication devices while driving.
Texting is banned for all drivers. In Virginia, it is considered a primary offense, which means police can pull you over if they suspect you of texting while driving. The fine is $125 for the first offense, and $250 for subsequent offenses.

"Although the law says a driver cannot “manually enter multiple letters or texts” while driving or “read any email or text message transmitted to the device,” drivers are still allowed to use their hands to make phone calls and get directions using a smartphone’s Global Positioning System."

Its almost a useless law at this time though...until they ban it altogether like other states have.
They are trying to extend the law in making handheld phones illegal to use while driving though.

Last edited by Hardrock23; 07-13-16 at 06:15 PM.
Hardrock23 is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 06:26 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1069 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times in 505 Posts
Originally Posted by NYMXer
That's interesting as I know many who were ticketed for texting a stop light, or talking on the phone. I noticed a lot of old dates and wonder if it is possible that the info is out of date? I also wonder if DMV and the law books the police use differ because I did not see things like "sections" of the law on the DMV link. That makes me thing the language might be different and misleading. I really can't explain what I don't know, I was never cited for this offense. NYS uses weird language and in something like a drunk sleeping in his car in a parking lot, if he is in possession of the keys, he is deemed "in control of his vehicle" and can be charged.

Some people just pull over along a major highway and take their calls. I believe that if the car is running, it's illegal but I am not sure. What I do know if driving along a highway and trying to merge at speed is probably more dangerous than talking while driving. Texting is more dangerous that talking, but now many phones have talk to type features.

Either way, I don't do it, the calls can wait and texting is not something I do often
I was waiting for our court case to be heard and before the judge was a guy who was arrested and was charged with something related to being drunk, car crash and .....? Guy's attorney argued that arresting officer did not see the crash take place and even though guy was drunk and there, he could not be charged for violation the officer wrote up. The attorney saved the guy money, prevented some lockup time and loss of license.
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 07:11 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388

Bikes: Yep

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Can't see how a disagreement at a red light would result in anything but anger. Maybe a chance to vent, maybe a chance to get shot.
sail is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 09:31 PM
  #45  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
So you think it appropriate for the driver to say "Go F**k yourself"? And for another poster to describe her as a pr**k?
Almost, but not quite, as inappropriate as presuming to scold someone for txting while not driving.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 09:34 PM
  #46  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
Yet a woman rider takes a stand, points out to a driver an issue that is recognised as a significant cause of vehicle collisions -- some with cyclists -- and she gets dumped on.
Don't play the gender card.

I for one didn't even notice it was a woman. Had I noticed, my response surely would have been different.... the last word would been better gender targeted. The rest however would be exactly the same, and no, NOT because it's a woman. Just because it's asinine. Period.

Last edited by nycphotography; 07-13-16 at 09:40 PM.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 09:39 PM
  #47  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,224

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,246 Times in 624 Posts
The Driver may have had a legit message to send out.

Used the light time to send it.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 09:40 PM
  #48  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Hardrock23
Its almost a useless law at this time though...until they ban it altogether like other states have.
They are trying to extend the law in making handheld phones illegal to use while driving though.
Yeah, we should all dig our fanfold maps out so we can find our way around. That was SOOOO much safer than using an electronic device.

God this whole thing is so ********. Everyone tells everyone not to do something that everyone is doing themselves. The absolute peak of hypocrisy.

Thanks to these fabulous safe laws, now people don't hold the phone above the wheel where they can see the road.... oh nooooo, now they secret it away down in their lap where they have zero chance of seeing anything on the road. THANK YOU BIG BROTHER FOR MAKING SURE THAT EVERYONE IS COMPLETELY BLIND WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO DO WHAT THEY ALWAYS DO.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 07-14-16, 04:23 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,276
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18432 Post(s)
Liked 15,593 Times in 7,342 Posts
Originally Posted by obed7
the people you are talking about here do exist... and their tendency to drift forward has nothing to do with cell phone use... I see people do it while looking at the light... they could be adjusting the volume on their radio or reciting the 23rd Psalm...bad drivers are just bad drivers... maybe they want to get a jump on the light, hope they look before they pull out and not just assume that since the light is green they can go...here in Texas a green light does not mean go, it means go if the way is clear...amazing how many folks do not know that.
But they are drifting with their eyes looking at, and their minds focussed on, their phones, which increases danger to others. Rationalize if you want. Humans are not good multi-taskers. They are good task switchers.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 07-14-16, 04:29 AM
  #50  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by teacherlady
I'm in the go-straight lane. Guy in the right-turn lane in a recent model black car (Uber?) is typing on a cell phone.
Me: (Loudly, since his window was shut, but not unpleasantly) Get off your phone, please.
Guy: (Rolling down his car window) Excuse me?
Me: Get off your phone, please. (Really, I said please twice.)
Guy: Or what?
Me: (Pausing) Or? I have no power over you. I can't do anything to you. But it's wrong.
Guy: What?!!
Me: It's wrong.
Guy: Go F**k yourself.
Light changes.
Guy: (Gunning the engine) Have a nice day.

I could have said, "Or you'll hurt someone. Or you'll get a ticket. Or you'll miss the light and get honked at."
Is using mobile phone while in a car illegal where you are?
Machka is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.