Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Light interference with computer

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Light interference with computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-18 | 06:21 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
Light interference with computer

I have a Cateye Urban Wireless computer on my road bike. I commute to work sometimes, and I use a Light & Motion brand Urban 800 model light. I started noticing that speed and miles were not being recorded on the computer for about the first mile or two after I leave home. I thought the batteries were the problem so I replaced them. Same problem. I pulled the urban wireless instructions out of the box, and sure enough, it indicates that 'interference may occur...or certain battery-powered lights. I had a different light on for awhile before the Urban 800 and never experienced this problem.

Are there certain brands or models that do this? Anybody else experience this? Don't really have many options for mounting the light away from the computer on road bike handle bars.

Thx,
Mark
Iawestrr is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 06:35 AM
  #2  
jgwilliams's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 174
From: Surrey, UK

Bikes: Dolan Tuono 105 Di2, custom built 653 and 531 bikes with frames by Barry Witcomb, Sonder Dial XT mountain bike and a Brompton folding bike.

Yes, and it's REALLY annoying. I have a very old Lupine Tesla that interferes with wireless computers, but since it was made before the latter became really popular I wasn't too surprised. However, I was quite disappointed when a brand new NiteRider Lumia 750 also interfered with it. In the end I replaced the wireless computer with a Cateye wired one.

Interestingly coded computers don't seem to suffer from this problem. My Garmin Edge, for example, continued to pick up the signal from the cadence/speed sensor regardless even though it was mounted much further away.
jgwilliams is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:04 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 55
From: West Orange County, CA

Bikes: '84 Peugeot PH10LE

That just proves that wireless isn't always the best way to go.

Jon
Jon T is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:10 AM
  #4  
Skipjacks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 239
From: Mid Atlantic / USA

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite

How close is the light to the computer? Do you have an option to move them to opposite sides of the handlebars? Or mouth the light lower, like on the stem or the head tube?

If there is interference I am guessing the light needs to be very close to the computer to cause it. Even if the light is between the computer and the wheel sensor it should be okay. It's likely that the light is too close to the computer itself.

Another option is to create a Faraday Cage. (It will help disperse rouge electromagnetic signals) Wrap the sides of the light in aluminum foil or a piece of metal window screen (has to be metal, not vinyl). See if that fixes the problem. If it works you can do it carefully so it looks nice. It might not work but it's a very cheap thing to try.
Skipjacks is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:17 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 90
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Skipjacks
How close is the light to the computer? Do you have an option to move them to opposite sides of the handlebars? Or mouth the light lower, like on the stem or the head tube?

If there is interference I am guessing the light needs to be very close to the computer to cause it. Even if the light is between the computer and the wheel sensor it should be okay. It's likely that the light is too close to the computer itself.

Another option is to create a Faraday Cage. (It will help disperse rouge electromagnetic signals) Wrap the sides of the light in aluminum foil or a piece of metal window screen (has to be metal, not vinyl). See if that fixes the problem. If it works you can do it carefully so it looks nice. It might not work but it's a very cheap thing to try.
It probably will. But then again, moving the light a couple of inches away will also probably fix it.
wschruba is online now  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:42 AM
  #6  
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 291
Likes: 16
I have the same problem with my light/speedo. My light is a Nite Rider 500 something, the computer is a Catseye wireless unit. What I have noticed is that if the light is on high or pulse the speedo works fine, low or medium causes the speedo to quit. I've come to the conclusion that it is a elector-magnetic field caused by the light causing the problem. Unlike a "nromal" light, LEDs are pulse width modulated to achieve "low light" settings which sets up the interference. As mentioned shielding the light with foil or such should stop it but it looks like kaka. The other option is to move the two as far apart as possible which worked for me.

fasthair
fasthair is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:44 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 83
From: Salt Lake City, UT (Formerly Los Angeles, CA)

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Synapse -- 2014 Cannondale Quick CX

I have a Light & Motion Urban 900 mounted to the left of my stem. The cycling computer was mounted at the forward-most part of my stem, so the rear of the L&M light sat along the side of my CatEye computer. When the light was on, I lost computer sensor reception.

Moving the computer aft a couple inches, to the rear of the stem was enough to make the difference. Perfect reception now that they aren't directly adjacent to each other.

So yes, LED lights do interfere with wireless cycling computers. I believe the reason is that the lights strobe at super high speeds to regulate brightness, and this oscillation has some RF leakage.
daoswald is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 08:55 AM
  #8  
Skipjacks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 239
From: Mid Atlantic / USA

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite

Originally Posted by wschruba
It probably will. But then again, moving the light a couple of inches away will also probably fix it.
It might also help just to swap sides. If the light is on the left and the computer is on the right, just swap sides. The computer's sensor could be on the same side of the unit that the light is on. Simply putting the light on the other side, an inch and a half further from the computer's sensor, could solve it.

(But the Faraday cage idea was more fun in a nerdy way. I like to take a "Damn you, physics! I'll put my stuff where I want to!" approach to life.)
Skipjacks is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 01:30 PM
  #9  
rollagain's Avatar
Lopsided biped
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 742
Likes: 167
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike); GreenSpeed Anura (the Black Swan)

I'm not sure the Faraday cage will make any difference. Most of the better bike lights and flashlights are already inside one, in the form of their aluminum housings. Leakage paths for stray RF would likely be the switch, the battery compartment door, the charger port, if it has one, and of course, the lens/reflector assembly. And, that RF might be bouncing off the handlebar or something else. About all you can do is try moving the comp and light to different locations.

Do write to the manufacturers of both the comp and the light to inform them of the problem; they can at least look at design improvements for their next round of products.
rollagain is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-18 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA

Bikes: Specialized Diverge

Very interesting topic. Never occurred to me that there could be issues like this. I've got a Garmin Edge 520 computer and Cygolite 450 Streak front light. They are mounted within an inch of each other. I haven't seen any interference problems, but I don't run the light very much right now. I'll have to watch for problems as the days get darker heading out of the summer months.

Mark
Mark VerMurlen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 01:58 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 898
Likes: 337
From: Saulkrasti, Latvia

Bikes: Focus Crater Lake

Is there any way to shield the computer from picking up RF interference? It seems that my wireless computer gets along ok with my light, but it seems to pick up signal from whatever outside sources; for example, it doesn't work when a tram is nearby, or sometimes it shows going at crazy speeds while resting on my desk at the office.
subgrade is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 02:20 AM
  #12  
jgwilliams's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 174
From: Surrey, UK

Bikes: Dolan Tuono 105 Di2, custom built 653 and 531 bikes with frames by Barry Witcomb, Sonder Dial XT mountain bike and a Brompton folding bike.

Originally Posted by Mark VerMurlen
Very interesting topic. Never occurred to me that there could be issues like this. I've got a Garmin Edge 520 computer and Cygolite 450 Streak front light. They are mounted within an inch of each other. I haven't seen any interference problems, but I don't run the light very much right now. I'll have to watch for problems as the days get darker heading out of the summer months.

Mark
I doubt you'll have a problem. This only seems to affect the cheaper computers which are not coded to a specific transmitter. I have a Garmin Edge 705 and the lights never bothered it at all, even though it was right next door. I had to move the Cateye computer to the other side of the bars to let it work with my NiteRider light. It's a shame that wireless computers are now so prevalent.
jgwilliams is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 07:29 AM
  #13  
Skipjacks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 239
From: Mid Atlantic / USA

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite

Originally Posted by rollagain
I'm not sure the Faraday cage will make any difference. Most of the better bike lights and flashlights are already inside one, in the form of their aluminum housings. Leakage paths for stray RF would likely be the switch, the battery compartment door, the charger port, if it has one, and of course, the lens/reflector assembly. And, that RF might be bouncing off the handlebar or something else. About all you can do is try moving the comp and light to different locations.

Do write to the manufacturers of both the comp and the light to inform them of the problem; they can at least look at design improvements for their next round of products.
I assumed a plastic housing. If it's an aluminum housing then yeah, your'e probably right.
Skipjacks is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 08:31 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 11
From: Taylor, MI

Bikes: 2008 Trek 2.1 WSD, 2010 Specialized Amira Elite, 2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD

I switched to ant+ computer/sensors to work with lights that Cateye wireless computers were not compatible. No problems since.
__________________
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
pinsonp2 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 09:22 AM
  #15  
rgconner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 13
From: Sacramento, CA

Bikes: Curtis Inglis Road, 80's Sekai touring fixie

Originally Posted by jgwilliams
I doubt you'll have a problem. This only seems to affect the cheaper computers which are not coded to a specific transmitter. I have a Garmin Edge 705 and the lights never bothered it at all, even though it was right next door. I had to move the Cateye computer to the other side of the bars to let it work with my NiteRider light. It's a shame that wireless computers are now so prevalent.
That is because uncoded one tend to be analog, so any RF spike, like from power lines or apparently a lighting system, will trigger them.

Coded ones tend to be digital, so they don't pick up the interference because it does not match the "code".
rgconner is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-18 | 11:24 AM
  #16  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA

Bikes: Specialized Diverge

So any computer using ANT+ or Bluetooth is not going to be affected?

Mark
Mark VerMurlen is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aubergine
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
8
12-27-15 07:24 PM
Solo44
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
11-04-13 12:31 PM
choclabman
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
08-31-12 06:19 PM
bragi
Commuting
7
10-20-11 10:43 PM
BikeMech
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
11-11-10 10:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.