Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Will Electric Bikes Overtake Standard Bike Sales?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Will Electric Bikes Overtake Standard Bike Sales?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-18, 02:30 AM
  #26  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: La-la Land, CA
Posts: 3,623

Bikes: Cannondale Quick SL1 Bike - 2014

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3405 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 185 Posts
Originally Posted by raceboy
E-bikes have nothing whatsoever to do with cycling, notwithstanding all the special pleading that goes on here on Bike Forums. E-bikes are just another form of motorized transportation.

^This^

People who are avid cyclists are not going to switch as long as they are healthy. The ebikes appeal to a different market: the infirm and wanna-be cyclists/commuters who want out of their cars and traffic but are too lazy/lack the desire to put in the effort of real cycling.
You're right. But they don't have a separate segment in the environment. Because they're still classified as bikes they get to use all the same facilities and encroach onto the already crowded biking thoroughfares. If you think there's an issue with roadies that using the MUPs now, just you wait.
KraneXL is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 08:03 AM
  #27  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
I think the big problem with e-bikes using bike infrastructure isn't going to be speed, which is relatively easy to regulate, it's going to be the weight of the vehicles/load as the engines get more powerful. Some of the powered cargo bikes I'm seeing in Boston are approaching motorcycle bulk when they're laden with cargo. They're only going 20 mph, but getting hit by a 400-600 pound vehicle at that speed is way more likely to kill you than a 200 pound vehicle/rider combination going the same speed.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 08:15 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 151

Bikes: 2018 Electra Townie Commute GO! 8i, 2019 Electra Townie GO! 7d, 2023 Cannondale Adventure Neo Allroad Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by raceboy
People who are avid cyclists are not going to switch as long as they are healthy. The ebikes appeal to a different market: the infirm and wanna-be cyclists/commuters who want out of their cars and traffic but are too lazy/lack the desire to put in the effort of real cycling.
Yes, they will. I am an avid cyclist, I used to commute to work on fast roadies for years. I recently switched to quality e-bike, a nice fat beach cruiser with Bosch performance mid drive. I love the thing with passion. If you put it in lower assist mode you can get your work out while still getting to work in comfort.
boggy is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 09:00 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by raceboy
The ebikes appeal to a different market: the infirm and wanna-be cyclists/commuters who want out of their cars and traffic but are too lazy/lack the desire to put in the effort of real cycling.
Or, you know, commuters who have to frequently move from location to location and/or who prefer to not be drenched in sweat in a professional office environment in July when pedaling through the hot city?

If cycling was how I commuted, I'd definitely consider an ebike. My commuting is not my recreation or fun time, it is a utilitarian need to get to my employment. How pure I am with regards to a sport when my need is to meet with a customer isn't really a primary concern.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 09:06 AM
  #30  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
Or, you know, commuters who have to frequently move from location to location and/or who prefer to not be drenched in sweat in a professional office environment in July when pedaling through the hot city?

If cycling was how I commuted, I'd definitely consider an ebike. My commuting is not my recreation or fun time, it is a utilitarian need to get to my employment. How pure I am with regards to a sport when my need is to meet with a customer isn't really a primary concern.

No, sorry. Everything must be reduced to a morality play where pedaling is good, assist is bad.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 09:09 AM
  #31  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Bmach
Last I looked the Netherlands was in Europe.
Is this a joke?

Just because something is true in one country in Europe does not mean the same is true for "Europe". The two mean entirely different things.

Did I actually need to explain that?
Kapusta is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 09:30 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
No, sorry. Everything must be reduced to a morality play where pedaling is good, assist is bad.
Sorry, I forgot

Originally Posted by Kapusta
Is this a joke?

Just because something is true in one country in Europe does not mean the same is true for "Europe". The two mean entirely different things.
Odd, I hear all the time how Europe is a cycling paradise, and inevitably it is in reference to something the Netherlands is doing.

But, my two bike tours in continental Europe tell me that ebike are definitely prevalent, to the point I would have to imagine that NEW sales have a sizeable market share, if not approaching parity. Toss in used, sure, ebikes are probably a much smaller percentage, but they simply haven't been around that long.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 10:28 AM
  #33  
Junior Member
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 151

Bikes: 2018 Electra Townie Commute GO! 8i, 2019 Electra Townie GO! 7d, 2023 Cannondale Adventure Neo Allroad Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
who prefer to not be drenched in sweat in a professional office environment in July when pedaling through the hot city?
Yes, this is a huge factor for me. I live in Los Angeles, we get a couple of cool months, if that, and the rest of the year is pretty hot. If I commute to work on roadie instead of e-bike, it necessitates unpleasant things such as:

Cooling down after the ride for 15 minutes, sitting in your office in cycling gear and getting soaked (and yes, working with people that walk in like that is not very presentable).
Cleaning yourself up in a tiny restroom with baby wipes (my favorite).
Hanging all of your gear all over your office to dry (looking for places out of sight).

E-bikes remove all of the above. Oh one more thing: my road bikes never could accommodate rack with panniers. Moving my load from backpack to panniers was quite liberating to say the least.
boggy is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 10:45 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
REDMASTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Traveling through time, will return last week.
Posts: 730

Bikes: Bare Rum Sword Knuckle Runner

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times in 64 Posts
For commuting hell yeah why not. Price, weight, and dork factor are all coming down with new models. I've considered the electron wheel to throw on my bike for use around town; especially in the summer so as not to arrive a sweaty mess and spend the first 15 minutes at my destination trying to cool down.
REDMASTA is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 10:48 AM
  #35  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by raceboy
People who are avid cyclists are not going to switch as long as they are healthy.


I think this is mostly true, but the key word here is “switch”. However, I think more and more may “add” an ebike.

The ebikes appeal to a different market: the infirm and wanna-be cyclists/commuters who want out of their cars and traffic but are too lazy/lack the desire to put in the effort of real cycling.
This is what you get wrong. Many ebikes fill a different purpose (utility as opposed to sport). However, the market can be avid cyclists as well as lazy people.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 11:25 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,085
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Liked 264 Times in 162 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Is this a joke?

Just because something is true in one country in Europe does not mean the same is true for "Europe". The two mean entirely different things.

Did I actually need to explain that?
lighten up Francis,

see you at the next ebike race.
Bmach is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 12:09 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 423
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 24 Posts
This debate reminds me a bit of the hydraulic vs rim brakes debate. The traditionalists insist rim brakes are just as good as hydraulics and aren't necessary on road bikes; the tech enthusiasts claim hydraulics require less hand pressure and work better in the wet. Ultimately, the new tech takes over and the debate is settled on practical grounds.

I tend to believe that the e-bike vs standard bikes debate will be settled in much the same way: with e-bike sales overtaking standard bike sales at some point in the near future, likely within a decade.

The more important question is, how quickly will cities around the US re-organize or develop new infrastructure to adapt to this new reality of increasing adoption of electric vehicles. I think more bike lanes will be built and there will be greater regulation of e-bikes with additional legislation (probably not especially heavy handed). The US will never become Europe: the US will remain automobile-centric for the foreseeable future but e-bikes are here to stay.
radroad is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 12:38 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
Originally Posted by radroad
E-bikes have supposedly already overtaken standard bike sales in Europe. See video below. Out on the rec trails locally, e-bikes seem to makeup at least half of all bicycle rentals (single rider bikes). Non rental e-bikes are also becoming more common on the rec trails: not quite rare, but a long ways from becoming the majority.
There are differences between Europe and the USA.

When I was in Italy, the Piaggio Mopeds were immensely popular with the kids. And I don't remember them ever actually using the pedals.

There were several things that led to the popularity of the mopeds.

I think driving ages were:
14: Mopeds
16: Small Motorcycles and scooters.
18: Small Cars with restrictions.
21 or 24: Fewer restrictions.

Fuel prices were also extremely expensive in Italy.

Anyway, this all led to the kids from 14 to 18 riding mopeds.

I'd imagine that E-Bike sales are now booming over the moped sales, with the youth shifting from mopeds to E-Bikes.

There is also a possibility that in some cases, the kids are keeping the E-Bikes as they get older rather than upgrading to more powerful motorcycles and cars.

When you look at the cost of a NEW E-Bike, they are likely competitive with the cost of new mopeds, scooters, or small motorcycles. And total cost of ownership of an E-Bike is much much cheaper than a car.

An E-Bike + Car could potentially even save money over just a car.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 12:43 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Flip Flop Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,109

Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times in 322 Posts
will e-bikes take the place of bikes, no

will e-bikes become an increased form of transportation , yes
Flip Flop Rider is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 01:18 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
One of the things alluded to in the GCN commentary is that cyclists are not a homogeneous group.

Probably one of the largest group of bike sales are the young kid's bikes, say for kids from about 3 to 14 years old, and not necessarily in the market for either E-Bikes or Road Bikes (although there seems to be a new niche for electric toy vehicles when pedal cars were once popular).

For the older people, one could probably stratify the market:
Cheap Commuters.
Hardcore MTB riders
Midrange Commuters, and moderate long distance commuters.
Roadie Commuters
Roadies
Cycle Tourists
Utility Cyclists
Pleasure and Recreational Riding.
???
It is likely that you'll see the E-Bikes scooping up a few of those midrange commuters. Maybe a few of the roadie commuters and long distance commuters, as well as some of the not quite so hardcore MTB riders (as long as MTB trails remain accessible to E-Bikes).

Utility Cycling will get hit heavily by E-Bikes.

Other groups may shy away from the E-Bikes, although there may be sub-groups, such as certain elderly recreational riders, or perhaps riders with strength discrepancy between cyclist and riding partners that may favor e-bikes.

In the end, the hardcore roadies are a minority of the cyclists on the road, and don't make the trends.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 01:34 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
Ebikes are still in a very expansive stage. They may well dominate sales out of sheer novelty value for awhile. This may not reflect a lasting condition.

Ebikes may well take over a segment or two of the bike sales.
Ebikes for various kinds of utility cycling seems like a natural thing.

Apart from that, I can’t see what this animosity is all about.

Weather permitting, I also do tour skating.
Traditionally, tour skaters used ONE heavy pole with a stepped-diameter point that was used to test ice thickness. It was near enough useless for anything else.
Then people who were primarily skiers took to the ice, bringing their poles with them.
It brought some advantages. People could steady themselves on rough sections, there were more muscle groups to engage. To put it simply, poles allowed less able skaters to do more.
And guess what, it triggered the same discussion as we’re seeing here.
”A real skater doesn’t use poles”.
”It’s not skating if it’s with poles”
etc etc,
I’ll leave you to draw the parallels.

It took a couple of years for the artificially cultivated ”us and them” to die down, but eventually all but the most stubborn realized there was more that brought us together than set us apart.

Unless you’re in a registered race, who cares what the others are riding?

How, sure.
Any vehicle, any tool can be used either well or poorly.
And what - in terms of road worthiness - that too.
I’ve been less than impressed by what seems to be a correlation between crude DIY conversions and an extreme willingness to disable the front brake.

But the mere existence of a power-assist feature - meh.
dabac is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 03:26 PM
  #42  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by radroad
This debate reminds me a bit of the hydraulic vs rim brakes debate. The traditionalists insist rim brakes are just as good as hydraulics and aren't necessary on road bikes; the tech enthusiasts claim hydraulics require less hand pressure and work better in the wet. Ultimately, the new tech takes over and the debate is settled on practical grounds.

I tend to believe that the e-bike vs standard bikes debate will be settled in much the same way: with e-bike sales overtaking standard bike sales at some point in the near future, likely within a decade.

The more important question is, how quickly will cities around the US re-organize or develop new infrastructure to adapt to this new reality of increasing adoption of electric vehicles. I think more bike lanes will be built and there will be greater regulation of e-bikes with additional legislation (probably not especially heavy handed). The US will never become Europe: the US will remain automobile-centric for the foreseeable future but e-bikes are here to stay.

The analogy is flawed--ebikes are superior to std bikes for certain uses, but far inferior as a "fitness machine" for an otherwise healthy person. Some bicycle commuters will make the shift, but I suspect more of the adopters of ebikes will be people who otherwise wouldn't be biking.

It's quite possible that ebike sales may overtake std bike sales without std bike sales declining noticeably. It might just be fewer people driving, riding public transit or even walking.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 04:00 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 423
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
The analogy is flawed--ebikes are superior to std bikes for certain uses, but far inferior as a "fitness machine" for an otherwise healthy person. Some bicycle commuters will make the shift, but I suspect more of the adopters of ebikes will be people who otherwise wouldn't be biking.

It's quite possible that ebike sales may overtake std bike sales without std bike sales declining noticeably. It might just be fewer people driving, riding public transit or even walking.
I think the analogy holds up reasonably well. Hydraulics in particular and discs in general, have some disadvantages: they weigh more, are not compatible with frames designed for rim brake compatibility and generally require frame and wheel redesign. There are costs and benefits with both approaches, but clearly, most new 'performance' models in all niches: road, gravel, e-bike and offload, all spec discs.

Even the lowest cost ebikes I've listed in this thread spec discs. Discs are the new industry standard.

Likewise, there are 'weaknesses' with e-bikes. They are far heavier. They are more expensive at the "low end." They introduce the possibility of electrical problems or even failure. There are penalties associated with electric bike use compared with standard bicycles. However, sales are growing whereas standard bike sales are flat and have been for a couple of decades. It's not terribly difficult to see what will happen if these present trends continue. E-bikes will supplant the standard bicycle.

I'm not convinced standard bike are superior fitness machines as you call them. Hill climbing can be punishing on the knees and this is where ebikes can alleviate any potential pain. The vast majority of e-bikes are equipped with suspension, allowing a rider to pedal farther with less discomfort/more joint protection. The weight penalty for ebikes is a non-factor because of the motor and battery, whereas most enthusiast standard bicycle riders want to save weight and improve efficiency meaning suspension adoption for road use is limited.

I have no definitive prediction obviously, but I could see e-bikes supplanting standard bikes as the new standard. I won't say it's inevitable, but it is possible With Tesla and GM jumping on board, this could be a huge shift.
radroad is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 05:49 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,737

Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 643 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times in 551 Posts
The question of what will sell more is unimportant to me. A better question might be how many electric bikes will be sold instead of regular bikes.

Not so much here in the states but in other countries, many people cannot afford a car or even a motorcycle and use a bike by necessity. I can see those people buying an e-bike over a standard bike but for people who cycle for sport or fitness I don't see many of them switching.

I certainly don't see it as a threat to the bicycle industry at large. Companies that specialize in commuter/transportation bikes will probably develop their own e-bikes and others will see minimal impact.
Ogsarg is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 06:12 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 1,189 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by radroad
I think the analogy holds up reasonably well. Hydraulics in particular and discs in general, have some disadvantages: they weigh more, are not compatible with frames designed for rim brake compatibility and generally require frame and wheel redesign. There are costs and benefits with both approaches, but clearly, most new 'performance' models in all niches: road, gravel, e-bike and offload, all spec discs.

Even the lowest cost ebikes I've listed in this thread spec discs. Discs are the new industry standard.

Likewise, there are 'weaknesses' with e-bikes. They are far heavier. They are more expensive at the "low end." They introduce the possibility of electrical problems or even failure. There are penalties associated with electric bike use compared with standard bicycles. However, sales are growing whereas standard bike sales are flat and have been for a couple of decades. It's not terribly difficult to see what will happen if these present trends continue. E-bikes will supplant the standard bicycle.

I'm not convinced standard bike are superior fitness machines as you call them. Hill climbing can be punishing on the knees and this is where ebikes can alleviate any potential pain. The vast majority of e-bikes are equipped with suspension, allowing a rider to pedal farther with less discomfort/more joint protection. The weight penalty for ebikes is a non-factor because of the motor and battery, whereas most enthusiast standard bicycle riders want to save weight and improve efficiency meaning suspension adoption for road use is limited.

I have no definitive prediction obviously, but I could see e-bikes supplanting standard bikes as the new standard. I won't say it's inevitable, but it is possible With Tesla and GM jumping on board, this could be a huge shift.
No, it doesn't. The analogy is completely useless. The rim brakes v. hydraulic brakes 'controversy' -- silly -- is within a context set by human-powered machines, i.e. bicycles. That debate has to do with braking; that debate had/has nothing whatsoever to do with motive power.

E-bikes, whatever spin/special pleading various posters on here (Bike Forums) want to put on them, are not human-powered machines. They are motorized vehicles. In other words, apples and bl__dy oranges.

I have no view one way or the other on "e-bikes" as such. I do not care if someone wishes to ride an "e-bike". Good on them. But doing so is not cycling. Full stop. To pretend otherwise is stupid.

I do have views on "e-bikes" when it comes to where they can be/should be ridden. They are motorized vehicles. They have no place on a MUP that prohibits the use of motorized vehicles, and their use thereon should be strictly banned outright. They have no place -- and should be strictly banned outright -- on mtb trails that prohibit the use of motorized vehicles. They have no place in/on bicycle lanes within cities, and their use thereon should be strictly banned outright.

I do not give a d__n if someone rides an e-bike on the road, in traffic. Good on 'em. I do not give a d__n if someone rides an e-bike, i.e. e-mtb, on trails open to dirt bikes and four-wheelers etc., good on 'em. And so on.

I can see the appeal. Who knows? I am old; maybe someday I will want, or will resort to, an e-bike. But if and when I do so, I will not be trying to fool myself into thinking that my riding one has anything whatsoever to do with cycling. It does not.

And so, the question whether or not "e-bike" sales will exceed the sales of bicycles at some point is of no interest from the point of view of a cyclist, any more than whether or not the sales of motorcycles, or cars, or pick-up trucks, do or will exceed the sales of bicycles. They probably will, given the propensity of us (humans) to look for ways not to exert ourselves in any fashion whatsoever.

Last edited by badger1; 11-07-18 at 07:44 PM.
badger1 is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 06:56 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
mackgoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 664

Bikes: 87 Bianchi X4, 95 Bianchi Ti Mega Tube, 06 Alan Carbon Cross X33, Gold plated Columbus AIR Guerciotti, 74 Galmozzi Super Competizione, 52 Bianchi Paris Roubaix.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Liked 540 Times in 166 Posts
I guess it depends on how many out of shape people want to ride a bike.
mackgoo is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 07:12 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
I don't think we have a crystal ball that tells us what will happen with e-bikes. They could supplant conventional bikes. They could increase overall interest in cycling, leaving conventional bikes alone. Or in in 5-10 years we might see a growing number of e-bikes gathering dust in garages, like conventional bikes. We don't know how e-vehicles will evolve, and if the e-bike will diverge from its origins as an electric assist pedal bike. There may be more practical options for some people. For instance, an urban commuter can ride an e-scooter and keep it in their office.

Some issues with cycling won't go away: Weather, security, safety, maintenance.

Some uses for conventional bikes won't go away. I live in a university town. There are scads of bikes on campus, most of them are parked outdoors, and many are used year-round. Most students don't have convenient indoor parking for their bikes. Same for people who work minimum wage jobs downtown, such as food service. Not everybody has a place to charge a bike, especially when it gets below the recommended minimum temperature for charging and using Li-ion batteries. My garage gets below that temperature.

Granted, we may be a minority, but we won't vanish completely. And there will always be plenty of second-hand bikes for us to choose from.
Gresp15C is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 07:36 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 423
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by badger1
No, it doesn't. The analogy is completely useless. The rim brakes v. hydraulic brakes 'controversy' -- silly -- is within a context set by human-powered machines, i.e. bicycles. That debate has to do with braking; that debate had/has nothing whatsoever to do with motive power.

E-bikes, whatever spin/special pleading various posters on here (Bike Forums) want to put on them, are not human-powered machines. They are motorized vehicles. In other words, apples and bl__dy oranges.

I have no view one way or the other on "e-bikes" as such. I do not care if someone wishes to ride an "e-bike". Good on them. But doing so is not cycling. Full stop. To pretend otherwise is stupid.

I do have views on "e-bikes" when it comes to where they can be/should be ridden. They are motorized vehicles. They have no place on a MUP that prohibits the use of motorized vehicles, and their use thereon should be strictly banned outright. They have no place -- and should be strictly banned outright -- on mtb trails that prohibit the use of motorized vehicles. They have no place in/on bicycle lanes within cities, and their use thereon should be strictly banned outright.

I do not give a d__n if someone rides and e-bike on the road, in traffic. Good on 'em. I do not give a d__n if someone rides an e-bike, i.e. e-mtb, on trails open to dirt bikes and four-wheelers etc., good on 'em. And so on.

I can see the appeal. Who knows? I am old; maybe someday I will want, or will resort to, and e-bike. But if and when I do so, I will not be trying to fool myself into thinking that my riding one has anything whatsoever to do with cycling. It does not.
You did not understand my point, probably deliberately so. I stated that the rim vs discs debate has it's pros and cons on both sides from an intellectual perspective, but ultimately sales determine their place in the market. The same will happen with electric vs standard bikes. Electric bike sales are clearly on the increase, sharply so, and there is little doubt that this trend will increase for the foreseeable future. OTOH, standard bike sales have been flat for approximately 3 decades, despite countless 'innovations' or what some would call arbitrary changes, or both.

If these trends continue, there is little question that electric bikes will displace standard bicycles in the marketplace as sales leaders. At least in first world countries. The point is, this is not an academic debate. It will be settled in the marketplace and there are no signs that standard bicycles will increase in sales at any point in the near or distant future.

One factor among several which have and will boost ebike sales is that this segment caters unabashedly to older adults: upright stems, riser bars, suspension saddles, seat posts, forks, stems, fat tires, step thru frames, and of course motors and batteries. They make no pretense that they are replicas of professional racing bikes; ebike races are few and far between after all, bordering on non-existent. As a result, ebikes will surely capture a lion's share of the largely untapped market of elderly people who want to and are willing to exercise but can't ride road racing bikes designed for 25 year olds with a body mass index of 19.

To address one of your other points, yes, ebikes are in fact bicycles. You pedal them, and the harder you pedal, the faster they go. A bicycle by definition is a vehicle with two wheels propelled with pedals. Every ebike fits that definition although some have throttles as an option.

Not to mention, swearing and insulting others is a sign that you cannot debate on the basis of evidence or logic. Please refrain and stick to facts.
radroad is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 07:49 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
Originally Posted by radroad
One factor among several which have and will boost ebike sales is that this segment caters unabashedly to older adults: upright stems, riser bars, suspension saddles, seat posts, forks, stems, fat tires, step thru frames, and of course motors and batteries. They make no pretense that they are replicas of professional racing bikes; ebike races are few and far between after all, bordering on non-existent. As a result, ebikes will surely capture a lion's share of the largely untapped market of elderly people who want to and are willing to exercise but can't ride road racing bikes designed for 25 year olds with a body mass index of 19.
The pretense of replicating road racing bikes ended 30 years ago with widespread consumer adoption of mountain bikes, a trend which has continued in the market with hybrid, "commuter," and "comfort" bikes.

The difference between a comfort bike, and a comfort bike with a motor, is the motor.

Last edited by Gresp15C; 11-07-18 at 07:53 PM.
Gresp15C is offline  
Old 11-07-18, 08:05 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
bogydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: ALASKA , SoCal
Posts: 914

Bikes: /Skye/ Torker mt, Sirrus flat bar

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 10 Posts
By what date.?

eventually yes.
As we get older....
When we’re getting passed by 65 year old Gram & Gramps.
They wave as they go by, say “ comé on , you can do it “
Many hardliners will change their tune.
bogydave is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.