![]() |
Censorship by bot? Is that what we really need, really want instead of simply ignoring posts by those you dislike? What hardship is there in not reading someone's post?
|
Originally Posted by fishboat
(Post 22309189)
Seems like an entirely rational statement to me. Sadly, the ignore function is all that's available to us regular folk, other than reporting posts that are clearly off the rails.
It would be interesting(only if it was never communicated to the general population) if BF developed a robot job in the software to eliminate losers based the total number of people that placed said loser on their ignore list. Sort of a blind sampling of the population to ID people that are thought to be generally offensive. This would require fairly broad use of the ignore function. Again, it would only work (well) if this function/robot was never communicated to the general membership. Who knew the oh so real struggles of trying to navigate an online forum with only an ignore button to protect your delicate sensibilities. I hope that someday you find true inner peace my brother. May the bots be with you. |
Originally Posted by downhillmaster
(Post 22308717)
Could you be a bit more judgemental and a bit more vague please?
Who exactly are the ‘worst’ people and what exactly have they done? If I were to post that Pancreatic Cancer is one of the deadliest types of cancer with only 5% living 5 years after diagnosis, that isnt me being judgmental, its me being analytical and just stating a reality. |
Originally Posted by shelbyfv
(Post 22309021)
It seems to depend on who's on duty and who's making the report, as unterhausen suggested above. I've given up reporting duplicate/multiple threads and threads in the wrong forum. Maybe others have as well. I'm not complaining, just took me awhile to figure it out.;)
At the same time, there is so much crossover in forums that I actually think some threads can exist in a couple different forums- and not just exist, but be beneficial. A thread about a specific steel road bike could exist in both road and c&v. A thread about a gravel bike could exist in both gravel and road. etc etc etc. Someone who posts a lot in c&v asks that forum about lighting because they know many posters and trust opinions- cool. They also post a thread in electronics because that may widen the net- cool. That hardly seems harmful. And given the likelihood that a lot of people who read c&v arent jumping into the electronics forum often(or ever), discussion of that topic can benefit others too, either in the immediate or months down the line as a reference. I often wonder what general cycling would look like if all the threads were moved to 'appropriate' forums. The MTB threads in MTB, the road bike threads in road, the hybrid threads in hybrid, the mechanical threads in mechanics, etc. General cycling forum would be a ghost town. |
Posts about the forums deteriorating are causing deterioration of the forums.
|
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 22309264)
I often wonder what general cycling would look like if all the threads were moved to 'appropriate' forums.
|
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
(Post 22309200)
Censorship by bot? Is that what we really need, really want instead of simply ignoring posts by those you dislike? What hardship is there in not reading someone's post?
|
Originally Posted by prj71
(Post 22309320)
Posts about the forums deteriorating are causing deterioration of the forums.
|
Originally Posted by fishboat
(Post 22309336)
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle sort of appears..
|
must be winter
|
I have been through all these posts and pages and there was not one picture of a bicycle, a component, or podium!
|
Originally Posted by BillyD
(Post 22307333)
I’d sure like to hear about it when someone is seriously giving my new members a hard time. Red button works.
From the forum rules page DiversityWe’re a community of cyclists, from different backgrounds and with different perspectives on sports and life. At all times, we expect our members to respect that. |
So far, it has turned out to be what I guessed it would be. |
Originally Posted by Velo Mule
(Post 22309362)
I have been through all these posts and pages and there was not one picture of a bicycle, a component, or podium!
|
Originally Posted by Wildwood
(Post 22309399)
I was riding a bike in Post #4. But only the wool long sleeve jersey was presented. Winter is coming so I thought of it as an enabling component. ;)
So far, no one called me out on the fact that I complained about no pictures and https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...879700d70b.jpg I did not post one myself. |
Here's one. I think it covers some of the topics being discussed in General. The paint is deteriorating. It has a triple. That might/might not make sense. It also could be too much gearing, or not. 9 speed brifters that could be Chinese Microshift knockoffs. Very few of the components match. Most are even different brands as a middle finger to Bike Bike. Built to be the bicycle version of Mad Max's "Road Warrior" motorized vehicle. Most importantly, the frame/fork was given to me by a member that was perma panned. We won't talk about him. The bike checks all the boxes. :thumb:
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4e2ff4ba6d.jpg |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 22309398)
Ha. funny you mention that forum. I was banned from viewing that forum by BillyD. I disagreed with the mod team moving threads over to it from c&v, especially ones that didnt actually fit that forum's parameters, and I made it known that I disagreed. So he banned me from viewing that specific forum and I still cant see it, unless I log out.
So far, it has turned out to be what I guessed it would be. |
Originally Posted by seypat
(Post 22309428)
Here's one. I think it covers some of the topics being discussed in General. The paint is deteriorating. It has a triple. That might/might not make sense. It also could be too much gearing, or not. 9 speed brifters. Most importantly, the frame/fork was given to me by a member that was perma panned. We won't talk about him. The bike checks all the boxes. :thumb:
You're going to die due to the lack of disc brakes. Or you will not. Platform pedals on a road bike are just wrong. Or they are are right. Carbon forks are death traps or are totally safe. Blue bikes are the slowest. Or they are the fastest. |
Originally Posted by Velo Mule
(Post 22309362)
I have been through all these posts and pages and there was not one picture of a bicycle, a component, or podium!
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...12e350d9b2.jpg |
Originally Posted by Velo Mule
(Post 22309411)
You are right Wildwood .
So far, no one called me out on the fact that I complained about no pictures and https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...879700d70b.jpg I did not post one myself. |
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
(Post 22309446)
|
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 22309443)
Don't shortchange yourself. Lot more boxes checked.
You're going to die due to the lack of disc brakes. Or you will not. Platform pedals on a road bike are just wrong. Or they are are right. Carbon forks are death traps or are totally safe. Blue bikes are the slowest. Or they are the fastest. |
Originally Posted by Velo Mule
(Post 22309411)
You are right Wildwood .
So far, no one called me out on the fact that I complained about no pictures and https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...879700d70b.jpg I did not post one myself. |
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 22309443)
Don't shortchange yourself. Lot more boxes checked.
You're going to die due to the lack of disc brakes. Or you will not. Platform pedals on a road bike are just wrong. Or they are are right. Carbon forks are death traps or are totally safe. Blue bikes are the slowest. Or they are the fastest. |
I have a blue one also, and it's shiny! Or is it purple? You decide. Listed as Iris.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f7288e1c81.jpg |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.