Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Which wheels are better and why.........

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Which wheels are better and why.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-12 | 10:35 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 593
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: 2012 Specialized Crux, Schwinn Mesa

Which wheels are better and why.........

I am looking at buying a new bike and of the four bikes I am considering these are the wheelsets that come with them. I understand the levels of the components (grouppo) but know nothing at all about wheels. Which of these wheelsets is best and why? Also any additional information about these and wheelsets in general would be helpful. Thanks in advance.
Cyclocross bikes: SBC Axis CXD, Alex Handsome Dragon 2.0
Road Bike: Easton EA-50SL, or Shimano RS10
Mondo734 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 03:08 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

Cyclocross bikes: SBC Axis CXD, Alex Handsome Dragon 2.0
Road Bike: Easton EA-50SL, or Shimano RS10
What are their merits ? i have not seen either of them . you tell Us.
post links..

wheels are rims + spokes + the hub, and tires
newer is factory built low spoke count wheels..
but i would not use any of them myself..

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-05-12 at 03:13 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 03:57 AM
  #3  
Monster Pete's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Warwick, UK

Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion

Generally, the most durable, strongest wheel will be a conventional 36-spoke, 3-cross pattern.

The Great Spoke Scam: In the early '80s a clever marketeer hit upon the idea of using only 32 spokes in wheels for production bikes. Because of the association of 32 spoke wheels with exotic, high-performance bikes, the manufacturers were able to cut corners and save money while presenting it as an "upgrade!" The resulting wheels were noticeably weaker than comparable 36 spoke wheels, but held up well enough for most customers.

Since then, this practice has been carried to an extreme, with 28-, 24-, even 16-spoke wheels being offered, and presented as if they were somehow an "upgrade."

Actually, such wheels normally are not an upgrade in practice. When the spokes are farther apart on the rim, it is necessary to use a heavier rim to compensate, so there isn't usually even a weight benefit from these newer wheels!

This type of wheel requires unusually high spoke tension, since the load is carried by fewer spokes. If a spoke does break, the wheel generally becomes instantly unridable. The hub may break too; see John Allen's article.
(From Sheldon Brown-wheelbuilding)
Monster Pete is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 07:37 AM
  #4  
Canuck in the mud again
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: West of TO, Canada

Bikes: Redline Conquest, Surly Pugsley custom, GF Nirvana, Miele classic road

Originally Posted by Mondo734
I am looking at buying a new bike and of the four bikes I am considering these are the wheelsets that come with them. I understand the levels of the components (grouppo) but know nothing at all about wheels. Which of these wheelsets is best and why? Also any additional information about these and wheelsets in general would be helpful. Thanks in advance.
Cyclocross bikes: SBC Axis CXD, Alex Handsome Dragon 2.0
Road Bike: Easton EA-50SL, or Shimano RS10
Most factory bikes save money on wheels. Unless you are looking at $2000+ bikes, there is no clear winner, they are all likely to just be average.
Things you may want to care about more than anything else:
Is the wheelset rated for more than your current wieght? Many are rated as low as 180lb and fail if the rider is actually that weight when used as a daily trainer..
Do you actually know what each of the wheels weigh? look for bladed, or 1.5mm spokes, -it "may" indicate a lighter wheel.
and most importantly....
Are you racing or can you pull off a century? - if not, all the above is irrelevant. Just simply worry about a strong wheel - the strongest you can afford. Most long distance (touring) bikes have more spokes to allow for bags, backpacks etc..

I would be most inclined to buy the bike with the best grouppo you can afford, and once you've ridden those wheels for many many miles.....
Then, get the best bikeshop you can find and get them to build you wheels. (A good store can easily get at least 3-4 outstanding referrals, not just a nice store)
roobydoo is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 08:34 AM
  #5  
Retro Grouch's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 30,225
Likes: 649
From: St Peters, Missouri

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Before anybody can intelligently discuss "better," you have to define a purpose.

Lighter is always good. More durable is always good. Less expensive is always good. You can't have all three. The trick is finding the right balance that matches your personal needs.

I'd buy the bike based upon everything else and plan on replacing the wheels in a year or so. Ultegra or better hubs on Open Pro or CXP-33 rims with 32 spokes laced 3 cross define par. Not the lightest nor the most aero nor the most durable nor the cheapest but a good balance for typical enthusiast use.

Last edited by Retro Grouch; 03-05-12 at 08:38 AM.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 09:30 AM
  #6  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Before anybody can intelligently discuss "better," you have to define a purpose.

Lighter is always good. More durable is always good. Less expensive is always good. You can't have all three. The trick is finding the right balance that matches your personal needs.

I'd buy the bike based upon everything else and plan on replacing the wheels in a year or so. Ultegra or better hubs on Open Pro or CXP-33 rims with 32 spokes laced 3 cross define par. Not the lightest nor the most aero nor the most durable nor the cheapest but a good balance for typical enthusiast use.
^^^^ This

I don't race, all of my wheels (with a few exceptions) are 36 3x 14ga ss spokes on eyelet box section alloy rims. Cost effective and almost indestructible. Hubs vary by bike and use, some are stock steel Raleigh, best is probably a set of Deore LX. I prefer the old style loose bearing hubs over just about everything else, personal preference.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 9
From: England
Differences include:
Rim section (aerodynamic deep section vs lightweight box section)
Spoke count: Fewer thicker spokes with strong /heavy rim or more, lighter-weight spokes with lighter rim.
Spoke-hub connection. Modern straight-pull spokes are more reliable than traditional bent spokes.
Bearing style. Cup and cone vs cartridge bearings.
A benchmark wheel for comparison would be a standard Shimano Ultegra/Open Pro/32 spoke. If something is lighter, more aero/better/cheaper its worth considering.
For bicycle assembly plants, it is more economical to outsourse wheelbuilding to another company and buy the whole wheel. Prebuilt wheels also have some sexy race-like characteristics like low spoke counts which adds to the bikes salebility.
MichaelW is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 01:28 PM
  #8  
BlazingPedals's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,559
Likes: 799
From: Middle of da Mitten

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Bacchetta Quattro, Catrike Speed

Originally Posted by roobydoo
Are you racing or can you pull off a century? - if not, all the above is irrelevant.
I disagree with this. Lower spoke counts do more than just save weight - they're faster, which is another way of saying they let you get down the road will less energy expended. You don't need to be a racer to appreciate that. For a lot of cyclists, those low-spoke-count wheels are strong enough. If you're touring, or if you're a clyde, then feel free to go ahead and get stronger wheels; just don't expect everyone else to share your priorities - racers or not.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
Canuck in the mud again
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: West of TO, Canada

Bikes: Redline Conquest, Surly Pugsley custom, GF Nirvana, Miele classic road

Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
I disagree with this. Lower spoke counts do more than just save weight - they're faster, which is another way of saying they let you get down the road will less energy expended. You don't need to be a racer to appreciate that. For a lot of cyclists, those low-spoke-count wheels are strong enough. If you're touring, or if you're a clyde, then feel free to go ahead and get stronger wheels; just don't expect everyone else to share your priorities - racers or not.
I can respect that, it's just that marketing in the cycling industry is targeted largely at elite atheletes. So opinion as to which wheel is better is less relevant to the enthusiast level. If it comes down to 1% less energy expended - I'd rather have the bombproof wheelset.

Now, to be clear - the lightest spokes are actually also some of the strongest, so you can have your cake and eat it too.
I find retro grouch's comments to be a usefull solution somewhat along my thought pattern.
roobydoo is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-12 | 03:15 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

I note Paris Roubaix, they get out the 32 hole 3 cross wheels again.
[unless sponsor money has a product to prove their durability]
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 03-07-12 | 04:28 PM
  #11  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
I disagree with this. Lower spoke counts do more than just save weight - they're faster, which is another way of saying they let you get down the road will less energy expended. You don't need to be a racer to appreciate that. For a lot of cyclists, those low-spoke-count wheels are strong enough. If you're touring, or if you're a clyde, then feel free to go ahead and get stronger wheels; just don't expect everyone else to share your priorities - racers or not.
To an extent you do get what you pay for in wheels. Stock wheels that come with a stock bike are made to sell the bike at a price. It is one of the ways that a manufacturer can keep the price of a bike down. For this reason one of the Best upgrades you can do for most bikes is to buy better wheels. How much and what type of wheel you get is down to your wallet size and Then you run into another problem of you could get wheels that give a harsh ride- or are not suitable for the way you ride. I do use the low spoke count wheels and they are good in most conditions but can be a hit "Harsh" on certain road surfaces- or on the "Wrong" bike.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Old 03-08-12 | 02:12 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 593
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: 2012 Specialized Crux, Schwinn Mesa

ok so here are the bikes that these wheelsets are on....
1) https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bc/...01&scname=Road

2) https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bc/...01&scname=Road

3) https://www.performancebike.com/bikes...mount+series+8

4) https://www.performancebike.com/bikes..._1096710_-1___

I would have to say that durability and strength are most important to me since I am comming from a MTB that is super heavy all of these bikes are easily 10lbs lighter. Price isn't a concern because these are all on bikes that I already am interested in and are not an extra expense just part of the cost of the bike.
Mondo734 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-08-12 | 07:57 PM
  #13  
dedhed's Avatar
SE Wis
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,331
From: Milwaukee, WI

Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970

If you are buying this bike form a LBS, INSIST that the shop check the spoke tension before it leaves the shop and again in 100 miles or so. This will go along way toward the original wheels providing adequate service no matter what wheel it is.
dedhed is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-12 | 01:27 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 593
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: 2012 Specialized Crux, Schwinn Mesa

@Dedhed

Thanks for that tip I will definitely make sure to do that(one of the more useful comments so far).
Mondo734 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikhalit
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
10
06-24-13 07:23 AM
twentysomething
Fifty Plus (50+)
34
12-16-11 06:51 AM
gusmanchu
Road Cycling
17
11-22-10 12:20 PM
EasyDoesIt
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
15
07-16-10 12:42 PM
saturnsc2
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-18-10 09:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.