![]() |
Originally Posted by nathand
(Post 23506528)
After closer inspection, turns out what I have is a '95, not a '97 (apparently I can't distinguish "Gloss Ice Inkwell Blue" from "Ice Indigo"). This bike has clearly been through some things and the rear wheel is totally wrong (8-speed cassette for what should be 7-speed, and the hub is missing a spacer so it rubs on the frame and doesn't actually spin smoothly). It was described on Craigslist as a "Trek TrackMaster," and for $50 it's a nice frame I can rebuild. I don't have the parts to build it up identically to my '92 790, and even if I did I don't need two nearly-identical bikes although it would be interesting to ride them one after the other for comparison. I think I'll start by stripping everything off the 750 frame and then I can lay it on top of the 790. If the geometry looks different enough I can move everything over from the 790 to this 750 and see if I like it better.
|
A great deal for $50!
|
Well, I'm back. In the 'collection reduction' thread I had posted that it was going to be time to move the 750 on, as it was a little too redundant to my Trek 990 700c conversion. But hot dang. Got back on this one and it is the smoothest riding bike I've ever been on, even with 23s. Totally silent, just a lovely ride. It's as if it was choosing me. I can't say no!
I really want to take my time and build it up right. Lots of changes to come. But what a great bicycle. These USA Multitracks are absolute gems. |
Well, I finally found a lugged one in my size. Popped up for sale right in my neighborhood and I just stumbled upon the ad for it. 23" 1992 Trek 790 MultiTrack. Threw some tires I had on it, but I want to get some 40mm ones on it soon. Looks like the original GripShifts and flat bar were swapped out at some point.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f88bc4835c.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...750afa6cf6.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d3cb9a0b21.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...868b60c13d.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...489c72d5ef.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cfbc71e933.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...034a95684e.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...75ef6864ef.jpg ' |
Originally Posted by casanewt
(Post 23525563)
Well, I finally found a lugged one in my size. Popped up for sale right in my neighborhood and I just stumbled upon the ad for it. 23" 1992 Trek 790 MultiTrack. Threw some tires I had on it, but I want to get some 40mm ones on it soon. Looks like the original GripShifts and flat bar were swapped out at some point.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f88bc4835c.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...750afa6cf6.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d3cb9a0b21.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...868b60c13d.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...489c72d5ef.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cfbc71e933.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...034a95684e.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...75ef6864ef.jpg ' Awesome find. So many people back in the day purchased these bikes, rode them a couple times, then put them away for 25 years. Many pop up in this sort of shape, and will a thorough cleaning, can be present nearly as new. This will not last forever. |
Got some new 40MM shoes for the '92 790. These WTB Nanos were on sale, but they are a cheap feeling tire. If I had paid more, I don't think I would be happy. The logo is only on one side?
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...608ed63fde.jpg |
My 750 got a new handlebar and some rack extenders to push the rack rearward.
Due to the geometry of the rack and the enormity of the panniers I just bought, combined with the shortish chainstays (435 mm) these bikes have, my feet hit the bags every time. So I made some extenders: https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...586349fd1.jpeg And a few gratuitous shots because I like my bike: https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4d45bae711.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...51027d3f06.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3f5fd4c8e4.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8140c56c83.jpg Thanks for looking! |
Originally Posted by Smokinapankake
(Post 23536068)
My 750 got a new handlebar and some rack extenders to push the rack rearward.
Due to the geometry of the rack and the enormity of the panniers I just bought, combined with the shortish chainstays (435 mm) these bikes have, my feet hit the bags every time. So I made some extenders: https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...586349fd1.jpeg And a few gratuitous shots because I like my bike: https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4d45bae711.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...51027d3f06.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3f5fd4c8e4.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8140c56c83.jpg Thanks for looking! |
Got some new 40MM shoes for the '92 790. These WTB Nanos were on sale, but they are a cheap feeling tire. If I had paid more, I don't think I would be happy. The logo is only on one side? |
Originally Posted by Smokinapankake
(Post 23536068)
My 750 got a new handlebar and some rack extenders to push the rack rearward.
I wonder though if you have heavy loads in your humongous panniers, will these eventually lever the upper eyelets off the dropout? Would a (custom) rack that extends further back but loads vertically/diagonally onto the eyelet be more robust? |
Originally Posted by wstephenson
(Post 23536240)
The extenders look well made. I like how you're using both eyelets. Does the extender contact the outside of the eyelet to transmit loads, or is it all going through the bolts?
I wonder though if you have heavy loads in your humongous panniers, will these eventually lever the upper eyelets off the dropout? Would a (custom) rack that extends further back but loads vertically/diagonally onto the eyelet be more robust? |
Originally Posted by wstephenson
(Post 23505364)
I've owned and compared lugged '91 and welded '96 750s, both built up for gravel/allroad use with drops. I got the 96 because of the issues you mention. The 96 has a noticeably lower bottom bracket and a slightly steeper head angle (iirc), but a longer effective top tube.
the ground than I'd like, and if I can get my foot down where I'd like then my knee stays too bent at the bottom of the pedal stroke. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d7a3ea694b.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...81012a107c.jpg |
Originally Posted by nathand
(Post 23547831)
I stripped the parts off the '95 today and lined it up with the '92 to compare, since I couldn't find detailed numbers from the Vintage Trek catalogues and anyway I find it more helpful to see it. Looks like the bottom bracket is about an inch lower on the '95. Now I've got to decide if that makes it worth moving everything over. I took the '92 for a mixed gravel/road ride yesterday and had a great time, but also felt like a lower bottom bracket would be nice - if I put the seat so I get proper leg extension then I'm a bit higher off
the ground than I'd like, and if I can get my foot down where I'd like then my knee stays too bent at the bottom of the pedal stroke. For my taste, I felt like the '96 750 had a more dialled ride compared to the '91, but so much of that depends on overall bike/rider fit. I used an inline seatpost to compensate for the slightly longer top tube, but still had enough room for a 100mm stem and some fairly compact (~70mm reach?) gravel bars, on a 21" frame. |
|
Originally Posted by ClydeRoad
(Post 23565748)
|
Originally Posted by SimplySycles1
(Post 21006435)
Hello i don't recall seeing a mid fork mount after 1994 or maybe 95. When the higher models of MT stopped being a clone with the 520, the last year i believe 1993, the mid fork mount disappeared. That being said and Trek being Trek any left over forks could have been used on 94 or 95 model years.
|
745 Trekking Model
Hi! I just finished a 745, which only was produced for one year (1998). I wonder if there are any pictures out there of some 745 builds? It comes with a shimano gear hub
|
Got a pair of 7300s, both are 20" and in very good conditions. Think they are from around 2003. So far, worked on the step-through; changed the saddle, handlebar, added a rear rack and front basket. Really enjoy it.https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0f240ffe9.jpeg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f067a7ee7.jpeg |
Just back from Ragbrai. I did see several steel Multitracks on the ride. I was thinking it's not my first choice for a longer 7 day ride but then I remembered I rode my 750 on Ragbrai in 2010 6 weeks after my heart attack because I wanted to keep my speed and effort lower and the extra low gears on it would help on the bigger hills.
here are a couple that I photographed: https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...e77c5aee98.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...1da28c1d28.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...c9d1776fab.jpg |
Originally Posted by loubapache
(Post 23573535)
Got a pair of 7300s, both are 20" and in very good conditions. Think they are from around 2003. So far, worked on the step-through; changed the saddle, handlebar, added a rear rack and front basket. Really enjoy it.https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0f240ffe9.jpeg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f067a7ee7.jpeg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...2eec5efeb.jpeg |
|
^ A lot of drop bar conversions look dorky but yours is really well done.
|
Aluminum Trek 7000 Multitrack.
previous owner tried to do a gravel bike conversion. Didn't work well. The frame is very stiff and bounces all over on gravel. Still has the Trek Invert 700c x 32 tires which were not meant for loose surfaces. The MicroNew 3x7 brake levers are not compatible with the v-brakes on the bike. They also used gear cables for the brakes. Yikes. I do like the 7 speed MegaRange freewheel. Low gear is low enough for the biggest hills. I'll be installing flat bars, the original stem and and grip shifts before flipping it. The 7000 was the base model and it has noticeably heavy parts. I had to change the rear tire & tube and I was surprised at how heavy the rear wheel was. Trek Matrix rim but still rather beefy.Shock seat post seized. came with a rear flat and rear tire worn out but I had a matching tire. note the "aero cage". I put a shorter stem on for today's ride. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...a856eeced7.jpg as received. Tilt stem all the way forward, out of my reach. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7b8a1be1b3.jpg microNEW R7 (right 7 speed) https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...ce3fe09133.jpg microNEW L3 (left 3 speed) https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...241d58bbf9.jpg microNew right: lower lever for up shifting, upper button for downshift release. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...799e1c577.jpeg |
Originally Posted by rickpaulos
(Post 23625026)
Aluminum Trek 7000 Multitrack.
previous owner tried to do a gravel bike conversion. Didn't work well. The frame is very stiff and bounces all over on gravel. Still has the Trek Invert 700c x 32 tires which were not meant for loose surfaces. The MicroNew 3x7 brake levers are not compatible with the v-brakes on the bike. They also used gear cables for the brakes. Yikes. I do like the 7 speed MegaRange freewheel. Low gear is low enough for the biggest hills. I'll be installing flat bars, the original stem and and grip shifts before flipping it. The 7000 was the base model and it has noticeably heavy parts. I had to change the rear tire & tube and I was surprised at how heavy the rear wheel was. Trek Matrix rim but still rather beefy.Shock seat post seized. came with a rear flat and rear tire worn out but I had a matching tire. note the "aero cage". I put a shorter stem on for today's ride. as received. Tilt stem all the way forward, out of my reach. microNEW R7 (right 7 speed) microNEW L3 (left 3 speed) microNew right: lower lever for up shifting, upper button for downshift release. How well do those MicroNEWs work? I haven’t tried a set of those yet. |
microNew
Originally Posted by daywood
(Post 23625341)
How well do those MicroNEWs work? I haven’t tried a set of those yet. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.