Too Much Rear Traction...
#1
Thread Starter
Trek DS 8.4 Rider!
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 480
Likes: 1
From: Anaheim, CA
Bikes: 1991 Gt Avalanche, 2012 DS 8.4
Too Much Rear Traction...
Yep..i was able to fit a 2.1" rear tire on my DS 8.4. I was not used to the traction compared to my 29-3's I had and made my front tire lift on a steep climb...you can figure out the rest...
.be
#2
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 5
From: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
yep, you needed more weight forward. it's tricky to manage that vs. being further back for more traction especially when standing. if you can stay seated (depends on power & gearing) usually you can lean forward and still have all the traction you need.
btw I have that same rear tire, bonty 29-3 rear, but the front wouldn't fit on my bike.
btw I have that same rear tire, bonty 29-3 rear, but the front wouldn't fit on my bike.
#7
Thread Starter
Trek DS 8.4 Rider!
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 480
Likes: 1
From: Anaheim, CA
Bikes: 1991 Gt Avalanche, 2012 DS 8.4
Thanx Everyone!
There are 2 versions of 29-3's. a 2.25 version which i used in the front with the stock rims and a 2.0 version which i used in the rear with the stock rims. On this ride, i used the Maxxis Crossmarks which are 2.1 in the rear.
*You can fit any 29" tire up to a 2.3" width up front.
**You can safely fit a 2.0" width tire in the rear and "some" 2.1" tires in the rear.
There are 2 versions of 29-3's. a 2.25 version which i used in the front with the stock rims and a 2.0 version which i used in the rear with the stock rims. On this ride, i used the Maxxis Crossmarks which are 2.1 in the rear.
*You can fit any 29" tire up to a 2.3" width up front.
**You can safely fit a 2.0" width tire in the rear and "some" 2.1" tires in the rear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09box
Bicycle Mechanics
14
04-15-16 11:13 AM






