Entry level bike to choose
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Entry level bike to choose
Hi all
I'm looking for a mountain bike with a budget around $600. I'm looking for a bike to do some trail, and to commute as well, I was wondering about those options I found online. they were
Full suspension
Schwin 405
Hard tail
Trek 4300 Disk
Cannondale F8
Specialized Hardrock Comp Disc
My questions are
At that prica range, should I get a FS or should I get a HT. if I should get a HT, which one should I choose between those 3.
Thanks a lot in advance
I'm looking for a mountain bike with a budget around $600. I'm looking for a bike to do some trail, and to commute as well, I was wondering about those options I found online. they were
Full suspension
Schwin 405
Hard tail
Trek 4300 Disk
Cannondale F8
Specialized Hardrock Comp Disc
My questions are
At that prica range, should I get a FS or should I get a HT. if I should get a HT, which one should I choose between those 3.
Thanks a lot in advance
#8
Hooligan
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
Bikes: 2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3
Out of the bicycles mentioned, I would recommend the Specialized Hardrock comp disc, personally. Reasoning?
Crankset has replaceable chainrings. Both the Trek and Cannondale are using a Shimano Altus crankset which does not have replaceable chainrings.
The Hardrock has a lockout on the fork, which you can use while road riding. The Cannondale does not. I'm not sure if the Trek does. Interestingly, the Trek 4300 has a different fork in its picture on the website than what the text below that picture says should be there. What's going on, Cannondale?
The Hardrock is equipped with SRAM X5 for a rear derailleur, SRAM's equivalent to Deore (higher in quality than both the Acera on the Cannondale and the Alivio on the Trek)
Hardrock has Avid BB5, which isn't a top notch brake, but it's pretty decent for the price tag. This is more of an opinion thing, but I prefer these over the Tektro IO and Shimano 416 (Alivio grade) on the Trek and Cannondale
Lastly, opinion again, I think the Specialized Hardrock just looks cooler than the other two. It's got a nice smooth sweep on the top that's just a bit nifty, and the colour scheme on the bike is nice.
I'd personally recommend giving them all a test ride and seeing if one really fits well and stands out, of course.
But if it were a matter of picking one for the features, so long as the price was relatively level, I think that the Hardrock is the pick for me.
Crankset has replaceable chainrings. Both the Trek and Cannondale are using a Shimano Altus crankset which does not have replaceable chainrings.
The Hardrock has a lockout on the fork, which you can use while road riding. The Cannondale does not. I'm not sure if the Trek does. Interestingly, the Trek 4300 has a different fork in its picture on the website than what the text below that picture says should be there. What's going on, Cannondale?
The Hardrock is equipped with SRAM X5 for a rear derailleur, SRAM's equivalent to Deore (higher in quality than both the Acera on the Cannondale and the Alivio on the Trek)
Hardrock has Avid BB5, which isn't a top notch brake, but it's pretty decent for the price tag. This is more of an opinion thing, but I prefer these over the Tektro IO and Shimano 416 (Alivio grade) on the Trek and Cannondale
Lastly, opinion again, I think the Specialized Hardrock just looks cooler than the other two. It's got a nice smooth sweep on the top that's just a bit nifty, and the colour scheme on the bike is nice.
I'd personally recommend giving them all a test ride and seeing if one really fits well and stands out, of course.
But if it were a matter of picking one for the features, so long as the price was relatively level, I think that the Hardrock is the pick for me.
#9
I have a 3900, and I've beat the living heck out of it.... its been incapacitated for some time now. Partly due to this being my learnign curve bike, both riding and mechanics
I'd go with the hardrock, I rode a hard rock before and it was a much more comfortable bike to ME. Like mentioned above, it also comes with more bang for your buck.
I'd go with the hardrock, I rode a hard rock before and it was a much more comfortable bike to ME. Like mentioned above, it also comes with more bang for your buck.
#10
Spec. Hardrock.
Hands down.
It will put hair on your little hobbit feet.
Hands down.
It will put hair on your little hobbit feet.
#11
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Alright, so it's decided then, I kinda like the HardRock more than the Trek also, but I'll go to my LBS and test ride both of them, to see which I feel more comfortable, thanks a lot for all of your responds
#12
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Centralia Washington
I was looking for a bike for the about the same thing as you and was looking at pretty much the same bikes, wasn't considering full suspension though. I ended up with a 2010 Specialized Rockhopper and couldn't be happier, for me it was the most comfortable, and value packed bike.
#13
I got a 4300 for my fiancee a while back.
It was missing the rear wheel and the cranks were messed up. I replaced the wheel and upgraded the cranks straight away to ones with removable chainrings.
Less than $300 spent in total, and it's a great bike.
But, if you want new, I'd also vote for the Speshy.
It was missing the rear wheel and the cranks were messed up. I replaced the wheel and upgraded the cranks straight away to ones with removable chainrings.
Less than $300 spent in total, and it's a great bike.
But, if you want new, I'd also vote for the Speshy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bleepjay
Hybrid Bicycles
26
05-02-15 07:13 AM
NorCal Cyclist
Hybrid Bicycles
3
05-20-13 08:58 PM






