![]() |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 18334112)
Nope. I scaled it based on one dimension and everything else matched up (within a few tenths of a millimeter and based on my point locations selected by using the pixels in the image).
Other specs I got after scaling drawing: Frame Stack: 669 Frame Reach: 327 Wheelbase: 1002 BB Drop: 80 Chainstays: 440 Seems ready for some serious gravel on paper, @UnfilteredDregs OMG, forgot about rake (crucial for figuring flop). I'm getting damn near 50mm of rake. |
Wow, it must be getting boring as spit outside in the greater 41, we got all sorts of unusual visitors dropping by to say hello.
Hey fellas, we're not serving any drinks until after hours when the bars close and the forum Admins are asleep. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 18334368)
It's amazing how much room there is in a 2.5 car garage when it's been cleaned and organized. Heck, I bet that I could fit two vehicles in there and still have a little room left over.
|
Everyone here maths good.
|
Originally Posted by BillyD
(Post 18334445)
Wow, it must be getting boring as spit outside in the greater 41, we got all sorts of unusual visitors dropping by to say hello.
Hey fellas, we're not serving any drinks until after hours when the bars close and the forum Admins are asleep. :thumb: Speaking of the greater 41, what the heck happened in that work stand thread? Simple question, simple answers based on personal experience, now everyone wants to kill each other. Then again, sounds like typical 41 behavior. |
Originally Posted by UnfilteredDregs
(Post 18333825)
Considering we have a reasonably sharp brain-trust within this thread I figure I'd ask here first...
So...I've been fit. I have a custom geometry, that bike will be built over the Spring and hopefully I'll have it for D2R2 2016... Nevertheless... I have not been able to translate my fit into everyday reasonable ballpark spec's that I can use to evaluate production frames in order to satisfy the various aspects of N+1... Without further ado, here's my geo...how do I translate this into useful information?: https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...10632874_o.jpg The 734mm and 401mm seem to be to scale so I assume the rest is to scale which makes that headtube about 200mm long and JoeJack puts the top tube at 523mm. If that is a correct fit (which I'd be surprised if it was) for a road bike then your going to need a serious amount of up angle on the stem. A Trek H2 fit for example with an effective top tube of 521mm is a size 50 and that has a headtube of only 130mm so you'd need to find another 70mm (nearly 3 inches) somewhere either in the steerer tube or up angled stem or both. |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 18333983)
I used that jpeg as an underlay for a CAD sketch and came up with:
Eff. Top Tube: 523mm Eff. Seat Tube (c-c): 653mm Stem: 90mm Head Tube: 240mm Seat Tube angle: 74° Head Tube angle: 72° You must have very long legs and a very short torso, correct? |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 18334049)
|
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 18333789)
Aborted my Friday indoor session this AM. Supposed to be a 40 minute FTP repeat but my legs and mind just weren't into it.
I watched the rest of the people complete their tests and I swear the triathletes and TT people just about orgasm during trainer workouts. Trainers = self-flagellation. |
Originally Posted by BillyD
(Post 18334445)
Wow, it must be getting boring as spit outside in the greater 41, we got all sorts of unusual visitors dropping by to say hello.
Hey fellas, we're not serving any drinks until after hours when the bars close and the forum Admins are asleep. :thumb: |
I met a guy today who works for countervail. Apparently they design an elastomer that makes carbon fiber more resilient and absorb shock better. We talked bikes for a few minutes, he said Bianchi has had good results with their tech. Apparently also useful in tennis racquets. Pretty cool stuff.
|
Originally Posted by Doug28450
(Post 18334145)
Can we please get away from this serious bike stuff and get back to the nonsense?
On another note...I don't know how you folks deal with tubes. 4 flats for me in the last two weeks, all annoying pinhole punctures. Death by 1000 ******. I'm so going back to tubeless... |
Hey UD we need to compare measurements sometime. Who designed the bike??
|
i could use a drink, its been a while and ive had a rough week
|
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 18334264)
Weirdos.
|
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 18334523)
I met a guy today who works for countervail. Apparently they design an elastomer that makes carbon fiber more resilient and absorb shock better. We talked bikes for a few minutes, he said Bianchi has had good results with their tech. Apparently also useful in tennis racquets. Pretty cool stuff.
|
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 18334530)
Hey UD we need to compare measurements sometime.
|
Originally Posted by UnfilteredDregs
(Post 18334527)
Srsly.
On another note...I don't know how you folks deal with tubes. 4 flats for me in the last two weeks, all annoying pinhole punctures. Death by 1000 ******. I'm so going back to tubeless... |
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 18334429)
Same results here. Scaled pic to the 782 dimension and the others seemed right.
Other specs I got after scaling drawing: Frame Stack: 669 Frame Reach: 327 Wheelbase: 1002 BB Drop: 80 Chainstays: 440 Seems ready for some serious gravel on paper, @UnfilteredDregs OMG, forgot about rake (crucial for figuring flop). I'm getting damn near 50mm of rake. I'm having some long discussions with Mr. Rosko, the gent building my frame: Rosko |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 18334541)
Is it the same problem over and over?
|
After a crappy trainer ride this AM, I decided to treat myself to an easy fun ride and did some geocache hunting.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5634/...fe35faf8_c.jpgUntitled by trsnrtr, on Flickr https://farm1.staticflickr.com/575/2...0d3b562d_c.jpgUntitled by trsnrtr, on Flickr |
It appears that Andy Griffith is alive and well and practicing law in Groveland, IL
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5716/...c30549d9_c.jpgUntitled by trsnrtr, on Flickr |
Originally Posted by smarkinson
(Post 18334509)
A Trek H2 fit for example with an effective top tube of 521mm is a size 50 and that has a headtube of only 130mm so you'd need to find another 70mm (nearly 3 inches) somewhere either in the steerer tube or up angled stem or both.
The angles on the Trek 50cm are likely so far off that the fit wouldn't work out even if he could find a long enough seatpost and tall enough stem. |
Also, during my travels, I saw this plate which kind of puzzles me.
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/639/2...e4e19d50_z.jpgUntitled by trsnrtr, on Flickr |
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 18334530)
Hey UD we need to compare measurements sometime. Who designed the bike??
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.