Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

My Venturi Breezer Build - 19.25 pound, steel bike <$850

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

My Venturi Breezer Build - 19.25 pound, steel bike <$850

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-16, 07:05 AM
  #176  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,820
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 377 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Well I guess we have found the one cyclist the Venturi was designed for.
Its not ideal, but it fits. A 54 horizontal top tube with like 38.5-39 reach, a 54 stack, and a 75-76 standover would be lovely. Oh wait, I can't determine fit from numbers (I read that somewhere).
wheelreason is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 09:01 AM
  #177  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,452

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3152 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times in 1,036 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
I saw it described as 'super light road'. Is there more of a description I'm missing? I'd love to know the full story behind someone wanting beach cruiser geometry in road bike form. That bike might as well not even have drops those bars are rotated so high. I mean, I'm all for making money and delivering what the customer asks for but if I was building custom bikes for a living, I'd leave that one off my website.
That's an unfortunate perspective, because aside from it not being beach cruiser geometry, plainly, that it's listed on the site tells me that English is an open minded builder who is willing to work across a spectrum of bikes types, not just the racer type, and so it enhances my perception and valuation of his talents.

I have little doubt that his background at BikeFriday gave him an appreciation of design possibilities beyond what most builders have; he probably doesn't think that steerer is really all that long given what BikeFriday does!

I don't know if you saw the detail link stating some of the specific and custom design features in realising this 13.1lbs road bike, but here it is: Tom?s superlight road | English Cycles
chaadster is online now  
Old 11-21-16, 09:03 AM
  #178  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,452

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3152 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times in 1,036 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Well I guess we have found the one cyclist the Venturi was designed for.
Speak for yourself. Some of us have more insight.
chaadster is online now  
Old 11-21-16, 09:11 AM
  #179  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by wheelreason
Its not ideal, but it fits. A 54 horizontal top tube with like 38.5-39 reach, a 54 stack, and a 75-76 standover would be lovely. Oh wait, I can't determine fit from numbers (I read that somewhere).
We are pretty similarly proportioned. My best fitting bike is very, very close to those dimensions (my old Trek 660, TT = 54cm on its 21"/53.5cm C-T frame) and my new Hongfu build (50cm C-T FM079-F frame) is very similar as well, albeit a bit shorter in reach and stack (ok by me as it gets me even lower and on a 110mm stem vs. 100mm on the Trek).
joejack951 is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 09:14 AM
  #180  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
That's an unfortunate perspective, because aside from it not being beach cruiser geometry, plainly, that it's listed on the site tells me that English is an open minded builder who is willing to work across a spectrum of bikes types, not just the racer type, and so it enhances my perception and valuation of his talents.

I have little doubt that his background at BikeFriday gave him an appreciation of design possibilities beyond what most builders have; he probably doesn't think that steerer is really all that long given what BikeFriday does!

I don't know if you saw the detail link stating some of the specific and custom design features in realising this 13.1lbs road bike, but here it is: Tom?s superlight road | English Cycles
Ok, I'll cut him some slack because the guy buying the bike is 79 and I hope I'm still into fun bikes at that age. However, a downward slanting stem on top of a massive stack of spacers is the 'comb-over' of cycling (to quote myself ). Throw a up-turned 45° stem on that thing and remove the bulk of that spacer and I bet it doesn't look nearly as absurd.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 09:17 AM
  #181  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
I don't think it is that simple. Even on smaller sizes the top tube is still way long when the steeper seat tube angles are take into account. And the head tubes/headsets are integrated so they are not effectively elongated by the bearing stack height like on a traditional head tube of the same height. I could make the M size work for me with a 90 mm stem flipped up on top of at least 40 mm of spacers. I like a lot of reach and almost a couple of inches saddle to bar drop so not really low, but not upright either. It could work but EEEEW, why would I want to.
I'd probably need a little bit of spacer under a 100mm stem to make the S/M (48cm) frame work, but I'm younger than you and more flexible than most (can almost palm the ground). I'd also have a ton of seatpost exposed which I'm not that crazy about. Other than that, it wouldn't be all that bad.

Last edited by joejack951; 11-21-16 at 02:33 PM.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 01:45 PM
  #182  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 401 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wheelreason
Oh wait, I can't determine fit from numbers (I read that somewhere).
Hang on there! I said you couldn't determine fit from the Venturi geo chart since it was so ambigious in how things are measured and did NOT mention stack and reach.
Inpd is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 02:48 PM
  #183  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Inpd
Hang on there! I said you couldn't determine fit from the Venturi geo chart since it was so ambigious in how things are measured and did NOT mention stack and reach.
'Stack and reach' are a fairly new concept. Cyclists have been determining fit off geometry charts like the Venturi's for years. It isn't possible to eyeball two different charts like that and say with half millimeter accuracy how different the frames are, but one can get close enough with a basic understanding of trig (understanding how the seat and head tube angles affect stack and reach).
joejack951 is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 03:23 PM
  #184  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Inpd
Hang on there! I said you couldn't determine fit from the Venturi geo chart since it was so ambigious in how things are measured and did NOT mention stack and reach.
It isn't ambiguous at all. Seat tube length is totally irrelevant on a compact geometry frame so it doesn't matter how they measure that. Effective top tube is only measured one way and is given. Head tube length is only measured one way and is give. The seat tube and head tube angles are only measured one way and are given. Yes, stack and reach aren't obvious, but the tube lengths and angles should suffice for a fit.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 05-15-17, 05:32 PM
  #185  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seriously looking to buy a venturi. I'm 5.6 with a 29-30 inseam. What size do you think I should get? 45 or 48cm? Thanks.
calboy is offline  
Old 05-15-17, 06:11 PM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by calboy
Seriously looking to buy a venturi. I'm 5.6 with a 29-30 inseam. What size do you think I should get? 45 or 48cm? Thanks.
correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to have long legs for your height.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-15-17, 06:34 PM
  #187  
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,496

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,483 Times in 1,839 Posts
Originally Posted by calboy
Seriously looking to buy a venturi. I'm 5.6 with a 29-30 inseam. What size do you think I should get? 45 or 48cm? Thanks.
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/S...ulatorBike.jsp

I also suggest measuring any bikes you own which fit you, and getting a range of comfortable numbers.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 05-15-17, 07:24 PM
  #188  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I normally ride a 52cm. My concern is the aggressive geometry of the Venturi.
calboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inpd
Road Cycling
71
06-15-16 07:43 AM
Bugstomper2000
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
11
11-09-15 10:48 AM
Babe Ruthless
Hybrid Bicycles
12
10-16-14 07:08 PM
markwebb
Road Cycling
12
08-31-11 06:59 AM
3373jones
Classic & Vintage
19
01-20-11 01:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.