Wahoo Elemnt Bolt question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Wahoo Elemnt Bolt question
My garmin 800 is getting old, beat up and starting to fail more regularly. Looking at the Elemnt.
Does anyone know if it can show "future elevation" like the Garmin? What I'm trying to describe is the screen on the Garmin that, when riding a preloaded course, future mountains. I use this feature a lot on mountain cookie rides when I'm not overly familiar with the route.
Does anyone know if it can show "future elevation" like the Garmin? What I'm trying to describe is the screen on the Garmin that, when riding a preloaded course, future mountains. I use this feature a lot on mountain cookie rides when I'm not overly familiar with the route.
#4
junior
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Fresno, Calif.
Posts: 282
Bikes: 2020 Surly ECR / 2018 Norco Search XR steel gravel bike with GRX / 1983 Bianchi Campione D'Italia / Gary Fisher Wingra / Motobecane Nomade mixte (daughter's)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
11 Posts
The Elemnt Bolt as an elevation profile section at the bottom of one of the default pages for a preloaded route from Ride with GPS. You can zoom in and zoom out of the profile as well, changing thee scale.
eric/fresno, ca.
eric/fresno, ca.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It does, but it's almost useless because it doesn't show either horizontal or vertical scale, and it doesn't show what's behind you, so you can't look at it and say "oh, I'm half way up the hill now." It's one of very few things I really don't like about my bolt.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
I have a Bolt and like it. It doesn’t, however, play well with my powermeter. It gives extremely inaccurate cadence numbers. Wahoo is aware of the issue, I just don’t think they plan on doing anything about it.
#7
Senior Member
Yep, I agree with this. I don't use the climbing page very much at all though so it doesn't bother me at all. I still love my Bolt.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
Can you expand on inaccuracies? I too am running a PM and a Bolt, but have not noticed anything out of the ordinary.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm just going to keep it until it completely breaks. I don't want the Bolt due to the elevation page issues noted above as that singular feature is very important to me. And all my buddies constantly complain about the newer garmins when it rains. The touchscreen is useless at that point they say - even sweat messes with it.
#12
Senior Member
Mine is very accurate on all metrics. I train on a CompuTrainer which measures speed, cadence and power separately, and the trainer and the Bolt match almost perfectly.
#13
Rubber side down
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769
Bikes: are fun! :-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times
in
105 Posts
My Bolt provides very consistent metrics with my Powertap G3 powermeter. I like my bolt a lot. But, I don't use the navigation/elevation features much.
Last edited by Clipped_in; 12-01-18 at 09:14 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
My Bolt handles cadence just fine from my 4iiii PM.
The one issue that I wish they'd fix is setting a known elevation. Hate it that some days I start out from my house, it can be a few hundred feet off, usually depending on weather. Cold/wet/cloudy/windy days it never gets the elevation right. Seems like a ridiculously easy thing to implement.
The one issue that I wish they'd fix is setting a known elevation. Hate it that some days I start out from my house, it can be a few hundred feet off, usually depending on weather. Cold/wet/cloudy/windy days it never gets the elevation right. Seems like a ridiculously easy thing to implement.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
5 minute Function test in front of my house just to make sure everything was working.
Corresponding cadence data from the 5 minute function test which appear to be correct.
Power numbers from last Saturday’s ride.
Corresponding cadence data from last Saturday’s ride which also appears correct.
So you are saying yours does it all the time? See mine was just that once on a harder effort. I will need to go hard and see if it still does it because as you see above my cadence appears to be correct on the 5 min test and last Saturday's ride which was 52 miles.
Last edited by jadocs; 12-03-18 at 12:29 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,084 Times
in
1,180 Posts
It's not apparently.
Better units use a barometer, which is sensitive to temperature and humidity, not to mention is the sensor port obstructed (moisture ?).
All GPS can do a very rough altitude calculation, but they are know to have significant errors in elevation as opposed to horizontal position. Good quick article here that is still pertinent.
Altitude Accuracy
Better units use a barometer, which is sensitive to temperature and humidity, not to mention is the sensor port obstructed (moisture ?).
All GPS can do a very rough altitude calculation, but they are know to have significant errors in elevation as opposed to horizontal position. Good quick article here that is still pertinent.
Altitude Accuracy
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
It's not apparently.
Better units use a barometer, which is sensitive to temperature and humidity, not to mention is the sensor port obstructed (moisture ?).
All GPS can do a very rough altitude calculation, but they are know to have significant errors in elevation as opposed to horizontal position. Good quick article here that is still pertinent.
Altitude Accuracy
Better units use a barometer, which is sensitive to temperature and humidity, not to mention is the sensor port obstructed (moisture ?).
All GPS can do a very rough altitude calculation, but they are know to have significant errors in elevation as opposed to horizontal position. Good quick article here that is still pertinent.
Altitude Accuracy
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 755
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 562 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 64 Times
in
46 Posts
I just got my Bolt, with the kit (cadence, speed and HR). Still learning how to use it.
I'd appreciate knowing more about the speed sensor and how the Bolt unit uses the data. For instance does Bolt rely on the sensor to calculate distance? Also, is there a way to compare the speed sensor to GPS readings to check for sensor calibration differences?
I'd appreciate knowing more about the speed sensor and how the Bolt unit uses the data. For instance does Bolt rely on the sensor to calculate distance? Also, is there a way to compare the speed sensor to GPS readings to check for sensor calibration differences?
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm on my second Bolt, and just like the first one, the climbing is overstated by 15% to 20% on every-single-ride. (It's the only real negative aspect of the Bolt for me.)
I know this because I use a second computer (Specialized Elite) as well...In the past, my Elite matched my Garmin 500 (often within 10's of feet, sometimes less) over hilly 30 to 100 mile routes.
Similarly, my Elite and Garmin data were usually very close to the data recorded by others on my rides and that predicted by RWGPS.
Now--I'm consistently the outlier with the Bolt returning higher climbing data than my Elite, my fellow riders, and the climbing predicted/expected by RWGPS.
I know this because I use a second computer (Specialized Elite) as well...In the past, my Elite matched my Garmin 500 (often within 10's of feet, sometimes less) over hilly 30 to 100 mile routes.
Similarly, my Elite and Garmin data were usually very close to the data recorded by others on my rides and that predicted by RWGPS.
Now--I'm consistently the outlier with the Bolt returning higher climbing data than my Elite, my fellow riders, and the climbing predicted/expected by RWGPS.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Hyper accurate elevation data, distance also, for that matter, is not super important to me. My metrics are more based on am I keeping up with the people I am riding with.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johngwheeler
Road Cycling
22
03-02-18 09:01 PM