Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

So Lance was doping after all

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

So Lance was doping after all

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-07 | 03:19 PM
  #51  
MONGO!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
He was on his bike, 6 hours a day, busting his ass.

What are YOU on???
MONGO! is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 03:20 PM
  #52  
Cassadamius's Avatar
Extra Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, FL

Bikes: '05 LeMond Buenos Aires

First of all, MichaelRasumusen, Lance Armstrong is not the Michael Jordan of cycling. Lance Armstrong is the Michael Jordan of the Tour de France. Second of all, this crap is nothing new - do you honestly think you're going to uncover some revelation about LA after all this? So many people have hunted for dirt on this guy for 7+ years and you think you finally found it? Either way, people NEED to believe in Lance. There are those that believe he doped (the logical ones) and there are those that believe he didn't. If at this point you believe Lance didn't dope, nothing is going to convince you - you are pretty much a blind follower and none of this new information is going to phase you.

And to the guy that linked wikipedia.......wikipedia? Come on, dude. I could go write a wikipedia entry right now stating that my dog could beat up your dog. Dictionary, man. Dictionary.
Cassadamius is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 03:22 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 32
So there have never been great athletes that stood out above the rest, without some 'help'?

I guess we can safely write off Michael Jordan, Bruce Jenner, Pete Sampras, etc...
schnee is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:17 PM
  #54  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by MichaelRasmusen
Or never tested positive = never doped. I think we forget that some people are simply talented and gifted athletes. I think Michael Jordan comes to mind as probably one of the most gifted athletes in his prime. Lance Armstrong was to Cycling as Michael Jordan was to Basketball. Of course there are always people that tend to be jealous and want to take away from these people. Don't hate the man just because he has seven TDF wins. If you hate him you must be French
There's a big difference between hating someone and accepting the atmosphere/climate/culture of which he was a part.

What sucks about all the doping scandals is that if someone ever DOES accomplish great things clean, nobody is going to believe it.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:21 PM
  #55  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by reef58
Lance did say I never used and performancing enhancing drugs.

His 1999 positive EPO tests tell a different story.

Richard
Dear God. Believe that he doped, but don't use the repeatedly debunked "evidence" to support your claim.

Believe what you want, but the evidence is circumstantial/guilt by association at its very best.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:34 PM
  #56  
reef58's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC

Bikes: Serotta Nove

I did not know that, really. I have read about it from several sources, but never found any thing that debunked it. Would it be because the sample were so old? Or maybe they were contaminated due to the fact they were being used for practice?

Richard

Originally Posted by DrPete
Dear God. Believe that he doped, but don't use the repeatedly debunked "evidence" to support your claim.

Believe what you want, but the evidence is circumstantial/guilt by association at its very best.
reef58 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:41 PM
  #57  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by reef58
I did not know that, really. I have read about it from several sources, but never found any thing that debunked it. Would it be because the sample were so old? Or maybe they were contaminated due to the fact they were being used for practice?

Richard
IIRC the issues were no chain of custody, new tests run on old specimens, mislabeling, etc.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:46 PM
  #58  
reef58's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC

Bikes: Serotta Nove

Good deal

Richard

Originally Posted by DrPete
IIRC the issues were no chain of custody, new tests run on old specimens, mislabeling, etc.
reef58 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:48 PM
  #59  
DMF's Avatar
DMF
Elitist Troglodyte
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 3
From: Dallas

Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)

DMF is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-07 | 05:54 PM
  #60  
pegleg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Portland, ME
Originally Posted by Cassadamius
There are those that believe he doped (the logical ones)
Sir Bedevere: ...Exactly. So, logically...
Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
Sir Bedevere: And therefore...
Peasant 2: ...A witch!
pegleg is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.