Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   bikes direct? (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/380939-bikes-direct.html)

BikeWise1 01-21-08 09:34 AM

^^^

I would imagine you have enough spare parts and bikes lying around that a long-distance warranty issue will not immobilize you.;)

I agree-with online bikes it's a pretty sure bet you won't have a problem. Bike parts are pretty good these days. But if you are a one-bike-only kind of guy, you could potentially spend weeks off the bike if you have to send stuff out for warranty. I couldn't do it-too big of an endorphine addict. I'd have to take luge lessons.;)

Nachoman 01-21-08 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6020650)
At least you're not smug.

And I was going to say at least he's not disingenuous.

patentcad 01-21-08 09:59 AM

BD threads provide the entertainment sadly lacking since the disappearance of Ryanf.

botto 01-21-08 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6021236)
BD threads provide the entertainment sadly lacking since the disappearance of Ryanf.

who?

mgmoore7 01-21-08 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6021236)
BD threads provide the entertainment sadly lacking since the disappearance of Ryanf.

Agreed. When a week or two go by without a BD thread, I start to go into withdrawals.

anomaly 01-21-08 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6020505)
I find the anti-BD trolls here puzzling. I'm not a BD shill. I'm just a consumer with lots of high end bike schwag who wanted another pricey bike and found BD's values compelling. What's wrong with that? What's wrong with Bikes Direct's business model? What's wrong with BD having a relationship with Bike Forums? How is that sinister? People come on here and trash BD all the time. They're not censored.

I just don't get it. I think these BD trolls are all Communists, especially that silly Brit dude who rides his trainer because it's raining. That must mean he never rides outdoors. It's always raining in the UK. How seriously can anybody take that guy as a cyclist? Cyclists ride their bikes in the real world.

Last week it was snowing but I had told a CL guy I would pick up a frame from him so what did I do? I got my back, a bungee cord and a trash bag, rode across the city, picked up the frame and rode with it on my back ice snow and all.

bikesdirect_com 01-21-08 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by mgmoore7 (Post 6021264)
Agreed. When a week or two go by without a BD thread, I start to go into withdrawals.


me too!

Bike Lover 01-21-08 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by Mitro (Post 6019060)
You don't consider corporations to be people too?

Corporations are not people. They are legal entities run by people for the sole purpose of enriching the companies share holders. The only time you will hear corporations being referred to anything but an "it", is when one is trying to elicit sympathy for the corporation.

What's the CEO of a company? The first person to answer to the shareholders.

botto 01-21-08 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by anomaly (Post 6021294)
Last week it was snowing but I had told a CL guy I would pick up a frame from him so what did I do? I got my back, a bungee cord and a trash bag, rode across the city, picked up the frame and rode with it on my back ice snow and all.

wussy.

http://thegearjunkie.com/images/500.jpg

patentcad 01-21-08 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by Bike Lover (Post 6021383)
Corporations are not people. They are legal entities run by people for the sole purpose of enriching the companies share holders. The only time you will hear corporations being referred to anything but an "it", is when one is trying to elicit sympathy for the corporation.

What's the CEO of a company? The first person to answer to the shareholders.

Correct.

The answer to the shareholders part used to be correct. Now they answer to their pals on the Board of Directors (that's the Board they appointed). Because shareholders wouldn't approve $100 million Golden Parachutes for aholes who just destroyed half the company's stock equity through their mismanagement.

D_Nice 01-21-08 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by botto (Post 6021412)

:roflmao:

BikeWise1 01-21-08 10:42 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021048)

However, please read [1]the question I was ask; [2]my answer; [3]Motobecane warranty; and [4]the Trek warranty.

[1]The question was "Does your warranty compare to Trek?"

[2]Your answer was "YES"

[3]Here is the Motobecane Warranty in it's entirety:

Attachment 63378

It states that even if there's a defect in a carbon frame, the customer still pays.
It states that it does not cover carbon parts.:eek:


[4]The Trek warranty is "LIFETIME" on the frame (except for one). Whatever material. And they have an extensive dealer network with which to administer it. And if you ride lots and lots, you can bolster the warranty with this product.

If there's a defect in any material frame, the customer pays nothing.
It covers carbon parts.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021048)
I think that my answer was exactly correct.

With regard to the obvious differences in warranties, how is "YES" exactly correct?


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021048)
And I think you covering labor of Trek claims is great; I have done that on all warranty claims since 1977.

So anytime someone has a warranty, you have covered their out-of-pocket labor expenses created by having to deal with a non-local entity? That's not what your warranty says it will do. If you are handing out refunds anytime someone incurs a LBS labor charge that involves warranty work, I'd certainly brag about it in the warranty.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021048)
However, that is beyond what the Trek warranty calls for now; or when I was selling them.

???


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021048)
Of course, as a bike dealer, you know as I do - the number of defects in ANY high grade bike brand is close to zero. Trek, Motobecane, Giant, Specialized, Fuji, Felt, Jamis, Windsor, and so on - defects are rare beyound beleif. One of the really nice things about the bike biz: [and one of the things we can all say thank you to Shimano & Suntour for. Just like with cars - the japanesse raised the bar on QC for everyone.

I agree completely. But that is not the issue at hand.

bikesdirect_com 01-21-08 11:31 AM


Originally Posted by BikeWise1 (Post 6021529)
[1]The question was "Does your warranty compare to Trek?"

[2]Your answer was "YES"

[3]Here is the Motobecane Warranty in it's entirety:

Attachment 63378

It states that even if there's a defect in a carbon frame, the customer still pays.
It states that it does not cover carbon parts.:eek:


[4]The Trek warranty is "LIFETIME" on the frame (except for one). Whatever material. And they have an extensive dealer network with which to administer it. And if you ride lots and lots, you can bolster the warranty with this product.

If there's a defect in any material frame, the customer pays nothing.
It covers carbon parts.



With regard to the obvious differences in warranties, how is "YES" exactly correct?



So anytime someone has a warranty, you have covered their out-of-pocket labor expenses created by having to deal with a non-local entity? That's not what your warranty says it will do. If you are handing out refunds anytime someone incurs a LBS labor charge that involves warranty work, I'd certainly brag about it in the warranty.



???



I agree completely. But that is not the issue at hand.

the question was 'does it compare?'
the answer is yes

and I would say it some ways its better and some ways not
but the answer of yes is completely correct - it compares; just about any warranty does
reader needs to compare details

maybe you are thinking it is a different question


I never said I cover out of pocket expenses on non-local repairs
where do you come up with this stuff?
we do LABOR for free on warranties - always have
even if it is a a bike we sold 20 years ago; from say Trek or Panasonic or Univega
if there is a defect - we do the LABOR for free
Trek warranty [like most others] clearly says LABOR is not covered
but we do it - as I understood that you said you did too

Now, the question of Carbon
read the all the warranties you like; Trek would be a nice place to start
CF gets special consideration; why? I think you know why.
Claims on CF far exceed metal -- most are due to impacts; but as the Trewk warranty points out; who knows what caused a cracked CF item - not easy to tell like with metal.

Claims of defects on Trek CF frames far exceed claims on AL or Steel - check with your rep or the corp office - percentage of claims on CF is off the charts compared with metal.
By the way, I am not saying number of actual defects; I am saying claims.

Let's say a JRL actually had a front impact. On a metal frame you can see the well-known bend in DT right behind HT AND you know what happened. On CF you might find a crack; but why? OMG - is that a defect? read the Trek warranty closely to get an idea to the answer.

luckily -- our defects and other high-end bike companies [besides one that I will not mention] are so low that it is easy to cover the cost. That is part of why Motobecane covers ALL components for life instead of 1 or 3 or 5 years.

Bike Lover 01-21-08 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6021428)
Correct.

The answer to the shareholders part used to be correct. Now they answer to their pals on the Board of Directors (that's the Board they appointed). Because shareholders wouldn't approve $100 million Golden Parachutes for aholes who just destroyed half the company's stock equity through their mismanagement.

Yeah, I didn't really want to get into the BoD area, but you did succinctfully enough. ;)

wfrogge 01-21-08 12:10 PM

Oh yeah.... well, my Dad can beat up your Dad!

Treefox 01-21-08 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6021236)
BD threads provide the entertainment sadly lacking since the disappearance of Ryanf.

Ryanf was more entertaining.

Savagewolf 01-21-08 12:30 PM

I really don't understand why there isn't a sticky for Bikes Direct. It seems to gather so many threads whether it's a complaint, question, or whatever. Just stick them all in one thread and let people sort it out. Endless threads about this company it seems.

Treefox 01-21-08 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 6020505)
I just don't get it. I think these BD trolls are all Communists, especially that silly Brit dude who rides his trainer because it's raining. That must mean he never rides outdoors. It's always raining in the UK. How seriously can anybody take that guy as a cyclist? Cyclists ride their bikes in the real world.

God Save The Queen.

Whatever dude, I've got one of your passports! Careful or I'll come over there and nationalise your healthcare. :D

Treefox 01-21-08 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by BikeWise1 (Post 6020920)
As much as you'd like people to think you equal Trek, you do not. And that's OK. You have a fine product at a great price. Isn't that a good enough leg to stand on? You should say "who cares about the warranty? I'm saving you so much $$ you can buy two and then you'll have a convenient parts bike on hand!"

+1

That's what I've been saying all along!

Treefox 01-21-08 12:36 PM


Originally Posted by Savagewolf (Post 6022263)
I really don't understand why there isn't a sticky for Bikes Direct. It seems to gather so many threads whether it's a complaint, question, or whatever. Just stick them all in one thread and let people sort it out. Endless threads about this company it seems.

I don't recall seeing any 'Which is best: Campy or Shimano?' threads lately. Someone should start one of those and we can sticky that too. ;)

BikeWise1 01-21-08 12:43 PM

That was a pretty quick response from a guy who says his business is growing faster than he can keep up with it.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
the question was 'does it compare?'
the answer is yes

and I would say it some ways its better and some ways not
but the answer of yes is completely correct - it compares; just about any warranty does
reader needs to compare details

maybe you are thinking it is a different question

In that case, by your logic, my 20 year old car compares to the Ferrari Enzo.:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
I never said I cover out of pocket expenses on non-local repairs

How about here?


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
And I think you covering labor of Trek claims is great; I have done that on all warranty claims since 1977.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
where do you come up with this stuff?

You said it, not me.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
we do LABOR for free on warranties - always have
even if it is a a bike we sold 20 years ago; from say Trek or Panasonic or Univega
if there is a defect - we do the LABOR for free

We? Who is we? Bikesdirect? Bikesdirect sold Trek 20 years ago?

I'm sure you do the labor of repairing the frame for free. But what about the charges incurred by your customer at the LBS for disassembly, reassembly, and shipping? We cover it, and then you stated in response:

"I have done that on all warranty claims since 1977".

But you also said: "I never said I cover out of pocket expenses on non-local repairs".

Do you or do you not reimburse your customers for the cost they incur in the disassembly, reassembly and boxing of their Motobecane warranty frame at their LBS?



Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
Now, the question of Carbon

<snip>

Blah, blah......

Trek covers it. Especially frames.

You don't. You make customers cover your warranty costs. Even if it was defective to begin with!

Compare that.


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6021843)
That is part of why Motobecane covers ALL components for life instead of 1 or 3 or 5 years.

Except carbon, right?:rolleyes:

As the CEO of a huge(by your own definition) bicycle company, have you ever considered how much it costs you in lost R&D time and possible sales revenues to answer all these posts? :)

bikesdirect_com 01-21-08 12:50 PM


Originally Posted by BikeWise1 (Post 6022369)
As the CEO of a huge(by your own definition) bicycle company, have you ever considered how much it costs you in lost R&D time and possible sales revenues to answer all these posts? :)

This is entertainment for me
Some people like to watch football, some like to go blowing, some like to do woodworking

I like to read rants on bike forums - it's fun

if it were warmer; I would also like to ride, go for a swim, or walk on the beach
but it's cold
please rave on

patentcad 01-21-08 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by Treefox (Post 6022278)
Careful or I'll come over there and nationalise your healthcare.

Just wait until after my knee scope.

botto 01-21-08 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6022431)
This is entertainment for me
Some people like to watch football, some like to go blowing, some like to do woodworking

I like to read rants on bike forums - it's fun


if it were warmer; I would also like to ride, go for a swim, or walk on the beach
but it's cold
please rave on

aren't you in Texas?

BikeWise1 01-21-08 01:02 PM


Originally Posted by bikesdirect_com (Post 6022431)
This is entertainment for me

So entertaining you couldn't even answer the questions.:rolleyes:

botto: it is 55 degrees in Houston right now.:D Too cold for Mike to ride!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.