![]() |
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16192639)
Ater a 35mph crit crash...I had some choices to make ... think the ones did came out pretty..
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t...psa99ba7d9.jpg |
Originally Posted by Herbie53
(Post 16194458)
Nice work. That head tube looks bigger than the rest of the frame, is that a standard geometry S-Works?
|
Originally Posted by gsa103
(Post 16194174)
I think its a nice color choice. Unique and really stands out.
There are two things that bug me about the bike. 1) SRM Power Meter is just plain ugly. If you could get a black version it would help, but it may be just too bulky and beyond help. 2) Cables. Sloping top tubes just don't look right with external cables. There's this weird gap that looks unfinished. |
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16194536)
Thats a standard head tube for a 61 S-Works .... 6-4" = big head tube!! hahaha
|
Originally Posted by chaadster
(Post 16194556)
Just a heads-up for you as a newbie: around here, people's legs are a lot faster than their synaptic transmissions. Presumably. ;)
|
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16194536)
Thats a standard head tube for a 61 S-Works .... 6-4" = big head tube!! hahaha
Given the stem you're using, it looks like you could use a bit shorter head tube. http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/d...psfd9c0e7b.jpg http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/d...ps6844fb32.jpg |
Thanks but Specialized doesn't offer a smaller head tube in a 61 ...that's what I keep saying ;-) it is what it is and works out fine
|
Originally Posted by chaadster
(Post 16194556)
Just a heads-up for you as a newbie: around here, people's legs are a lot faster than their synaptic transmissions. Presumably. ;)
What is your beef? |
[MENTION=147472]Herbie53[/MENTION], what bars are pictured in the guru?
|
|
It I find I bike hot, I'll say so.
Sometimes I agree with others sometimes I don't. We're not all robots in the 41... ;) |
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 16193816)
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8263/8...2f418308_z.jpg
1) im not a photographer. photo suggestions welcome. 2) component (aesthetic) suggestions welcome, although the build isn't likely to change 3) yes, those are monodisperse silica nanoparticles that I made at work on the poster. in case you were dying to know. Cheers |
Hot.
Originally Posted by Herbie53
(Post 16194597)
http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/d...psfd9c0e7b.jpg http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/d...ps6844fb32.jpg |
@ hed210.
This is the most opinionated thread in all of BF, dont take things too personal. There's a certain standard bikes must meet to be considered "Hot" by most in this thread. Like I said your bike is Hot in my eyes, because its different. It catches my eye, & probably would more in person . "We can't win then all..." I love my bikes, but none of them are "Hot in hurr". :lol: I built them they way I wanted them, & they fit my needs. Don't worry about the negative comments, we're a bunch of critics I here. :thumb: |
|
Originally Posted by stevemtbr
(Post 16195133)
|
Originally Posted by Herbie53
(Post 16194681)
FSA Wingpro compact.
Now I'm looking at buying new bars! I wasn't REALLY thinking about it until I saw your bars again. I like that shape a lot. Looks like plenty of clearance from your forearms hitting the top tube while in the drops. How do you like the shape of the FSA vs the ergo shape you have on your november bike? I have Ritchey superlogic Evolution bars with an ergo drop and I have liked them, but I'm not extremely fond of the shape aesthetically. |
Originally Posted by Ghost Ryder
(Post 16195115)
@ hed210.
This is the most opinionated thread in all of BF, dont take things too personal. There's a certain standard bikes must meet to be considered "Hot" by most in this thread. Like I said your bike is Hot in my eyes, because its different. It catches my eye, & probably would more in person . "We can't win then all..." I love my bikes, but none of them are "Hot in hurr". :lol: I built them they way I wanted them, & they fit my needs. Don't worry about the negative comments, we're a bunch of critics I here. :thumb: Its all good ....it serves the purpose and that's why it was built that way.... |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16195892)
Damn you....
Now I'm looking at buying new bars! I wasn't REALLY thinking about it until I saw your bars again. I like that shape a lot. Looks like plenty of clearance from your forearms hitting the top tube while in the drops. How do you like the shape of the FSA vs the ergo shape you have on your november bike? I have Ritchey superlogic Evolution bars with an ergo drop and I have liked them, but I'm not extremely fond of the shape aesthetically. For me the compact bend works better, especially for crits where I spend an hour or so at a time in the drops. Since I broke the Guru I moved the compact bars over to the November. They are a bit heavier, but the improved fit (slightly shorter reach brought the November fit closer to my "ideal") is nice. |
good to know. Thanks for the info. I am about to pull the trigger on an FSA Nano light compact UD set. They are supposed to weigh in at 185g for 42mm bars. Thats lighter than my ritchey bars.
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16195973)
good to know. Thanks for the info. I am about to pull the trigger on an FSA Nano light compact UD set. They are supposed to weigh in at 185g for 42mm bars. Thats lighter than my ritchey bars.
|
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16192639)
Ater a 35mph crit crash...I had some choices to make ... think the ones did came out pretty good ;-)
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t...ps2de5555b.jpg |
Originally Posted by ethan.g75
(Post 16196401)
:O hope you also pulled the trigger on a kforce stem and sp! :)
Lol, I haven't pulled a trigger on anything yet. Wont do an FSA stem or seatpost. Too heavy. IF, I do the FSA bars, it will be very difficult for me to have mismatched equiptment. Unfortunately, Ritchey doesn't make a bar that has the short and shallow compact bar that FSA or Zipp makes and this is the shape of bar that I'm looking for. |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16196420)
Unfortunately, Ritchey doesn't make a bar that has the short and shallow compact bar that FSA or Zipp makes and this is the shape of bar that I'm looking for.
first handlebar photo down the page, i like the shape a bit more than anything else ritchey has put out. Though my new zipps are to die for (sl-80) |
thanks for finding and sharing those. though the shape is similar, it is not as close to what I'm looking for. AND, the big no go on those is 253g. whatever bar I go with, I will stay sub 200g. the claimed weight on the FSA Nano light bar is 185g for 42cm bars
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.