![]() |
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16193402)
Stem and bars look funky? hahaha yeah ok ... 120 negative stem with Ritchey EVO curve bars....I guess they're funky and its a race bike ...the crank isn't made to look pretty its made to produce massive power! The bike is a 61 so you don't really get a choice on the head tube buddy ...... Thanks for your comment ;-)
|
Originally Posted by thechemist
(Post 16193499)
Hot bike! How are you liking the srm with red and did you have any adapter issues running the srm crank with specialized?
|
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16193402)
Stem and bars look funky? hahaha yeah ok ... 120 negative stem with Ritchey EVO curve bars....I guess they're funky and its a race bike ...the crank isn't made to look pretty its made to produce massive power! The bike is a 61 so you don't really get a choice on the head tube buddy ...... Thanks for your comment ;-)
This thread is all about staging. staging the bike and taking a photo that makes the bike look best. When you (anyone) take a picture of a bike from a low angle looking up, it always looks weird to me. Yes, the bars look funky to me because of the angle this photo was taken. I cant tell from the picture, is that a -17 degree stem? If it is, I wont like it. I cant stand the look of a -17 degree stem. ESPECIALLY on frame that has such a sloped top tube. The bike is a 61 and have no choice in the head tube, I get that, but doesn't mean that I give it a pass just because of it being circumstantial. Like I said, I'd like to see this bike with a better photo. |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16193513)
This thread is all about staging. staging the bike and taking a photo that makes the bike look best. When you (anyone) take a picture of a bike from a low angle looking up, it always looks weird to me. Yes, the bars look funky to me because of the angle this photo was taken. I cant tell from the picture, is that a -17 degree stem? If it is, I wont like it. I cant stand the look of a -17 degree stem. ESPECIALLY on frame that has such a sloped top tube. The bike is a 61 and have no choice in the head tube, I get that, but doesn't mean that I give it a pass just because of it being circumstantial. Like I said, I'd like to see this bike with a better photo.
|
thanks
|
I'm not a fan of the frame shaping, but that bike looks great. Hot. |
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16193402)
Stem and bars look funky? hahaha yeah ok ... 120 negative stem with Ritchey EVO curve bars....I guess they're funky and its a race bike ...the crank isn't made to look pretty its made to produce massive power! The bike is a 61 so you don't really get a choice on the head tube buddy ...... Thanks for your comment ;-)
I dig the color, but I have to agree with b10...the crankset isn't aesthetically pleasing - you can run SRM with other cranksets. A sloping top tube and -17* stem looks funny. Gatorskins on a race bike seem weird to me. The tire logo doesn't seem to match up with the valve stem on the front tire. The bike isn't properly staged. Now does that take anything away from your ability to ride it, race it, and probably kick butt in the process...not at all. Would it be staged like this on Specialized's website...probably not. Is it still a nice bike, yeppers. |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16193513)
This thread is all about staging. staging the bike and taking a photo that makes the bike look best. When you (anyone) take a picture of a bike from a low angle looking up, it always looks weird to me. Yes, the bars look funky to me because of the angle this photo was taken. I cant tell from the picture, is that a -17 degree stem? If it is, I wont like it. I cant stand the look of a -17 degree stem. ESPECIALLY on frame that has such a sloped top tube. The bike is a 61 and have no choice in the head tube, I get that, but doesn't mean that I give it a pass just because of it being circumstantial. Like I said, I'd like to see this bike with a better photo.
|
Lol ok. So because the thread was created before I joined, I can't take part? Good to know. I give MY opinion. If you think I'm wrong, then that's your opinion. There are plenty that agree with me. Its no big deal man. I'm opinionated in this thread, but that's all this thread is about. Simmer down
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16193513)
I cant tell from the picture, is that a -17 degree stem? If it is, I wont like it. I cant stand the look of a -17 degree stem. ESPECIALLY on frame that has such a sloped top tube.
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16193703)
Lol ok. So because the thread was created before I joined, I can't take part? Good to know. I give MY opinion. If you think I'm wrong, then that's your opinion. There are plenty that agree with me. Its no big deal man. I'm opinionated in this thread, but that's all this thread is about. Simmer down
|
Ok
|
Originally Posted by chaadster
(Post 16193662)
Dude, I know you need to think you're the Mayor, but give it rest. Better yet, why don't you go start your own "Most Awesome Bicycle Pics" thread where you can be a weenie all you want about 'staging' and other silliness. This thread was started before you were even a member, and it's utterly ridiculous for you to be prancing around telling people what it's "all about," especially when you're wrong about it.
simma down now. just sayin' http://thumbnails.hulu.com/392/40039..._generated.jpg |
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8263/8...2f418308_z.jpg
1) im not a photographer. photo suggestions welcome. 2) component (aesthetic) suggestions welcome, although the build isn't likely to change 3) yes, those are monodisperse silica nanoparticles that I made at work on the poster. in case you were dying to know. |
Ive never been fond of the setback thomson seat post. I usually prefer bar tape and saddle to match. BUT, I dig it.
|
Originally Posted by hed210
(Post 16192639)
|
Originally Posted by gc3
(Post 16193896)
That is one helluva fast looking ugly bike! Altho I'm sure many find it hot.
|
I think its a nice color choice. Unique and really stands out.
There are two things that bug me about the bike. 1) SRM Power Meter is just plain ugly. If you could get a black version it would help, but it may be just too bulky and beyond help. 2) Cables. Sloping top tubes just don't look right with external cables. There's this weird gap that looks unfinished. |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 16193513)
This thread is all about staging.
What you mean is that by popular convention we have come to understand that staging can sometimes be an important factor. On many occasions it deservedly is, but in many other cases I've seen it used to discredit an otherwise Hot bike. We don't want this either, I'm sure. Originally, way before the birth of this thread, the white garage door thing and pedal placement thing was just a joke, just another way to have some fun around here. This thread takes it too seriously. Everybody needs to simmer down and lighten up with the staging crap, and have some fun like it was originally intended. |
Damn it - I hate it when I wholeheartedly agree with the sheriff.
;) |
|
Originally Posted by Ghost Ryder
(Post 16192573)
That's the spam I love to see miamijim!
Where did you find a wife who appreciates the beauty of bikes. ;)
Originally Posted by gaucho777
(Post 16192708)
Jim, all those bikes are HOT. Of course, the Merlin Cyrene (gush), Vitus, Paramount mixte, Basso (hot enough to overcome the splatter tape), Paramount track bike, and Litespeed Classic are all exceedingly hot. I don't remember seeing the Paramount track bike before. Very nice. :thumb:
|
Originally Posted by BillyD
(Post 16194287)
No, it's not all about staging. You obviously don't mean that, because if it was then an unattractive bike would automatically qualify as Hot just because it was staged perfectly. And we wouldn't want that.
What you mean is that by popular convention we have come to understand that staging can sometimes be an important factor. On many occasions it deservedly is, but in many other cases I've seen it used to discredit an otherwise Hot bike. We don't want this either, I'm sure. Originally, way before the birth of this thread, the white garage door thing and pedal placement thing was just a joke, just another way to have some fun around here. This thread takes it too seriously. Everybody needs to simmer down and lighten up with the staging crap, and have some fun like it was originally intended. good call. |
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 16193816)
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8263/8...2f418308_z.jpg
1) im not a photographer. photo suggestions welcome. 2) component (aesthetic) suggestions welcome, although the build isn't likely to change 3) yes, those are monodisperse silica nanoparticles that I made at work on the poster. in case you were dying to know. |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 16194295)
Damn it - I hate it when I wholeheartedly agree with the sheriff.
;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.