![]() |
Originally Posted by jeanatx
(Post 9705231)
whoa
|
OK, what's the over/under on botto getting banned again?
Here's my $5, put it on the 9 Day box. |
Originally Posted by botto
(Post 9705270)
should i tell everyone what your latest schwag acquisition is?
That would of course result in the revocation of your Top Secret Pcad Schwag Security Clearance. |
Do you two need a room?
Oh, by the way pcad, I saw a CO license plate here yesterday that was [METSWIN]. Thought you'd appreciate that. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
(Post 9705304)
Do you two need a room?
Oh, by the way pcad, I saw a CO license plate here yesterday that was [METSWIN]. Thought you'd appreciate that. :thumb: But really, they did win today. |
Originally Posted by CbadRider
(Post 9705065)
It has not been moved to Foo because it is a discussion about the perceived environment of the Road forum.
The handful of female-specific cycling threads I have seen all went downhill pretty quickly. That is one reason why I personally have not posted any in the Road forum, and the same reason a lot of those in the Women's forum give for not posting in Road. Even if others called out the vulgar posts, I doubt if it would stop or change anything. Some are doing it for shock and entertainment value. There are many lurkers that are probably more reluctant to post for fear of getting flamed or facepalmed. Maybe you can spread the word in the woman’s forum to encourage participation in RC. The <1% of insulting posts shouldn’t keep you away. If a post is truly vulgar, the mods should immediately pull it. |
Originally Posted by DScott
(Post 9700896)
FWIW, there's a ton of women who ride around here, especially of the "recreational cyclist" variety. I'd guess it's like 40-50% of the groups I see out on the road on any given weekend day. Lots of triathletes too, thank god. :love:
Sorry, I digress. But when it gets into road cyclists who are interested in going faster, the numbers drop off pretty significantly, to maybe 10-20% of the groups I see being women. Certainly true for the racers, too. What I think isn't being said here is that while cycling isn't necessarily a male-dominated activity, internet discussion forums sure as shootin' are. Women just don't seem to be as interested in geeking about bikes on the internet as guys are, and it shows. Frankly, I don't believe there's a whole lot of women who would WANT to be a part of BF.net's RC forum, even if it was all sweet and nice. Plus, I doubt a "kinder and gentler" RC forum would be very interesting for many men. I mean, really, internet discussion forums like this one are a guy thing for the most part. I'd be curious if anyone could point me to a bicycle discussion forum that has a very active female presence, and that isn't boring and slow. Or, for that matter, I'd love an example of ANY discussion forum that has a similar level of activity to BF.net, in which women play a major part in the discussion. Anyone? I feel sad that I've been ignored, and marginalized. Do I need to insist on a "nobody pays enough attention to me here" sub-forum? :( I highlighted the important parts. |
I'm too tired to care about this thread anymore.
It's saturday. Sholdn't you all be in the same boat as me therefore? Too tired to care about this thread? |
Originally Posted by FLvector
(Post 9705331)
I wouldn’t have guessed that a female interested in learning more about cycling would be reluctant to post questions or share their thoughts. The amount of vulgar and insulting posts directed towards females seems infrequent from my eyes. I just read them and think “idiot” and move on.
Even if others called out the vulgar posts, I doubt if it would stop or change anything. Some are doing it for shock and entertainment value. There are many lurkers that are probably more reluctant to post for fear of getting flamed or facepalmed. Maybe you can spread the word in the woman’s forum to encourage participation in RC. The <1% of insulting posts shouldn’t keep you away. If a post is truly vulgar, the mods should immediately pull it. |
Originally Posted by botto
(Post 9705251)
don't "whoa" the sentiment, "whoa" the fact that i found common ground.
|
Originally Posted by botto
(Post 9704946)
when is foo going to be renamed "The Single and Looking and/or I Have Low Self Esteem Please Compliment My Looks Forum?"
Originally Posted by DScott
(Post 9705397)
I'm taking a lesson from the pcaddie-daddy and replying to my own post.
I feel sad that I've been ignored, and marginalized. Do I need to insist on a "nobody pays enough attention to me here" sub-forum? :( I highlighted the important parts. |
Originally Posted by NomadVW
(Post 9704586)
How in God's name has this not been moved to foo? For all the threads the mods feel the need to move, this one doesn't get the nod? *boggle*
|
Originally Posted by NomadVW
(Post 9704586)
How in God's name has this not been moved to foo? For all the threads the mods feel the need to move, this one doesn't get the nod? *boggle*
I don't know about all the other forums here because I don't frequent them all, but I do know that if a guy posts a ride report in Long Distance or Touring, and mentions meeting up with a girl at some point during that ride, the response is not "Was she hot?" "Did you two hook up?" Etc. That seems to be a Road Forum response. Now interestingly, the age profile in Long Distance and Touring tends to be a bit older. Is that why there is more of a focus on the cycling aspect of things there, and less on the looks of the women involved? Or is it something else? |
Originally Posted by cbadrider
(Post 9705011)
men should follow the same guidelines and not post in a female-specific thread if they are only going to trash it.
But you know, if the mods would simply delete those posts and warn/ban as appropriate, then I'd wager the behavior would stop. Kind of makes you go Hmmmmmm. |
Originally Posted by FLvector
(Post 9705331)
I wouldn’t have guessed that a female interested in learning more about cycling would be reluctant to post questions or share their thoughts. The amount of vulgar and insulting posts directed towards females seems infrequent from my eyes. I just read them and think “idiot” and move on.
Even if others called out the vulgar posts, I doubt if it would stop or change anything. Some are doing it for shock and entertainment value. There are many lurkers that are probably more reluctant to post for fear of getting flamed or facepalmed. Maybe you can spread the word in the woman’s forum to encourage participation in RC. The <1% of insulting posts shouldn’t keep you away. If a post is truly vulgar, the mods should immediately pull it. But here's the thing ... women are concerned that if they post something, it will either deteriorate into something vulgar and insulting ... or that they will get flamed or facepalmed because they don't know the right questions to ask or right terms to use or whatever. There's a concern about both things. I think women should just get in here and post ... and I also think that the mods should be right on it if it turns negative toward the women. |
Originally Posted by Machka
(Post 9706050)
But here's the thing ... women are concerned that if they post something, it will either deteriorate into something vulgar and insulting ... or that they will get flamed or facepalmed because they don't know the right questions to ask or right terms to use or whatever. There's a concern about both things.
|
Originally Posted by Tulex
(Post 9705160)
Ok, so I'll be the one that looks like an ahole for pointing it out, but your title says you are a cougar, you have a dominatrix avatar, you say you are on the prowl, and your sig says you are looking for a new toy.
Don't you think that might have something to do with it? And it works both ways by the way. More often than I see women treated poorly on here, I see men jump to help them because they ARE a woman. And I have seen women flirt like hell on here. And just like it might be a small percent of the women that do that, so is it a small percent of the men that scare women away. In the same way that dressing provocatively isn't an invitation for unwanted sexual advances, an avatar/sig that display some bit of sexuality are not a big red flag saying "please be vulgar around me." |
Originally Posted by DrPete
(Post 9706134)
In the same way that dressing provocatively isn't an invitation for unwanted sexual advances, an avatar/sig that display some bit of sexuality are not a big red flag saying "please be vulgar around me."
This will either quiet things a bit, or throw gas on the fire. |
I got through five pages of this thread before I realized I was the one who had posted the "Was she hot?" question.
My intentions were misunderstood. IIRC I was concerned if the woman was febrile: running a fever. H1N1 is spreading and I am vigilant about any febrile illness that might be going around. I used the term "hot" for fear of lapsing into incomprehensible medical-speak. To the 150 million women of America: I apologize. I apologize for all the acts of unkindness, insensitivity and violence that have been committed by all the male pigs running around. Anyone got any febrile pictures? |
Originally Posted by Machka
(Post 9706050)
But here's the thing ... women are concerned that if they post something, it will either deteriorate into something vulgar and insulting ... or that they will get flamed or facepalmed because they don't know the right questions to ask or right terms to use or whatever. There's a concern about both things.
There are no favorites here. Dumb questions are dumb questions, no matter who asks them. Here, they are all equally worthless. |
I don't know what you're talking about.
:innocent:
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 9705956)
I love when someone comes for validation and everyone just tells him he is stupid :p
|
Originally Posted by The Weak Link
(Post 9706214)
To the 150 million women of America: I apologize. I apologize for all the acts of unkindness, insensitivity and violence that have been committed by all the male pigs running around.
Anyone got any febrile pictures? |
Originally Posted by The Weak Link
(Post 9706214)
Anyone got any febrile pictures?
|
Originally Posted by DrPete
(Post 9706134)
In the same way that dressing provocatively isn't an invitation for unwanted sexual advances, an avatar/sig that display some bit of sexuality are not a big red flag saying "please be vulgar around me."
|
Originally Posted by Bearonabike
(Post 9706295)
Alright, I just can't let this one go. I've tried, call it a weakness. Anyway, Dr., have you been to any local "hot spots" lately? The men and women aren't decked out in "accentuating" attire to play Kanasta!
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.