Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Considering a used Trek?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Considering a used Trek?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-09, 12:56 PM
  #501  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
Hey, Pcad's broken a crankarm in half. Snapped it right off.

I snapped the hub in my back wheel. Broke it so when I spun the cranks, the chain would spin with the casette, but it was snapped off so the wheel would not turn. That was a retail wheelset for about $1,500.

Stuff happens.
Yep it does...and some companies will go above and beyond what is written in their implied contracts and others wont. I'll buy another LOOK...I'll never buy a Trek.

BTW when I drove my two week old CAAD 8 into the garage door Kermit (the local C'dale rep) hooked me up with a crash replacement deal...somehow I doubt that's what they had in mind when they wrote the warranty. I'd buy another C'dale.

Which goes to the heart of this...Trek could have said let us take a look at it and see if it was due to a manufactures defect or due to rider abuse (ie racing). But they didn't, they fell back on their contract and moved on. I know WR quite well, our children attend the same school, we attend the same church, and we ride for the same team. I know what he's said about this subject and I know that if Trek had at least taken the frame for examination this thread wouldn't exist.

Last edited by El Diablo Rojo; 12-18-09 at 12:59 PM.
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:01 PM
  #502  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I'd just add too....I buy lots of used stuff, saddles, posts, bars, stems, drivetrain... The more I think about it I think I'd avoid a used frame:

1) Most expensive part to replace.
2) The thing it's best to know the full history of.

Just me, just sayin'.
khatfull is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:02 PM
  #503  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
Yep it does...and some companies will go above and beyond what is written in their implied contracts and others wont. I'll buy another LOOK...I'll never buy a Trek.
I've seen Trek do what you are talking about.
I still say getting this kind of coverage is all about regions/reps/relationships with your LBS. Consequently YMMV
Erik B is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:04 PM
  #504  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Erik B
I've seen Trek do what you are talking about.
I still say this kind of coverage is all about regions/reps/relationships with your LBS. Consequently YMMV
This is about the most sane thing I've seen written on the subject. The thread is now closed.
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:09 PM
  #505  
Draught
 
jwible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,051

Bikes: N-1 where N = number needed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
This is about the most sane thing I've seen written on the subject. The thread is now closed.
Is not.
jwible is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:09 PM
  #506  
Senior Member
 
H-Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 235

Bikes: Scott

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So is this the correct cliff notes version?

WR calls Trek:

WR: My bike is broken and you need to fix it for free
T: Are you the original owner?
WR: No
T: Sorry but our warranty only applies to original owners. Could I interest you in a new frame for 20% off, which would include a full warranty?
WR: No, I want this bike fixed, for free
T: Well, if that's the case, pound sand.
WR: Do you know who I am?!?!
T: No but whoever you are, pound sand.
H-Bear is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:12 PM
  #507  
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by hammond9705
What did you do to the cups?
I magnified them about 3x so you could see the nicks?
waterrockets is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:13 PM
  #508  
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by johnybutts
look @ the BB shell, it's clear he didnt try, or if he did, he didn't try very hard.

WR has a big mouth, you have to take everything he says with a grain of salt. Just because it's on the internet does NOT mean it's true.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:13 PM
  #509  
Herasmus B Draggin
 
One Way Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106

Bikes: Many, often

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnybutts
Then explain the lifetime warranty roadwarrior... They ARE supposed to last at least 1 lifetime.
Allow me. When you buy new, you get a lifetime warranty against defects. If you crash it, there's a crash replacement discount.

That's the part of the equation people here aren't seeing- WR bought used with no warranty, therefore he has no standing with Trek. Trek was willing to give WR a crash replacement deal-a discounted new frame with a warranty but he turned it down.
__________________
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
One Way Rider is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:16 PM
  #510  
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589

Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets

"Ok, so you're telling me I can either turn this poorly built $3500 frame in for a crash replacement or throw it in the trash?"

"Correct."
If it's so pooly built, why would you want another one?
longbeachgary is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:22 PM
  #511  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jwible
Is not.
Is to..infinity!
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:24 PM
  #512  
Has coddling tendencies.
 
KiddSisko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Topanga Canyon
Posts: 8,360

Bikes: 2008 Blue RC8 w/ '09 Rival

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Fleabiscuit
Any joker could fish a busted frame out of a dumpster or garage sale and send it in to be fixed or to have the mfg examine it for "design flaws". Trek is a large manufacturer so they are an easy target.
When I start my bike frame company, I'm so going to invest in a whole department of hacks whose job it is to fend off all the jokers fishing our product out of dumpsters. And those customers who reflect positively on us by winning races while riding our bikes? Treat them like mud! Yes, that will be my strategy for success in business.
KiddSisko is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 01:43 PM
  #513  
Has coddling tendencies.
 
KiddSisko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Topanga Canyon
Posts: 8,360

Bikes: 2008 Blue RC8 w/ '09 Rival

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Erik B
One of the local hammers rides the same frame. He's big,incredibly strong and his hasn't fallen apart 4 years later...
It's carbon, right? Only a matter of time. Tic toc, tic toc...
KiddSisko is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:00 PM
  #514  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by johnybutts
but you have to admit he runs his mouth a lot on this forum. Half of what he says is correct, the other half incorrect. Like all his strategy for a 1km win... it's all bull**** because no one else can DO THAT.
I've done it, twice. It's a good strategy if you have the power to pull it off. It's just far enough out that the sprinters don't want to go, and if you get a clean separation (critical) nobody wants to chase you because they know they will destroy themselves and lose. So either some has to get on your wheel right away or they have to sacrifice themselves for someone else to win. It's not a sure thing, nothing ever is. But it is a solid strategy. Regardless I've never seen him claim it's the only way to win or that is what everyone should be doing.
umd is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:03 PM
  #515  
going roundy round
 
wanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 6,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I'm beginning to think WR's power numbers are made up and that picture of his win is photoshopped.
wanders is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:04 PM
  #516  
going roundy round
 
wanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 6,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
...and that video of your win umd is cgi.
wanders is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:05 PM
  #517  
Herasmus B Draggin
 
One Way Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106

Bikes: Many, often

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
..... they fell back on their contract....<snip>...we attend the same church
All in the spirit of fun....

This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?

I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.

You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.

Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
__________________
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
One Way Rider is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:06 PM
  #518  
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by longbeachgary
If it's so pooly built, why would you want another one?
If they replaced it, I'd be impressed with their service and happily race the frame. If it happened again... ebay the replacement.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:24 PM
  #519  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by One Way Rider
All in the spirit of fun....

This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?

I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.

You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.

Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
They also teach forgiveness in church so I'll forgive you for being so stupid. There I even added a nice little thumbs up for emphasis.

What is germane is that Trek didn't even want to know if the failure was due to a factory defect or caused buy the end user...they just decided that they didn't have to deal with it. Anecdotal or not the fact that other manufactures have taken steps to at least determine if they were at fault shows a lack of integrity on Treks part. WR knows he took a risk buying a used frame. He knew he didn't have any legal right to getting a replacement frame. What he had hoped for was that Trek would have at least taken a look, and if it were determined that it was a factory defect they would have fixed or replaced the frame regardless of chain of ownership.

Last edited by El Diablo Rojo; 12-18-09 at 02:31 PM.
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:29 PM
  #520  
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by One Way Rider
non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Well at least you're not trying to compare me to Hitler.

Yet.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:38 PM
  #521  
Tilting with windmills
 
txvintage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Texas 'Burbs
Posts: 4,828

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Well at least you're not trying to compare me to Hitler.

Yet.
Well, you do live in a town that flashes satanic symbols. That is what that two fingered thing is right?
txvintage is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:41 PM
  #522  
slow up hills
 
kudude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931

Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Setting aside the warranty legal issues, which clearly favor Trek, I don't see how this could be classed as a manufacturers defect. The frame lasted for 4 years of racing before wearing out. I would venture that more than meets the design specs that Trek (or any other manufacturer) started with.

They can afford to offer a lifetime warranty only because they know that 90% of their customers are not gonig to be racing and doing 1750W sprints every week. It doesn't make economic sense that they design their bikes to survive a lifetime of racing; that's not their business.
So 10% of Trek's customers can put down 1750W? They must be magic frames.

Originally Posted by waterrockets
Well at least you're not trying to compare me to Hitler.

Yet.
waited for 20 pages to kill the thread, eh?
kudude is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:47 PM
  #523  
Senior Member
 
WCroadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,365

Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
Yep it does...and some companies will go above and beyond what is written in their implied contracts and others wont. I'll buy another LOOK...I'll never buy a Trek.

BTW when I drove my two week old CAAD 8 into the garage door Kermit (the local C'dale rep) hooked me up with a crash replacement deal...somehow I doubt that's what they had in mind when they wrote the warranty. I'd buy another C'dale.

Which goes to the heart of this...Trek could have said let us take a look at it and see if it was due to a manufactures defect or due to rider abuse (ie racing). But they didn't, they fell back on their contract and moved on. I know WR quite well, our children attend the same school, we attend the same church, and we ride for the same team. I know what he's said about this subject and I know that if Trek had at least taken the frame for examination this thread wouldn't exist.
Trek offered WR a crash replacement frame as well even though they knew he was not the original owner. I doubt that's what Trek had in mind when they wrote their warranty. I'd buy another Trek. I'd buy another Cannondale as well.
WCroadie is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:49 PM
  #524  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by WCroadie
Trek offered WR a crash replacement frame as well even though they knew he was not the original owner. I doubt that's what Trek had in mind when they wrote their warranty. I'd buy another Trek. I'd buy another Cannondale as well.
That would be incorrect. They offered him 20% off retail. Big difference.
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 12-18-09, 02:53 PM
  #525  
Still can't climb
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by One Way Rider
All in the spirit of fun....

This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?

I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.

You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.

Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.

take it to p&R

over there you can burn all the heretics you want and god will thank you for it too.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.