Considering a used Trek?
#501
Banned.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058
Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hey, Pcad's broken a crankarm in half. Snapped it right off.
I snapped the hub in my back wheel. Broke it so when I spun the cranks, the chain would spin with the casette, but it was snapped off so the wheel would not turn. That was a retail wheelset for about $1,500.
Stuff happens.
I snapped the hub in my back wheel. Broke it so when I spun the cranks, the chain would spin with the casette, but it was snapped off so the wheel would not turn. That was a retail wheelset for about $1,500.
Stuff happens.
BTW when I drove my two week old CAAD 8 into the garage door Kermit (the local C'dale rep) hooked me up with a crash replacement deal...somehow I doubt that's what they had in mind when they wrote the warranty. I'd buy another C'dale.
Which goes to the heart of this...Trek could have said let us take a look at it and see if it was due to a manufactures defect or due to rider abuse (ie racing). But they didn't, they fell back on their contract and moved on. I know WR quite well, our children attend the same school, we attend the same church, and we ride for the same team. I know what he's said about this subject and I know that if Trek had at least taken the frame for examination this thread wouldn't exist.
Last edited by El Diablo Rojo; 12-18-09 at 12:59 PM.
#502
FBoD Member at Large
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I'd just add too....I buy lots of used stuff, saddles, posts, bars, stems, drivetrain... The more I think about it I think I'd avoid a used frame:
1) Most expensive part to replace.
2) The thing it's best to know the full history of.
Just me, just sayin'.
1) Most expensive part to replace.
2) The thing it's best to know the full history of.
Just me, just sayin'.
#503
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I still say getting this kind of coverage is all about regions/reps/relationships with your LBS. Consequently YMMV
#505
Draught
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,051
Bikes: N-1 where N = number needed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#506
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 235
Bikes: Scott
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So is this the correct cliff notes version?
WR calls Trek:
WR: My bike is broken and you need to fix it for free
T: Are you the original owner?
WR: No
T: Sorry but our warranty only applies to original owners. Could I interest you in a new frame for 20% off, which would include a full warranty?
WR: No, I want this bike fixed, for free
T: Well, if that's the case, pound sand.
WR: Do you know who I am?!?!
T: No but whoever you are, pound sand.
WR calls Trek:
WR: My bike is broken and you need to fix it for free
T: Are you the original owner?
WR: No
T: Sorry but our warranty only applies to original owners. Could I interest you in a new frame for 20% off, which would include a full warranty?
WR: No, I want this bike fixed, for free
T: Well, if that's the case, pound sand.
WR: Do you know who I am?!?!
T: No but whoever you are, pound sand.
#507
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
#508
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
#509
Herasmus B Draggin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106
Bikes: Many, often
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's the part of the equation people here aren't seeing- WR bought used with no warranty, therefore he has no standing with Trek. Trek was willing to give WR a crash replacement deal-a discounted new frame with a warranty but he turned it down.
__________________
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
#510
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
#512
Has coddling tendencies.
When I start my bike frame company, I'm so going to invest in a whole department of hacks whose job it is to fend off all the jokers fishing our product out of dumpsters. And those customers who reflect positively on us by winning races while riding our bikes? Treat them like mud! Yes, that will be my strategy for success in business.
#513
Has coddling tendencies.
#514
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've done it, twice. It's a good strategy if you have the power to pull it off. It's just far enough out that the sprinters don't want to go, and if you get a clean separation (critical) nobody wants to chase you because they know they will destroy themselves and lose. So either some has to get on your wheel right away or they have to sacrifice themselves for someone else to win. It's not a sure thing, nothing ever is. But it is a solid strategy. Regardless I've never seen him claim it's the only way to win or that is what everyone should be doing.
#517
Herasmus B Draggin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106
Bikes: Many, often
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?
I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.
You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
__________________
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...
#518
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
#519
Banned.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058
Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
All in the spirit of fun....
This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?
I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.
You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?
I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.
You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
What is germane is that Trek didn't even want to know if the failure was due to a factory defect or caused buy the end user...they just decided that they didn't have to deal with it. Anecdotal or not the fact that other manufactures have taken steps to at least determine if they were at fault shows a lack of integrity on Treks part. WR knows he took a risk buying a used frame. He knew he didn't have any legal right to getting a replacement frame. What he had hoped for was that Trek would have at least taken a look, and if it were determined that it was a factory defect they would have fixed or replaced the frame regardless of chain of ownership.
Last edited by El Diablo Rojo; 12-18-09 at 02:31 PM.
#520
Making a kilometer blurry
Thread Starter
#522
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Setting aside the warranty legal issues, which clearly favor Trek, I don't see how this could be classed as a manufacturers defect. The frame lasted for 4 years of racing before wearing out. I would venture that more than meets the design specs that Trek (or any other manufacturer) started with.
They can afford to offer a lifetime warranty only because they know that 90% of their customers are not gonig to be racing and doing 1750W sprints every week. It doesn't make economic sense that they design their bikes to survive a lifetime of racing; that's not their business.
They can afford to offer a lifetime warranty only because they know that 90% of their customers are not gonig to be racing and doing 1750W sprints every week. It doesn't make economic sense that they design their bikes to survive a lifetime of racing; that's not their business.
waited for 20 pages to kill the thread, eh?
#523
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,365
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yep it does...and some companies will go above and beyond what is written in their implied contracts and others wont. I'll buy another LOOK...I'll never buy a Trek.
BTW when I drove my two week old CAAD 8 into the garage door Kermit (the local C'dale rep) hooked me up with a crash replacement deal...somehow I doubt that's what they had in mind when they wrote the warranty. I'd buy another C'dale.
Which goes to the heart of this...Trek could have said let us take a look at it and see if it was due to a manufactures defect or due to rider abuse (ie racing). But they didn't, they fell back on their contract and moved on. I know WR quite well, our children attend the same school, we attend the same church, and we ride for the same team. I know what he's said about this subject and I know that if Trek had at least taken the frame for examination this thread wouldn't exist.
BTW when I drove my two week old CAAD 8 into the garage door Kermit (the local C'dale rep) hooked me up with a crash replacement deal...somehow I doubt that's what they had in mind when they wrote the warranty. I'd buy another C'dale.
Which goes to the heart of this...Trek could have said let us take a look at it and see if it was due to a manufactures defect or due to rider abuse (ie racing). But they didn't, they fell back on their contract and moved on. I know WR quite well, our children attend the same school, we attend the same church, and we ride for the same team. I know what he's said about this subject and I know that if Trek had at least taken the frame for examination this thread wouldn't exist.
#525
Still can't climb
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
All in the spirit of fun....
This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?
I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.
You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
This poses an interesting question! If you found out that vocal, anti-religion athiests were getting into the same heaven as you have been promised, but you were expected to shell out tithes and offerings and obey a certain set of rules to get there, would you be OK with it? Or would you prefer God stuck with the posted terms of entrance? All people are potentially defective, some just have protection against eternal damnation, right? Oh should we just just throw the doors open? Let all defective people in regardless of their personal choices?
I buy things like bikes retail because I want the security of protection against defects. Seeing someone who chose to play the odds by going outside that channel, but who still wants the same benefits I had to pay extra for is getting something for nothing. It isn't fair and it ticks me off.
You'd think someone who attends weekly meetings where ideas such as integrity, forgiveness, not cheating, etc are taught would understand what WR is demanding something he doesn't have claim to, as well as taking a very (I'm assuming based on location) non-Christian attitude: publicly declaring his intent to use his position here to try and damage Trek.
Red Devil, whether or not a defect existed isn't germane to the issue-we know there was a defect present. But WR must accept accountability for his choices. He chose a risky path. They teach about that at church, too.
take it to p&R
over there you can burn all the heretics you want and god will thank you for it too.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack