recommend a crank
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
recommend a crank
im doing a new build with sram for, i bought it all online but the groupset did not have a crank with it. what crank would be a comparable?
i was looking at the nashbar crank, anyone have any experience with it?
i was looking at the nashbar crank, anyone have any experience with it?
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 2
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
#4
Señor Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 14
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX
If you are concerned about $, I'd get a SRAM Rival crank. The '08 (silver and no hollow arms) is about the same price as the Nashbar Road crank ($85+/-).
#8
Genuine curiosity here - on what do you base the assertion that Nashbar cranks are craptastic, or even further, how is it craptastic? Do you have any personal experience, or is it the name you take issue with? It is by far more economical than either the S900 or Rival, and unless you plan on racing professionally, I'm sure the Nashbar crank would be a fine solution. I have been riding a Nashbar Trekking crank for 4,000 miles now (48-38-28) on my mountain bike and it is still cranking away. Nashbar stuff is stigmatized for being inexpensive, but that does not make it cheap.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 2
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
I've read a handful of reports that seem to suggest the Nashbar road cranks don't shift particularly well (as compared to 105 or Rival) and that the chainrings wear somewhat quickly. Plus, they require an ISIS bottom bracket which I consider a dead-end technology. If you're happy with 2200 or Sora quality, I'm sure they're fine. If you're discerning enough to buy a Force gruppo, however, you may want something with better longevity and shifting...
#10
If I could afford SRAM stuff for my non-racing use, I'd probably consider the purchase. I think 4,000 road miles is fine for the $65 I paid for the Nashbar cranks. Speaks for itself as far as wear, and there are no shifting problems. I'm looking for longevity and durability, and I got it. We all have different needs, just sayin' the OP may want to consider the Nashbar cranks if this is for recreational use. Also don't mind the ISIS - cannot tell the difference from other technologies, but then, I'm just a long distance/tourer/recreational road guy/commuter
#13
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Unless you are a very powerful sprinter, cranks are probably one of the least important things on the bike. I can put out around 1000W in a sprint and I can't tell the difference between the cranks I've used. Just get what's convenient and looks nice.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 2
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
Unfortunately, I've read reviews of all three cranks (trekking, R2, CR2) and the roadies reviewing the road cranks don't seem to be nearly as happy as the tour/commute guys reviewing the trekking crank. Maybe the two groups have different sensibilities (ex: most of the touring guys I know don't use STI or DoubleTap shifters)... or maybe the road cranks just aren't up to the same standards of the trekking crank. Either way, based on what I've read I would not buy a Nashbar R2 or CR2 crank unless it was the only thing my budget would allow...
#15
EDIT: If you apply your logic to all discontinued cycling items, are you willing to nullify all feedback associated with them?
Last edited by RT; 02-06-10 at 12:51 AM.
#16
Just saw this over in Commuter forum. 105 cranks, octalink BB, $22.
https://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...+Crankset.aspx
https://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...+Crankset.aspx
#17
i think the nashbar stuff is pretty good for the quality, i knew a friend that raced mtb with one of them and he would win pretty regularly. i think he put 4k miles on it before selling the bike no problem
yes you get better quality for brand names , but the cost vs quality difference is not warranted. for the nashbar crank you pay 70 bucks , for the 105 you pay 210, the 105 is not 3 times better
yes you get better quality for brand names , but the cost vs quality difference is not warranted. for the nashbar crank you pay 70 bucks , for the 105 you pay 210, the 105 is not 3 times better






