![]() |
Originally Posted by El Funko
(Post 12563785)
Honest question, I don't pretend to be an expert in these matters, but why is it incorrect to use a shorter stem? I've hesitated to post pictures of my bike, because I've read enough of this forum to know that the "stem police" will call out my short stem. I have stem inadequacy syndrome! if it's so "bad" why do they make them? |
Well said shopgirl! and El Funko, post your bike :)
|
Originally Posted by rat fink
(Post 12563996)
They are nice bikes. The CAAD 9 may not be the smoothest riding frame there is, but a guy I ride with sometimes switches bikes with me for a few miles on long flats and the thing is smoother than my steel bikes. It feels surprisingly gentle and easier to pedal even after 60mi. I want to get an 8 or 9 soon. Size 56 if anyone is reading who like nice steel bikes and wants to trade.
I think the carbon fork has a lot to do with ride quality as well, less bounce and jitter also makes for sick cornering. |
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 12555199)
The BF crowd tends to regard marketing as scientific fact.
|
Originally Posted by shopgirl
(Post 12570828)
I think the short stem thing is mostly about aesthetics. As for why manufacturers make them, even though they're "frowned upon?" Obviously, for the same reason they make stem risers, 40 degree rise stems, and extra-thick gel handlebar tape. For profiling purposes...
But whether or not I find the aesthetics of my short stem pleasing, until my conditioning improves I'm somewhat stuck with it. Or is the recommendation to use a longer stem to "force" myself to stretch? We added the 70mm stem last week to help identify a cause for my right knee pain. The shop tech (who's apparently taken some "classes" in body mechanics) wanted to see if my stretching out for the 90mm stem was causing an unnatural seat position - hence the knee pain. Either way, I haven't taken any pictures of the bike yet. I'll do that this weekend and post up. But it's a completely stock CAAD9-5 dark grey. You've all seen them before. |
Originally Posted by Nick Bain
(Post 12570854)
I feel very tempted that's a sweet looking colnago. I just bought a carbon tarmac but I still have mad love for my Caad 8. Hope you get a good one, they are the ****. Definitely harsher ride than the tarmac but still just great.
I think the carbon fork has a lot to do with ride quality as well, less bounce and jitter also makes for sick cornering. |
Got a new EA90 130mm 10º stem.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5029/...a05364b5_b.jpg And I got new shoes, finally. http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5270/...45ebdb27_b.jpg |
K. Legaspi,
Cannondale's technical guidance regarding their Premium fork has always been fairly specific about NOT having any steerer tube extending above the stem clamp area. It has to do with the fact that their SI top cap provides the internal reinforcement for the clamping force. If you extend that reinforcement up, the bottom of the stem may be clamped to unreinforced CF steerer. If you're using a different interface, you may be ok. |
Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks for the heads up! Greatly appreciate it!
|
I got the same info Banzai has stated about the steer tube and spacers from my bike shop too.
|
Any word on the 2012 CAAD10 / 11?
|
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 12576208)
K. Legaspi,
Cannondale's technical guidance regarding their Premium fork has always been fairly specific about NOT having any steerer tube extending above the stem clamp area. It has to do with the fact that their SI top cap provides the internal reinforcement for the clamping force. If you extend that reinforcement up, the bottom of the stem may be clamped to unreinforced CF steerer. If you're using a different interface, you may be ok. |
hey, ivri-- i just saw your post-- paid $1799 for a CAAD9-1, with stock wheels, new tires, chain, cassette, and BB- was a demo model they showed me when i went to the store to see if i could like a CAAD... took it out for spin and within a 100 yards was asking myself "How did Cannondale know I wanted a custom frame?"--- i turned right around and went in and bought it. i've already done two criteriums on it, and i just love the damn thing
|
Goodbye to my CAAD9 :(
Originally Posted by shrinkboy
(Post 12595797)
hey, ivri-- i just saw your post-- paid $1799 for a CAAD9-1, with stock wheels, new tires, chain, cassette, and BB- was a demo model they showed me when i went to the store to see if i could like a CAAD... took it out for spin and within a 100 yards was asking myself "How did Cannondale know I wanted a custom frame?"--- i turned right around and went in and bought it. i've already done two criteriums on it, and i just love the damn thing
|
Originally Posted by irvri
(Post 12570831)
Well said shopgirl! and El Funko, post your bike :)
http://i567.photobucket.com/albums/s...6-DSC_7127.jpg And with the short stem: http://i567.photobucket.com/albums/s...9-DSC_7129.jpg |
Here's mine again with the new Boyd 50mm clinchers
|
|
"We’d be concerned that a bike that gets down to a weight this low is going to be fragile,
but Cannondale claim that the EVO’s complex layup and mixture of fibres actually makes this one of the strongest frames they have ever made. Even to the point of providing data from destructive tests showing the Evo to be stronger than their own super tough aluminium CAAD9 road frame." I think this will be my next bike CAADicts! 695g frame (size 56)! And! It's supposed to be durable! http://cdn.mos.bikeradar.com/images/...-90-500-70.jpg http://road.cc/sites/default/files/i...2rse2c_blk.jpg |
^^^ I like! ^^^
|
New Cult Member
I did it, I decided to join the Cult.
I just picked up my CAAD10 yesterday and took it for a short ride in the LBS parking lot and all I have to say is .... wait for it ... AWESOMENESS. I made a few changes to it and it was well worth the money spent. Enjoy. [IMG]http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/w...CAAD10/001.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/w...CAAD10/003.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/w...CAAD10/005.jpg[/IMG] ... and fully loaded at 14.69 lbs. (everything except for the rider) |
That's a classy looking bike hobiek, very nice indeed.
|
Have a quick question that I'm hoping some CAAD10 owners can help with:
Do you find that the RD cable that runs below the right side chain stay is very close to the chainstay itself (at one point almost touching) and does not run parallel to the chainstay like a lot of other bikes? I find this to the be case on my C10 and I noticed the same thing on another C10 at the LBS. Thanks |
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
(Post 12602090)
you got a different fork on that too? I can't tell from the pic?
|
Originally Posted by CLTNewbie
(Post 12617792)
Have a quick question that I'm hoping some CAAD10 owners can help with:
Do you find that the RD cable that runs below the right side chain stay is very close to the chainstay itself (at one point almost touching) and does not run parallel to the chainstay like a lot of other bikes? I find this to the be case on my C10 and I noticed the same thing on another C10 at the LBS. Thanks |
Another Rival here! It's funny how the blue paint looks almost black. Anyone else notice this on there's?
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9699560/CAAD...%20Resized.jpg Stock bike with Speedplay Zeros. I'm keeping the stem flipped up for now. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.