Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Chain Life

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Chain Life

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-11 | 05:58 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Road runner
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Chain Life

Hi, I'd like to know how long are most of you changing out your chain and cassettes. I have the parks chain stretch measure tool and I'm at .75 the only other measurement it 1.0 at this point this currant chain has 1500 miles.
My currant thought is to change out the chain (around 2000 miles) on the same cassette and run that set up till I need a new chain and cassette.
Whats your strategy ??
ducati hyp is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 06:32 AM
  #2  
diverguy's Avatar
No longer just a beginner
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Auburndale, FL

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 5

I change the chain about every 1500 miles, clean and relube it about every 100 miles or so, and have about 6400 miles on the cassette and the shop says it still looks like new.
diverguy is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 06:45 AM
  #3  
MNBikeCommuter's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 871
Likes: 115
From: Minnesota

Bikes: Cannondale '92 T600 '95 H600 '01 RT1000

Clean and lube chain maybe every 700-1000 miles depending on noise and degrading shifting, and replace when worn to 12 1/16 inches, which for the last was 9000 miles. Cassettes seem to go forever, with the last one 27k miles. On the tandem, another story...
MNBikeCommuter is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
iab's Avatar
iab
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,921
Likes: 5,494
From: NW Burbs, Chicago
Spend $10 instead of guessing.

iab is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:24 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
Originally Posted by iab
Spend $10 instead of guessing.

I'm really curios: why measure? My chains seem to degrade gradually enough that when they start skipping I can replace them before they fail or anything. What's gonna happen if I run a stretched chain too far? Extra cassette of chainring wear?
canam73 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:33 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by canam73
I'm really curios: why measure? My chains seem to degrade gradually enough that when they start skipping I can replace them before they fail or anything. What's gonna happen if I run a stretched chain too far? Extra cassette of chainring wear?
Yes.
ErichM is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
kbro1986's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: phx, az

Bikes: Ti

can someone explain what happens to the chain to make it needed to be replaced to this n00b? thanks. does it stretch? how can one tell?
kbro1986 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:51 AM
  #8  
Shimagnolo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,102
Likes: 6,009
From: Zang's Spur, CO
All there is to know about chain wear: https://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-004/000.html
(And forget about the Park tool; A tape measure is more accurate.)
Shimagnolo is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by kbro1986
can someone explain what happens to the chain to make it needed to be replaced to this n00b? thanks. does it stretch? how can one tell?
People call it stretching but according to Sheldon Brown it really is the chain pins wearing down the contacting metal, which creates play.

One can tell by measuring it, each complete chain link is one inch, so over a foot (a standard ruler length) one should have twelve links exactly. If the final rivet is past the end of the ruler by 1/16" you should replace the chain.

https://sheldonbrown.com/chains.html

EDIT: I should note that when I say each link is an inch I mean a full link combination (inner/outer pair).

Last edited by ErichM; 09-18-11 at 08:57 AM.
ErichM is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 08:52 AM
  #10  
BetweenRides's Avatar
Dog Chaser
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Seven Evergreen, Merlin Cyrene, Trek TCT 5000, Trek Checkpoint

Originally Posted by kbro1986
can someone explain what happens to the chain to make it needed to be replaced to this n00b? thanks. does it stretch? how can one tell?
It doesn't really stretch, the internal rollers wear out over time. I don't know why anyone has to replace a chain in 1500 miles. I lube and wipe down my chain (D-A or Ultegra usually) at least every 100 miles, which means 2x a week. I typically get 3,500-4,000 miles on a chain, replace the cogset every second chain. Sure I use the Park tool to measure, but you can tell by shift degradation when the chain is starting to go.
BetweenRides is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 578
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Let’s start with elongation or the more commonly used term “chain stretch”. Chains really do get longer as they are used, but it’s not due to anything stretching, it’s simply the accumulated wear between the pins and the bushings formed into the inner sideplates. It is also the only type of wear that increases the pitch of the chain, beyond its nominal .500 inch. It’s commonly recommended to not allow a chain to elongate more than .5% , which is 1/16 inch per foot or ¼ inch over four feet of chain. I like to think that ¼ inch over the full chain length of 52-54 inches is close enough. Where this figure came from, I have no idea. It’s not a bad number, but only relevant to chains that exhibit significant elongation. Some brands will elongate quickly, so adhering to this recommendation might work with those chain (like Shimano). Others will show very little elongation, even after 5,000 miles (Campy is one example). If you wait for a Campy chain to elongate by .5%, you’ll be waiting a long time and causing cog damage long before that much elongation is ever reached.

The only good way to measure elongation is with a 12 inch or longer scale, a full length comparison with a new chain, or some other properly made gage for measuring length, that does NOT rest against the rollers. The 12 inch scale is most common tool, but the least accurate. Place the end of the scale on the edge of a pin. The pin at the opposite end of the scale will be totally covered when the chain is new. As the chain wears, this pin will begin to “peek out” from under the scale. When half of this pin is exposed, you’ve reached a little more than 1/16” of elongation per foot. Full length comparison with a new chain is not a bad method either, but I have found that some new chains may be up to 1/16” shorter than nominal when new. That amounts to 25% of the ¼ inch that you’re trying to measure. What looks to be .5% elongation may really be .38%.

My tests have proven that cogs can be worn to the point that they will not engage with a new chain (chain skips), even if the only chain used on the cassette never exhibits more than a fraction of the commonly recommended .5% elongation. The culprit for this cog wear is not elongation (change in pitch), but roller wear. Rollers always wear much more than the pins and their mating bushings, regardless of brand.

A well worn roller might have an OD reduced by .006 inch, or about 20 times the wear on the pins. If you’ve ever disassembled a chain link, you’ll see that the roller rides on a bushing, formed into the inner side plates. This is a 2-piece bushing with a gap in the center. A severely worn roller will have a diameter in the center that’s about the same as new (since it never touches the bushing), but an area on both sides, where it contacts the bushing halves, that is much larger. It’s quite easy to see the depth of the wear with the naked eye, since they are so deep. You may find the ID of a roller increased in diameter by .010 inch, which is about 30 times the wear on a pin. When I measured the distance between rollers (inside to inside) on a worn chain (6,000 miles), I found an increase from .200 inch when new to .235- .240. IMO, that chain was worn out to the point it should be tossed. The official recommendation from Campagnolo is to toss a chain when the roller spacing has only increased by .020 inch. IMO, that sells a lot of chains, but is much too conservative. I use dial calipers to measure the distance between rollers, so I can compare the new and used dimensions. Shimano and KMC chains have a significantly longer .210 inch roller spacing, compared to .200 inch for Campy, so that should be taken into account when figuring the roller wear.

The last wear area that can be monitored is the side clearance. When new, you’ll most often find a side clearance in the .004-.008 inch range. With a lot of use, that clearance might increase into to as much as .013 inch or more. If you’re into that range, then the chain will exhibit a lot of side flex that may affect shifting precision. Side clearance is easy to check with feeler gages.

Now that you have some idea of how to monitor chain wear, there’s the more complicated issue of how often to change a chain and when to trash it, in order to maximize cog life. Some people change chains very frequently, probably long before they are fully worn, and get more cog life by doing so. The only problem with this approach is that at some point, a new chain will be installed and chain skip will still occur on one or more of the most worn cogs. The cost of all the chains thrown away in an effort to increase the cog life could easily exceed the price of a new cassette and most likely, it is not the most cost effective approach to chain and cassette management.

The most cost effective method of managing chains and cassettes is to use at least three and perhaps more chains, in a regular rotation. The idea here is to get some use on all of the chains, before enough cog wear occurs to produce chain skip with the last new chain in the rotation. I like to get the most from my chains and never seem to notice deteriorated shifting from side wear, so I like to use only three chains expecting about 5,000 miles from each (Campy) chain. If I was using some other brand, I’d buy 4 or 5 chains and expect to get about the same 15,000 miles from them. The primary requirement for a practical chain rotation schedule is a reusable link to join the chain. A Campy chain can be joined with the HD-L pin for its first use, but after that, a reusable link is needed. Shimano chains can be joined several times, using the special joining pins, available from Shimano, but I’d probably choose a properly fitting reusable link. You don’t need to log a lot of miles on any one chain on its first use. 1000 miles is plenty, but I tend to use each of three Campy chains at least 2,000 before rotating. Once each chain has some mileage on it, chain skip should never occur when rotating to one of the other partially used chains. Each chain can gradually be used until it reaches one of the dimensional limits for elongation, roller wear or side wear. Some brands will hit the elongation limit first and others may hit the roller or side wear limit, but all brands eventually hit the trash can.

About cassette life; there is no reason to change a cassette unless a new chain is installed and skipping occurs on one or more cogs when pedaling with heavy pressure.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 10:52 AM
  #12  
danvuquoc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Mountain View, California
Originally Posted by BetweenRides
It doesn't really stretch, the internal rollers wear out over time. I don't know why anyone has to replace a chain in 1500 miles. I lube and wipe down my chain (D-A or Ultegra usually) at least every 100 miles, which means 2x a week. I typically get 3,500-4,000 miles on a chain, replace the cogset every second chain. Sure I use the Park tool to measure, but you can tell by shift degradation when the chain is starting to go.
These chain threads always make me go "wtf? 1500 miles?" I have almost 5,000 mi on my SRAM pc-1091r chain, a parks chain wear tool, another chain wear tool, a tape measure, a steel ruler with 1/32" markings all tell me that I'm not even at 75% life yet. I wipe the chain down from grime on a daily basis, relube every week, and run it through a chain cleaner + relube every month. Chainrings and rear cassette all look great. I ride ~ 150-200mi a week and I'm not slow, nor am I a lightweight, nor am I a heavy guy. I also climb a normal amount for the Bay Area, CA -- and I ride through "winter" which is probably about 30-40 days of rain.
danvuquoc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 01:03 PM
  #13  
armybikerider's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 4
From: North TX

Bikes: Lynskey R330 Chris Bishop custom steel road bike

Originally Posted by danvuquoc
These chain threads always make me go "wtf? 1500 miles?"
+1

I just passed 10,600 miles on the STOCK Sram PC1070 chain and cassette. A metal tape measure and a steel ruler both indicate that I haven't reached the elongation limit. AND, with a new chain installed, there is NO skipping.

I clean and lube the chain regularly and keep the entire drivetrain including cassette clean. I'm 5'8, 150 so not a huge guy, I'm typically a spinner and not a big gear masher and I average in the 19 - 21 MPH range depending on the terrain, wind, how I feel blah blah blah. I think the biggest thing is NOT shifting under load.
armybikerider is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 04:23 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
5K on a Sram 1070(I think thats the model). Still cant slip the .75 of the park tool in the chain. Clean every 250mi or so with simple green in a chain scrubber, rinse, let dry and lube.
martialman.45 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 07:10 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
Hmm. I'm still not going to measure. Or ever take my chain off to clean it. I'm going to keep buying Sram 1051 chains (because for some reason they are cheaper than 1031 on eBay) for $30 or less delivered. I wipe them and add some lube about every 2 weeks or 250 miles and replace them when they skip which is about year on my main bike.

I can't imagine that people have so much more time to waste fartin' around over a chain. I know I don't.
canam73 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-11 | 09:06 PM
  #16  
LarryMelman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 25
From: Phoenix, AZ
I just replaced my original KMC DX10SC chain at 5000 miles. The Park checker shown in post #4 had just started showing .75% wear. It had been cleaned (wiped down on the bike) and lubed every 300 miles or so.

With 5000 miles of use, my (105) cassette is slightly worn in the middle cogs. Nothing I could see, but the LBS used the Rohloff checker https://www.rohloff.de/en/products/hg_ig_check and it did show some wear. No wear on my chain rings. I replaced my chain with another KMC, plan to maintain it the same way. I imagine that the wear on the cassette will cause the new chain to wear a bit faster than the original did. When the second chain is worn, I expect it will be time to replace the cassette too.
LarryMelman is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-11 | 06:44 AM
  #17  
Spiduhman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 6
From: CenCal - SLO

Bikes: S2, Wilier GTR (Arr), Giant VT, Myata 3-10

Significant wear at 12k; could have stretched it further, but had a big ride coming up.

I run three chains, swap out filthy for clean and lubed, hence the entire set up wears in and out together.

The amount and type of dirt makes a difference, like trimite sandpaper (silicon carbide slurry) cuts way better than the cheapass flint kind. f
Spiduhman is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-11 | 07:31 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY

Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)

Originally Posted by iab
Spend $10 instead of guessing.

Spend $1 instead of $10:
UberGeek is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CNC2204
Road Cycling
36
10-18-15 11:06 AM
Bike Gremlin
Commuting
32
11-01-13 05:33 PM
berner
Fifty Plus (50+)
49
11-13-12 04:56 PM
undisputed83
Road Cycling
15
07-13-11 04:15 PM
yaegervette
Road Cycling
30
03-18-11 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.