Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

will a short stem impact control

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

will a short stem impact control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-11 | 11:35 AM
  #51  
ColinL's Avatar
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 5
From: Wichita

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Those super-short 31.8mm clamp stems were originally intended for mountainbike use. The leverage and effective steering angles aren't as much of an issue when you have a wide, flat bar.

But seriously, I'm not going to sit here and say that bike is 'wrong'. If it works for you, ride the hell out of it.
ColinL is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 11:40 AM
  #52  
datlas's Avatar
Should Be More Popular
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,222
Likes: 11,769
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Plenty of folks here will say it's wrong....

I would not go that far but still stand by my prior posting that doing this is a serious red flag for a sizing problem and is going to be a compromise.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:03 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 6
I agree that it is a red flag but may be correct.

My wife is 5'8" and runs an 80mm stem with a 55cm top tube. If we dropped to a better fitting 53-54cm top tube the seat tube and head tube would be too short. As pictured the stem is all the way up. She is a prime candidate for a WSD frame (all legs) but wanted vintage steel:

thirdgenbird is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:09 PM
  #54  
Freddin' it
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Wichita
Originally Posted by datlas
I think needing a stem shorter than 80 or 90 is a "red flag" for MAJOR sizing problems.

You can try to compensate for a poorly fitted frame by tweaking stem and saddle position, but these will be compromises at best.

Why do people get bikes that are not properly fitted??!??
Because some of us need bikes with long seat tubes and short top tubes, and they are not available. Add to that the need or desire to have a bar height near the same height as the saddle only compounds the problem. The answer to your question is that people can only buy the bikes in available sizes. Stems, bars, seat posts are made in a variety of sizes to get these canned-sized bikes closer to the custom size the rider needs. Put simply, NO bike fits very many riders; the rest of us make adjustments.
akansaskid is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:11 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 771
Likes: 0


This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-*
Biscayne05 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:12 PM
  #56  
Fiery's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 19
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird
I agree that it is a red flag but may be correct.

My wife is 5'8" and runs an 80mm stem with a 55cm top tube. If we dropped to a better fitting 53-54cm top tube the seat tube and head tube would be too short. As pictured the stem is all the way up. She is a prime candidate for a WSD frame (all legs) but wanted vintage steel:

https://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...m/DSC01126.jpg
If she had a modern short/shallow bar on there, she would most likely need a 100mm stem and nobody would think anything was wrong with it. On the other hand, is she had modern Shimano STI levers, she would probably need an even shorter stem.
People often forget to account for differences in reach for various handlebar and brake hood designs.
Fiery is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:16 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Biscayne05


This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-*


That doesn't surprise me on a tiny frame. A 60cm is different. He probably bought the smallest size they have.
thirdgenbird is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:21 PM
  #58  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Originally Posted by tagaproject6
LOL! I want to see that bike posted in the "HOT or NOT" thread.
I could do that.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 12:35 PM
  #59  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by Fiery
People often forget to account for differences in reach for various handlebar and brake hood designs.
+1; I figure that I'd need to change to either a shorter stem or a bar with less reach if I went with SRAM (or 6700/7900) instead of the 7800 shifters I have now.
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 01:10 PM
  #60  
tagaproject6's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 281
Originally Posted by Biscayne05


This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-*
Holy Snow White, Batman...that is a dwarfish frame
tagaproject6 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 03:26 PM
  #61  
wkg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
wkg is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 03:32 PM
  #62  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by wkg
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
Maybe, but they'd need to check the head tube length so that they don't end up with huge saddle-to-bar drop, too.
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 03:50 PM
  #63  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Maybe, but they'd need to check the head tube length so that they don't end up with huge saddle-to-bar drop, too.
not only that, but for 700c bikes, frame sizes smaller than 21"/53cm are not actually smaller. The steeper STA only makes it worse for people with longer legs, because they'll have to buy a special seatpost with extra long setback.

Basically, the top tube does not get any shorter than 21.5"/54.5cm
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-11 | 04:16 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by wkg
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
Not always possible.

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Maybe, but they'd need to check the head tube length so that they don't end up with huge saddle-to-bar drop, too.
Correct. My wifes bike has a fairly tall stem at the min. insert mark and still has a healthy saddle to bar drop for a new cyclist.


More seatpost and more stem would be a worse fit than the short stem.


I would question a short stem with very little rise on any frame over 53cm. In that case a different frame may be better. In my wifes case a wsd frame or touring frame would be better but it was what she wanted, it was cheap, and she is a casual cyclist.

Last edited by thirdgenbird; 11-21-11 at 05:07 PM. Reason: clarity
thirdgenbird is offline  
Reply
Old 11-28-11 | 01:27 PM
  #65  
wants185s
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Burr Ridge, IL

Bikes: Cannondale 2003 Caad 4

Originally Posted by wkg
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
It is hard to appreciate the issue unless you are there. As I mentioned above I ride a 63 cm frame (center to top of seat tube), 60 cm top tube, with a 45 mm stem. My position is very comfortable ( right now I am riding about 9 cm seat to bar drop. If I went down in frame size to 62, 61, and even some 60's I would likely reduce top tube length by 1 or 2 cm at most. So now I can ride a 55 or 65 cm stem with the same position - big deal. At 61 or 60 frame size the head tube length starts to be a problem. There are a few frames that take another cm or 2 out of the top tube but they are not common. So unless I go custom I will be(happily) riding a short stem.
wants185s is offline  
Reply
Old 11-28-11 | 01:57 PM
  #66  
curiouskid55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 1
From: SoCal Baby

Bikes: o5 Specilized roubaix Comp, 06 Tequilo

How many miles are you riding? What percentage do you ride in the drops? Reagrdless of set up if you dont ride in the drops you wont be comfortable in the drops. Make a conscious effort to spend a percentage of your rides in the drops and see if you dont develop the flexibility to use them comfortably. It will take some time.
curiouskid55 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-28-11 | 05:19 PM
  #67  
surgeonstone's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,222
Likes: 30
From: South Bend IN

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Originally Posted by Looigi
It does, but not in any important or significant way.
I agree with that, something anyone can get use to with time.
surgeonstone is offline  
Reply
Old 11-28-11 | 05:21 PM
  #68  
surgeonstone's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,222
Likes: 30
From: South Bend IN

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Originally Posted by Menel
It will not impact control. It will feel different when you ride, so go easy at first, but your mind and body will quickly adapt and it will be a non issue.

I have long legs and shortish reach. 5'9, with a 54 frame, and 60 stem AND short reach ritchey bars.

Don't alter saddle position, you can introduce other issues such as knee pain, every fitter I have talked to have said I did correctly. Adjust saddle so lower body is in position properly in relation to crank and pedals. Adjust stem, bar reach positioning for upper body. Don't sacrifice lower body geometry for upper body reach.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Correct.
surgeonstone is offline  
Reply
Old 11-28-11 | 06:24 PM
  #69  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Also, another thing to keep in mind is that some bikes need a shorter stem to speed up steering.
Take for example, most XS and S size bikes. Many of them have 71 deg head tube angles. This prevents toe overlap and allows the top tube to be shorter.
The slacker head angle (71 vs 73-74 on a regular sized bike) will slow down the steering. Thus to speed it up the steering, a shorter stem is needed.

The shorter stem also works well because it allows an even shorter reach to the handlebars.
natzoo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-29-11 | 11:53 AM
  #70  
Fiery's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 19
Originally Posted by Menel
It will not impact control. It will feel different when you ride, so go easy at first, but your mind and body will quickly adapt and it will be a non issue.

I have long legs and shortish reach. 5'9, with a 54 frame, and 60 stem AND short reach ritchey bars.

Don't alter saddle position, you can introduce other issues such as knee pain, every fitter I have talked to have said I did correctly. Adjust saddle so lower body is in position properly in relation to crank and pedals. Adjust stem, bar reach positioning for upper body. Don't sacrifice lower body geometry for upper body reach.

https://img202.imageshack.us/img202/2034/800m.png
I would seriously doubt the knowledge of every fitter you have talked to, if none of them found your saddle tilt to be a problem.
Fiery is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trail_monkey
General Cycling Discussion
8
09-21-16 05:55 AM
lawlessbeanr
Fitting Your Bike
12
09-06-14 11:38 PM
d.wayne
Bicycle Mechanics
15
10-07-12 02:43 PM
smurray
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
15
07-03-12 08:11 PM
Oramas
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
16
12-15-10 12:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.